If you disallowed goals from set pieces from someone being offside, nobody would ever score

Dembele was bossing yaya.



You must been on your second bottle by then. Dembele was terrible, missing tackles, giving balls away

It was still a wrong decision though, and he judged Ade was interfering with play

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

*wasn't interfering

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by KentSpur (U11208)
posted less than a minute ago
If you disallowed goals from set pieces from someone being offside, nobody would ever score
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have sympathy for the lino with that one. It happened in a split second. But aren't the rules meant in favour of the attacking team. Ultimately he guessed it.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

And that influenced Hart how? He'd already dived

Can you tell them on the Lennon slating article please.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe it really depends on how much I can be bothered. A lot of people on here slate a player without actually realising that its a team game and that one factor directly effects another

2 on 2 in the middle we were doing ok.. Dembele was bossing yaya. Silva was the difference
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I would dispute that I thought Dembele was dreadful and they could have been 4-0 at half time due to their superiority. Look back at the match thread we were getting excited cos we got near their penalty box after 30 minutes

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by KentSpur (U11208)
posted less than a minute ago
And that influenced Hart how? He'd already dived
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By going for the header.

If he just stood there and not attempted it then you could argue it but he didn't

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Regardless, getting the decision 'right' wrongly should not be applauded, he's still facked up

comment by ツ Heиgy (U9129)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by KentSpur (U11208)
posted less than a minute ago
And that influenced Hart how? He'd already dived
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By going for the header.

If he just stood there and not attempted it then you could argue it but he didn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hart would still have dived in the manner he did though?

Reality is we got taken apart by a very good team. On this occasion we did respond positively though, and could possibly have sneaked a lucky draw but for poor decisions

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

I can because he got it wrong

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

How was he interfering
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please learn the laws of the game. He was directly in the keepers line of vision which is interference in itself.

His attempt to make the header effected any decision Hart had to make, again considered by a ref as interference.

Thirdly he was inside the 6 yard box, which again referees would take as being close enough to be classed as interference.

A player does not have to touch the ball to be interfering, his presence is quite enough particularly when the players is so close to goal.

I am a qualified ref and I would have given the offside without a second thought

So he made two incorrect decisions in the space of 5 seconds then?

comment by KentSpur (U11208)
posted 11 seconds ago
I can because he got it wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No he got the decision right but for the wrong reason

"I am a qualified ref"

Is that a euphemism ??


"and I would have given the offside without a second thought"

Against who ??