comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
Its very concerning when a clip like that comes out and a percentage of the population are seeing it as a justified action by a police officer. We are in deep trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more concerning to me that people on social media continue to judge without fact or context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury #TeamTrump2024 #FightFightFig... (U12980)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Sydney Sweeney (U11781)
posted 2 minutes ago
I bet the people advocating this were happy for George Floyd to die whilst being disarmed as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet you’d be happy for an Israeli to die in the same situation you just admitted so why the fack is a runt like you trying to take the moral high ground
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I did not admit that, I said I would be drooling if it happened to you.
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you believed there to be a potential terror attack you would do the same
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't a clue and I would wager you don't either. But is it hard to imagine that armed anti terror police in an airport may actually have a remit for above the normal use of aggressive force
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
Its very concerning when a clip like that comes out and a percentage of the population are seeing it as a justified action by a police officer. We are in deep trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more concerning to me that people on social media continue to judge without fact or context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bullsheet statements like this one are also very concerning. People come out with florid prose that sounds profound, but if you read between the lines it's utter excrement.
People have always judged without context or fact throughout human history. Why would that be of special concern as opposed to a policeman taking out their anger on a criminal and people saying it's OK?
Further using reasonings like "you would do the same". It's a facking cop FFS.
The levels of utter stoopidity in this country is over the top and there's just too many geniuses around. We are doomed.
So the police should have said "You're nicked son" and the lads should have replied "It's a fair cop, Guv"?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted less than a minute ago
So the police should have said "You're nicked son" and the lads should have replied "It's a fair cop, Guv"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See.
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
So the police should have said "You're nicked son" and the lads should have replied "It's a fair cop, Guv"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were you tasered, kicked in the face and stamped on the head as a child?
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
Its very concerning when a clip like that comes out and a percentage of the population are seeing it as a justified action by a police officer. We are in deep trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more concerning to me that people on social media continue to judge without fact or context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bullsheet statements like this one are also very concerning. People come out with florid prose that sounds profound, but if you read between the lines it's utter excrement.
People have always judged without context or fact throughout human history. Why would that be of special concern as opposed to a policeman taking out their anger on a criminal and people saying it's OK?
Further using reasonings like "you would do the same". It's a facking cop FFS.
The levels of utter stoopidity in this country is over the top and there's just too many geniuses around. We are doomed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol we have nothing common. Draw a line under this diatribe and move on.
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't a clue and I would wager you don't either. But is it hard to imagine that armed anti terror police in an airport may actually have a remit for above the normal use of aggressive force
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter if they do. This incident doesn't fall under the scope of their additional powers. The kicks to the head and knees in the back are not actions for any policing intent. They're not designed to incapacitate or neutralise a clear and present threat. They're just punishing and hurting the idiots because they're angry. Simple as that. It is extremely dangerous to condone behaviour like that from police and this demonstrates how we are slowly going authoritarian. It is punishment for a crime levied by the policemen themselves instead of a court of law.
Facking 1984.
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
So the police should have said "You're nicked son" and the lads should have replied "It's a fair cop, Guv"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were you tasered, kicked in the face and stamped on the head as a child?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't assault policewomen either.
A foreign leader just stood in the United States Capitol, addressing both houses of Congress, and called American people “idiots”.
To rapturous applause from Senators and representatives.
Unbelievable.
https://x.com/alimilaniuk/status/1816186584846438564?s=46&t=bPTrpdgNggCdz9igvhmVyw
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is here? No issue with police using force in these situations. The issue is kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head after they are down on the floor after being tasered. The latter is what I find unacceptable from, presumably, a highly trained police officer.
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't a clue and I would wager you don't either. But is it hard to imagine that armed anti terror police in an airport may actually have a remit for above the normal use of aggressive force
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter if they do. This incident doesn't fall under the scope of their additional powers. The kicks to the head and knees in the back are not actions for any policing intent. They're not designed to incapacitate or neutralise a clear and present threat. They're just punishing and hurting the idiots because they're angry. Simple as that. It is extremely dangerous to condone behaviour like that from police and this demonstrates how we are slowly going authoritarian. It is punishment for a crime levied by the policemen themselves instead of a court of law.
Facking 1984.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know, have you trained and worked as an armed anti terror officer?
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
Its very concerning when a clip like that comes out and a percentage of the population are seeing it as a justified action by a police officer. We are in deep trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more concerning to me that people on social media continue to judge without fact or context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bullsheet statements like this one are also very concerning. People come out with florid prose that sounds profound, but if you read between the lines it's utter excrement.
People have always judged without context or fact throughout human history. Why would that be of special concern as opposed to a policeman taking out their anger on a criminal and people saying it's OK?
Further using reasonings like "you would do the same". It's a facking cop FFS.
The levels of utter stoopidity in this country is over the top and there's just too many geniuses around. We are doomed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol we have nothing common. Draw a line under this diatribe and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've basically said nothing here. Just threw in a fancy word. Sheet like that doesn't get past me. Try again.
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is here? No issue with police using force in these situations. The issue is kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head after they are down on the floor after being tasered. The latter is what I find unacceptable from, presumably, a highly trained police officer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My point is as it was in the beginning. Emotional social media rants and judgements prior to knowing the full facts and context is just irrational.
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't a clue and I would wager you don't either. But is it hard to imagine that armed anti terror police in an airport may actually have a remit for above the normal use of aggressive force
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter if they do. This incident doesn't fall under the scope of their additional powers. The kicks to the head and knees in the back are not actions for any policing intent. They're not designed to incapacitate or neutralise a clear and present threat. They're just punishing and hurting the idiots because they're angry. Simple as that. It is extremely dangerous to condone behaviour like that from police and this demonstrates how we are slowly going authoritarian. It is punishment for a crime levied by the policemen themselves instead of a court of law.
Facking 1984.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know, have you trained and worked as an armed anti terror officer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know because only actions that have meaning in actual police work would be within the mandate of additional force being allowed.
You can't stomp on the head of a guy that is lying flat on his face and knee them in the back and then argue you have the right to do it because you are an airport cop and are therefore allowed to use additional force.
Fecking geniuses. It was punishment and anger, which is outside the purview of police work.
My point is as it was in the beginning. Emotional social media rants and judgements prior to knowing the full facts and context is just irrational.
=====
No it isn't. It is a rational conclusion derived from available and verified facts at any one moment in time. If more facts become available or verified in future, the conclusion may or may not change.
There's with irrational about it.
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is here? No issue with police using force in these situations. The issue is kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head after they are down on the floor after being tasered. The latter is what I find unacceptable from, presumably, a highly trained police officer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My point is as it was in the beginning. Emotional social media rants and judgements prior to knowing the full facts and context is just irrational.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why bring up the other members of the public at the airport being scared then in your reply?
I don’t see how it’s irrational to watch that video and think that kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head is unacceptable conduct. Especially when the police have since released a statement that the men were arrested for affray.
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is here? No issue with police using force in these situations. The issue is kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head after they are down on the floor after being tasered. The latter is what I find unacceptable from, presumably, a highly trained police officer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My point is as it was in the beginning. Emotional social media rants and judgements prior to knowing the full facts and context is just irrational.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why bring up the other members of the public at the airport being scared then in your reply?
I don’t see how it’s irrational to watch that video and think that kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head is unacceptable conduct. Especially when the police have since released a statement that the men were arrested for affray.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because its a possibility they were scared. Its a possibility in that sort of situation in what at this time of year is quite likely a busy airport. I am pointing out all kinds of possible scenarios. Was it yesterday a soldier was brutally attacked? In the wake of that horrific incident,is it possible that anti terror armed police were put on a heartened state of alert and given permission to use increased force?
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 4444 of 4747
4445 | 4446 | 4447 | 4448 | 4449
posted on 24/7/24
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
Its very concerning when a clip like that comes out and a percentage of the population are seeing it as a justified action by a police officer. We are in deep trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more concerning to me that people on social media continue to judge without fact or context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury #TeamTrump2024 #FightFightFig... (U12980)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Sydney Sweeney (U11781)
posted 2 minutes ago
I bet the people advocating this were happy for George Floyd to die whilst being disarmed as well
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet you’d be happy for an Israeli to die in the same situation you just admitted so why the fack is a runt like you trying to take the moral high ground
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I did not admit that, I said I would be drooling if it happened to you.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you believed there to be a potential terror attack you would do the same
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
posted on 24/7/24
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't a clue and I would wager you don't either. But is it hard to imagine that armed anti terror police in an airport may actually have a remit for above the normal use of aggressive force
posted on 24/7/24
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
Its very concerning when a clip like that comes out and a percentage of the population are seeing it as a justified action by a police officer. We are in deep trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more concerning to me that people on social media continue to judge without fact or context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bullsheet statements like this one are also very concerning. People come out with florid prose that sounds profound, but if you read between the lines it's utter excrement.
People have always judged without context or fact throughout human history. Why would that be of special concern as opposed to a policeman taking out their anger on a criminal and people saying it's OK?
Further using reasonings like "you would do the same". It's a facking cop FFS.
The levels of utter stoopidity in this country is over the top and there's just too many geniuses around. We are doomed.
posted on 24/7/24
So the police should have said "You're nicked son" and the lads should have replied "It's a fair cop, Guv"?
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted less than a minute ago
So the police should have said "You're nicked son" and the lads should have replied "It's a fair cop, Guv"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
So the police should have said "You're nicked son" and the lads should have replied "It's a fair cop, Guv"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were you tasered, kicked in the face and stamped on the head as a child?
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
Its very concerning when a clip like that comes out and a percentage of the population are seeing it as a justified action by a police officer. We are in deep trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more concerning to me that people on social media continue to judge without fact or context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bullsheet statements like this one are also very concerning. People come out with florid prose that sounds profound, but if you read between the lines it's utter excrement.
People have always judged without context or fact throughout human history. Why would that be of special concern as opposed to a policeman taking out their anger on a criminal and people saying it's OK?
Further using reasonings like "you would do the same". It's a facking cop FFS.
The levels of utter stoopidity in this country is over the top and there's just too many geniuses around. We are doomed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol we have nothing common. Draw a line under this diatribe and move on.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't a clue and I would wager you don't either. But is it hard to imagine that armed anti terror police in an airport may actually have a remit for above the normal use of aggressive force
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter if they do. This incident doesn't fall under the scope of their additional powers. The kicks to the head and knees in the back are not actions for any policing intent. They're not designed to incapacitate or neutralise a clear and present threat. They're just punishing and hurting the idiots because they're angry. Simple as that. It is extremely dangerous to condone behaviour like that from police and this demonstrates how we are slowly going authoritarian. It is punishment for a crime levied by the policemen themselves instead of a court of law.
Facking 1984.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
So the police should have said "You're nicked son" and the lads should have replied "It's a fair cop, Guv"?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Were you tasered, kicked in the face and stamped on the head as a child?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't assault policewomen either.
posted on 24/7/24
A foreign leader just stood in the United States Capitol, addressing both houses of Congress, and called American people “idiots”.
To rapturous applause from Senators and representatives.
Unbelievable.
https://x.com/alimilaniuk/status/1816186584846438564?s=46&t=bPTrpdgNggCdz9igvhmVyw
posted on 24/7/24
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is here? No issue with police using force in these situations. The issue is kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head after they are down on the floor after being tasered. The latter is what I find unacceptable from, presumably, a highly trained police officer.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't a clue and I would wager you don't either. But is it hard to imagine that armed anti terror police in an airport may actually have a remit for above the normal use of aggressive force
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter if they do. This incident doesn't fall under the scope of their additional powers. The kicks to the head and knees in the back are not actions for any policing intent. They're not designed to incapacitate or neutralise a clear and present threat. They're just punishing and hurting the idiots because they're angry. Simple as that. It is extremely dangerous to condone behaviour like that from police and this demonstrates how we are slowly going authoritarian. It is punishment for a crime levied by the policemen themselves instead of a court of law.
Facking 1984.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know, have you trained and worked as an armed anti terror officer?
posted on 24/7/24
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
Its very concerning when a clip like that comes out and a percentage of the population are seeing it as a justified action by a police officer. We are in deep trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more concerning to me that people on social media continue to judge without fact or context.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bullsheet statements like this one are also very concerning. People come out with florid prose that sounds profound, but if you read between the lines it's utter excrement.
People have always judged without context or fact throughout human history. Why would that be of special concern as opposed to a policeman taking out their anger on a criminal and people saying it's OK?
Further using reasonings like "you would do the same". It's a facking cop FFS.
The levels of utter stoopidity in this country is over the top and there's just too many geniuses around. We are doomed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol we have nothing common. Draw a line under this diatribe and move on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've basically said nothing here. Just threw in a fancy word. Sheet like that doesn't get past me. Try again.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is here? No issue with police using force in these situations. The issue is kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head after they are down on the floor after being tasered. The latter is what I find unacceptable from, presumably, a highly trained police officer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My point is as it was in the beginning. Emotional social media rants and judgements prior to knowing the full facts and context is just irrational.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Arne Sabah Nur (U1282)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Mr Boggart Hole (U9489)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Onana what's my name? (U14210)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yh officer should have known better but hope he keeps his job
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What? He should be prosecuted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's hope be isnt and can carry on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, though? What is your reasoning for this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reasonable force based on circumstances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking someone that isn’t demented.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Put yourself in the officer’s shoes. Woman officer attacked, nose broken, potential terrorists storming the airport and public at risk.
You’d do the same.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I wouldn't you popsicle. Kicks to the head are designed to punish the person, not to incapacitate or neutralise them. How are kicks to the head justified FFS? They achieve nothing. It's an act of anger and punishment which is the last last thing a cop should do. This is why they are trained.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you know exactly about how armed anti terror police are trained? Do you think its the same training as Bobby on the street?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't a clue and I would wager you don't either. But is it hard to imagine that armed anti terror police in an airport may actually have a remit for above the normal use of aggressive force
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter if they do. This incident doesn't fall under the scope of their additional powers. The kicks to the head and knees in the back are not actions for any policing intent. They're not designed to incapacitate or neutralise a clear and present threat. They're just punishing and hurting the idiots because they're angry. Simple as that. It is extremely dangerous to condone behaviour like that from police and this demonstrates how we are slowly going authoritarian. It is punishment for a crime levied by the policemen themselves instead of a court of law.
Facking 1984.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you know, have you trained and worked as an armed anti terror officer?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know because only actions that have meaning in actual police work would be within the mandate of additional force being allowed.
You can't stomp on the head of a guy that is lying flat on his face and knee them in the back and then argue you have the right to do it because you are an airport cop and are therefore allowed to use additional force.
Fecking geniuses. It was punishment and anger, which is outside the purview of police work.
posted on 24/7/24
My point is as it was in the beginning. Emotional social media rants and judgements prior to knowing the full facts and context is just irrational.
=====
No it isn't. It is a rational conclusion derived from available and verified facts at any one moment in time. If more facts become available or verified in future, the conclusion may or may not change.
There's with irrational about it.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is here? No issue with police using force in these situations. The issue is kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head after they are down on the floor after being tasered. The latter is what I find unacceptable from, presumably, a highly trained police officer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My point is as it was in the beginning. Emotional social media rants and judgements prior to knowing the full facts and context is just irrational.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why bring up the other members of the public at the airport being scared then in your reply?
I don’t see how it’s irrational to watch that video and think that kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head is unacceptable conduct. Especially when the police have since released a statement that the men were arrested for affray.
posted on 24/7/24
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by SWTN - Judas is number 1 (U7916)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Darren The String Fletcher (U10026)
posted less than a minute ago
These were members of the public, there’s been no mention of terrorism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I seriously doubt it was perceived as terrorism or armed force would have been used. They are members of the public that have allegedly committed a very serious crime.
What about the non criminal members of the public at the airport,quite possibly with their children.Imaginehow scared those families may have been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what your point is here? No issue with police using force in these situations. The issue is kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head after they are down on the floor after being tasered. The latter is what I find unacceptable from, presumably, a highly trained police officer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My point is as it was in the beginning. Emotional social media rants and judgements prior to knowing the full facts and context is just irrational.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why bring up the other members of the public at the airport being scared then in your reply?
I don’t see how it’s irrational to watch that video and think that kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head is unacceptable conduct. Especially when the police have since released a statement that the men were arrested for affray.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because its a possibility they were scared. Its a possibility in that sort of situation in what at this time of year is quite likely a busy airport. I am pointing out all kinds of possible scenarios. Was it yesterday a soldier was brutally attacked? In the wake of that horrific incident,is it possible that anti terror armed police were put on a heartened state of alert and given permission to use increased force?
Page 4444 of 4747
4445 | 4446 | 4447 | 4448 | 4449