or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 121476 comments are related to an article called:

Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread

Page 4098 of 4860

posted on 14/3/24

No, you’ve have responded to me repeatedly. It’s right there written in black and white. That’s simply another example of you being, at best, economical with the truth.

You’ve already been caught lying today about the job centre stuff.

I mean who even does that anyway. An arguably vocational role working with vulnerable people and you look down your nose at it.

You really are quite vile.

posted on 14/3/24

Do you reckon we could get the Conservative Party classed as an extremist group under Gove's new definition?

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
No, you’ve have responded to me repeatedly. It’s right there written in black and white. That’s simply another example of you being, at best, economical with the truth.

You’ve already been caught lying today about the job centre stuff.

I mean who even does that anyway. An arguably vocational role working with vulnerable people and you look down your nose at it.

You really are quite vile.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking down my nose at you, Mr Grammar School not the job which I said was laudable.

And you have responded to me repeatedly, Christ it’s not that hard to understand even for Mr Grammar School.

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Do you reckon we could get the Conservative Party classed as an extremist group under Gove's new definition?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s he said?

posted on 14/3/24

Sat Nav properly rattled now.

A right wing apologist, elitist, vile little pathetic man and we can all see it.

‘Oh but I’m having so much fun!’

No one believes you, you have no credibility.

Lovely stuff.

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Do you reckon we could get the Conservative Party classed as an extremist group under Gove's new definition?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s he said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah I’ve read now.

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Do you reckon we could get the Conservative Party classed as an extremist group under Gove's new definition?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s he said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the new definition, which comes into force on Thursday, extremism is "the promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance, that aims to:

1. Negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; or
2. Undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights; or
3. Intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve the results in (1) or (2)."

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Do you reckon we could get the Conservative Party classed as an extremist group under Gove's new definition?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What’s he said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the new definition, which comes into force on Thursday, extremism is "the promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance, that aims to:

1. Negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; or
2. Undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights; or
3. Intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve the results in (1) or (2)."


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it’s just more populism stuff appealing to the right I guess.

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Sat Nav properly rattled now.

A right wing apologist, elitist, vile little pathetic man and we can all see it.

‘Oh but I’m having so much fun!’

No one believes you, you have no credibility.

Lovely stuff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeeees there he is. Busy at work eh?? Still posting in reply to me and about me eh?

Grammar School lol

posted on 14/3/24

I can think of several occasions where they have attempted to undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of liberal parliamentary democracy.

posted on 14/3/24



Absolute state of this blurt

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 6 seconds ago
I can think of several occasions where they have attempted to undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of liberal parliamentary democracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Patel’s tenure comes to mind

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 24 seconds ago


Absolute state of this blurt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A HahHa there he is still

Mr Grammar School

posted on 14/3/24

Every major religion falls foul of point 1.

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 7 minutes ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s actually true

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I can’t be gay, drink beer, have seeex before marriage or go to a strip club as a practicing Muslamic

posted on 14/3/24

Pretty sure that is an infringement of your freedom

posted on 14/3/24

If I was a Jew I can’t be gaaay either or have a 4skin, just like a Muslamic. And I can’t eat whatever meat I want

posted on 14/3/24

Does this.make the Catholic Church's views on abortion extremist?

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 6 seconds ago
I can think of several occasions where they have attempted to undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of liberal parliamentary democracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Patel’s tenure comes to mind
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pro-roguing parliament and lying to the late Queen is another

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Lucious Lyon (U11781)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 1 minute ago
Every major religion falls foul of point 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you mean?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I can’t be gay, drink beer, have seeex before marriage or go to a strip club as a practicing Muslamic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t stop you though eh?? 🤣

Kidding

Not sure if they legally conflict though as the religion and its requirements under god are a choice.

posted on 14/3/24

Is campaigning against the Glazers anti-Semitic?

Is supporting them Islamaphobic?

It’s a fekin minefield these days

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by Mamba the Chief Disinformation Officer on JA606 (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 40 seconds ago
I have never worked in the job centre, you simply made it up. It’s things like this that are the reason you’re pretty much universally mocked on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you don’t work for the council or anything related to benefits?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, as said you’ve made it up because you’re an idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superb rationale as per usual. Perhaps I have mistaken you for someone else but I don’t think I have and it doesn’t really matter either way.

You offer no reasoning, no explanations, no specifics, just your personal tiny opinionated conclusions. You couldn’t make your case to save your life.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Cry more. I mean you could have sworn a minute ago, now you’re confused and may be thinking of someone else.

You have zero credibility and that’s why people take the p!ss out of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not crying, you’re an amusing diversion whilst I’m ill on my sofa.

Still no reasoning, explanations, specifics whatsoever. You’re a clown mate.

Unlike you, I don’t care what anonymous people on an internet forum think, hence why I will set out my opinions clearly and with my reasoning.

You’re either too scared to do that or too inept - my guess is both. Prove me wrong - explain to me why RR criticising Thomas Sowell via no means other than he’s a conservative, has opposed AA, voted for Trump - doesn’t criticise his ideas nor his data, hasn’t read his works, just disregards him because he’s a conservative is different to the analogy I made with me a United fan criticising Klopp outright just because he’s Liverpool manager without looking at his tactics, skill sets not successes. Go on, explain that to me. You won’t for the aforementioned reasons and continue to prove me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You left out Sowell being hostile to the Civil rights movement. Why?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please accept my sincerest apologies Chief.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not accepted. You left it out because it is the red herring that proves that he is a shill and nothing he says can be taken seriously. He is in it for the money and always has been and also works for the Hoover institute which should tell you everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reminds me of people citing Candace Owens because of the colour of her skin and support of right wing culture war shiite.

Its the equivalent of saying its not racist because a black person agrees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Satty was a big defender of little Candy. I'm just wondering what he has to say about her defence of Hamas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol here we go again. A big defender of her or her points? Yeah I think you’ll find it would have been her points.

If she supports Hamas then I think she’s entitled to her opinion much as you are yours but I couldn’t disagree with her more.

If she does support Hamas, then by your logic you like her now, right?

So binary with you guys.


The only person here who actually bothers to engage properly by asking questions is BMCL (a few too many questions perhaps 🤣).

The majority of the rest of you just make supposition upon supposition, stereotyping upon stereotyping, straw man upon straw man. It’s a sign of severe insecurity and lack of empathy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you insinuating I support Hamas? Fvk you.
And what's wrong with working in a job centre, pr!k?

posted on 14/3/24

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 16 minutes ago
Is campaigning against the Glazers anti-Semitic?

Is supporting them Islamaphobic?

It’s a fekin minefield these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its political incorrectness gone mad I tell you.

Page 4098 of 4860

Sign in if you want to comment