And that's the reason for keeping a man that signed Robbie Blake, and spent nearly £10m on Ngog, Sordell and Alonso..

Brilliant... Count me in...

Cheaper and in bed by midnight, you do love this site don't you?

Congratulations X... you guys deserved that today so much, did your end of the bargain for us too. Hope you're celebrating in style.

Actually Mr T, today's the first time I've been on since last Sunday..

I give myself rests so I can be recharged and dazzle the locals on here!

Oh and I'm busy at work..

' Better the devil you know '? Better stick with the one who's failed miserably, proved tactically inept & motivationally lacking, than take a chance on someone else? Stability would have equated to remaining in the prem; All we've got now is INstability, and a manager who's standing and reputation is shot to pieces ..... and you think that folk just want a replacement ' for the sake of it '??? If a manager fails his only objective, and sends a club into a downward spiral that may take donkey's years to recover from (if ever) isn't that reason enough to consider replacing them? Managers get fired even when they're pushin' for promotion, never mind relegating a club!

I'm just saying that you could just as easily bring in someone worse, much worse. As a City fan I've seen a great deal of managers come and go and it doesn't do much good. Yes Coyle has had a poor season, but so long as he hasn't lost the dressing room, what makes you think Bolton can attract someone better? x

Well... The same that makes you think we can't.. A hunch..

PS well done today, amazing win. Pleased for you

If every club (including City) thought ' Oh, let's not change our manager, just in case we do even worse ' ....then no club would ever make a change ..except on death!

Didn't stop you sacking Sven and Mark Hughes, did it? No ..you changed managers till you got one that brought success ...we have the right to do the same ....

Dean Holdsworth, doing a good job in the lower leagues, former striker, bit of a cult hero despite not being that good. What could go wrong?

I think you know what can go wrong when you let ex-player sentimentality have too much prominence .....

Looks like you had in without me.

I did realise last night that MT accused me of warning Moses about him and basically tapping Moses up.

He has now admitted, only a few comments up that he warned another poster about me. Thus, doing exactly the same as what he accused me of. MT won't be able to work this out though. He'll come back with some boring remark suggesting that I will/have lost and maybe through in a work 'joke' for good measure.

It won't work.

Whoops

Had *fun without me...

You really are a boring little man aren't you. Finish your break and your greggs bacon barm and crack on with some work.

Regardless of who you talk to on here, or the contents of your tweets you're just an angry little man... You lost face by returning to 606 after your dramatic exit, like something from the theatre..

Why not use your brain and filter me... Instead of us spoiling articles this why you can't read me, & I won't respond to you. It's not difficult.

But outside of this arena, I'd seek the help which will stop you being angry. Its like a chip on the shoulder and the need to be so right on here all the time!!!

I supported Megson then admitted I was wrong, I supported Coyle then admitted I was wrong... I even said a few weeks back Coyle could keep us up!! I admitted I was wrong...

You, just can't do it...

And don't try and second guess my replies....! It's kind of a weak effort of suggesting you've covered all the bases...

You haven't. Filter me...

Ps:

Can you rewrite your bio... It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.. It's the second line of the paragraph.. I'm assuming it's mean for been...


Adios

I won't filter you.

Thanks for throwing in a weak work joke. See, I guessed that. If you must know, I'm off work today. Handing in Uni assignments and volunteering at a young people establishment later on...

There have been plenty times that I have admitted I am wrong, MT. Your accusation is factually incorrect...by some distance. It's you that can't not respond to me. You can't resist. As if trying to get one over makes you feel better. It's a bloomin Internet forum mate. Your fight and quest for power is so obvious.

Yeah. It's mean for been. Thanks for pointing that out.

My mistake.

Fight for quest for power is so obvious....?

-----------

It's 606 fella not Harry Potter.. Please avoid the self righteous rubbish... I tolerated you but when you called me a ret4rd I decided to dispise you. I don't accept your apology.

You need to calm down about the weak work jokes... I'd know it didn't bother you if you didn't raise it every time I go fishing.. I pull a string or 2 and see what bothers you... Easy.

What's "Can't not respond" - now that's factually incorrect...

Anyway move on... I'm off to build a church in a far away country and won't be back for hours.

Ta ra

-----------------------------

That's the line the sand now for me.

Mention me offensively & I'll retaliate. When I'm able to unfiltered you, I will.. And I'll ignore. Simple.

Good for everyone.


I'll even allow you the next offensive comment due to the delay in time lines etc..

*in the sand

It does bother me, MT. You're right. It's not where I work, per se, that bothers me, it's the fact that you think it's ok to share personal information about me on here. There's an unwritten rule about that. It's just a bit deceitful, underhand and selfish. I don't hate anyone else personal info and neither should you. It's not yours to share.

Same as posting my twitter username the other month, to get people to see my tweets to you. Why couldn't they just look at yours?

I'd have said lord of the rings...

You can't not respond = you can't resist. Even though you have me filtered.

So you admit that you are trying to wind me up...but failing? You just get yourself wound up mate. I ain't angry...

Personal information.....?

Go on... Explain that little gem...?

And please, don't you dare suggest you've never given your twitter address on here before. I know you have.

Anyway, that's your free last offensive comment...

Thanks for the respone by the way. Just what I suggested. You still don't get it? Don't respond to me, I won't respond to you. The ball is in your court, fella. You have me filtered. It should be easy.

I posted it when people have asked. It's the principle of you posting it without my permission.

Personal information, yeah. Where I work for a start. My name - which happens to be my twitter username...see above.

I don't post stuff like that about you, whether you despise me or not, there are some things that you just shouldn't do. It's called common courtesy.

Anyway, you're not going to respond now are you? Line in the sand and all that.

Nice try...


I don't respond to control freaks... So you have given your details on here... Thanks.


Have I said where you work...?

I don't respond to control freaks... So you have given your details on here... Thanks.

--------

Are you calling me a control freak? If you are, don't respond then!!!



You don't need to say where I work. You have pretty much narrowed it down enough.

You are great at avoiding the point. I answer you directly, do I not?

This is now an argument that no-one can win !

I hope you can both leave it at last comments, and enjoy football banter when we all return for the next installment of BWFC's roller-coaster ride