comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 10 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 15 seconds ago
Need a good movie recommendation. Something easy to watch but entertaining enough. Really wish I hadn’t watched the top marvel films as much as I have…

Might do John Wick 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a related note - have you watched Jane Bond yet NPE? I haven’t yet, can’t say I’m in a rush to; heard dreadful things
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Saw it.

Really liked it.

Even cried at the end.

Lashanna Lynch was actually really good too.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll be sure to skip it then 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can watch F9 instead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably a load better than Jane Bond.

I tend to be sceptical of these relatively low numbers for resolving global issues, if it was 6 billion it would have been done already.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Vince_Evans1/status/1455454477473964037

Polishing turds or positioning Liz Truss?

comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 7 minutes ago
I tend to be sceptical of these relatively low numbers for resolving global issues, if it was 6 billion it would have been done already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is good at doing things on a budget, I’ll grant him that.

I remember him talking about China and how easily you could power all of it with solar.

But I cannot see 6 billies scratching the surface, no.

comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 14 minutes ago
I tend to be sceptical of these relatively low numbers for resolving global issues, if it was 6 billion it would have been done already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm pretty sure that is point of Elon Musk asking how it will work.

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 14 minutes ago
I tend to be sceptical of these relatively low numbers for resolving global issues, if it was 6 billion it would have been done already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm pretty sure that is point of Elon Musk asking how it will work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus I’m sure they’ve raised way more than that and world hunger still exists.

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 14 minutes ago
I tend to be sceptical of these relatively low numbers for resolving global issues, if it was 6 billion it would have been done already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm pretty sure that is point of Elon Musk asking how it will work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus I’m sure they’ve raised way more than that and world hunger still exists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Most of that money probably gets dispersed into other things and into operating costs.

The reason why I find this so interesting is that if they can show how world hunger could be solved with a concentrated donation, Elon Musk is exactly the type of guy to take it on himself to feed his own ego. The UN should he looking at this as a major opportunity.

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 57 minutes ago
What kind of thinking was at work when they thought "smart" motorways were a good idea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Self-driving cars will solve traffic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Watching too many sci-fi films mate.
We live in today, something like 40 dead bodies specifically caused by them.

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 31 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 14 minutes ago
I tend to be sceptical of these relatively low numbers for resolving global issues, if it was 6 billion it would have been done already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm pretty sure that is point of Elon Musk asking how it will work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus I’m sure they’ve raised way more than that and world hunger still exists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Most of that money probably gets dispersed into other things and into operating costs.

The reason why I find this so interesting is that if they can show how world hunger could be solved with a concentrated donation, Elon Musk is exactly the type of guy to take it on himself to feed his own ego. The UN should he looking at this as a major opportunity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not just his ego to be honest, he does a lot of things just to feed in to his desire to Inhabit mars, this is an opportunity for him to learn in that regard too.

comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 57 minutes ago
What kind of thinking was at work when they thought "smart" motorways were a good idea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Self-driving cars will solve traffic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Watching too many sci-fi films mate.
We live in today, something like 40 dead bodies specifically caused by them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They already cause less deaths per 100k miles than human driven vehicles.

That was the case a good two years ago.. and without streets and junctions meant for them, as well as a lack of other vehicles to communicate with.

comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 57 minutes ago
What kind of thinking was at work when they thought "smart" motorways were a good idea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Self-driving cars will solve traffic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Watching too many sci-fi films mate.
We live in today, something like 40 dead bodies specifically caused by them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They already cause less deaths per 100k miles than human driven vehicles.

That was the case a good two years ago.. and without streets and junctions meant for them, as well as a lack of other vehicles to communicate with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I think they’re a lot closer than we all would have thought a few years back. The ease on traffic will be really impressive too.

I can't wait for the day calling a driverless car to take you to work is cheaper than driving yourself. Excellent opportunity to get extra sleep in the mornings.

The Musk 6 billion thing was actually bad reporting to something taken out of context.

I can't remember the number exactly but the UN guy was actually referring to how 6 billion would help something like 42 million who are in immediate danger of dying due to starvation, which CNN (?) took as him saying 6 billion would solve world hunger.

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 1 minute ago
The Musk 6 billion thing was actually bad reporting to something taken out of context.

I can't remember the number exactly but the UN guy was actually referring to how 6 billion would help something like 42 million who are in immediate danger of dying due to starvation, which CNN (?) took as him saying 6 billion would solve world hunger.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaaah sounds about right lol

"Musk was responding to comments by David Beasley, the director of the UN's World Food Programme, who told CNN's "Connect the World" last week that a $6 billion donation from billionaires such as Musk and Jeff Bezos could help 42 million people who he said were "literally going to die if we don't reach them."

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/un-says-6b-worlds-billionaires-031016473.html

https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1455178205657247746

Biden’s COP 26 motorcade lol

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 14 minutes ago
I tend to be sceptical of these relatively low numbers for resolving global issues, if it was 6 billion it would have been done already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm pretty sure that is point of Elon Musk asking how it will work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus I’m sure they’ve raised way more than that and world hunger still exists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Most of that money probably gets dispersed into other things and into operating costs.

The reason why I find this so interesting is that if they can show how world hunger could be solved with a concentrated donation, Elon Musk is exactly the type of guy to take it on himself to feed his own ego. The UN should he looking at this as a major opportunity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GiveDirectly are doing some very excellent, evidence-based work in Kenya and elsewhere delivering a UBI to every household, working village to village.

The results (independently studied) are looking very promising indeed.

I’d recommend to everyone checking them out.

^ This is the kind of shiiiit Musk would already know about if he actually gave a fack about anyone outside his own skin.

Is this like when you predicted there would be no terrorism attacks at Kabul airport and it was all nonsense, the day before there were two separate attacks lol

comment by Insert random username (U10647)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 57 minutes ago
What kind of thinking was at work when they thought "smart" motorways were a good idea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Self-driving cars will solve traffic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Watching too many sci-fi films mate.
We live in today, something like 40 dead bodies specifically caused by them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They already cause less deaths per 100k miles than human driven vehicles.

That was the case a good two years ago.. and without streets and junctions meant for them, as well as a lack of other vehicles to communicate with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I meant smart motorways.

Insulate Britain at it again including Birmingham and Manchester ffs

comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 31 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1455178205657247746

Biden’s COP 26 motorcade lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think DGL shared that yesterday. Hilarious

comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 32 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/PoliticsForAlI/status/1455178205657247746

Biden’s COP 26 motorcade lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Almost a mad as the British PM preaching on the COP stage then jumping on a plane for a 45 minute flight.

SatNav, along with hilariously bad predictions about Afghanistan, has anyone on here being cheering on the muppet brigade known as Insulate Britain?

comment by NPEEEEE (U22712)
posted 12 minutes ago
Is this like when you predicted there would be no terrorism attacks at Kabul airport and it was all nonsense, the day before there were two separate attacks lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? What’s this referring to?