Ginge
When you say suffer do you mean, unable to pay the rent, get a mortgage, get social housing, get a GP appt, get a hospital appt or even cancer treatment as quick as you need it. Or perhaps suffering from cold or hunger, homelessness or working a full week then having to go the food bank to feed your family, or make the choice between heating and food?
All of the above is a ‘shambles’ (a mild description at best, more of a total understatement) according to you. Yet you’ve still not got over the ‘suffering’ you endured shy of 20 years ago and will tolerate more of the above before voting Labour.
Behave yourself FFS
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
It always makes me laugh when the party that left the "I'm afraid there is no money" note at the Treasury accuses others of crashing the economy!!?
The Covid contracts for mates is a silly criticism as well. When my fence blew down last year I got my mate to erect a new one. I could of looked around but why bother when I know somebody who'll do it for a few quid, a cup of tea and some digestives?
Don't know why so many Labour voters get wound up by Lee Anderson, Sunak has put him there to deflect attention away from governments problems and folk are falling right into the trap? He's a stooge and even Starmer knows that, he's just about the only Tory minister who he hasn't said should resign.
The Covid contracts for mates is a silly criticism as well.
======
Fml
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what it pays so I'm not really sure what your point is.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted less than a minute ago
Ginge
When you say suffer do you mean, unable to pay the rent, get a mortgage, get social housing, get a GP appt, get a hospital appt or even cancer treatment as quick as you need it. Or perhaps suffering from cold or hunger, homelessness or working a full week then having to go the food bank to feed your family, or make the choice between heating and food?
All of the above is a ‘shambles’ (a mild description at best, more of a total understatement) according to you. Yet you’ve still not got over the ‘suffering’ you endured shy of 20 years ago and will tolerate more of the above before voting Labour.
Behave yourself FFS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I’m not saying that . I’ve said they have to go. Can’t make it much clearer and yes that means a Labour government.
All I know from their last innings was having no power 4 nights a week, schools closed, bodies piling up in morgues and hospitals, people not able to pay bills; our rent included at the time, unemployment and national strikes, rubbish piled in streets and the like.
What I’ve seen so far is non commitment on practically everything, reversal of policies and fence sitting. It hardly fills me with confidence.
Shambles is too weak a word admittedly.
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what it pays so I'm not really sure what your point is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I mean I that you have to have some decent money behind you to want to be an MP.
£100k for all that daily abuse, your family being targeted, colleagues being murdered, stalked and/or threatened with the risk of being slung out of employment on the whim of the average voter.
No thanks
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what it pays so I'm not really sure what your point is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I mean I that you have to have some decent money behind you to want to be an MP.
£100k for all that daily abuse, your family being targeted, colleagues being murdered, stalked and/or threatened with the risk of being slung out of employment on the whim of the average voter.
No thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahhh right, yeah I get you but Sunak is (if you include his wife) tens of millions. Given what you've said about abuse, security risks on so on why exactly is he doing the job because I don't think it's benevolence.
It would be nice to have someone that actually cares and are not in it to sort out their cronies.
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted less than a minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sadly yes. childhood admittedly but even still.
More recently though, Blair and his bloodsucking family are hardly the epitome of what Labour is meant to stand for I’d suggest.
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what it pays so I'm not really sure what your point is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I mean I that you have to have some decent money behind you to want to be an MP.
£100k for all that daily abuse, your family being targeted, colleagues being murdered, stalked and/or threatened with the risk of being slung out of employment on the whim of the average voter.
No thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahhh right, yeah I get you but Sunak is (if you include his wife) tens of millions. Given what you've said about abuse, security risks on so on why exactly is he doing the job because I don't think it's benevolence.
It would be nice to have someone that actually cares and are not in it to sort out their cronies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100%
As for Sunak the fwcking wet lettuce. Could have done himself a favour with the non dom rule.
Idiot
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve clarified that. The 90’s remind me of the creeps that are the Blairs
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I’m certain I didn’t say the global economy hit was down to Labour.
Maybe you can correct me
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve clarified that. The 90’s remind me of the creeps that are the Blairs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t vote Labour, the Blair’s from 20 years ago scare me
Funny the weird different standards both parties are held to. How did the Tories get this far without riots I don’t know. Labour minister sneezes and you’ll go mental about it.
Amazing the lengths people will go to to justify why they will end up voting blue again at the next election.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 40 seconds ago
Amazing the lengths people will go to to justify why they will end up voting blue again at the next election.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They will say anything to discredit the Labour Party as an alternative except the truth, which is of course, 'I'm in denial'.
Well I’m pretty certain I didn’t say I was voting Conservative again but again I’m sure someone will put me right.
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 40 seconds ago
Amazing the lengths people will go to to justify why they will end up voting blue again at the next election.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They will say anything to discredit the Labour Party as an alternative except the truth, which is of course, 'I'm in denial'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re very good at categorising people without a single sense, notion or idea of who they are or what they think.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
Well I’m pretty certain I didn’t say I was voting Conservative again but again I’m sure someone will put me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that it’s taken getting this far for Tory voters to meekly call this government a shambles is disturbing. Especially when you’ll hark back to the 70’s when considering the other option.
It’s like saying that criminal hasn’t committed enough crime before I’m willing to condemn them for what they are. These other lot stole a penny sweet in the 70’s though.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
Well I’m pretty certain I didn’t say I was voting Conservative again but again I’m sure someone will put me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that it’s taken getting this far for Tory voters to meekly call this government a shambles is disturbing. Especially when you’ll hark back to the 70’s when considering the other option.
It’s like saying that criminal hasn’t committed enough crime before I’m willing to condemn them for what they are. These other lot stole a penny sweet in the 70’s though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet again someone assumes as if I’ve just arrived at this thought.
As for the time frame, I was asked a direct question as you may recall. I don’t hark back to much in my life in all honesty and much prefer looking forward.
Not sure what your final paragraph is about to be honest.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was an American financial crisis, really, which spread to Europe (primarily) and elsewhere due to European banks’ exposure to the same risk.
Brown should have done what the Icelandic government did and told the banks to fack off and deal with their own losses, rather than transferring them to the public accounts.
But it’s always the same, isn’t it?: borrow from the state and/or the public to gamble with, privatise the profits when you win (whilst doing everything possible to avoid paying taxes on them) and socialise the losses when you lose.
Then blame the incumbent government when the country’s debt soars
Tbf, they are to blame insofar as they didn’t let the banking system collapse entirely.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
comment by Ten Hag Bald is Best Ball at its Facking Finest (U17054)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown 🤓 (U14177)
posted 9 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/IndiaWilloughby/status/1629072415023046658
Who was it who was a fan of Candace Owens?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She sounds absolutely insane here. Completely unhinged.
“I have such great contempt for trans individuals and everything they are doing in society… I have yet to meet a single one who is a good person.”
What the actual feck
Don’t call her a transphobe, though…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a lovely person she seems
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think it was Just Shoot who used to defend her to the hilt/use her as an example of a black person reaffirming his views to add validity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And SatNav.
Facking joke that people still actually believe the state of the economy when Labour left office was anything to do with anything other than a bunch of not-as-smart-as-they-thought-they-were bankers and a toothless regulatory regime.
Mark Blyth described it as “the greatest bait-and-switch in human history”, and I’m inclined to agree with him. That people bought - and still buy into - that narrative is mind-boggling.
Right. I have a home to go to. I think anyway
Put the world to right everyone
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 3321 of 4903
3322 | 3323 | 3324 | 3325 | 3326
posted on 24/2/23
Ginge
When you say suffer do you mean, unable to pay the rent, get a mortgage, get social housing, get a GP appt, get a hospital appt or even cancer treatment as quick as you need it. Or perhaps suffering from cold or hunger, homelessness or working a full week then having to go the food bank to feed your family, or make the choice between heating and food?
All of the above is a ‘shambles’ (a mild description at best, more of a total understatement) according to you. Yet you’ve still not got over the ‘suffering’ you endured shy of 20 years ago and will tolerate more of the above before voting Labour.
Behave yourself FFS
posted on 24/2/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
posted on 24/2/23
It always makes me laugh when the party that left the "I'm afraid there is no money" note at the Treasury accuses others of crashing the economy!!?
The Covid contracts for mates is a silly criticism as well. When my fence blew down last year I got my mate to erect a new one. I could of looked around but why bother when I know somebody who'll do it for a few quid, a cup of tea and some digestives?
Don't know why so many Labour voters get wound up by Lee Anderson, Sunak has put him there to deflect attention away from governments problems and folk are falling right into the trap? He's a stooge and even Starmer knows that, he's just about the only Tory minister who he hasn't said should resign.
posted on 24/2/23
The Covid contracts for mates is a silly criticism as well.
======
Fml
posted on 24/2/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what it pays so I'm not really sure what your point is.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted less than a minute ago
Ginge
When you say suffer do you mean, unable to pay the rent, get a mortgage, get social housing, get a GP appt, get a hospital appt or even cancer treatment as quick as you need it. Or perhaps suffering from cold or hunger, homelessness or working a full week then having to go the food bank to feed your family, or make the choice between heating and food?
All of the above is a ‘shambles’ (a mild description at best, more of a total understatement) according to you. Yet you’ve still not got over the ‘suffering’ you endured shy of 20 years ago and will tolerate more of the above before voting Labour.
Behave yourself FFS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I’m not saying that . I’ve said they have to go. Can’t make it much clearer and yes that means a Labour government.
All I know from their last innings was having no power 4 nights a week, schools closed, bodies piling up in morgues and hospitals, people not able to pay bills; our rent included at the time, unemployment and national strikes, rubbish piled in streets and the like.
What I’ve seen so far is non commitment on practically everything, reversal of policies and fence sitting. It hardly fills me with confidence.
Shambles is too weak a word admittedly.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what it pays so I'm not really sure what your point is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I mean I that you have to have some decent money behind you to want to be an MP.
£100k for all that daily abuse, your family being targeted, colleagues being murdered, stalked and/or threatened with the risk of being slung out of employment on the whim of the average voter.
No thanks
posted on 24/2/23
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
posted on 24/2/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what it pays so I'm not really sure what your point is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I mean I that you have to have some decent money behind you to want to be an MP.
£100k for all that daily abuse, your family being targeted, colleagues being murdered, stalked and/or threatened with the risk of being slung out of employment on the whim of the average voter.
No thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahhh right, yeah I get you but Sunak is (if you include his wife) tens of millions. Given what you've said about abuse, security risks on so on why exactly is he doing the job because I don't think it's benevolence.
It would be nice to have someone that actually cares and are not in it to sort out their cronies.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted less than a minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sadly yes. childhood admittedly but even still.
More recently though, Blair and his bloodsucking family are hardly the epitome of what Labour is meant to stand for I’d suggest.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
Regardless of any party I'd settle for some people who are simply bright and competent. That's it. If we can throw in not being a corrupt sociopath even better.
What I don't want is some multimillionaire. Why do they even want a £100k a year job? We know the answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would do that job if all they earned was £100k a year?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what it pays so I'm not really sure what your point is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I mean I that you have to have some decent money behind you to want to be an MP.
£100k for all that daily abuse, your family being targeted, colleagues being murdered, stalked and/or threatened with the risk of being slung out of employment on the whim of the average voter.
No thanks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahhh right, yeah I get you but Sunak is (if you include his wife) tens of millions. Given what you've said about abuse, security risks on so on why exactly is he doing the job because I don't think it's benevolence.
It would be nice to have someone that actually cares and are not in it to sort out their cronies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
100%
As for Sunak the fwcking wet lettuce. Could have done himself a favour with the non dom rule.
Idiot
posted on 24/2/23
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve clarified that. The 90’s remind me of the creeps that are the Blairs
posted on 24/2/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I’m certain I didn’t say the global economy hit was down to Labour.
Maybe you can correct me
posted on 24/2/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve clarified that. The 90’s remind me of the creeps that are the Blairs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t vote Labour, the Blair’s from 20 years ago scare me
Funny the weird different standards both parties are held to. How did the Tories get this far without riots I don’t know. Labour minister sneezes and you’ll go mental about it.
posted on 24/2/23
Amazing the lengths people will go to to justify why they will end up voting blue again at the next election.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 40 seconds ago
Amazing the lengths people will go to to justify why they will end up voting blue again at the next election.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They will say anything to discredit the Labour Party as an alternative except the truth, which is of course, 'I'm in denial'.
posted on 24/2/23
Well I’m pretty certain I didn’t say I was voting Conservative again but again I’m sure someone will put me right.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 40 seconds ago
Amazing the lengths people will go to to justify why they will end up voting blue again at the next election.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They will say anything to discredit the Labour Party as an alternative except the truth, which is of course, 'I'm in denial'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re very good at categorising people without a single sense, notion or idea of who they are or what they think.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
Well I’m pretty certain I didn’t say I was voting Conservative again but again I’m sure someone will put me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that it’s taken getting this far for Tory voters to meekly call this government a shambles is disturbing. Especially when you’ll hark back to the 70’s when considering the other option.
It’s like saying that criminal hasn’t committed enough crime before I’m willing to condemn them for what they are. These other lot stole a penny sweet in the 70’s though.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
Well I’m pretty certain I didn’t say I was voting Conservative again but again I’m sure someone will put me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that it’s taken getting this far for Tory voters to meekly call this government a shambles is disturbing. Especially when you’ll hark back to the 70’s when considering the other option.
It’s like saying that criminal hasn’t committed enough crime before I’m willing to condemn them for what they are. These other lot stole a penny sweet in the 70’s though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet again someone assumes as if I’ve just arrived at this thought.
As for the time frame, I was asked a direct question as you may recall. I don’t hark back to much in my life in all honesty and much prefer looking forward.
Not sure what your final paragraph is about to be honest.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 1 minute ago
Ginger are you talking about the 70s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s obviously scrubbed the late 90’s onwards from his memory. Unless it’s the GLOBAL financial crisis which was all Labour’s fault apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was an American financial crisis, really, which spread to Europe (primarily) and elsewhere due to European banks’ exposure to the same risk.
Brown should have done what the Icelandic government did and told the banks to fack off and deal with their own losses, rather than transferring them to the public accounts.
But it’s always the same, isn’t it?: borrow from the state and/or the public to gamble with, privatise the profits when you win (whilst doing everything possible to avoid paying taxes on them) and socialise the losses when you lose.
Then blame the incumbent government when the country’s debt soars
Tbf, they are to blame insofar as they didn’t let the banking system collapse entirely.
posted on 24/2/23
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
comment by Ten Hag Bald is Best Ball at its Facking Finest (U17054)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown 🤓 (U14177)
posted 9 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/IndiaWilloughby/status/1629072415023046658
Who was it who was a fan of Candace Owens?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She sounds absolutely insane here. Completely unhinged.
“I have such great contempt for trans individuals and everything they are doing in society… I have yet to meet a single one who is a good person.”
What the actual feck
Don’t call her a transphobe, though…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a lovely person she seems
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think it was Just Shoot who used to defend her to the hilt/use her as an example of a black person reaffirming his views to add validity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And SatNav.
posted on 24/2/23
Facking joke that people still actually believe the state of the economy when Labour left office was anything to do with anything other than a bunch of not-as-smart-as-they-thought-they-were bankers and a toothless regulatory regime.
Mark Blyth described it as “the greatest bait-and-switch in human history”, and I’m inclined to agree with him. That people bought - and still buy into - that narrative is mind-boggling.
posted on 24/2/23
Right. I have a home to go to. I think anyway
Put the world to right everyone
Page 3321 of 4903
3322 | 3323 | 3324 | 3325 | 3326