Actually a perfect business model is one which is self-sufficient and makes a profit




In football terms it would be one which makes a profit of £0 that way all the money is being put back into the club

To be fair, City share a city with one of the biggest clubs in the world. They do have a decent local support, but obviously United and Liverpool have a larger local fanbase.
======

FC United of Manchester?

is that so, well im happy to bet your ticket prices go up at least 25-30 % in the next 3 yrs ,

Lot of money to turn your back on play

We have an owner who is willing to invest his own money rather than borrow from the banks. A perfect business model in any othey sphere of commerce.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Translation :

We are fecked without the Sheik's cash !!!

Actually a perfect business model is one which is self-sufficient and makes a profit

Amazon made a loss for the first 8 years of trading, they seem to be doing alright now.

No, Manchester United. The club that's recorded large attendances for the past 50 years Still licking City's crack, Bubbles?

Don't start going on about using investment for growth, that will blow their minds completely.

Carrot crunchers

Football is a business same as any other, they want to see a profit the same as anybody else. If they reinvest fair enough, but they need profit to generate reserves.

City opposed it Please don't stop the Arabs buying us players

comment by Boris "Inky" Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Actually a perfect business model is one which is self-sufficient and makes a profit

Amazon made a loss for the first 8 years of trading, they seem to be doing alright now.



thats amazon, not a football club

City and Chelsea

Supported by ch-avs.. ownned by sugar daddys

Only small clubs need them as the rest of us can stand on our own two feet

I made an article on the City board about their financial accounts, to be fair to them it's looking very good. They did cut their losses by 100m in one year

Arsenal will benefit most clearly but clearly all other clubs except the two feel its important.

Wearethefamousthfc is talking bullsheit as per. Fulham sell out their 25,000 ground, QPR don't sell out their 18,000. How are QPR bigger than Fulham?

It's deluded fools like that who believe Spurs are bigger than Arsenal and Chelsea

They did cut their losses by 100m in one year

I hate those plastic companies receiving investment from dragons den

They shouldn't be given funds to elevate themselves and should spend decades of slow growth

Well they've just got 350k back from balotelli's firework allowence. I suppose you have to start somewhere.

is that so, well im happy to bet your ticket prices go up at least 25-30 % in the next 3 yrs ,

Lot of money to turn your back on play "

I'll take that bet. Even if that were the case, it would still be cheaper than Arsenals! Good old sustainability, eh?

It may sound funny Rui, but I wasn't mocking them there

The Beatles hadn't even met each other the last time Spúds won the league but they seem to think they're a big club despite their Victorian ground and average support.

I know Arab

Nan Bread

Football is a business, not a sport. It stopped being a sport a long time ago.

Weare

No club would survive without serious investment. Including small clubs like Spurs

Reggae Reggae Sauce are a plastic sauce as they got to their position through investment. HP are a real sauce