Peebs bum is a trans alley
NFL:
There are a number of plays that are not reviewable, including the following:
Turnovers, which are automatically reviewed;Scoring plays, which are automatically reviewed;Penalties, including offensive or defensive pass interference;Turnovers after the whistle is blown;Forward progress.
So if translated to football it would be throw ins/corner kicks, yellow cards, offsides that don't lead to goal?
I'm okay with that, tbh. A lot largely inconsequential tbh, and it would be hard for the manager to call.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
How would coaches challenges help us when the VAR watches everything already?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because I don't believe it does. The game is quite fast and some decisions are subjective. So its very easy for a VAR ref to miss the decision and then justify it later by 'clear and obvious' when they are at fault for either missing the seriousness of a challenge or missing the incident entirely. I think when they were testing VAR they had 3 Refs looking at every game which is clearly not possible.
So I think by giving that responsibility to the coaches who are also watching on TV monitors during the game anyway, it takes away any impression of complicity or incompetency by the those who subjectively pick and choose which ref mistake to look at further.
comment by We Demolished Highbury For This? (U3245)
posted 3 minutes ago
wtf is a bum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry
bumbum*
Coaches are not watching the game on monitors, and certainly not as intensely as the VAR and VAAR.
And, in the NFL, coaches have to challenge before the next play. How will that translate to a far more fast game like football? Having to make instant calls or miss out??
#Worldle #125 6/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨↗️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
The assistant to the assistant ref does not have an assistant to assist the assistant ref using video assistance
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 18 seconds ago
Coaches are not watching the game on monitors, and certainly not as intensely as the VAR and VAAR.
And, in the NFL, coaches have to challenge before the next play. How will that translate to a far more fast game like football? Having to make instant calls or miss out??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats the jeopardy that I believe will limit coaches challenges in the game to serious decisions only. And you could also limit the number of challenges as do in the NFL. The NFL have dedicated coaches monitoring the game for every team who then buzzes the head coach to make a challenge (up to the teams on how they implement their own decision making in that). In terms of different break periods compared to NFL, I agree with you. However if you look at it now, there are times we are waiting for the ball to go out of play or a foul for VAR to look at a major incident. So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 18 seconds ago
Coaches are not watching the game on monitors, and certainly not as intensely as the VAR and VAAR.
And, in the NFL, coaches have to challenge before the next play. How will that translate to a far more fast game like football? Having to make instant calls or miss out??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats the jeopardy that I believe will limit coaches challenges in the game to serious decisions only. And you could also limit the number of challenges as do in the NFL. The NFL have dedicated coaches monitoring the game for every team who then buzzes the head coach to make a challenge (up to the teams on how they implement their own decision making in that). In terms of different break periods compared to NFL, I agree with you. However if you look at it now, there are times we are waiting for the ball to go out of play or a foul for VAR to look at a major incident. So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But serious decisions are already always reviewed.
So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
------
So the manager has to make a split decision call or does buzzing not count as a challenge?
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 18 seconds ago
Coaches are not watching the game on monitors, and certainly not as intensely as the VAR and VAAR.
And, in the NFL, coaches have to challenge before the next play. How will that translate to a far more fast game like football? Having to make instant calls or miss out??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats the jeopardy that I believe will limit coaches challenges in the game to serious decisions only. And you could also limit the number of challenges as do in the NFL. The NFL have dedicated coaches monitoring the game for every team who then buzzes the head coach to make a challenge (up to the teams on how they implement their own decision making in that). In terms of different break periods compared to NFL, I agree with you. However if you look at it now, there are times we are waiting for the ball to go out of play or a foul for VAR to look at a major incident. So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But serious decisions are already always reviewed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By one VAR ref who by their own rules is not allowed to re-referee the game. Puts that ref into a very precarious position that I believe is one reason for the inconsistency.
comment by We Demolished Highbury For This? (U3245)
posted 5 minutes ago
#Worldle #125 6/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨↗️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 45 seconds ago
So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
------
So the manager has to make a split decision call or does buzzing not count as a challenge?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the manager, but someone from his team. The manager or his special assistant could then call for the review, while the game continues. Just the way VAR 'under review' comes up these days.
DJ when he gets a 180 but then one of his dars falls off the board 😲
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 45 seconds ago
So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
------
So the manager has to make a split decision call or does buzzing not count as a challenge?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the manager, but someone from his team. The manager or his special assistant could then call for the review, while the game continues. Just the way VAR 'under review' comes up these days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems unworkable to me, tbh. VAR already review every goal, every penalty shout, every straight red. So managers would just be asking someone to review what they have already made a call on. Why would they change?
What the real issue you are pointing out is the VAR is pretty incompetent because all our refs are.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 45 seconds ago
So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
------
So the manager has to make a split decision call or does buzzing not count as a challenge?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the manager, but someone from his team. The manager or his special assistant could then call for the review, while the game continues. Just the way VAR 'under review' comes up these days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems unworkable to me, tbh. VAR already review every goal, every penalty shout, every straight red. So managers would just be asking someone to review what they have already made a call on. Why would they change?
What the real issue you are pointing out is the VAR is pretty incompetent because all our refs are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think there is an issue that refs do not like to call out their mates for making mistakes in fear that they will do the same when they are refereeing a game.
You take that away completely and no club complains if they feck up missing out on looking at an incorrect decision.
You take that away completely and no club complains if they feck up missing out on looking at an incorrect decision.
-----
Apart from when they have used their challenge, the VAR backs his mate on the pitch... and then they have no challenges left and another call goes against them.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 24 seconds ago
You take that away completely and no club complains if they feck up missing out on looking at an incorrect decision.
-----
Apart from when they have used their challenge, the VAR backs his mate on the pitch... and then they have no challenges left and another call goes against them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, and whose fault would that but for the coaches? In cricket the players are blamed for using up a challenge. In NFL the coaches are. It adds to the game compared to how its done now when everyone incl pundit, managers are complain legitimately about the rules and how they are incorrectly implemented with limited to no consistency during the season.
Sign in if you want to comment
THE Arsenal Thread
Page 26164 of 31904
26165 | 26166 | 26167 | 26168 | 26169
posted on 26/5/22
Peebs bum is a trans alley
posted on 26/5/22
😲
posted on 26/5/22
wtf is a bum
posted on 26/5/22
NFL:
There are a number of plays that are not reviewable, including the following:
Turnovers, which are automatically reviewed;Scoring plays, which are automatically reviewed;Penalties, including offensive or defensive pass interference;Turnovers after the whistle is blown;Forward progress.
So if translated to football it would be throw ins/corner kicks, yellow cards, offsides that don't lead to goal?
I'm okay with that, tbh. A lot largely inconsequential tbh, and it would be hard for the manager to call.
posted on 26/5/22
😲
posted on 26/5/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
How would coaches challenges help us when the VAR watches everything already?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because I don't believe it does. The game is quite fast and some decisions are subjective. So its very easy for a VAR ref to miss the decision and then justify it later by 'clear and obvious' when they are at fault for either missing the seriousness of a challenge or missing the incident entirely. I think when they were testing VAR they had 3 Refs looking at every game which is clearly not possible.
So I think by giving that responsibility to the coaches who are also watching on TV monitors during the game anyway, it takes away any impression of complicity or incompetency by the those who subjectively pick and choose which ref mistake to look at further.
posted on 26/5/22
comment by We Demolished Highbury For This? (U3245)
posted 3 minutes ago
wtf is a bum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry
bumbum*
posted on 26/5/22
bauawme
posted on 26/5/22
Coaches are not watching the game on monitors, and certainly not as intensely as the VAR and VAAR.
And, in the NFL, coaches have to challenge before the next play. How will that translate to a far more fast game like football? Having to make instant calls or miss out??
posted on 26/5/22
What about VAAAR
posted on 26/5/22
#Worldle #125 6/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨↗️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
posted on 26/5/22
The assistant to the assistant ref does not have an assistant to assist the assistant ref using video assistance
posted on 26/5/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 18 seconds ago
Coaches are not watching the game on monitors, and certainly not as intensely as the VAR and VAAR.
And, in the NFL, coaches have to challenge before the next play. How will that translate to a far more fast game like football? Having to make instant calls or miss out??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats the jeopardy that I believe will limit coaches challenges in the game to serious decisions only. And you could also limit the number of challenges as do in the NFL. The NFL have dedicated coaches monitoring the game for every team who then buzzes the head coach to make a challenge (up to the teams on how they implement their own decision making in that). In terms of different break periods compared to NFL, I agree with you. However if you look at it now, there are times we are waiting for the ball to go out of play or a foul for VAR to look at a major incident. So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
posted on 26/5/22
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 18 seconds ago
Coaches are not watching the game on monitors, and certainly not as intensely as the VAR and VAAR.
And, in the NFL, coaches have to challenge before the next play. How will that translate to a far more fast game like football? Having to make instant calls or miss out??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats the jeopardy that I believe will limit coaches challenges in the game to serious decisions only. And you could also limit the number of challenges as do in the NFL. The NFL have dedicated coaches monitoring the game for every team who then buzzes the head coach to make a challenge (up to the teams on how they implement their own decision making in that). In terms of different break periods compared to NFL, I agree with you. However if you look at it now, there are times we are waiting for the ball to go out of play or a foul for VAR to look at a major incident. So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But serious decisions are already always reviewed.
posted on 26/5/22
So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
------
So the manager has to make a split decision call or does buzzing not count as a challenge?
posted on 26/5/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 18 seconds ago
Coaches are not watching the game on monitors, and certainly not as intensely as the VAR and VAAR.
And, in the NFL, coaches have to challenge before the next play. How will that translate to a far more fast game like football? Having to make instant calls or miss out??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats the jeopardy that I believe will limit coaches challenges in the game to serious decisions only. And you could also limit the number of challenges as do in the NFL. The NFL have dedicated coaches monitoring the game for every team who then buzzes the head coach to make a challenge (up to the teams on how they implement their own decision making in that). In terms of different break periods compared to NFL, I agree with you. However if you look at it now, there are times we are waiting for the ball to go out of play or a foul for VAR to look at a major incident. So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But serious decisions are already always reviewed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By one VAR ref who by their own rules is not allowed to re-referee the game. Puts that ref into a very precarious position that I believe is one reason for the inconsistency.
posted on 26/5/22
By one VAR and one VAAR.
posted on 26/5/22
comment by We Demolished Highbury For This? (U3245)
posted 5 minutes ago
#Worldle #125 6/6 (100%)
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨↗️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨⬆️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
https://worldle.teuteuf.fr
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 26/5/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 45 seconds ago
So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
------
So the manager has to make a split decision call or does buzzing not count as a challenge?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the manager, but someone from his team. The manager or his special assistant could then call for the review, while the game continues. Just the way VAR 'under review' comes up these days.
posted on 26/5/22
DJ when he gets a 180 but then one of his dars falls off the board 😲
posted on 26/5/22
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 45 seconds ago
So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
------
So the manager has to make a split decision call or does buzzing not count as a challenge?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the manager, but someone from his team. The manager or his special assistant could then call for the review, while the game continues. Just the way VAR 'under review' comes up these days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems unworkable to me, tbh. VAR already review every goal, every penalty shout, every straight red. So managers would just be asking someone to review what they have already made a call on. Why would they change?
What the real issue you are pointing out is the VAR is pretty incompetent because all our refs are.
posted on 26/5/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 45 seconds ago
So there is no reason why a coach couldn't buzz and the ref could wait till that happens before looking at a replay?
------
So the manager has to make a split decision call or does buzzing not count as a challenge?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the manager, but someone from his team. The manager or his special assistant could then call for the review, while the game continues. Just the way VAR 'under review' comes up these days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems unworkable to me, tbh. VAR already review every goal, every penalty shout, every straight red. So managers would just be asking someone to review what they have already made a call on. Why would they change?
What the real issue you are pointing out is the VAR is pretty incompetent because all our refs are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think there is an issue that refs do not like to call out their mates for making mistakes in fear that they will do the same when they are refereeing a game.
You take that away completely and no club complains if they feck up missing out on looking at an incorrect decision.
posted on 26/5/22
😲
posted on 26/5/22
You take that away completely and no club complains if they feck up missing out on looking at an incorrect decision.
-----
Apart from when they have used their challenge, the VAR backs his mate on the pitch... and then they have no challenges left and another call goes against them.
posted on 26/5/22
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 24 seconds ago
You take that away completely and no club complains if they feck up missing out on looking at an incorrect decision.
-----
Apart from when they have used their challenge, the VAR backs his mate on the pitch... and then they have no challenges left and another call goes against them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, and whose fault would that but for the coaches? In cricket the players are blamed for using up a challenge. In NFL the coaches are. It adds to the game compared to how its done now when everyone incl pundit, managers are complain legitimately about the rules and how they are incorrectly implemented with limited to no consistency during the season.
Page 26164 of 31904
26165 | 26166 | 26167 | 26168 | 26169