THERE ACTUALLY IS A VIDEOGAMES THREAD NAMED AFTER ME
One might question the extent to which Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are in fact a single character. Until the end of the novel, the two personas seem nothing alike—the well-liked, respectable doctor and the hideous, depraved Hyde are almost opposite in type and personality. Stevenson uses this marked contrast to make his point: every human being contains opposite forces within him or her, an alter ego that hides behind one's polite facade. Correspondingly, to understand fully the significance of either Jekyll or Hyde, we must ultimately consider the two as constituting one single character. Indeed, taken alone, neither is a very interesting personality; it is the nature of their interrelationship that gives the novel its power.
Despite the seeming diametric opposition between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, their relationship in fact involves a complicated dynamic. While it is true that Jekyll largely appears as moral and decent, engaging in charity work and enjoying a reputation as a courteous and genial man, he in fact never fully embodies virtue in the way that Hyde embodies evil. Although Jekyll undertakes his experiments with the intent of purifying his good side from his bad and vice versa, he ends up separating the bad alone, while leaving his former self, his Jekyll-self, as mixed as before. Jekyll succeeds in liberating his darker side, freeing it from the bonds of conscience, yet as Jekyll he never liberates himself from this darkness.
Jekyll's partial success in his endeavors warrants much analysis. Jekyll himself ascribes his lopsided results to his state of mind when first taking the potion. He says that he was motivated by dark urges such as ambition and pride when he first drank the liquid and that these allowed for the emergence of Hyde. He seems to imply that, had he entered the experiment with pure motives, an angelic being would have emerged. However, one must consider the subsequent events in the novel before acquitting Jekyll of any blame. For, once released, Hyde gradually comes to dominate both personas, until Jekyll takes Hyde’s shape more often than his own. Indeed, by the very end of the novel, Jekyll himself no longer exists and only Hyde remains. Hyde seems to possess a force more powerful than Jekyll originally believed. The fact that Hyde, rather than some beatific creature, emerged from Jekyll’s experiments seems more than a chance event, subject to an arbitrary state of mind. Rather, Jekyll’s drinking of the potion seems almost to have afforded Hyde the opportunity to assert himself. It is as if Hyde, but no comparable virtuous essence, was lying in wait.
This dominance of Hyde—first as a latent force within Jekyll, then as a tyrannical external force subverting Jekyll—holds various implications for our understanding of human nature. We begin to wonder whether any aspect of human nature in fact stands as a counter to an individual’s Hyde-like side. We may recall that Hyde is described as resembling a “troglodyte,” or a primitive creature; perhaps Hyde is actually the original, authentic nature of man, which has been repressed but not destroyed by the accumulated weight of civilization, conscience, and societal norms. Perhaps man doesn’t have two natures but rather a single, primitive, amoral one that remains just barely constrained by the bonds of civilization. Moreover, the novel suggests that once those bonds are broken, it becomes impossible to reestablish them; the genie cannot be put back into the bottle, and eventually Hyde will permanently replace Jekyll—as he finally does. Even in Victorian England—which considered itself the height of Western civilization—Stevenson suggests that the dark, instinctual side of man remains strong enough to devour anyone who, like Jekyll, proves foolish enough to unleash it.
No, I've just spent so much time on here instead of working that I copied the post on to here in the hope that I would read it fully.
opposite forces within him or her
========================
forces within him or her which are diametrically opposed to one another
Doing a creative response to Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Thinking of having a Smeagol/Gollum style exchange between the two.
and i'm revising for my exam tomoro morning
If you tolerate this, then your children will be next
did you write that SKA ? it's excellent.
God knows why I'm watching a Blackburn match from over 10 years ago. Watched the whole highlight reel, sums up how bored I am.
Some decent football though to be fair.
I would like to say yes but I didn't. I'm using it for inspiration.
fair enough. that's a shame. ive got a quote for you somewhere which might be useful
God knows why I'm watching a Blackburn match from over 10 years ago. Watched the whole highlight reel, sums up how bored I am.
===
Someone watched it There were some fantastic goals in that game.
The most racking pangs succeeded: a grinding in the bones, deadly nausea, and a horror of the spirit that cannot be exceeded at the hour of birth or death. Then these agonies began swiftly to subside, and I came to myself as if out of a great sickness. There was something strange in my sensations, something indescribably sweet. I felt younger, lighter, happier in body; within I was conscious of a heady recklessness, a current of disordered sensual images running like a millrace in my fancy, a solution of the bonds of obligation, an unknown but innocent freedom of the soul. I knew myself, at the first breath of this new life, to be more wicked, tenfold more wicked, sold a slave to my original evil and the thought, in that moment, braced and delighted me like wine.
fight in gala fener match
not unexpected
SkA - Hang on a tick, and i'll type this quote out ive got which is engraved on a statue in the botanical gardens in cape town you'll like it
two red cards by cuneyt cakir (man utd nani)
one for goaly
...and it was as an ordinary secret sinner that I at last fell before the assaults of temptation.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
...and it was as an ordinary secret sinner that I at last fell before the assaults of temptation.
====================
Milton ?
Stevenson, though it could well have been inspired by Milton.
I like your quote, just about sums up what my response will be.
750 words only, I'll post it when I'm finished.
Sign in if you want to comment
Pro Clubs
Page 18028 of 21487
18029 | 18030 | 18031 | 18032 | 18033
posted on 12/5/13
THERE ACTUALLY IS A VIDEOGAMES THREAD NAMED AFTER ME
posted on 12/5/13
One might question the extent to which Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are in fact a single character. Until the end of the novel, the two personas seem nothing alike—the well-liked, respectable doctor and the hideous, depraved Hyde are almost opposite in type and personality. Stevenson uses this marked contrast to make his point: every human being contains opposite forces within him or her, an alter ego that hides behind one's polite facade. Correspondingly, to understand fully the significance of either Jekyll or Hyde, we must ultimately consider the two as constituting one single character. Indeed, taken alone, neither is a very interesting personality; it is the nature of their interrelationship that gives the novel its power.
Despite the seeming diametric opposition between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, their relationship in fact involves a complicated dynamic. While it is true that Jekyll largely appears as moral and decent, engaging in charity work and enjoying a reputation as a courteous and genial man, he in fact never fully embodies virtue in the way that Hyde embodies evil. Although Jekyll undertakes his experiments with the intent of purifying his good side from his bad and vice versa, he ends up separating the bad alone, while leaving his former self, his Jekyll-self, as mixed as before. Jekyll succeeds in liberating his darker side, freeing it from the bonds of conscience, yet as Jekyll he never liberates himself from this darkness.
Jekyll's partial success in his endeavors warrants much analysis. Jekyll himself ascribes his lopsided results to his state of mind when first taking the potion. He says that he was motivated by dark urges such as ambition and pride when he first drank the liquid and that these allowed for the emergence of Hyde. He seems to imply that, had he entered the experiment with pure motives, an angelic being would have emerged. However, one must consider the subsequent events in the novel before acquitting Jekyll of any blame. For, once released, Hyde gradually comes to dominate both personas, until Jekyll takes Hyde’s shape more often than his own. Indeed, by the very end of the novel, Jekyll himself no longer exists and only Hyde remains. Hyde seems to possess a force more powerful than Jekyll originally believed. The fact that Hyde, rather than some beatific creature, emerged from Jekyll’s experiments seems more than a chance event, subject to an arbitrary state of mind. Rather, Jekyll’s drinking of the potion seems almost to have afforded Hyde the opportunity to assert himself. It is as if Hyde, but no comparable virtuous essence, was lying in wait.
This dominance of Hyde—first as a latent force within Jekyll, then as a tyrannical external force subverting Jekyll—holds various implications for our understanding of human nature. We begin to wonder whether any aspect of human nature in fact stands as a counter to an individual’s Hyde-like side. We may recall that Hyde is described as resembling a “troglodyte,” or a primitive creature; perhaps Hyde is actually the original, authentic nature of man, which has been repressed but not destroyed by the accumulated weight of civilization, conscience, and societal norms. Perhaps man doesn’t have two natures but rather a single, primitive, amoral one that remains just barely constrained by the bonds of civilization. Moreover, the novel suggests that once those bonds are broken, it becomes impossible to reestablish them; the genie cannot be put back into the bottle, and eventually Hyde will permanently replace Jekyll—as he finally does. Even in Victorian England—which considered itself the height of Western civilization—Stevenson suggests that the dark, instinctual side of man remains strong enough to devour anyone who, like Jekyll, proves foolish enough to unleash it.
posted on 12/5/13
your essay?
posted on 12/5/13
No, I've just spent so much time on here instead of working that I copied the post on to here in the hope that I would read it fully.
posted on 12/5/13
opposite forces within him or her
========================
forces within him or her which are diametrically opposed to one another
posted on 12/5/13
Doing a creative response to Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Thinking of having a Smeagol/Gollum style exchange between the two.
posted on 12/5/13
and i'm revising for my exam tomoro morning
posted on 12/5/13
If you tolerate this, then your children will be next
posted on 12/5/13
What's it on?
posted on 12/5/13
did you write that SKA ? it's excellent.
posted on 12/5/13
God knows why I'm watching a Blackburn match from over 10 years ago. Watched the whole highlight reel, sums up how bored I am.
posted on 12/5/13
Some decent football though to be fair.
posted on 12/5/13
I would like to say yes but I didn't. I'm using it for inspiration.
posted on 12/5/13
fair enough. that's a shame. ive got a quote for you somewhere which might be useful
posted on 12/5/13
God knows why I'm watching a Blackburn match from over 10 years ago. Watched the whole highlight reel, sums up how bored I am.
===
Someone watched it There were some fantastic goals in that game.
posted on 12/5/13
That own goal
posted on 12/5/13
The most racking pangs succeeded: a grinding in the bones, deadly nausea, and a horror of the spirit that cannot be exceeded at the hour of birth or death. Then these agonies began swiftly to subside, and I came to myself as if out of a great sickness. There was something strange in my sensations, something indescribably sweet. I felt younger, lighter, happier in body; within I was conscious of a heady recklessness, a current of disordered sensual images running like a millrace in my fancy, a solution of the bonds of obligation, an unknown but innocent freedom of the soul. I knew myself, at the first breath of this new life, to be more wicked, tenfold more wicked, sold a slave to my original evil and the thought, in that moment, braced and delighted me like wine.
posted on 12/5/13
fight in gala fener match
not unexpected
posted on 12/5/13
SkA - Hang on a tick, and i'll type this quote out ive got which is engraved on a statue in the botanical gardens in cape town you'll like it
posted on 12/5/13
two red cards by cuneyt cakir (man utd nani)
one for goaly
posted on 12/5/13
...and it was as an ordinary secret sinner that I at last fell before the assaults of temptation.
posted on 12/5/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/5/13
...and it was as an ordinary secret sinner that I at last fell before the assaults of temptation.
====================
Milton ?
posted on 12/5/13
Stevenson, though it could well have been inspired by Milton.
I like your quote, just about sums up what my response will be.
750 words only, I'll post it when I'm finished.
posted on 12/5/13
mehmet topal in goal
Page 18028 of 21487
18029 | 18030 | 18031 | 18032 | 18033