Which is impossible to determine.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Well, anyway - I think we now know where the divisions in opinion lie on here and now it's just going round and round...
Where's Convicted Vandal Weare?
Convicted Vandal and Former Skinhead Weare.
Weare the bovver boy
comment by Harrys accountant (U1141)
posted 3 hours, 53 minutes ago
Convicted Vandal and Former Skinhead Weare.
Weare the bovver boy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Convicted Vandal Weare has changed his mind on the finality of jury's decisions, when it concerns him
"every time he's mentioned they add the precursor 'convicted rapist' which is hardly helping his cause."
He is a convicted rapist. Why should the media help his cause? That's not their job.
Is Lesley Grantham introduced as a convicted murderer? Is David Dickinson introduced as a convicted fraudster?
I would suggest that a bit of balance and equal treatment isn't too much to ask.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I don't think most on here are sticking up for him, I think the main point being made is that there are grounds for reasonable doubt therefore his conviction could be unsafe.
If he did rape that girl he's a sc-umbag but the evidence against him is far from conclusive.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 1 minute ago
Do you agree there is a big difference between McDonald sharing a taxi, walking into the hotel and to the room with the girl and Evans turning up and letting himself in the room?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand your point. Does this have any bearing on whether she consented or not because unless it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that she didn't, he shouldn't be found guilty. If she can't remember whether she did or not I suggest there are grounds for reasonable doubt.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
But it still doesn't prove that he raped her.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Ched Evans (updated update)
Page 28 of 44
29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33
posted on 9/1/15
Which is impossible to determine.
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Well, anyway - I think we now know where the divisions in opinion lie on here and now it's just going round and round...
Where's Convicted Vandal Weare?
posted on 9/1/15
Convicted Vandal and Former Skinhead Weare.
Weare the bovver boy
posted on 9/1/15
comment by Harrys accountant (U1141)
posted 3 hours, 53 minutes ago
Convicted Vandal and Former Skinhead Weare.
Weare the bovver boy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Convicted Vandal Weare has changed his mind on the finality of jury's decisions, when it concerns him
posted on 9/1/15
"every time he's mentioned they add the precursor 'convicted rapist' which is hardly helping his cause."
He is a convicted rapist. Why should the media help his cause? That's not their job.
posted on 9/1/15
Is Lesley Grantham introduced as a convicted murderer? Is David Dickinson introduced as a convicted fraudster?
I would suggest that a bit of balance and equal treatment isn't too much to ask.
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
I don't think most on here are sticking up for him, I think the main point being made is that there are grounds for reasonable doubt therefore his conviction could be unsafe.
If he did rape that girl he's a sc-umbag but the evidence against him is far from conclusive.
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
comment by Cal Neva (U11544)
posted 1 minute ago
Do you agree there is a big difference between McDonald sharing a taxi, walking into the hotel and to the room with the girl and Evans turning up and letting himself in the room?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand your point. Does this have any bearing on whether she consented or not because unless it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that she didn't, he shouldn't be found guilty. If she can't remember whether she did or not I suggest there are grounds for reasonable doubt.
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
But it still doesn't prove that he raped her.
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 9/1/15
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 28 of 44
29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33