or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 118 comments are related to an article called:

Total Net Spend For Each Club...

Page 5 of 5

posted on 1/9/12

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Tu Meke (U3732)

posted on 1/9/12

Who the heck did everton sell to make profit Gotta say well done to them

comment by 8bit (U2653)

posted on 1/9/12

Rodwell

posted on 1/9/12

how have we made a 47 million loss

rvp 24 million
kagawa 12 million
powell 4 million
henriquez 4 million
buttner 3.9 million

total 47.9 million spend and we've sold quite a few

posted on 1/9/12

The OP is a joke.

posted on 1/9/12

have you put in transfers out? And money made by the club....as I'm certain United didn't lose £47m!

posted on 1/9/12

I don't think he knows what net spend means.

posted on 1/9/12

That Southampton figure shocked me. I had to go look at their transfers myself because I thought that was a mistake but holy christ they really have spent that much.

That's a big gamble on staying in the Premier League that could backfire spectacularly.

comment by Philo (U3120)

posted on 2/9/12

OP figures are very wrong

posted on 17/9/12

these figures are all wrong.

comment by 8bit (U2653)

posted on 17/9/12

bit late mate

posted on 17/9/12

yep but was amazed by how wrong it was unless this was some random season or time its not recent.

posted on 17/9/12

There are some wrong numbers there

posted on 17/9/12

United spent more than City so any success this season will have been bought.

posted on 17/9/12

city spent more then man utd this season as there wage bill is higher haha take that.

comment by Diggler (U4142)

posted on 17/9/12

@Boris,

So?

posted on 17/9/12

posted on 17/9/12

and you say bought we need to spend like £300m to just catch up in the premier league era. We have spent £280m less then man city so using your logic boris man city should clean sweep.

http://transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/transfer-league-table-1992-to-today.html

Page 5 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment