I put it down to his nerves being stretched to the limit.
That's it - Chippy tea then off to get my lift at 6.15.
C'MON CITY.
I hope Tevez scores, and celebrates infront of Fergie again. It would be priceless!
how did you get this article top of the list again?
^You have to ask the admins. The same will happen with my Big Match Thread
Don't choke on your chips Boris!
Only an hour left so get those votes in. United or city. Just don't come on here complaining when city take the likes of van p, bale , mata and carol off you in the future.
The last one was obviously a joke.
And i vote draw, that is what my head says.
I don't understand why my vote should be void. It's my opinion.
I don't want a player like Ashley Young to have a PL winners medal.
Also, with regards to my comment on City's spending patterns, Liverpool have now set the precedent that young English players will cost a fortune because of the sales of Henderson and Carroll. This harms the national team.
City have payed fair prices (apart from maybe the Lescott buy, but they needed a decent CB at the time).
Maybe people on this forum don't understand economics. (Or maybe it's just the people from Liverpool )
I have had to ask the admin to bump it up twice now. Seems to be a lot of badly thought articles this afternoon that haven't caught on. I blame the nerves...
To be honest. I dont expect a good game with good football.
I don't want a player like Ashley Young to have a PL winners medal.
------------------------
Why?
Chelsea paid £10m on Frank Lampard 10 years ago! How much would that be in todays money?
Liverpool did not at all start this high spending on English players!
Look at the prices paid for Phil Jones, Michael Carrick, James Milner, Wright-Phillips, Ferdinand...
At least we understand how to spell paid. You can't even blame that on predictive texting. Basics.
Like i say, your city lovein can continue in the summer when van p signs for them. So gonna happen.
Chelsea paid £10m on Frank Lampard 10 years ago! How much would that be in todays money?
Liverpool did not at all start this high spending on English players!
--------------------------
When Hendersn bangs in over 150 Premier League goals we'll talk.
United will win.it theyre much more determined.
comment by robinvanpersieleft foot (U9061)
posted 11 minutes ago
COME ON CITY
-------------------------------
I suspect there'll be a lot of similar usernames expressing similar sentiments next season.
Still, Podolski should get into double figures.
I dislike both teams and couldn't care less who wins. If you ask me who I think will win, then the obvoius choice is City because United's defense is shaky and City have the best striking options in the league. Add to that an incredible home form, and it becomes a bit of a forgone conclusion.
However, the amount of hype surrounding the game makes it destined to be a 0-0 draw, so United limp to title number 20, which is great testiment to the manager considering this has been the weakest 'title-winning' United side in recent memory. Credit to Fergie for getting a disjointed United side over the line; he has established himself as the second best ever (Paisley will always be the best as no one is close to matching his record and trophy ratio).
City have payed fair prices (apart from maybe the Lescott buy, but they needed a decent CB at the time).
======================
Roque Santa Cruz. I'm sure even City fans will admit they had their pants pulled down on that one.
Sadly for Liverpool the Blackburn owners passed a few tips onto Newcastle....
City's home form is solid, but when big teams go there...
Man City 0 - 1 Liverpool
Man City 2 - 3 Man United
Or they might have an off day tonight.
Man City 3 - 3 Sunderland
Want United to win tonight, I can't accept the fact that you can throw ££ to win the Premier League.
I can't believe people are giving the article one star! Defies sense. An article about who you want to win and it gets one star. Adolescent arsenal fans no doubt.
I think United probably deserve it slightly more for the way they've approached it (actually trying to half-build a team rather than throwing money at it), but equally I know far more United fans than City ones and all of them will be insufferable if they win, so it's City for me.
Want United to win tonight, I can't accept the fact that you can throw ££ to win the Premier League.
-------------------------------------
Funny if you imagine this statement out of context
Ludy Del Piero - the two defeats were in cups, when they played weakened squads; therefore not their main focus after their CL exit.
I watched the Sunderland game, and CIty were lucky. However, regardless of their 'off-day', they cam back from a few goals down and snatched a result. If you ask me, that game alone was their turning point. That 'one point gained' is suddenly an incredibly important point as they could be top tonight, if they hadn't got it.
You = pointless straw-grabbing.
I do, however, agree with you about teams throwing cash at trying to win the PL like City, Chelsea and Blackburn (in the distant past) have done. I can't stand it either, but as I find United fans insufferable, I'd take a bought league victory over United any year.
I want City to make it more exciting
Sign in if you want to comment
The JA 606 big match vote - 72% want city
Page 6 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 30/4/12
I put it down to his nerves being stretched to the limit.
That's it - Chippy tea then off to get my lift at 6.15.
C'MON CITY.
posted on 30/4/12
I hope Tevez scores, and celebrates infront of Fergie again. It would be priceless!
posted on 30/4/12
how did you get this article top of the list again?
posted on 30/4/12
^You have to ask the admins. The same will happen with my Big Match Thread
posted on 30/4/12
Don't choke on your chips Boris!
Only an hour left so get those votes in. United or city. Just don't come on here complaining when city take the likes of van p, bale , mata and carol off you in the future.
The last one was obviously a joke.
posted on 30/4/12
And i vote draw, that is what my head says.
posted on 30/4/12
I don't understand why my vote should be void. It's my opinion.
I don't want a player like Ashley Young to have a PL winners medal.
Also, with regards to my comment on City's spending patterns, Liverpool have now set the precedent that young English players will cost a fortune because of the sales of Henderson and Carroll. This harms the national team.
City have payed fair prices (apart from maybe the Lescott buy, but they needed a decent CB at the time).
Maybe people on this forum don't understand economics. (Or maybe it's just the people from Liverpool )
posted on 30/4/12
I have had to ask the admin to bump it up twice now. Seems to be a lot of badly thought articles this afternoon that haven't caught on. I blame the nerves...
posted on 30/4/12
To be honest. I dont expect a good game with good football.
posted on 30/4/12
I don't want a player like Ashley Young to have a PL winners medal.
------------------------
Why?
posted on 30/4/12
Chelsea paid £10m on Frank Lampard 10 years ago! How much would that be in todays money?
Liverpool did not at all start this high spending on English players!
Look at the prices paid for Phil Jones, Michael Carrick, James Milner, Wright-Phillips, Ferdinand...
posted on 30/4/12
At least we understand how to spell paid. You can't even blame that on predictive texting. Basics.
Like i say, your city lovein can continue in the summer when van p signs for them. So gonna happen.
posted on 30/4/12
COME ON CITY
posted on 30/4/12
Chelsea paid £10m on Frank Lampard 10 years ago! How much would that be in todays money?
Liverpool did not at all start this high spending on English players!
--------------------------
When Hendersn bangs in over 150 Premier League goals we'll talk.
posted on 30/4/12
United will win.it theyre much more determined.
posted on 30/4/12
comment by robinvanpersieleft foot (U9061)
posted 11 minutes ago
COME ON CITY
-------------------------------
I suspect there'll be a lot of similar usernames expressing similar sentiments next season.
Still, Podolski should get into double figures.
posted on 30/4/12
I dislike both teams and couldn't care less who wins. If you ask me who I think will win, then the obvoius choice is City because United's defense is shaky and City have the best striking options in the league. Add to that an incredible home form, and it becomes a bit of a forgone conclusion.
However, the amount of hype surrounding the game makes it destined to be a 0-0 draw, so United limp to title number 20, which is great testiment to the manager considering this has been the weakest 'title-winning' United side in recent memory. Credit to Fergie for getting a disjointed United side over the line; he has established himself as the second best ever (Paisley will always be the best as no one is close to matching his record and trophy ratio).
posted on 30/4/12
City have payed fair prices (apart from maybe the Lescott buy, but they needed a decent CB at the time).
======================
Roque Santa Cruz. I'm sure even City fans will admit they had their pants pulled down on that one.
Sadly for Liverpool the Blackburn owners passed a few tips onto Newcastle....
posted on 30/4/12
City's home form is solid, but when big teams go there...
Man City 0 - 1 Liverpool
Man City 2 - 3 Man United
Or they might have an off day tonight.
Man City 3 - 3 Sunderland
Want United to win tonight, I can't accept the fact that you can throw ££ to win the Premier League.
posted on 30/4/12
I can't believe people are giving the article one star! Defies sense. An article about who you want to win and it gets one star. Adolescent arsenal fans no doubt.
posted on 30/4/12
I think United probably deserve it slightly more for the way they've approached it (actually trying to half-build a team rather than throwing money at it), but equally I know far more United fans than City ones and all of them will be insufferable if they win, so it's City for me.
posted on 30/4/12
Want United to win tonight, I can't accept the fact that you can throw ££ to win the Premier League.
-------------------------------------
Funny if you imagine this statement out of context
posted on 30/4/12
Ludy Del Piero - the two defeats were in cups, when they played weakened squads; therefore not their main focus after their CL exit.
I watched the Sunderland game, and CIty were lucky. However, regardless of their 'off-day', they cam back from a few goals down and snatched a result. If you ask me, that game alone was their turning point. That 'one point gained' is suddenly an incredibly important point as they could be top tonight, if they hadn't got it.
You = pointless straw-grabbing.
posted on 30/4/12
I do, however, agree with you about teams throwing cash at trying to win the PL like City, Chelsea and Blackburn (in the distant past) have done. I can't stand it either, but as I find United fans insufferable, I'd take a bought league victory over United any year.
posted on 30/4/12
I want City to make it more exciting
Page 6 of 8
6 | 7 | 8