or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 211212 comments are related to an article called:

LFC Tranny Thread

Page 7212 of 8449

posted on 14/8/23

comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 2 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted about 2 hours ago
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
If we don't rate Lavia at £50m who are we planning on signing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only time will tell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No 1 lol said before id be shocked if we spent over 100m and more than 30/40m net. Promising start then we did fack all until panicking for a super 3/4 month late bid for caicedo prob knowing itd be rejected but least itll look like we tried. Ditto lavia.

Facking structure of the clubs a mess, care taker dof whats the point? .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course we will sign someone.

posted on 14/8/23

comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted about 3 hours ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 2 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted about 2 hours ago
comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted less than a minute ago
If we don't rate Lavia at £50m who are we planning on signing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only time will tell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No 1 lol said before id be shocked if we spent over 100m and more than 30/40m net. Promising start then we did fack all until panicking for a super 3/4 month late bid for caicedo prob knowing itd be rejected but least itll look like we tried. Ditto lavia.

Facking structure of the clubs a mess, care taker dof whats the point? .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course we will sign someone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fingers crossed…

posted on 14/8/23

comment by tliv7-0 (U11882)
posted 9 hours, 27 minutes ago
I was hoping we could challenge if we got signings, but tbh I'm realising a lot of tactical work needs to be done regardless of signings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
About fecking time.

posted on 14/8/23

170m on 21 year olds Caicedo and Lavia? Chelsea will have to be very successful and win things to justify their outlay and these players will be impossible to shift if they don't do well.

Let's just say I'm not too fussed to miss out on these particular players and the behaviour from the club suggests they agree that these players are overvalued, but our midfield situation is the major concern.

At this point I'm not sure the right midfield player will be available this summer. I'm not sure Lavia is ready to play that role for us anyway but Caicedo looked good enough, but just for one season in a team that was doing very well all around. Perhaps we can sort a loan to take us through to January when I'm sure the field will look a lot different to what it looks like now.

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 14/8/23

So apparently the 5 year amortisation rule is a Uefa one only. Clubs can still amortise contracts over their total length for stat. account and for premier league financial sustainability purposes. Only becomes more of an issue when Chelsea get back into Europe. Makes sense why Chelsea continue to hand out these long deals.

posted on 14/8/23

comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 34 minutes ago
170m on 21 year olds Caicedo and Lavia? Chelsea will have to be very successful and win things to justify their outlay and these players will be impossible to shift if they don't do well.

Let's just say I'm not too fussed to miss out on these particular players and the behaviour from the club suggests they agree that these players are overvalued, but our midfield situation is the major concern.

At this point I'm not sure the right midfield player will be available this summer. I'm not sure Lavia is ready to play that role for us anyway but Caicedo looked good enough, but just for one season in a team that was doing very well all around. Perhaps we can sort a loan to take us through to January when I'm sure the field will look a lot different to what it looks like now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A lot different? What exactly do you expect to happen in a few months?

posted on 14/8/23

I reckon we get Andre in January

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 14/8/23

We can't wait until January. We already wrote off one season waiting for Bellingham, only to not sign him.

posted on 14/8/23

Of course we will sign someone.
___________
Who? I may think they dont do enough, are slow and reactionary. But i agree with the way they've always done it under Klopp in regards to not signing players for he sake of it instead making do until a target we are sold on is available.

Markets awful right now and seeing as we left it so late and everyone knows we have 111m + its only gona be worse.

posted on 14/8/23

The reason we wanted Caicedo was he is very good off and on the ball and he can play multiple positions.

Players like Sangare, Doucoure and Fofana are ball winners but are very slow on the ball and will be exposed when we build up play.

Mats Wieffer of Feyenoord impressed me when he played for the Dutch national team. Very good tackler and isn't bad on the ball.

posted on 14/8/23

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 8 minutes ago
I reckon we get Andre in January
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Woohoo

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 14/8/23

comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 8 minutes ago
I reckon we get Andre in January
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Woohoo
----------------------------------------------------------------------

posted on 14/8/23

comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 6 minutes ago
Of course we will sign someone.
___________
Who? I may think they dont do enough, are slow and reactionary. But i agree with the way they've always done it under Klopp in regards to not signing players for he sake of it instead making do until a target we are sold on is available.

Markets awful right now and seeing as we left it so late and everyone knows we have 111m + its only gona be worse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
None of us know. But clearly we're looking to make improvements.

posted on 14/8/23

Why does anybody think the market is going to improve before January?!

posted on 14/8/23

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 17 minutes ago
I reckon we get Andre in January
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t mean wait just for him, we definitely need someone now. That was far too painful yesterday.

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 14/8/23

comment by Never Mind the Defending: Here’s Jü... (U3979)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why does anybody think the market is going to improve before January?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It won't. Nobody will be available, like always. Apart from Andre supposedly.

posted on 14/8/23

There’s probably not many CDMs we can’t afford if we were willing to spend £111m on Caicedo so maybe we should be looking at Barella or Kimmich. I’d still sign Andre in January.

Kimmich may not want to join us but Bayern may need money after the Kane deal.

posted on 14/8/23

Let's have a bit of faith eh?

posted on 14/8/23

Newcastle look absolutely superb and tbh I thought Chelsea had the makings of an excellent team yesterday - even top 5 is going to be a real challenge this year.

Spurs also have 100m burning a hole in their pocket.

Need that CDM in this window or we can kiss the CL goodbye again.

posted on 14/8/23

comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U (U1108)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 8 minutes ago
I reckon we get Andre in January
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Woohoo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, cool reply. Everything I’ve read suggests he’s very good and very highly rated. So what are you going to make up that suggests otherwise?

posted on 14/8/23

Barella isn't a dm. Andre could do it but he plays mainly in a double pivot.

posted on 14/8/23

We're obviously going to sign someone given we clearly have £110m to spend.

I have absolutely no idea who that could be but I know we've been linked with Doucoure from Palace and Foffana fron Monaco.

Whoever it is needs to be in place before the Newcastle game.

posted on 14/8/23

£70m for Kimmich on £300k would be my preference.

I know the wages are a lot but I'd see that as better value than some daft fee on Palhinha or Doucoure.

I'd not let Schmadtke anywhere near the new deaos either if we want to get it done.

posted on 14/8/23

Positives from yesterday, I thought Szob and Mac Allister, despite playing in positions less suited to their talents were both superb.

Both look like brilliant buys, AMA looks more composed than Szobo but he’s 22 playing his first game in the league in about 3 different positions as the game progressed.

Get a CDM behind them and that’s a great midfield going into the season.

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 14/8/23

Kimmich ffs

Let's have sensible names please.

Page 7212 of 8449

Sign in if you want to comment