Chelsea: -£86.46m
-----
YES!!!!
Tottenham Hotspur: £0.86m
Wasn't that their profit for the 2010-11 season?
Another profit for Arsene. Seriously, how long until their fans realise?
chelsea 86.4 mill net spend and got wacked by atheltic madrid
what a joke they are
We won the Champions League
Manchester City: -£37.74m
Our domestic TV money alone for last season was £42m so it's no real biggie.
Think most of us realised a long time ago, Ruiney.
What to do about it though? I can't go to as many matches as I used to. The next step would be to cancel my membership altogether I guess. But that wouldn't make me happy, so..?
Our domestic TV money alone for last season was £42m so it's no real biggie.
----------------------------
So was ours
Oh and fair play, Adot for re-doing this.
Fair play to Fulham and Swansea, got in a fair bit of cash without really affecting the quality of their squad too much.
Chronic, didnt you guys sell your two best players and replace them with Fulham's two best players?
Chronic, didnt you guys sell your two best players and replace them with Fulham's two best players?
--------------------
But they got Lloris and Sigurdsson as well!
comment by Transalpinotrails (U7475)
posted 2 minutes ago
*Atletico
----
too late...
comment by Saìn† Mal - La Liga ITK (U7307)
posted 22 seconds ago
Chronic, didnt you guys sell your two best players and replace them with Fulham's two best players?
--
no.
on paper VDV might be one of our two best players, but those who watch spurs every week, like me, will tell you that last season he was far worse than his first season, his dead ball delivery is woeful, and he cant keep himself fit/last 90 mins.. 10 mill was great money.
its a shame though as he was a deadly finisher on his game (which wasnt often enough)
overall though he was great for us.
dempsey was more prolific last season than vdv has ever been in his career i believe
Swansea made a good profit and they still bought in quality players. Great summer for them.
Chelsea, United and City trying to buy the title again
Don't you just hate those s
Yeah Oil money and dirty yanks ruining football as usual
Spurs are now the feeder/ B team for Real Madrid
Why you ing VRF? It's the truth.
"10 mill was great money. "
I dunno about that. I agree he's not actually amazing, but I'd still say he's worth more than £10m
Who would have thought the best teams in the premier league spend money improving their squad and don't get rid of their best players to fund the transfers?
Glazers out, they've only spent nearly £100m the last two summer windows.
Sign in if you want to comment
Total Net Spend For Each Club...
Page 1 of 5
posted on 1/9/12
Chelsea: -£86.46m
-----
YES!!!!
posted on 1/9/12
Tottenham Hotspur: £0.86m
Wasn't that their profit for the 2010-11 season?
posted on 1/9/12
Another profit for Arsene. Seriously, how long until their fans realise?
posted on 1/9/12
About time
posted on 1/9/12
chelsea 86.4 mill net spend and got wacked by atheltic madrid
what a joke they are
posted on 1/9/12
athletico*
posted on 1/9/12
We won the Champions League
posted on 1/9/12
Manchester City: -£37.74m
Our domestic TV money alone for last season was £42m so it's no real biggie.
posted on 1/9/12
*Atletico
posted on 1/9/12
Think most of us realised a long time ago, Ruiney.
What to do about it though? I can't go to as many matches as I used to. The next step would be to cancel my membership altogether I guess. But that wouldn't make me happy, so..?
posted on 1/9/12
Our domestic TV money alone for last season was £42m so it's no real biggie.
----------------------------
So was ours
posted on 1/9/12
Oh and fair play, Adot for re-doing this.
posted on 1/9/12
Fair play to Fulham and Swansea, got in a fair bit of cash without really affecting the quality of their squad too much.
posted on 1/9/12
Chronic, didnt you guys sell your two best players and replace them with Fulham's two best players?
posted on 1/9/12
Chronic, didnt you guys sell your two best players and replace them with Fulham's two best players?
--------------------
But they got Lloris and Sigurdsson as well!
posted on 1/9/12
comment by Transalpinotrails (U7475)
posted 2 minutes ago
*Atletico
----
too late...
comment by Saìn† Mal - La Liga ITK (U7307)
posted 22 seconds ago
Chronic, didnt you guys sell your two best players and replace them with Fulham's two best players?
--
no.
on paper VDV might be one of our two best players, but those who watch spurs every week, like me, will tell you that last season he was far worse than his first season, his dead ball delivery is woeful, and he cant keep himself fit/last 90 mins.. 10 mill was great money.
its a shame though as he was a deadly finisher on his game (which wasnt often enough)
overall though he was great for us.
dempsey was more prolific last season than vdv has ever been in his career i believe
posted on 1/9/12
Swansea made a good profit and they still bought in quality players. Great summer for them.
posted on 1/9/12
Chelsea, United and City trying to buy the title again
posted on 1/9/12
Don't you just hate those s
posted on 1/9/12
Yeah Oil money and dirty yanks ruining football as usual
posted on 1/9/12
Spurs are now the feeder/ B team for Real Madrid
posted on 1/9/12
Why you ing VRF? It's the truth.
posted on 1/9/12
"10 mill was great money. "
I dunno about that. I agree he's not actually amazing, but I'd still say he's worth more than £10m
posted on 1/9/12
Who would have thought the best teams in the premier league spend money improving their squad and don't get rid of their best players to fund the transfers?
posted on 1/9/12
Glazers out, they've only spent nearly £100m the last two summer windows.
Page 1 of 5