how many more times ........HE HAS NO RIGHT TO DO THAT .....he's in breech of contract by doing that
====================================

Then sue him but it still doesn't mean what he has said is not the truth does it?

Look I never said he didn't say it I said he didn't have permission to say it

The fact you glibly ignore the PL Rules information I sent you tells me enough about you.
---------------------------------------------

I have not been debating the rules with you, god do you actually have any idea what issues have been up for debate here?

Listen.....there is no clear evidence, if there was then action would be taken! I have said already that does not mean evidence will not be forthcoming, but that can apply to you and me on any matter in life.

If Spurs currently had the opportunity to report Chelsea, they would. Maybe they will next week and if they do, then by all means lets debate the grounds and the evidence.

At the moment, you have none.

Nd

Official ...what a load of twaddle ...how that that stuff in the mail offical....Official to who ???

I think that qualifies as trying to discredit the interview.

and are the FACTS that you have been punished at least twice before for the same offence unsubstantiated ?????
==================================

What offence?

Spurs will not punish him for the remarks

If he goes then there's no point and if he stays then it will be all "kiss and make up" so it will be forgotten

and are the FACTS that you have been punished at least twice before for the same offence unsubstantiated
---------------------------------------------------------------------
But as we already mentioned this is irrelevant unless the club is found guilty in this case also. Then any punishment can take previous history into consideration.

If you subscribe to the theory that everyone and everything repeat offends, then everyone should stay in prison for life and everyone should divorce because it will eventually happen anyhow.

Just out of interest how do you know what clauses are in his contract?

Dispeller of Myths (U3913)
posted 16 seconds ago

and are the FACTS that you have been punished at least twice before for the same offence unsubstantiated ?????
==================================

What offence?

..............

Call yourself a Chelsea fan , you don't even know what your own club has been done for

You fill me in with the details then.

how many more times ........HE HAS NO RIGHT TO DO THAT .....he's in breech of contract by doing that
--------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant, the only thing that matters is if the article gives a true and official account of the individual's feelings.

Are you an advocate for the communist system where only the state shall speak for the individual.

I suspect Modric has had enough of those types of regimes.

If you are referring to the Kakuta saga Chelsea were cleared of any wrong-doing on appeal.

You may have more money (well your dubious owner does) than us, however your club lacks integrity, class & respectability.
--------------------------------------------------
Or your total myopia about such issues makes you bitter and takes away your ability for any form of reasonable evidence based debate.

In fairness i think he is talking about Cole and Arnesen.

Clauses in contracts

All contracts are more or less the same just fill in the players details , wages , length etc and any other agreed clauses , the small print and standard clauses are pretty standard ....Did you think there are totally different contracts for every deal that's done

Did you think there are totally different contracts for every deal that's done
---------------------------------------------------------

Not every, but certainly for many. Clauses over image rights, buy out clauses, etc

All contracts are more or less the same
=============================

OK<well I have never seen one so do you have a link to one so i can see how they are worded.

In fairness i think he is talking about Cole and Arnesen.
===============================

What did we get found guilty of over Arnesen?

CFC were not found guilty of anything, but we paid Spurs a settlement fee to stop them reporting the club for an illegal approach for Arnesen.

The actions suggest Chelsea were guilty of some wrong doing.

Not every, but certainly for many. Clauses over image rights, buy out clauses, etc
.......
Yes as I said , They start with a standard contract and add whatever is required or delete what isn't until it's acceptable to both parties

I would imagine that confidentiality clauses are standard practice in every job not just football and as Football is so media driven it's an important clause which will not be removed

OK.
Well he said we were punished so he must mean another thing.If he'd answer we'd alll know what 2 offences he meant.

Yes as I said , They start with a standard contract and add whatever is required or delete what isn't until it's acceptable to both parties

I would imagine that confidentiality clauses are standard practice in every job not just football and as Football is so media driven it's an important clause which will not be removed
================================

Do you have an example of one or not?

I think they'll make Modric stay tbh.

Yeah pop up to Nottingham and I'll show you one

It's not difficult to actually find out about it , I'm sure you're intelligent enough to surf the net

It's not difficult to actually find out about it , =============================

Can't find on anywhere.
How did you get hold of one? Did a player give it to you?
Which player and how long ago?