comment by Hippo on Toast (mufc) - follow the new ja606 t... (U1301)
posted 36 seconds ago
A club with no European football, not performing on the biggest stage, is not an attractive proposition for investors.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
didn't make any difference to liverpool did it.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Not is it an attractive proposition for potential new signings.
"A club with no European football, not performing on the biggest stage, is not an attractive proposition for investors."
Yes, just ask fans of Man City, Paris Saint German or the French second division giants that were Monaco. This is literally the stupidest comment I have ever read on this forum (and there are a few contenders) given how ridiculously wrong it is.
No they won't fire him, thank goodness otherwise we may end up with Maureen.
I know half of you on here think he is a genius, but I think the next half season will show he is not.
Unless of course, another 100 mill is coughed up in January.
The difference between Utd and City, PSG or Monaco is that Utd cannot throw money about like confetti.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
True. But that has nothing to do with how attractive football clubs are to investors and the illogical point of view that people will only invest in clubs already at the top, when in fact investors look for clubs who they perceive as undervalued with potential to grow.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Oh right, fair enough. That's what happens when you don't read all the comments
To be fair, that is actually the best time to invest though
He's toast. Shareholders won't tolerate that, and why should they?
They buy their shares and should expect a return.
It isn't just this season, either. Unless you clear that ridiculous debt I can see many years of mid table obscurity.
Sign in if you want to comment
Will the board sack David Moyes if we.....
Page 4 of 4
posted on 8/12/13
comment by Hippo on Toast (mufc) - follow the new ja606 t... (U1301)
posted 36 seconds ago
A club with no European football, not performing on the biggest stage, is not an attractive proposition for investors.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
didn't make any difference to liverpool did it.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Not is it an attractive proposition for potential new signings.
posted on 8/12/13
"A club with no European football, not performing on the biggest stage, is not an attractive proposition for investors."
Yes, just ask fans of Man City, Paris Saint German or the French second division giants that were Monaco. This is literally the stupidest comment I have ever read on this forum (and there are a few contenders) given how ridiculously wrong it is.
posted on 8/12/13
No they won't fire him, thank goodness otherwise we may end up with Maureen.
I know half of you on here think he is a genius, but I think the next half season will show he is not.
Unless of course, another 100 mill is coughed up in January.
posted on 8/12/13
The difference between Utd and City, PSG or Monaco is that Utd cannot throw money about like confetti.
posted on 8/12/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/12/13
True. But that has nothing to do with how attractive football clubs are to investors and the illogical point of view that people will only invest in clubs already at the top, when in fact investors look for clubs who they perceive as undervalued with potential to grow.
posted on 8/12/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/12/13
Oh right, fair enough. That's what happens when you don't read all the comments
posted on 8/12/13
To be fair, that is actually the best time to invest though
posted on 8/12/13
He's toast. Shareholders won't tolerate that, and why should they?
They buy their shares and should expect a return.
It isn't just this season, either. Unless you clear that ridiculous debt I can see many years of mid table obscurity.
Page 4 of 4