Wtcbu, we have left it with him now, he isnt going to answer sensibly now. Either because there isnt a sensible answer, or he is back to being his usual fool
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 1 minute ago
I dont have a problem. Ur opinion isnt credible, thats ur problem, so nobody takes u seriously. Must be a terrible feeling to know nobody gives u any credit
In any case, proving things to us is impossible. U dont think facts r a good basis of an opinion.
Also, it is u who is claiming lewis was locking up and nico was setting fastest laps at will. U havent provided any evidence.
Later u will be saying we dont have the guts to debatr and we are cowards (notice 'we'. When in fact, u havrnt the guts to provide evidence to support ur opinions. We all have. Give me some evidence that adds credence to ur opinion n i will take it on boarf as a different, but respectable opinion. Up to u mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are the one that is having the problem with peoples harmless opinion on here not me , does not bother me one jot what opinion people have about anything on here -
------------ so prove me wrong
BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
Exactly.
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
On the basis of the fact that I have watched the entire race then it is untrue that Lewis Hamilton had more lockups than Nico Rosberg.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair enough --- i am of a different opinion
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
On the basis of the fact that I have watched the entire race then it is untrue that Lewis Hamilton had more lockups than Nico Rosberg.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair enough --- i am of a different opinion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think u will find a number of lockups is a quantitative fact, and cannot be.opinionated
Go away now martial, ur being an ar5ehole again
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
On the basis of the fact that I have watched the entire race then it is untrue that Lewis Hamilton had more lockups than Nico Rosberg.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair enough --- i am of a different opinion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think u will find a number of lockups is a quantitative fact, and cannot be.opinionated
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair enough --- that is your opinion and i dont have a problem with it
Martial has all the DVD's.
A simple matter for him to rewind and answer my questions.
Antagonising eh martial. Classy
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
Martial has all the DVD's.
A simple matter for him to rewind and answer my questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you also have the race somewhere as you have just watched almost 2 hours of racing in the space of 30 mins so you know the laps and the individual lock ups -
----------- so you know the answer
Well i assume u know the lockups eh martial?
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 16 seconds ago
Well i assume u know the lockups eh martial?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not from memory without wasting 2 hours to rewatch a race i found boring the first time i watched it --
I haven't counted the lock ups, life really is too short, but I did see both drivers lock up at times in the race. The Mercedes-Benz, if it has a weakness at all, has less than rock solid brakes, also, when a driver is on the limit he will lock up occasionally. It doesn't automatically make one driver better than the other. Although it would be a valid argument that Rosberg's familiarity with the Mercedes-Benz over so long a period of time should certainly give him an advantage over Hamilton.
If someone is controlling a race, why would he let his rival into the DRS zone?
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 2 hours, 47 minutes ago
If someone is controlling a race, why would he let his rival into the DRS zone?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why not --- when he was driving a very tactical race with the tyres and knew he had the chasing driver covered ,
--------- as turned out to be the case
http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/9558567/Rosberg-was-in-control-
Quoting a link from Rosberg is not a suitable form of evidence.
For example; If Rosberg said he was the greatest ever and we used a quote from him, it would be silly
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Quoting a link from Rosberg is not a suitable form of evidence.
For example; If Rosberg said he was the greatest ever and we used a quote from him, it would be silly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its not meant to be evidence manx -- just another little link that backs up the obvious -
----------- if rosberg had not had the race under control lewis would have at the very ,very, very, very, very , least of been in a position to have tried one solitary , sole , single , lone , isolated , pass on rosberg -
------------ as he did not tells me that rosberg had his tactics and the situation and lewis under control
its not meant to be evidence manx -- just another little link that backs up the obvious -
----------------------
r u really that stupid? Genuine question
MUDD - Lets not bother eh. Theirs no point.
Double standards aplenty and mass conjecture
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 33 minutes ago
MUDD - Lets not bother eh. Theirs no point.
Double standards aplenty and mass conjecture
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you have your opinion and i have mine BW and the race footage and the result would appear to lend a certain amount of credibility to my opinion -
its not a united nations peace treaty we are discussing just a harmless difference of F1 opinion and does not mean that either of us are
wrong
MA - as i have said before, it isnt anything i worry about, believe me, ur not important.
But i do enjoy coming on here and discussing F1 - you ruin that for many on here, and eventually they will vote with there feet and just leave.
You continuously refer to having a different opinion! HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY THAT ISNT THE ISSUE!!!! The issue is how u generate your opinions, and then demand that other provide evidence to "disprove you". They do provide evidence, which in every book on the universe is good evidence. Your counter to that is.....nah guys, ur wrong, i have watched f1 for 100 years.
You then refuse to offer a reason why our opinion is wrong, and then refuse further to provide evidence to support your opinion.
So eventually- it doesnt become a debate forum. it becomes a state opinion forum and thats it! Rendering it boring.
You then go on to antogonise people, and patronise. Then people insult you for those reasons, then you refer to them as cowards, gutless, geriatrics.
So martial - provide evidence that Rosberg had the race under control.........save yourself some time mate, dont bother, because there isnt any
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 8 minutes ago
MA - as i have said before, it isnt anything i worry about, believe me, ur not important.
But i do enjoy coming on here and discussing F1 - you ruin that for many on here, and eventually they will vote with there feet and just leave.
You continuously refer to having a different opinion! HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY THAT ISNT THE ISSUE!!!! The issue is how u generate your opinions, and then demand that other provide evidence to "disprove you". They do provide evidence, which in every book on the universe is good evidence. Your counter to that is.....nah guys, ur wrong, i have watched f1 for 100 years.
You then refuse to offer a reason why our opinion is wrong, and then refuse further to provide evidence to support your opinion.
So eventually- it doesnt become a debate forum. it becomes a state opinion forum and thats it! Rendering it boring.
You then go on to antogonise people, and patronise. Then people insult you for those reasons, then you refer to them as cowards, gutless, geriatrics.
So martial - provide evidence that Rosberg had the race under control.........save yourself some time mate, dont bother, because there isnt any
----------------------------------------------------------------------
look at what you have just wrote BW , this is just another silly example of you getting completely bent out of shape because somebody has a different opinion than you about something completely insignificant as a formula 1 difference of opinion -
--------------- as i said we are all entitled to our opinions on here and just because i sometimes have a different opinion than you does not mean that either of us are wrong -
----------- it is merely a very harmless difference of a formula 1 related opinion -
------------------- nothing more nothing less
"""For example; If Rosberg said he was the greatest ever and we used a quote from him, it would be silly"""
Very true, also if Rosberg was booed at Spa and claimed it was because the people who booed him were British, that would be silly too. But that would never happen.
Yes but he locked up multiply on the low down force high down force with a superior engine that was inferior.
The above opinions are facts.
Do you know the difference?
No?
Thought not.
I have won again.
It's great being stupid. Everyone runs away from you.
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 9 minutes ago
Yes but he locked up multiply on the low down force high down force with a superior engine that was inferior.
The above opinions are facts.
Do you know the difference?
No?
Thought not.
I have won again.
It's great being stupid. Everyone runs away from you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are going to have to run that one by everybody again WT -
------------- not sure that any of us can decipher whatever F1 related point it is that you are trying to make -
----------------- i take it there is a formula 1 related point in there somewhere
Sign in if you want to comment
who spotted that MB cost Hamilton the race?
Page 5 of 6
6
posted on 16/11/14
Wtcbu, we have left it with him now, he isnt going to answer sensibly now. Either because there isnt a sensible answer, or he is back to being his usual fool
posted on 16/11/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 1 minute ago
I dont have a problem. Ur opinion isnt credible, thats ur problem, so nobody takes u seriously. Must be a terrible feeling to know nobody gives u any credit
In any case, proving things to us is impossible. U dont think facts r a good basis of an opinion.
Also, it is u who is claiming lewis was locking up and nico was setting fastest laps at will. U havent provided any evidence.
Later u will be saying we dont have the guts to debatr and we are cowards (notice 'we'. When in fact, u havrnt the guts to provide evidence to support ur opinions. We all have. Give me some evidence that adds credence to ur opinion n i will take it on boarf as a different, but respectable opinion. Up to u mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are the one that is having the problem with peoples harmless opinion on here not me , does not bother me one jot what opinion people have about anything on here -
------------ so prove me wrong
posted on 16/11/14
BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
Exactly.
posted on 16/11/14
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
On the basis of the fact that I have watched the entire race then it is untrue that Lewis Hamilton had more lockups than Nico Rosberg.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair enough --- i am of a different opinion
posted on 16/11/14
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
On the basis of the fact that I have watched the entire race then it is untrue that Lewis Hamilton had more lockups than Nico Rosberg.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair enough --- i am of a different opinion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think u will find a number of lockups is a quantitative fact, and cannot be.opinionated
posted on 16/11/14
Go away now martial, ur being an ar5ehole again
posted on 16/11/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by martial artist (U9033)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
On the basis of the fact that I have watched the entire race then it is untrue that Lewis Hamilton had more lockups than Nico Rosberg.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair enough --- i am of a different opinion
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think u will find a number of lockups is a quantitative fact, and cannot be.opinionated
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fair enough --- that is your opinion and i dont have a problem with it
posted on 16/11/14
Martial has all the DVD's.
A simple matter for him to rewind and answer my questions.
posted on 16/11/14
Antagonising eh martial. Classy
posted on 16/11/14
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 1 minute ago
Martial has all the DVD's.
A simple matter for him to rewind and answer my questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you also have the race somewhere as you have just watched almost 2 hours of racing in the space of 30 mins so you know the laps and the individual lock ups -
----------- so you know the answer
posted on 16/11/14
Well i assume u know the lockups eh martial?
posted on 16/11/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 16 seconds ago
Well i assume u know the lockups eh martial?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not from memory without wasting 2 hours to rewatch a race i found boring the first time i watched it --
posted on 16/11/14
I haven't counted the lock ups, life really is too short, but I did see both drivers lock up at times in the race. The Mercedes-Benz, if it has a weakness at all, has less than rock solid brakes, also, when a driver is on the limit he will lock up occasionally. It doesn't automatically make one driver better than the other. Although it would be a valid argument that Rosberg's familiarity with the Mercedes-Benz over so long a period of time should certainly give him an advantage over Hamilton.
posted on 17/11/14
If someone is controlling a race, why would he let his rival into the DRS zone?
posted on 17/11/14
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 2 hours, 47 minutes ago
If someone is controlling a race, why would he let his rival into the DRS zone?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
why not --- when he was driving a very tactical race with the tyres and knew he had the chasing driver covered ,
--------- as turned out to be the case
http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/9558567/Rosberg-was-in-control-
posted on 17/11/14
Quoting a link from Rosberg is not a suitable form of evidence.
For example; If Rosberg said he was the greatest ever and we used a quote from him, it would be silly
posted on 17/11/14
comment by M.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire (U9612)
posted 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
Quoting a link from Rosberg is not a suitable form of evidence.
For example; If Rosberg said he was the greatest ever and we used a quote from him, it would be silly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
its not meant to be evidence manx -- just another little link that backs up the obvious -
----------- if rosberg had not had the race under control lewis would have at the very ,very, very, very, very , least of been in a position to have tried one solitary , sole , single , lone , isolated , pass on rosberg -
------------ as he did not tells me that rosberg had his tactics and the situation and lewis under control
posted on 17/11/14
its not meant to be evidence manx -- just another little link that backs up the obvious -
----------------------
r u really that stupid? Genuine question
posted on 17/11/14
MUDD - Lets not bother eh. Theirs no point.
Double standards aplenty and mass conjecture
posted on 17/11/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 33 minutes ago
MUDD - Lets not bother eh. Theirs no point.
Double standards aplenty and mass conjecture
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you have your opinion and i have mine BW and the race footage and the result would appear to lend a certain amount of credibility to my opinion -
its not a united nations peace treaty we are discussing just a harmless difference of F1 opinion and does not mean that either of us are
wrong
posted on 17/11/14
MA - as i have said before, it isnt anything i worry about, believe me, ur not important.
But i do enjoy coming on here and discussing F1 - you ruin that for many on here, and eventually they will vote with there feet and just leave.
You continuously refer to having a different opinion! HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY THAT ISNT THE ISSUE!!!! The issue is how u generate your opinions, and then demand that other provide evidence to "disprove you". They do provide evidence, which in every book on the universe is good evidence. Your counter to that is.....nah guys, ur wrong, i have watched f1 for 100 years.
You then refuse to offer a reason why our opinion is wrong, and then refuse further to provide evidence to support your opinion.
So eventually- it doesnt become a debate forum. it becomes a state opinion forum and thats it! Rendering it boring.
You then go on to antogonise people, and patronise. Then people insult you for those reasons, then you refer to them as cowards, gutless, geriatrics.
So martial - provide evidence that Rosberg had the race under control.........save yourself some time mate, dont bother, because there isnt any
posted on 17/11/14
comment by BWFCCLEGG (U7583)
posted 8 minutes ago
MA - as i have said before, it isnt anything i worry about, believe me, ur not important.
But i do enjoy coming on here and discussing F1 - you ruin that for many on here, and eventually they will vote with there feet and just leave.
You continuously refer to having a different opinion! HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO SAY THAT ISNT THE ISSUE!!!! The issue is how u generate your opinions, and then demand that other provide evidence to "disprove you". They do provide evidence, which in every book on the universe is good evidence. Your counter to that is.....nah guys, ur wrong, i have watched f1 for 100 years.
You then refuse to offer a reason why our opinion is wrong, and then refuse further to provide evidence to support your opinion.
So eventually- it doesnt become a debate forum. it becomes a state opinion forum and thats it! Rendering it boring.
You then go on to antogonise people, and patronise. Then people insult you for those reasons, then you refer to them as cowards, gutless, geriatrics.
So martial - provide evidence that Rosberg had the race under control.........save yourself some time mate, dont bother, because there isnt any
----------------------------------------------------------------------
look at what you have just wrote BW , this is just another silly example of you getting completely bent out of shape because somebody has a different opinion than you about something completely insignificant as a formula 1 difference of opinion -
--------------- as i said we are all entitled to our opinions on here and just because i sometimes have a different opinion than you does not mean that either of us are wrong -
----------- it is merely a very harmless difference of a formula 1 related opinion -
------------------- nothing more nothing less
posted on 17/11/14
"""For example; If Rosberg said he was the greatest ever and we used a quote from him, it would be silly"""
Very true, also if Rosberg was booed at Spa and claimed it was because the people who booed him were British, that would be silly too. But that would never happen.
posted on 17/11/14
Yes but he locked up multiply on the low down force high down force with a superior engine that was inferior.
The above opinions are facts.
Do you know the difference?
No?
Thought not.
I have won again.
It's great being stupid. Everyone runs away from you.
posted on 17/11/14
comment by WTCBU (U13662)
posted 9 minutes ago
Yes but he locked up multiply on the low down force high down force with a superior engine that was inferior.
The above opinions are facts.
Do you know the difference?
No?
Thought not.
I have won again.
It's great being stupid. Everyone runs away from you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are going to have to run that one by everybody again WT -
------------- not sure that any of us can decipher whatever F1 related point it is that you are trying to make -
----------------- i take it there is a formula 1 related point in there somewhere
Page 5 of 6
6