Angela Rayner is 44 ffs 😹

She would be considered a youngster at Glasto

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 36 minutes ago
BBC News - UK inflation in surprise fall to lowest in three years
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czxde3779lxo

Those union pay rises
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest rate cut coming

comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 36 minutes ago
BBC News - UK inflation in surprise fall to lowest in three years
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czxde3779lxo

Those union pay rises
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest rate cut coming
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes but what about dancing in Dj booths!!!!!!!

comment by Oscar. #TeamFury #TeamTrump2024 #FightFightFight (U12980)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 57 minutes ago
Prepare for the Trump Nonsense Factor to soar as the US election approaches. At his rally last night and in recent days, he has:

- Said that his Democratic opponents are "very dangerous enemies from within", “are Marxists and communists and fascists and they're sick”, and that he could use the military against "radical left lunatics”

- Said that Nancy Pelosi and her husband are “so sick and they're so evil”

- Called for the death penalty to be automatically applied for “any migrant that kills an American citizen or law enforcement officer”

- Called for the federal death penalty to be extended to apply to people found guilty of trafficking women and children

- Claimed that Kamala Harris has fuelled an "invasion" that threatens to "destroy" the US

- Claimed that Harris personally allowed migrants into the US who committed murder

- Repeated, again, the lie that immigrants are stealing and eating people’s household pets

- Claimed that Democrats want to allow post-natal abortion and allow “execution after birth”

- Has said under his leadership that the US will “frack, frack, frack, and drill, baby, drill” and, bizarrely, that the US is the only country with oil reserves

- Has said that he will “cut your energy prices in half within 12 months”

Labelling of all opposition to his movement as radical left Marxists and fifth columnists; threats to use the military internally against dissenters; wild slandering of political opponents; demonisation of and proposal of different laws for immigrants; ridiculous populist claims about how he’ll improve the lives of true citizens.

Pretty sure we’ve heard all this stuff before somewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of curiosity, what do you actually not like or disagree with from those pledges?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s literally all either verifiably and incontestably complete lies or it’s a proposal for apartheid or it’s blatantly unachievable.

Are you in favour of apartheid, Oscy?

Do you think politicians should threaten to deploy the military against peaceful dissenters within their own borders?

Do you think politicians should be free to use demonstrable lies in order to demonise minority groups, even when those lies lead to threats against life and the disruption of civil society?

comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
Are you in favour of apartheid, Oscy?

Do you think politicians should threaten to deploy the military against peaceful dissenters within their own borders?

Do you think politicians should be free to use demonstrable lies in order to demonise minority groups, even when those lies lead to threats against life and the disruption of civil society?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#TeamTrump2024 would suggest he is and does.

I find it astonishing that grandmother Rayner is dancing in a DJ booth in Ibiza or 62 year old Starmer goes to see TS twice!!? Why not grow old with some dignity?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Barry.

Angela Rayner is 44 years old and from South Manchester you old, sqaure, fart. Do the math.

Kids, eh?

comment by Joshua The King Of Kings Zirkzee (U10026)
posted about an hour ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 24 minutes ago
According to Kay Burley Labour have pulled out of providing a mp for the usual Sky news interview this morning.

I guess it's wise not to put some hapless minister up to try and justify Reeves hypocrisy with the impending NI business rises or Starners ridiculous fixation with Taylor Swift.

I would have thought after Barry G had his picture had taken with Clean Bandit and stuck it on social media (it turned out not to be them) Labour mp's would have taken stock on how dodgy trying to look down with the kids can be.

I find it astonishing that grandmother Rayner is dancing in a DJ booth in Ibiza or 62 year old Starmer goes to see TS twice!!? Why not grow old with some dignity?

I wonder how long before the back benches start coming for Starmer. I knew he'd be a dreadful pm but he's managing to be even worse than I thought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This guy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pawl told me that Angie could have a life outside politics but it should be gardening pottery or church activities

All the Taylor Swift story says to me is that a number of journos out there can't seem to operate anymore unless there's some kind of scandal to report.

A terrorist attack was foiled at one of her shows, so it made perfect sense to give her additional security for her London shows. Starmer then meets her, big whoop-de-doo.

Could you imagine if they ignored her request and then something happened?

The Arsenal tickets are more of a scandal

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 7 minutes ago
All the Taylor Swift story says to me is that a number of journos out there can't seem to operate anymore unless there's some kind of scandal to report.

A terrorist attack was foiled at one of her shows, so it made perfect sense to give her additional security for her London shows. Starmer then meets her, big whoop-de-doo.

Could you imagine if they ignored her request and then something happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mail, Express and that other rag are always telling their readers about the latest 'outrage' is. Faced with dwindling readerships in print it's all about the clicks and engagement online and subsequent ad revenue.

https://x.com/andrew_raeburn/status/1846309469459767336?s=61&t=ncpdEcJLIN1zPASIYpgYDA

Classic media double standards

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 20 minutes ago
All the Taylor Swift story says to me is that a number of journos out there can't seem to operate anymore unless there's some kind of scandal to report.

A terrorist attack was foiled at one of her shows, so it made perfect sense to give her additional security for her London shows. Starmer then meets her, big whoop-de-doo.

Could you imagine if they ignored her request and then something happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There was no threat and the request was declined.

Only self interest from government officials with vested interests interfered to demand the cover only ever given to royalty or the most senior of state officials. On top of that why not pay for it herself?

Dress it up any way you like but those are the simple facts.

It’s even denied to Harry and his Mrs for goodness sakes.

Harry’s a ginger though

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 20 minutes ago
All the Taylor Swift story says to me is that a number of journos out there can't seem to operate anymore unless there's some kind of scandal to report.

A terrorist attack was foiled at one of her shows, so it made perfect sense to give her additional security for her London shows. Starmer then meets her, big whoop-de-doo.

Could you imagine if they ignored her request and then something happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There was no threat and the request was declined.

Only self interest from government officials with vested interests interfered to demand the cover only ever given to royalty or the most senior of state officials. On top of that why not pay for it herself?

Dress it up any way you like but those are the simple facts.

It’s even denied to Harry and his Mrs for goodness sakes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite right, too

I can get behind the criticism of paying for it herself, but the sleaze angle their trying to produce here is just nonsense for me.

A terrorist attack was foiled and the horrible Southport killings were also during a Taylor Swift dance class. I think it's entirely sensible to therefore be a bit apprehensive something else could happen involving her concerts.

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 20 minutes ago
All the Taylor Swift story says to me is that a number of journos out there can't seem to operate anymore unless there's some kind of scandal to report.

A terrorist attack was foiled at one of her shows, so it made perfect sense to give her additional security for her London shows. Starmer then meets her, big whoop-de-doo.

Could you imagine if they ignored her request and then something happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There was no threat and the request was declined.

Only self interest from government officials with vested interests interfered to demand the cover only ever given to royalty or the most senior of state officials. On top of that why not pay for it herself?

Dress it up any way you like but those are the simple facts.

It’s even denied to Harry and his Mrs for goodness sakes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s a non-story that’s made the front pages of the rags and been lapped up by rabid, snowflake right wingers.

Dress it up how you like but those are the simple facts.

Two interest rate cuts by the end of the year and projections for it to be down to 3.75% by the end of 2025, from what I’ve been advised.

God forbid there is a real scandal rather than these confected faux outrages.

comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 20 minutes ago
All the Taylor Swift story says to me is that a number of journos out there can't seem to operate anymore unless there's some kind of scandal to report.

A terrorist attack was foiled at one of her shows, so it made perfect sense to give her additional security for her London shows. Starmer then meets her, big whoop-de-doo.

Could you imagine if they ignored her request and then something happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There was no threat and the request was declined.

Only self interest from government officials with vested interests interfered to demand the cover only ever given to royalty or the most senior of state officials. On top of that why not pay for it herself?

Dress it up any way you like but those are the simple facts.

It’s even denied to Harry and his Mrs for goodness sakes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s a non-story that’s made the front pages of the rags and been lapped up by rabid, snowflake right wingers.

Dress it up how you like but those are the simple facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How do non stories make the front page headlines of practically every media outlet and stay there for days on end?

That doesn’t can make sense

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 20 minutes ago
All the Taylor Swift story says to me is that a number of journos out there can't seem to operate anymore unless there's some kind of scandal to report.

A terrorist attack was foiled at one of her shows, so it made perfect sense to give her additional security for her London shows. Starmer then meets her, big whoop-de-doo.

Could you imagine if they ignored her request and then something happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There was no threat and the request was declined.

Only self interest from government officials with vested interests interfered to demand the cover only ever given to royalty or the most senior of state officials. On top of that why not pay for it herself?

Dress it up any way you like but those are the simple facts.

It’s even denied to Harry and his Mrs for goodness sakes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s a non-story that’s made the front pages of the rags and been lapped up by rabid, snowflake right wingers.

Dress it up how you like but those are the simple facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How do non stories make the front page headlines of practically every media outlet and stay there for days on end?

That doesn’t can make sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------

By media publications concocting an angle, so that the more challenged among us can be manipulated.

No offence.

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
I can get behind the criticism of paying for it herself, but the sleaze angle their trying to produce here is just nonsense for me.

A terrorist attack was foiled and the horrible Southport killings were also during a Taylor Swift dance class. I think it's entirely sensible to therefore be a bit apprehensive something else could happen involving her concerts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There’s a world of a difference between a bit of apprehension and full blue light cover to a concert venue. What were they expect? A rooftop sniper or a road side bombing?

comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 2 minutes ago
I can get behind the criticism of paying for it herself, but the sleaze angle their trying to produce here is just nonsense for me.

A terrorist attack was foiled and the horrible Southport killings were also during a Taylor Swift dance class. I think it's entirely sensible to therefore be a bit apprehensive something else could happen involving her concerts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We also think nothing of football teams getting police escorts to and from away grounds without the same outrage.

comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - keepy up arbiter. Don’t ... (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 20 minutes ago
All the Taylor Swift story says to me is that a number of journos out there can't seem to operate anymore unless there's some kind of scandal to report.

A terrorist attack was foiled at one of her shows, so it made perfect sense to give her additional security for her London shows. Starmer then meets her, big whoop-de-doo.

Could you imagine if they ignored her request and then something happened?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There was no threat and the request was declined.

Only self interest from government officials with vested interests interfered to demand the cover only ever given to royalty or the most senior of state officials. On top of that why not pay for it herself?

Dress it up any way you like but those are the simple facts.

It’s even denied to Harry and his Mrs for goodness sakes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s a non-story that’s made the front pages of the rags and been lapped up by rabid, snowflake right wingers.

Dress it up how you like but those are the simple facts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How do non stories make the front page headlines of practically every media outlet and stay there for days on end?

That doesn’t can make sense
----------------------------------------------------------------------

By media publications concocting an angle, so that the more challenged among us can be manipulated.

No offence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you’d need to try a lot harder than that to even attempt to offend me. And that would have to be on a personal level which I’m certain you wouldn’t even contemplate.

And we are talking about all media outlets. Not the ones that just have a biased slant.

You don’t even know they’re manipulating you