"west london to far to travel for most glory huntingh plastics was it .. ,"
irrelevant drivel
Fecking bunch of plastics .....
i was there in 1981 and all the papers reported that over 1 million linned the streets and it was jammed from the ground to the town hall
yeh forgot about the other 20 players all on a fiver a week ,
"i was there in 1981"
Right well given what I can gather from your intelligence I wouldn't be surprised if you got your 1 million confused with your 8.
"papers reported that over 1 million "
papers predicted you were only more than 6 foot away from a rat too
"yeh forgot about the other 20 players all on a fiver a week ,"
"yeh" forgot about the other 20 players on less than what city off their other 20 players
"if the debt for the other 9 years is written off it is irrelevant and does not concern the club hence the club has made a profit"
Again, are you saying that for EVERY YEAR that Chelsky makes an ANNUAL loss, Roman then issues share equity to the value of that loss and purchases the shares himself ??
"Again, are you saying that for EVERY YEAR that Chelsky makes an ANNUAL loss, Roman then issues share equity to the value of that loss and purchases the shares himself ??
"
Again I am saying Roman has funded the debt that the club has hence it is irrelevant and doesn't concern the club because the tax man wont be knocking on our door tomorrow asking for the other £500m that Roman spent his own money on
"Making positive profit. Last years figures said we did this and we are projected to make profits in the future hence I consider us more or less self sufficient"
---------------------------------------------------
I'd be interested to know what was the basis for the projections of future profit, what levels of profit were mooted and whether the recent purchase of new players on high salaries was factored in to this...any idea or is that irrelevant too?
City's losses have been halved from 200m to 90m in 12 months. And apparently these figures don't include the PL prize money.
Sounds a bit too good to be true if you ask me.
500 million
could of brought Matalan for that and kitted out the ch-avs for next ten yrs
"I'd be interested to know what was the basis for the projections"
increased revenue + decreased outgoings
simple concepts
"500 million"
laughing at numbers, confirms my thoughts of your intelligence.
"could of brought Matalan for that and kitted out the ch-avs for next ten yrs "
irrelevant drivel
"City offered RVP 300k a week, didn't want that
And I can assure you Utd do not pay ANYONE anywhere near 200k per week
He may get that with commercial deals Etc etc but the club wouldn't pay that and Rooney doesn't get 250k he got the original 160k deal he was offered and the club confirmed this. "
We didn't offer RVP anything, it never got to that stage. It was apparently overheard being said by Wenger, unit was true, then it goes completely against the public spat Mancini and Marwood had.
Can I ask when Rooneys salary was confirmed as 160 as I read it was 220, the same as RVP?
increasesd.. so your going to win champions league this season are you ,
wheres next yrs increase coming from then ?
"increasesd.. so your going to win champions league this season are you ,
"
No?
"wheres next yrs increase coming from then ?"
from the several sponsorship agreements my club have been making for the past year?
Where is the increased revenue coming from? Was future CL qualification and success included?
Where are the decreased outgoings coming from bearing in mind you have just invested in several new players, with a few more touted for January? Has the current economic climate been taken into account, together with recent forecasts that the downturn could last several years longer than expected?
Some concepts only appear simple if you don't understand them
FAT RON
i WOULD BE EMBARRESSED TO SUPPORT YOUR SMALL CLUB PROPPED UP BY A SUGAR DADDY AND DISLIKED BY EVERYONE
,
More United spin. City said early on they wouldn't meet Percy's salary demands but now he's supposedly playing for United on minimum wage.
"Again I am saying Roman has funded the debt"
All you are being asked is whether Chelsky have EVER MADE cumulative profits greater or equal to the amount Roman has had to pay in bailing out debts.
If you have, fine.
And given my understanding that the club were attempting to get to that point in 2008, I am asking WHEN that happened.
If you have not, then the club is not operating under its own steam.
If you cannot answer because you don't actually KNOW, just say so. If you can answer, then do so.
"Where is the increased revenue coming from?"
Already said many times that the club have been signing several sponsorship deals in the past year.
"Where are the decreased outgoings coming from"
the several players that used to be at the club on £100k+ wages
"bearing in mind you have just invested in several new players"
Already been said that my club is far more than capable of funding the transfers and that only the wage bill was a concern however as these new players are on less than what the older players had I don't see this as a concern.
"Some concepts only appear simple if you don't understand them "
Glad you agree you don't understand
You dont see it as a concern that in a season you earned over 100 million you made 1.5 million profit .. Classic stuff
More United spin. City said early on they wouldn't meet Percy's salary demands but now he's supposedly playing for United on minimum wage.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't you mean the Sheik refused to meet his demands.
Since when did City finance their own deals?
"i WOULD BE EMBARRESSED TO SUPPORT YOUR SMALL CLUB PROPPED UP BY A SUGAR DADDY AND DISLIKED BY EVERYONE
"
That effected me... slightly.
"All you are being asked is whether Chelsky have EVER MADE cumulative profits greater or equal to the amount Roman has had to pay in bailing out debts.
"
What Roman receives back on his investment is irrelevant I am only concerned on what my clubs figures say, which this year happened to showed profit.
"By the club in 2010"
Who at the club? I thought United never fully released the details, just the stuff that Gill said at the time? I'm genuinely interested, as I remember him doing a fair bit of grumbling to get that new contract and tried to find the details at the time.
Since when did City finance their own deals?
From 1880 onwards.
"You dont see it as a concern that in a season you earned over 100 million you made 1.5 million profit .. Classic stuff "
I'm not concerned that my club broke even and earned trophies in the process no Nor am I concerned what last years wage bill (which reflects most of our losses) looks like considering most of the high earners at the club are slowly but surely being shown the door
Sign in if you want to comment
Premier League clubs agree new cost control
Page 9 of 17
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
posted on 18/12/12
"west london to far to travel for most glory huntingh plastics was it .. ,"
irrelevant drivel
Fecking bunch of plastics .....
i was there in 1981 and all the papers reported that over 1 million linned the streets and it was jammed from the ground to the town hall
yeh forgot about the other 20 players all on a fiver a week ,
posted on 18/12/12
"i was there in 1981"
Right well given what I can gather from your intelligence I wouldn't be surprised if you got your 1 million confused with your 8.
"papers reported that over 1 million "
papers predicted you were only more than 6 foot away from a rat too
"yeh forgot about the other 20 players all on a fiver a week ,"
"yeh" forgot about the other 20 players on less than what city off their other 20 players
posted on 18/12/12
"if the debt for the other 9 years is written off it is irrelevant and does not concern the club hence the club has made a profit"
Again, are you saying that for EVERY YEAR that Chelsky makes an ANNUAL loss, Roman then issues share equity to the value of that loss and purchases the shares himself ??
posted on 18/12/12
"Again, are you saying that for EVERY YEAR that Chelsky makes an ANNUAL loss, Roman then issues share equity to the value of that loss and purchases the shares himself ??
"
Again I am saying Roman has funded the debt that the club has hence it is irrelevant and doesn't concern the club because the tax man wont be knocking on our door tomorrow asking for the other £500m that Roman spent his own money on
posted on 18/12/12
"Making positive profit. Last years figures said we did this and we are projected to make profits in the future hence I consider us more or less self sufficient"
---------------------------------------------------
I'd be interested to know what was the basis for the projections of future profit, what levels of profit were mooted and whether the recent purchase of new players on high salaries was factored in to this...any idea or is that irrelevant too?
posted on 18/12/12
City's losses have been halved from 200m to 90m in 12 months. And apparently these figures don't include the PL prize money.
Sounds a bit too good to be true if you ask me.
posted on 18/12/12
500 million
could of brought Matalan for that and kitted out the ch-avs for next ten yrs
posted on 18/12/12
"I'd be interested to know what was the basis for the projections"
increased revenue + decreased outgoings
simple concepts
posted on 18/12/12
"500 million"
laughing at numbers, confirms my thoughts of your intelligence.
"could of brought Matalan for that and kitted out the ch-avs for next ten yrs "
irrelevant drivel
posted on 18/12/12
"City offered RVP 300k a week, didn't want that
And I can assure you Utd do not pay ANYONE anywhere near 200k per week
He may get that with commercial deals Etc etc but the club wouldn't pay that and Rooney doesn't get 250k he got the original 160k deal he was offered and the club confirmed this. "
We didn't offer RVP anything, it never got to that stage. It was apparently overheard being said by Wenger, unit was true, then it goes completely against the public spat Mancini and Marwood had.
Can I ask when Rooneys salary was confirmed as 160 as I read it was 220, the same as RVP?
posted on 18/12/12
increasesd.. so your going to win champions league this season are you ,
wheres next yrs increase coming from then ?
posted on 18/12/12
If it, not unit
posted on 18/12/12
"increasesd.. so your going to win champions league this season are you ,
"
No?
"wheres next yrs increase coming from then ?"
from the several sponsorship agreements my club have been making for the past year?
posted on 18/12/12
Where is the increased revenue coming from? Was future CL qualification and success included?
Where are the decreased outgoings coming from bearing in mind you have just invested in several new players, with a few more touted for January? Has the current economic climate been taken into account, together with recent forecasts that the downturn could last several years longer than expected?
Some concepts only appear simple if you don't understand them
posted on 18/12/12
By the club in 2010
posted on 18/12/12
FAT RON
i WOULD BE EMBARRESSED TO SUPPORT YOUR SMALL CLUB PROPPED UP BY A SUGAR DADDY AND DISLIKED BY EVERYONE
,
posted on 18/12/12
More United spin. City said early on they wouldn't meet Percy's salary demands but now he's supposedly playing for United on minimum wage.
posted on 18/12/12
"Again I am saying Roman has funded the debt"
All you are being asked is whether Chelsky have EVER MADE cumulative profits greater or equal to the amount Roman has had to pay in bailing out debts.
If you have, fine.
And given my understanding that the club were attempting to get to that point in 2008, I am asking WHEN that happened.
If you have not, then the club is not operating under its own steam.
If you cannot answer because you don't actually KNOW, just say so. If you can answer, then do so.
posted on 18/12/12
"Where is the increased revenue coming from?"
Already said many times that the club have been signing several sponsorship deals in the past year.
"Where are the decreased outgoings coming from"
the several players that used to be at the club on £100k+ wages
"bearing in mind you have just invested in several new players"
Already been said that my club is far more than capable of funding the transfers and that only the wage bill was a concern however as these new players are on less than what the older players had I don't see this as a concern.
"Some concepts only appear simple if you don't understand them "
Glad you agree you don't understand
posted on 18/12/12
You dont see it as a concern that in a season you earned over 100 million you made 1.5 million profit .. Classic stuff
posted on 18/12/12
More United spin. City said early on they wouldn't meet Percy's salary demands but now he's supposedly playing for United on minimum wage.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't you mean the Sheik refused to meet his demands.
Since when did City finance their own deals?
posted on 18/12/12
"i WOULD BE EMBARRESSED TO SUPPORT YOUR SMALL CLUB PROPPED UP BY A SUGAR DADDY AND DISLIKED BY EVERYONE
"
That effected me... slightly.
"All you are being asked is whether Chelsky have EVER MADE cumulative profits greater or equal to the amount Roman has had to pay in bailing out debts.
"
What Roman receives back on his investment is irrelevant I am only concerned on what my clubs figures say, which this year happened to showed profit.
posted on 18/12/12
"By the club in 2010"
Who at the club? I thought United never fully released the details, just the stuff that Gill said at the time? I'm genuinely interested, as I remember him doing a fair bit of grumbling to get that new contract and tried to find the details at the time.
posted on 18/12/12
Since when did City finance their own deals?
From 1880 onwards.
posted on 18/12/12
"You dont see it as a concern that in a season you earned over 100 million you made 1.5 million profit .. Classic stuff "
I'm not concerned that my club broke even and earned trophies in the process no Nor am I concerned what last years wage bill (which reflects most of our losses) looks like considering most of the high earners at the club are slowly but surely being shown the door
Page 9 of 17
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14