comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Falcoff, it's only a mata of time before we have our Rojo back for Shaw. (U18599)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by XMAS P.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire(U9612)
posted 4 minutes ago
I was pondering these thoughts as well cleverson. Chelsea have spent in excess of a billion pounds and have as many PL titles as Wenger at Arsenal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Baffles me MUDDLING
It's quite embarrassing really when you consider that they have effectively been given a blank cheque book and yet still find themselves behind the likes of villa and sheff Wednesday in terms of titles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SO embarrasing, how will the chelsea hierachy cope
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite badly considering the amount they spent and finished another season with the same amount of trophys as DAVID MOYES Manchester United
Oh wait.. Even moyesy win something shiny!!
How a utd fan can talk about a waste of money what with the falcao deal, shaw deal, rojo, smalling, phil jones deals and many more is baffling. Thats 150 million already.
You guys had fergie who helped with so many of your titles, not everyone has that. If chelsea keep mourinho now hoppefully we will see a few more titles and it will be all worth it(even though it already is)
yes Im sure they are coping badly are you reading your posts.
Nickalopodis
What are you talking about? United have more money. Under FFP rules United can comfortably out spend chelsea, Its not an opinion, its a fact. At present, United can spend more money on transfer fees and wages. Jose already said that Chelsea cant compete with united after we sighn Luke shaw.
You have the London factor going for Chelsea I agree but If a player prefers getting payed more over living in London then United are a bigger draw. If a player prefers living in London over getting payed more then chelsea are a bigger draw. As I said earlier which club is the bigger draw depends on the player. Its silly to make generalized arguments about which club is the bigger draw
Haven't Utd recently spent £200 million just to ensure you remain in the top 4 ?
1/5 of a Billion quid just to be in the Champions League is a lot of wonga.
What are you talking about, Chelsea technically have more money, and I do not know the ins and outs of FFP but Im pretty sure there are ways we could buy anyone we so wished, what with articles ridiculously linking us with Messi
Jose didnt want Luke Shaw at that price if I recall, didnt say we cant compete.
But you were stating asif chelsea could get nowhere near the wages or price utd paid, We have lost cole, lampard, terry has taken a decrease, drogba a decrease and alot of our players are not on the big bucks essien, ballack and co are on, im pretty sure we would be fine
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 26 seconds ago
Haven't Utd recently spent £200 million just to ensure you remain in the top 4 ?
1/5 of a Billion quid just to be in the Champions League is a lot of wonga.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WOW !
crazy isnt it superb, utd have been on top for 50 years, and still have to resort to spending millions just to be in the top four, absolutely baffling!
(see guys we can all spin it which ways)
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
How a utd fan can talk about a waste of money what with the falcao deal, shaw deal, rojo, smalling, phil jones deals and many more is baffling. Thats 150 million already.
You guys had fergie who helped with so many of your titles, not everyone has that. If chelsea keep mourinho now hoppefully we will see a few more titles and it will be all worth it(even though it already is)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea can't even buy success anymore
FFP
Same number of titles as wenger at Arsenal and 1 billion spent
Jose's campaign
Are you bored today cleverson...?
Either can utd dumb son son son
FFP indeed
200 odd million on players to play just once a week
Hahahaha Melton. Just doing my last round of fishing for 2014.
These cockneys bite hard
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
the classic, losing an argument so "insert opposite fan here* is biting.
well done for making yourself look stupid.
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Either can utd dumb son son son
FFPindeed
200 odd million on players to play just once a week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you said we couldn't spend but then mention 200 million?
Chelsea's finest
Ok Chelsea may have more money but you can only spend what you earn. United's revenues far exceeds chelsea's, therefore United can spend far more than chelsea. Its not even up for debate.
Im not talking about just this season. unless chelsea significantly improve their revenue streams, they cannot financially compete with united. Im not a fan off FFP but this is the reality of the situation whether you like it or not
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
In the last 5 years, Chelsea and United have spent pretty much the same. In the last 5 years Chelsea have won the CL, Europa League, FA Cupx2, charity shield and the Premier League. Utd have won the Premier Leaguex2, the League Cup and the charity shield x3. So yet again it looks like a Manc talking absolute sh ite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Liverpool managed 1 second place finish.
#wegoagain
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Falcoff, it's only a mata of time before we have our Rojo back for Shaw. (U18599)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Either can utd dumb son son son
FFPindeed
200 odd million on players to play just once a week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you said we couldn't spend but then mention 200 million?
Chelsea's finest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when did I say you couldnt spend? wtf are you on about SO SO stupid
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
That 200 million spend didn't even include Flopcao
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Falcoff, it's only a mata of time before we have our Rojo back for Shaw. (U18599)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Either can utd dumb son son son
FFPindeed
200 odd million on players to play just once a week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you said we couldn't spend but then mention 200 million?
Chelsea's finest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when did I say you couldnt spend? wtf are you on aboutSO SO stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many titles do chelsea have?
How much has sugar daddy spent to get there?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
But this isn't about Liverpool, quite an off topic comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite right so no input from irrelevant scousers needed.
comment by The Luke Show (U8522)
posted 1 minute ago
Ok Chelsea may have more money but you can only spend what you earn. United's revenues far exceeds chelsea's, therefore United can spend far more than chelsea. Its not even up for debate.
Im not talking about just this season. unless chelsea significantly improve their revenue streams, they cannot financially compete with united. Im not a fan off FFP but this is the reality of the situation whether you like it or not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe utd can spend more but how much more realistically to make a difference? We could probably still spend millions a summer if we so wished and could get 99 percent of players we wanted. We have improved our revenue streams, the only thing holding us back is the stadium. Where we still charge the highest corporate tickets to make up for it.
Unless utd wanted to spend 100 million on a 30 million pound player then we shouldnt struggle tbh.
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
the classic, losing an argument so "insert opposite fan here* is biting.
well done for making yourself look stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Followed by the still losing argument so change the topic completely comment. Nothing clever about clever son.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Here Slippy Slippy Slippy
Sign in if you want to comment
Successful or Not?
Page 3 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Falcoff, it's only a mata of time before we have our Rojo back for Shaw. (U18599)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by XMAS P.U.D.D - Luke Shaw makes me throb with desire(U9612)
posted 4 minutes ago
I was pondering these thoughts as well cleverson. Chelsea have spent in excess of a billion pounds and have as many PL titles as Wenger at Arsenal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Baffles me MUDDLING
It's quite embarrassing really when you consider that they have effectively been given a blank cheque book and yet still find themselves behind the likes of villa and sheff Wednesday in terms of titles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SO embarrasing, how will the chelsea hierachy cope
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite badly considering the amount they spent and finished another season with the same amount of trophys as DAVID MOYES Manchester United
Oh wait.. Even moyesy win something shiny!!
posted on 31/12/14
How a utd fan can talk about a waste of money what with the falcao deal, shaw deal, rojo, smalling, phil jones deals and many more is baffling. Thats 150 million already.
You guys had fergie who helped with so many of your titles, not everyone has that. If chelsea keep mourinho now hoppefully we will see a few more titles and it will be all worth it(even though it already is)
posted on 31/12/14
yes Im sure they are coping badly are you reading your posts.
posted on 31/12/14
Nickalopodis
What are you talking about? United have more money. Under FFP rules United can comfortably out spend chelsea, Its not an opinion, its a fact. At present, United can spend more money on transfer fees and wages. Jose already said that Chelsea cant compete with united after we sighn Luke shaw.
You have the London factor going for Chelsea I agree but If a player prefers getting payed more over living in London then United are a bigger draw. If a player prefers living in London over getting payed more then chelsea are a bigger draw. As I said earlier which club is the bigger draw depends on the player. Its silly to make generalized arguments about which club is the bigger draw
posted on 31/12/14
Haven't Utd recently spent £200 million just to ensure you remain in the top 4 ?
1/5 of a Billion quid just to be in the Champions League is a lot of wonga.
posted on 31/12/14
What are you talking about, Chelsea technically have more money, and I do not know the ins and outs of FFP but Im pretty sure there are ways we could buy anyone we so wished, what with articles ridiculously linking us with Messi
Jose didnt want Luke Shaw at that price if I recall, didnt say we cant compete.
But you were stating asif chelsea could get nowhere near the wages or price utd paid, We have lost cole, lampard, terry has taken a decrease, drogba a decrease and alot of our players are not on the big bucks essien, ballack and co are on, im pretty sure we would be fine
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 26 seconds ago
Haven't Utd recently spent £200 million just to ensure you remain in the top 4 ?
1/5 of a Billion quid just to be in the Champions League is a lot of wonga.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WOW !
posted on 31/12/14
crazy isnt it superb, utd have been on top for 50 years, and still have to resort to spending millions just to be in the top four, absolutely baffling!
(see guys we can all spin it which ways)
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
How a utd fan can talk about a waste of money what with the falcao deal, shaw deal, rojo, smalling, phil jones deals and many more is baffling. Thats 150 million already.
You guys had fergie who helped with so many of your titles, not everyone has that. If chelsea keep mourinho now hoppefully we will see a few more titles and it will be all worth it(even though it already is)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea can't even buy success anymore
FFP
Same number of titles as wenger at Arsenal and 1 billion spent
Jose's campaign
posted on 31/12/14
Are you bored today cleverson...?
posted on 31/12/14
Either can utd dumb son son son
FFP indeed
200 odd million on players to play just once a week
posted on 31/12/14
Hahahaha Melton. Just doing my last round of fishing for 2014.
These cockneys bite hard
posted on 31/12/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/12/14
the classic, losing an argument so "insert opposite fan here* is biting.
well done for making yourself look stupid.
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Either can utd dumb son son son
FFPindeed
200 odd million on players to play just once a week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you said we couldn't spend but then mention 200 million?
Chelsea's finest
posted on 31/12/14
Ok Chelsea may have more money but you can only spend what you earn. United's revenues far exceeds chelsea's, therefore United can spend far more than chelsea. Its not even up for debate.
Im not talking about just this season. unless chelsea significantly improve their revenue streams, they cannot financially compete with united. Im not a fan off FFP but this is the reality of the situation whether you like it or not
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
In the last 5 years, Chelsea and United have spent pretty much the same. In the last 5 years Chelsea have won the CL, Europa League, FA Cupx2, charity shield and the Premier League. Utd have won the Premier Leaguex2, the League Cup and the charity shield x3. So yet again it looks like a Manc talking absolute sh ite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And Liverpool managed 1 second place finish.
#wegoagain
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Falcoff, it's only a mata of time before we have our Rojo back for Shaw. (U18599)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Either can utd dumb son son son
FFPindeed
200 odd million on players to play just once a week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you said we couldn't spend but then mention 200 million?
Chelsea's finest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when did I say you couldnt spend? wtf are you on about SO SO stupid
posted on 31/12/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/12/14
That 200 million spend didn't even include Flopcao
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Falcoff, it's only a mata of time before we have our Rojo back for Shaw. (U18599)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Either can utd dumb son son son
FFPindeed
200 odd million on players to play just once a week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you said we couldn't spend but then mention 200 million?
Chelsea's finest
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when did I say you couldnt spend? wtf are you on aboutSO SO stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many titles do chelsea have?
How much has sugar daddy spent to get there?
posted on 31/12/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 1 minute ago
But this isn't about Liverpool, quite an off topic comment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite right so no input from irrelevant scousers needed.
posted on 31/12/14
comment by The Luke Show (U8522)
posted 1 minute ago
Ok Chelsea may have more money but you can only spend what you earn. United's revenues far exceeds chelsea's, therefore United can spend far more than chelsea. Its not even up for debate.
Im not talking about just this season. unless chelsea significantly improve their revenue streams, they cannot financially compete with united. Im not a fan off FFP but this is the reality of the situation whether you like it or not
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe utd can spend more but how much more realistically to make a difference? We could probably still spend millions a summer if we so wished and could get 99 percent of players we wanted. We have improved our revenue streams, the only thing holding us back is the stadium. Where we still charge the highest corporate tickets to make up for it.
Unless utd wanted to spend 100 million on a 30 million pound player then we shouldnt struggle tbh.
posted on 31/12/14
comment by Ttliv87 (U11882)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by Nickalopodis-BoomsObsession (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
the classic, losing an argument so "insert opposite fan here* is biting.
well done for making yourself look stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Followed by the still losing argument so change the topic completely comment. Nothing clever about clever son.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Here Slippy Slippy Slippy
Page 3 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9