mancinicity

Stop embarrassing yourself!!!!

"arsenal used to be out rivar, liverpool nearly were too with bentiez. to a lesser extent newcastle too."

You do realise that Arsenal team was effectively paid for by Danny Fiszman, don't you...?

You know Ashley Cole would probably still be at Arsenal, as well as Adebayor, Nasri, RVP, Clichy, Song, Toure etc if it wasnt for Chelsea and City's billions flying around the place.

(I say RVP because there's no way he would have left if City/Chelsea didn't take their best players, that probably goes for Fabregas too)

Actually, i reckon Fabregas was always destined to return to Barcelona, count that out

"You know Ashley Cole would probably still be at Arsenal, as well as Adebayor, Nasri, RVP, Clichy, Song, Toure etc if it wasnt for Chelsea and City's billions flying around the place."

And none of them would have been at Arsenal if thy hadn't had investment. It's still down to the same thing.

The thing United supporters blatantly ignore is Chevy gives them money because of the success they got from the money the CL bureaucrats gave them which they got because of the success they got from the money Sky gave them which came from their owners letting Fergie break transfer records for 5 years while winning £$% all.

And then you say you 'earned it all'

It rings a bit hollow,

The Saints made Man. City chase the ball most of the game. Some observations:

- Assuming that Tevez is fit, why isn't he playing?
- Even though Balotelli was a jerk, he would have brought a spark to this City team today!
- Barry's goal was better than Dzeko's goal.
- I think that Mancini will go quietly this Summer, even if City wins the F.A. Cup.

Kaisers - what are you on mate. That is how football clubs earn money. Desperate arguments.

Tevez was down to urgent family issues, apparently.

Mancini please stay at City!!

"That is how football clubs earn money."

That is the problem and why United can't fail and other clubs have to spend out of their own pockets the equivalent amount of money that the CL, Sky and sponsors give United if they want to compete.

Every year you get given (not earned) an extra sum of money to buy a Rio, Rooney or Berbatov. Every year for decades.

And then you put your blissfully and deliberately ignorant stupid hat on and say "why don't they just get money the way we do?"

Well derrrr spacktard, because you're the only club that has gotten 100s of millions of quid no one else did for decades.

TheKaisersTrainers

Have You been sucked too many lemons today??

United have more fans than anyone else and have since the 1960's. Right through Liverpool's dominance United got higher crowds than them every season except one, and that was when United brought in a compulsory membership scheme which backfired.
United's own fans have made the club what it is, not anyone else. Liverpool by the way were subsidised right throught their success by the football pools owning Moores family.
United spent big in the 1980's, it got them nowhere. United's fortune was being successful just as money came into the game but all of their wealth is self generated, they have never been subsidised by anyone since the 1930s.

"Have You been sucked too many lemons today??"

I'll take that as admission that I hit a nerve thanks.

We've been 'successful' (trophies come in more than 99% of sides) because we have money.

For some reason United McFans won't admit they do too.

you really are making yourself look an idiot, well done.

TheKaisersTrainers

You aint hit a nerve at all, but this giving us money is bollôcks, you play all season to get in the CL so its earned.

more fans = more money = success
United > Liverpool
therefore United win more than Liverpool.
winning brings money
money brings better players
United are never subsidised by anyone.
Hope that clears things up

They could distribute it in a fair way if they wanted to. They don't.

Selling scarves..earned
Seliing tickets..earned
Selling pies..earned

Being given £50 million quid a year that other teams don't get from Sky and Football bureaucrats? Is that really earned?

You could buy Jones, De Gea and Young with that kind of money and you wouldn't have to blink. They were free.

The only reason United made a profit last season was because they received a tax credit, that's a subsidy.

Selling scarves..earned
Seliing tickets..earned
Selling pies..earned

Thats puts us in a postion to be able to compete, we then compete and reap the rewards for winning.

United earn sky money, its only right they give it back

the 'rewards for winning' create a scenario of never ending success.

If they changed that there could be be honest competition

Instead the only route to that is billionaires writing cheques.

the 'rewards for winning' create a scenario of never ending success
------
There lies the answer, start winning!!!

City's income was over £240m last season, people seem to ignore that fact.

Bo

That wont cover the wage bill