Sky News understands Sir Keir Starmer is considering putting Labour's position on Israel-Hamas conflict to a vote tomorrow in a bid to maintain party unity
We all know how Keith will be voting
I wonder if Keir will toss them out if they don't vote his way.
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
That would always happened late at night when it seemed like they were drunk too
Worth reflecting, Gerry Adams and Martin McGuiness (both senior members of the army council by all accounts) were able to sit down and negotiate peace in Northern Ireland despite at the time being considered terrorists by the British government. Something to think about with all the rhetoric about condemning or not Hamas…
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s funny, I don’t remember giving any orders.
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that Barry something! Not lunatic Barry someone else
Wasn’t me
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that Barry something! Not lunatic Barry someone else
Wasn’t me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m gonna guess BB7
Sir Keir Starmer is preparing to sack Labour shadow ministers who vote in favour of backing a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza conflict, The Telegraph understands.
Figures close to the Labour leader believe more than 10 of his own frontbenchers could end up supporting the amendment if it is selected for a vote on Wednesday.
Keith the war mongerer
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that Barry something! Not lunatic Barry someone else
Wasn’t me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. Think he's based in Dublin.
comment by Dushane Hill (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
Sir Keir Starmer is preparing to sack Labour shadow ministers who vote in favour of backing a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza conflict, The Telegraph understands.
Figures close to the Labour leader believe more than 10 of his own frontbenchers could end up supporting the amendment if it is selected for a vote on Wednesday.
Keith the war mongerer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Human rights lawyer. Funny way to describe a pr!k.
Even the wet Tory Macron is calling for a ceasefire now.
Steve Hedley tells Richard Tice and Isabel Oakeshott "You're a pair of fascists."
https://x.com/woodgnomology/status/1724407124568994248?s=46&t=bPTrpdgNggCdz9igvhmVyw
What a legend
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By calling me an iiinbred means he was insulting my parents.
Out of interest are you Muslim? And why does racism trump all insults?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not Muslim. It's very worrying that you ask why racism trumps regular insults. You seriously don't know?
Explains a lot actually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you a minority?
For all he knows I maybe have aids, so calling me an aids ridden piece of shiiit is a bigger insult that me using racism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, but why does it matter? Your while approach to this race thing is badly warped. Where did you grow up?
Thread needs a new OP.
Therefore instead of an outright ban for abusive/offensive posts something like a week long sin bin could be used
#Breaking Suella Braverman accused Rishi Sunak of having “manifestly and repeatedly failed to deliver” on key policies and said his “distinctive style of government means you are incapable of doing so”, in her resignation letter
There it is
Braverman to Sunak
“someone needs to be honest: your plan is not working, we have endured record election defeats, your resets have failed and we are running out of time. You need to change course urgently.”
Lol
comment by Lala (U3664)
posted 10 minutes ago
Thread needs a new OP.
Therefore instead of an outright ban for abusive/offensive posts something like a week long sin bin could be used
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed
We've teetered on the edge but done well not to get the thread shut
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Lala(U3664)
posted 10 minutes ago
Thread needs a new OP.
Therefore instead of an outright ban for abusive/offensive posts something like a week long sin bin could be used
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is fare
The previous thread got shut down for less.ðŸ˜
comment by groovyduringthewar (U1054)
posted 1 minute ago
The previous thread got shut down for less.ðŸ˜
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah NPE was upset about something and just started calling everyone a nonce
It hasn't degenerated that far yet
Once it gets the million post mark could possibly restart it.
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by groovyduringthewar (U1054)
posted 1 minute ago
The previous thread got shut down for less.ðŸ˜
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah NPE was upset about something and just started calling everyone a nonce
It hasn't degenerated that far yet
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think the wildest thing I’ve ever read was that poster saying they’d refuse to change their baby’s nappy 😂😂😂
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 3833 of 4908
3834 | 3835 | 3836 | 3837 | 3838
posted on 14/11/23
Sky News understands Sir Keir Starmer is considering putting Labour's position on Israel-Hamas conflict to a vote tomorrow in a bid to maintain party unity
We all know how Keith will be voting
posted on 14/11/23
I wonder if Keir will toss them out if they don't vote his way.
posted on 14/11/23
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
posted on 14/11/23
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
posted on 14/11/23
That would always happened late at night when it seemed like they were drunk too
posted on 14/11/23
Worth reflecting, Gerry Adams and Martin McGuiness (both senior members of the army council by all accounts) were able to sit down and negotiate peace in Northern Ireland despite at the time being considered terrorists by the British government. Something to think about with all the rhetoric about condemning or not Hamas…
posted on 14/11/23
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s funny, I don’t remember giving any orders.
posted on 14/11/23
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that Barry something! Not lunatic Barry someone else
Wasn’t me
posted on 14/11/23
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that Barry something! Not lunatic Barry someone else
Wasn’t me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m gonna guess BB7
posted on 14/11/23
Sir Keir Starmer is preparing to sack Labour shadow ministers who vote in favour of backing a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza conflict, The Telegraph understands.
Figures close to the Labour leader believe more than 10 of his own frontbenchers could end up supporting the amendment if it is selected for a vote on Wednesday.
Keith the war mongerer
posted on 14/11/23
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also Clap - the problem you face is that you used what you said as pejorative and you added a comment about age to compound matters.
Don’t get me wrong, Arab gets away with murder on this site. I have no idea whatsoever why Admin1 tolerates him. Perhaps he agrees with Arab a lot? I don’t know but I wouldn’t have someone like that using my site, that’s for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is fvkin desperate. You're trying to shame Admin into banning a poster. Shame on you.
As you righties are always on about cancel culture and freedom of speech, why would you want to cancel Arab and take away his freedom of speech?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Us righties? Gtfo SoQ
How about telling him to stop calling people Islamophobe or racist who clearly aren’t?
How about telling him to stop telling people that they’re AIDS or cancer - anyone here could have been directly affected by those two ailments; yet we’re supposed to be happy when Arab throws them around as if he’s just calling people dcks of something?
Get real SoQ, get real.
And for what’s it’s worth I stand by every word I wrote above. I have no idea how Arab is not perma banned from here, he’s like this every day, every year. Admin1 can do what he likes, it’s his site as far as I’m aware.,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to dictate to him what and how to post?
To paraphrase somebody, "I may disapprove of the schit you post but I'll defend your right to post schit."<sic>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You disapproving would be a good fking start
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I went through the same thing when TBBAB was demanding an Irish guy condemn the PIRA. Then demanding I condemn the Irish guy for not. I don't have to follow anyone's orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was that Barry something! Not lunatic Barry someone else
Wasn’t me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. Think he's based in Dublin.
posted on 14/11/23
comment by Dushane Hill (U11781)
posted 1 minute ago
Sir Keir Starmer is preparing to sack Labour shadow ministers who vote in favour of backing a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza conflict, The Telegraph understands.
Figures close to the Labour leader believe more than 10 of his own frontbenchers could end up supporting the amendment if it is selected for a vote on Wednesday.
Keith the war mongerer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Human rights lawyer. Funny way to describe a pr!k.
posted on 14/11/23
Even the wet Tory Macron is calling for a ceasefire now.
posted on 14/11/23
Steve Hedley tells Richard Tice and Isabel Oakeshott "You're a pair of fascists."
https://x.com/woodgnomology/status/1724407124568994248?s=46&t=bPTrpdgNggCdz9igvhmVyw
What a legend
posted on 14/11/23
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 1 hour, 50 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
He attacked you individually, which is not OK, but in trying to attack him you attacked Muslims in general.
He could have said what he said regardless of your race, gender, religion etc.
You couldn't say what you said if he wasn't Muslim.
I hope this isn't too complicated for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By calling me an iiinbred means he was insulting my parents.
Out of interest are you Muslim? And why does racism trump all insults?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not Muslim. It's very worrying that you ask why racism trumps regular insults. You seriously don't know?
Explains a lot actually.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you a minority?
For all he knows I maybe have aids, so calling me an aids ridden piece of shiiit is a bigger insult that me using racism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, but why does it matter? Your while approach to this race thing is badly warped. Where did you grow up?
posted on 14/11/23
Thread needs a new OP.
Therefore instead of an outright ban for abusive/offensive posts something like a week long sin bin could be used
posted on 14/11/23
#Breaking Suella Braverman accused Rishi Sunak of having “manifestly and repeatedly failed to deliver” on key policies and said his “distinctive style of government means you are incapable of doing so”, in her resignation letter
There it is
posted on 14/11/23
Braverman to Sunak
“someone needs to be honest: your plan is not working, we have endured record election defeats, your resets have failed and we are running out of time. You need to change course urgently.”
Lol
posted on 14/11/23
comment by Lala (U3664)
posted 10 minutes ago
Thread needs a new OP.
Therefore instead of an outright ban for abusive/offensive posts something like a week long sin bin could be used
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed
posted on 14/11/23
We've teetered on the edge but done well not to get the thread shut
posted on 14/11/23
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Lala(U3664)
posted 10 minutes ago
Thread needs a new OP.
Therefore instead of an outright ban for abusive/offensive posts something like a week long sin bin could be used
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is fare
posted on 14/11/23
The previous thread got shut down for less.ðŸ˜
posted on 14/11/23
comment by groovyduringthewar (U1054)
posted 1 minute ago
The previous thread got shut down for less.ðŸ˜
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah NPE was upset about something and just started calling everyone a nonce
It hasn't degenerated that far yet
posted on 14/11/23
Once it gets the million post mark could possibly restart it.
posted on 14/11/23
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by groovyduringthewar (U1054)
posted 1 minute ago
The previous thread got shut down for less.ðŸ˜
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah NPE was upset about something and just started calling everyone a nonce
It hasn't degenerated that far yet
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think the wildest thing I’ve ever read was that poster saying they’d refuse to change their baby’s nappy 😂😂😂
Page 3833 of 4908
3834 | 3835 | 3836 | 3837 | 3838