Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Shut it fatso you filthy runt.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
You smell burning pubes as deodorant.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
was with ter reading through the comments here
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/12040/9036453/taxpayers-to-pay-bulk-of-200m-olympic-stadium-conversion-costs
£200M!!??
Just for interest, how much would a new 60k capacity stadium would have cost?
You will not get any reasonable comment out of myhoofers or muffinboy re WHU getting the benefit of taxpayers money.
It is interesting to note however two things in this report, one us that LLDC will benefit from the catering which suggests they & not WHU will have the concessionary rights in that area. Secondly the report suggest the capacity is 55,000 & not 54,000. Will myhoofers be on to them to correct this?
Finally, it is the restructuring of the seating & the roof which is costing the most. Surely these are costs that should be borne by West Ham?
Reasonable debate? Says a man with a lot of integrity on JA606...
1) You blame West Ham being benefited from Tax payers in one hand and in other you say West Ham don't own the stadium...then how West Ham are responsible for wasting tax payers money..
2) In that article it says tax payers would be paying £1mil a year to maintain the stadium while it is unused...So, WEST HAM ARE HELPING THE TAX PAYER. Why don't you get this simple facts, you simpleton..
I'm waiting for the man answers from the man of integrity on 606 or who gives exclusives about OS on here.
Sign in if you want to comment
E- petition
Page 19 of 19
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
posted on 23/3/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/3/13
Shut it fatso you filthy runt.
posted on 23/3/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/3/13
You smell burning pubes as deodorant.
posted on 23/3/13
Muffy poops xx
posted on 18/5/13
posted on 18/5/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/5/13
was with ter reading through the comments here
posted on 19/5/13
posted on 22/11/13
http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/12040/9036453/taxpayers-to-pay-bulk-of-200m-olympic-stadium-conversion-costs
posted on 22/11/13
£200M!!??
Just for interest, how much would a new 60k capacity stadium would have cost?
posted on 22/11/13
You will not get any reasonable comment out of myhoofers or muffinboy re WHU getting the benefit of taxpayers money.
It is interesting to note however two things in this report, one us that LLDC will benefit from the catering which suggests they & not WHU will have the concessionary rights in that area. Secondly the report suggest the capacity is 55,000 & not 54,000. Will myhoofers be on to them to correct this?
Finally, it is the restructuring of the seating & the roof which is costing the most. Surely these are costs that should be borne by West Ham?
posted on 22/11/13
Reasonable debate? Says a man with a lot of integrity on JA606...
1) You blame West Ham being benefited from Tax payers in one hand and in other you say West Ham don't own the stadium...then how West Ham are responsible for wasting tax payers money..
2) In that article it says tax payers would be paying £1mil a year to maintain the stadium while it is unused...So, WEST HAM ARE HELPING THE TAX PAYER. Why don't you get this simple facts, you simpleton..
I'm waiting for the man answers from the man of integrity on 606 or who gives exclusives about OS on here.
Page 19 of 19
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19