C.C
Look, if myself and VC are agreeing on something then you're definitely shiitt outta luck. Just give up.
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all, but Germany at their best would not concede 3 goals. They wouldn't concede 1.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Why is this guy trying to steal Stretty's crown?
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 3 minutes ago
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all, but Germany at their best would not concede 3 goals. They wouldn't concede 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany at their best conceded 2 to Poland and lost in an important qualifier
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
From nearly 300 posts the major thing that I have learnt, and will take with me, is that the motivation levels of San Marino are awful.
Well they clearly weren't at their best if they lost to poland, were they?
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 4 minutes ago
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all, but Germany at their best would not concede 3 goals. They wouldn't concede 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany at their best once conceded 5 against England.
Hell they even conceded 4 in the world cup final.
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 3 minutes ago
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all
...............
That is exactly what you said ->
"Well, they lost. That's pretty good evidence they weren't taking it seriously".
comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
I've just seen that this is a poster who signed up yesterday
Are we seeing the return of TCP?? Definitely a returning banned wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No great, this is the return of l, the Maureen loving, follow him anywhere stalker
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 3 minutes ago
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all
...............
That is exactly what you said ->
"Well, they lost. That's pretty good evidence they weren't taking it seriously".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They just weren't at their best, doesn't mean they weren't trying at all. They just weren't giving it 100%
They just weren't at their best
............
How do you know? It might just happen that for once England played very well.
................
They just weren't giving it 100%
...................
So from that we can only assume they did not give 100% in the World Cup Final against England. Maybe you are on to something.
Well no because German player 1966 =/= German players 2016
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 2 minutes ago
Well no because German player 1966 =/= German players 2016
..........
Not sure how that makes any difference?
Please explain.
I am also still waiting for your explanation as to why you were deliberately spelling Vardy incorrectly.
Because they're completely different players so you can't compare.
Yeah, well I'm still waiting for the explanation as to why you like men.
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 15 minutes ago
From nearly 300 posts the major thing that I have learnt, and will take with me, is that the motivation levels of San Marino are awful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the flat out don't give a fwock
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 1 minute ago
Because they're completely different players so you can't compare.
............
I have not compared them. Learn how to read.
I don't even understand your argument.
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't even understand your argument.
..........
I am not making one. I am just pointing out the idiocy of yours.
It seems that not only do you have reading issues, you don't understand what people say to you either.
All I said was that Germany weren't trying their hardest vs England. How does talking about 2001 and 1966 prove they were trying their hardest in 2016?
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don't even understand your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're not even trying.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
OK. Well my logic is that this current English team is way worse than the current German team. But this wasn't the case in 2001 and 1996.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Rashford to Euros
Page 13 of 14
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
posted on 14/4/16
C.C
Look, if myself and VC are agreeing on something then you're definitely shiitt outta luck. Just give up.
posted on 14/4/16
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all, but Germany at their best would not concede 3 goals. They wouldn't concede 1.
posted on 14/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/4/16
Why is this guy trying to steal Stretty's crown?
posted on 14/4/16
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 3 minutes ago
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all, but Germany at their best would not concede 3 goals. They wouldn't concede 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany at their best conceded 2 to Poland and lost in an important qualifier
posted on 14/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/4/16
From nearly 300 posts the major thing that I have learnt, and will take with me, is that the motivation levels of San Marino are awful.
posted on 14/4/16
Well they clearly weren't at their best if they lost to poland, were they?
posted on 14/4/16
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 4 minutes ago
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all, but Germany at their best would not concede 3 goals. They wouldn't concede 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany at their best once conceded 5 against England.
Hell they even conceded 4 in the world cup final.
posted on 14/4/16
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 3 minutes ago
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all
...............
That is exactly what you said ->
"Well, they lost. That's pretty good evidence they weren't taking it seriously".
posted on 14/4/16
comment by Greatteamswinit4times- a terrible enemy (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
I've just seen that this is a poster who signed up yesterday
Are we seeing the return of TCP?? Definitely a returning banned wum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No great, this is the return of l, the Maureen loving, follow him anywhere stalker
posted on 14/4/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 3 minutes ago
Look, I'm not saying that Germany weren't trying at all
...............
That is exactly what you said ->
"Well, they lost. That's pretty good evidence they weren't taking it seriously".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They just weren't at their best, doesn't mean they weren't trying at all. They just weren't giving it 100%
posted on 14/4/16
They just weren't at their best
............
How do you know? It might just happen that for once England played very well.
................
They just weren't giving it 100%
...................
So from that we can only assume they did not give 100% in the World Cup Final against England. Maybe you are on to something.
posted on 14/4/16
Well no because German player 1966 =/= German players 2016
posted on 14/4/16
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 2 minutes ago
Well no because German player 1966 =/= German players 2016
..........
Not sure how that makes any difference?
Please explain.
I am also still waiting for your explanation as to why you were deliberately spelling Vardy incorrectly.
posted on 14/4/16
Because they're completely different players so you can't compare.
Yeah, well I'm still waiting for the explanation as to why you like men.
posted on 14/4/16
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 15 minutes ago
From nearly 300 posts the major thing that I have learnt, and will take with me, is that the motivation levels of San Marino are awful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the flat out don't give a fwock
posted on 14/4/16
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 1 minute ago
Because they're completely different players so you can't compare.
............
I have not compared them. Learn how to read.
posted on 14/4/16
I don't even understand your argument.
posted on 14/4/16
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't even understand your argument.
..........
I am not making one. I am just pointing out the idiocy of yours.
It seems that not only do you have reading issues, you don't understand what people say to you either.
posted on 14/4/16
All I said was that Germany weren't trying their hardest vs England. How does talking about 2001 and 1966 prove they were trying their hardest in 2016?
posted on 14/4/16
comment by C.C. (U20944)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don't even understand your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're not even trying.
posted on 14/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/4/16
OK. Well my logic is that this current English team is way worse than the current German team. But this wasn't the case in 2001 and 1996.
posted on 14/4/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 13 of 14
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14