comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 27 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor you
Or could it be that we’re likely to bring in Ozil, a superior player than mata. For £0
Chequebook Jose
oh unless they bought some players in before pep officially joined.
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 38 minutes ago
The problem is the manager. Allardyce would get more out of the players.
He's damaged goods and we know what happens in the third season.
Time to get Ancelotti in
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good god
My bad. £380 million/£400 million. Still a huge amount.
---------------
But you have a list you said.
What, did you add it up wrong?
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 13 seconds ago
oh unless they bought some players in before pep officially joined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair Pep was a City manager for months before he officially joined
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 15 seconds ago
My bad. £380 million/£400 million. Still a huge amount.
---------------
But you have a list you said.
What, did you add it up wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My list said £400 million.
I’m prepared to bow to a better listmaker in the transferleague website. Still, I’m not far off at all unless you still debate the figure
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 12 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the key and fundamental point that likes of robb will never understand
Utd had stability with SAF. City prepared behind the scenes for pep from way back
I would rather a long term manager and a few years in the wilderness than a quick fix like mourinho, who most acknowledge is a 2/3 year thing
We need to rebuild completely and changing managers and buying Herrera's, lukakus etc will.mean big spend every couple of years with each new manager
And I told you, your list is wrong.
Which you have now admitted.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 seconds ago
And I told you, your list is wrong.
Which you have now admitted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you agree with £380 million?
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 15 seconds ago
Pep has spent £380m according to transferleague
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/manchester-city/english-football-teams/manchester-city-transfers
Same website has united at £295m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they value mkhi at like 38m when they paid 26.5m according to SP and Lukaku at 75m when sources say everton held out for 90m and koeman even said 90+ etc.
it says city spent Expenditures: £224.37m in 17/18 and Expenditures: £191.70m the year beofre so idk where they/you got 380m from.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The link has 17/18 as £212m and 16/17 as £168m so £380m.
And there Mourinho reverts fully back to type. I didn’t think he’d be saying this even before the new year.
comment by Zlatanariyan (U19849)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 12 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the key and fundamental point that likes of robb will never understand
Utd had stability with SAF. City prepared behind the scenes for pep from way back
I would rather a long term manager and a few years in the wilderness than a quick fix like mourinho, who most acknowledge is a 2/3 year thing
We need to rebuild completely and changing managers and buying Herrera's, lukakus etc will.mean big spend every couple of years with each new manager
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ironically you display a lack of understanding
You say you’d be happy with a period of wilderness
That can never happen. The club is a victim of its own success and has to have people like Jose run it
I’m not saying that a philosophy I particularly want. But I’m a realist and accept the reality of the situation.
Either way, City's spend is absolutely ridiculous
comment by Robb 🎬⚽️⭐️ (U21234)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 seconds ago
And I told you, your list is wrong.
Which you have now admitted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you agree with £380 million?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It depends if you include Luiz & Moreno who were bought to send straight out on loan
They would be at least £15m
Robb is a noob but £400m and £380m is hardly a huge difference.in scheme.of.things these.days.to.argue the toss over
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 15 seconds ago
Pep has spent £380m according to transferleague
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/manchester-city/english-football-teams/manchester-city-transfers
Same website has united at £295m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they value mkhi at like 38m when they paid 26.5m according to SP and Lukaku at 75m when sources say everton held out for 90m and koeman even said 90+ etc.
it says city spent Expenditures: £224.37m in 17/18 and Expenditures: £191.70m the year beofre so idk where they/you got 380m from.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The link has 17/18 as £212m and 16/17 as £168m so £380m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i just went to the premier league transfers and manually checked city expenditure this year and last.
If we want to keep up with City we need to keep spending. Simple as that.
People don’t seem to understand we’re up against a near invincible side. How else do you keep up without bringing in better players?
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 15 seconds ago
Pep has spent £380m according to transferleague
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/manchester-city/english-football-teams/manchester-city-transfers
Same website has united at £295m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they value mkhi at like 38m when they paid 26.5m according to SP and Lukaku at 75m when sources say everton held out for 90m and koeman even said 90+ etc.
it says city spent Expenditures: £224.37m in 17/18 and Expenditures: £191.70m the year beofre so idk where they/you got 380m from.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The link has 17/18 as £212m and 16/17 as £168m so £380m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i just went to the premier league transfers and manually checked city expenditure this year and last.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/transfers/wettbewerb/GB1/plus/?saison_id=2017&s_w=&leihe=0&leihe=1&intern=0&intern=1
comment by Robb 🎬⚽️⭐️ (U21234)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 27 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor you
Or could it be that we’re likely to bring in Ozil, a superior player than mata. For £0
Chequebook Jose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mata is superior to Fellaini. Whether or not Ozil is a success at Old Trafford is another matter- the lad is lazier than Martial
Robb is a noob but £400m and £380m is hardly a huge difference.in scheme.of.things these.days.to.argue the toss over
---------------
The point is obvious.
It's simply stupid to mention figures in making a point if you don't know what the figures actually are.
Robb's entire point is negated for that simple fact.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 2 seconds ago
Robb is a noob but £400m and £380m is hardly a huge difference.in scheme.of.things these.days.to.argue the toss over
---------------
The point is obvious.
It's simply stupid to mention figures in making a point if you don't know what the figures actually are.
Robb's entire point is negated for that simple fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. The list I had said £400 million.
Someone provided an even more official list which said £380 million.
It’s noy exactly a smoking gun that shoots my opinion down. Unless you purposely want to have a fight of semantics to distract from the realities of your mega splurge
comment by Robb 🎬⚽️⭐️ (U21234)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Zlatanariyan (U19849)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 12 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the key and fundamental point that likes of robb will never understand
Utd had stability with SAF. City prepared behind the scenes for pep from way back
I would rather a long term manager and a few years in the wilderness than a quick fix like mourinho, who most acknowledge is a 2/3 year thing
We need to rebuild completely and changing managers and buying Herrera's, lukakus etc will.mean big spend every couple of years with each new manager
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ironically you display a lack of understanding
You say you’d be happy with a period of wilderness
That can never happen. The club is a victim of its own success and has to have people like Jose run it
I’m not saying that a philosophy I particularly want. But I’m a realist and accept the reality of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still don't get it.
Let me put it this way, and yes it is hypothetical
If we had dropped down to 15th in Moyes 2nd year but won in his 3rd is that better than what we got with Moyes sacked, lvg sacked and mourinho off the pace?
FYI I think Moyes was the wrong man unless he had SAF helping him for a year or so.
Semantics?
You fool. This isn't an argument about semantics. It's an argument about specifics.
Your figures are wrong. Which negates your entire point.
comment by Zlatanariyan (U19849)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Robb 🎬⚽️⭐️ (U21234)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Zlatanariyan (U19849)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 12 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the key and fundamental point that likes of robb will never understand
Utd had stability with SAF. City prepared behind the scenes for pep from way back
I would rather a long term manager and a few years in the wilderness than a quick fix like mourinho, who most acknowledge is a 2/3 year thing
We need to rebuild completely and changing managers and buying Herrera's, lukakus etc will.mean big spend every couple of years with each new manager
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ironically you display a lack of understanding
You say you’d be happy with a period of wilderness
That can never happen. The club is a victim of its own success and has to have people like Jose run it
I’m not saying that a philosophy I particularly want. But I’m a realist and accept the reality of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still don't get it.
Let me put it this way, and yes it is hypothetical
If we had dropped down to 15th in Moyes 2nd year but won in his 3rd is that better than what we got with Moyes sacked, lvg sacked and mourinho off the pace?
FYI I think Moyes was the wrong man unless he had SAF helping him for a year or so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t run a football club with hindsight or fantasy outcomes.
A club like ours is massive. So big that two seasons outside the CL, while not quite terminal, is quite damaging to the business so we need to bring in safe hands like Jose.
What Pep has done with City is unprecedented. Jose shouldn’t be blamed for that.
Sign in if you want to comment
300 million not enough, give him a Billion.
Page 4 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 26/12/17
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 27 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor you
Or could it be that we’re likely to bring in Ozil, a superior player than mata. For £0
Chequebook Jose
posted on 26/12/17
oh unless they bought some players in before pep officially joined.
posted on 26/12/17
comment by ManUtdDaredevil (U9612)
posted 38 minutes ago
The problem is the manager. Allardyce would get more out of the players.
He's damaged goods and we know what happens in the third season.
Time to get Ancelotti in
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good god
posted on 26/12/17
My bad. £380 million/£400 million. Still a huge amount.
---------------
But you have a list you said.
What, did you add it up wrong?
posted on 26/12/17
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 13 seconds ago
oh unless they bought some players in before pep officially joined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair Pep was a City manager for months before he officially joined
posted on 26/12/17
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 15 seconds ago
My bad. £380 million/£400 million. Still a huge amount.
---------------
But you have a list you said.
What, did you add it up wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My list said £400 million.
I’m prepared to bow to a better listmaker in the transferleague website. Still, I’m not far off at all unless you still debate the figure
posted on 26/12/17
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 12 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the key and fundamental point that likes of robb will never understand
Utd had stability with SAF. City prepared behind the scenes for pep from way back
I would rather a long term manager and a few years in the wilderness than a quick fix like mourinho, who most acknowledge is a 2/3 year thing
We need to rebuild completely and changing managers and buying Herrera's, lukakus etc will.mean big spend every couple of years with each new manager
posted on 26/12/17
And I told you, your list is wrong.
Which you have now admitted.
posted on 26/12/17
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 seconds ago
And I told you, your list is wrong.
Which you have now admitted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you agree with £380 million?
posted on 26/12/17
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 15 seconds ago
Pep has spent £380m according to transferleague
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/manchester-city/english-football-teams/manchester-city-transfers
Same website has united at £295m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they value mkhi at like 38m when they paid 26.5m according to SP and Lukaku at 75m when sources say everton held out for 90m and koeman even said 90+ etc.
it says city spent Expenditures: £224.37m in 17/18 and Expenditures: £191.70m the year beofre so idk where they/you got 380m from.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The link has 17/18 as £212m and 16/17 as £168m so £380m.
posted on 26/12/17
No, £380m is also wrong.
posted on 26/12/17
And there Mourinho reverts fully back to type. I didn’t think he’d be saying this even before the new year.
posted on 26/12/17
comment by Zlatanariyan (U19849)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 12 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the key and fundamental point that likes of robb will never understand
Utd had stability with SAF. City prepared behind the scenes for pep from way back
I would rather a long term manager and a few years in the wilderness than a quick fix like mourinho, who most acknowledge is a 2/3 year thing
We need to rebuild completely and changing managers and buying Herrera's, lukakus etc will.mean big spend every couple of years with each new manager
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ironically you display a lack of understanding
You say you’d be happy with a period of wilderness
That can never happen. The club is a victim of its own success and has to have people like Jose run it
I’m not saying that a philosophy I particularly want. But I’m a realist and accept the reality of the situation.
posted on 26/12/17
Either way, City's spend is absolutely ridiculous
posted on 26/12/17
comment by Robb 🎬⚽️⭐️ (U21234)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 seconds ago
And I told you, your list is wrong.
Which you have now admitted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you agree with £380 million?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It depends if you include Luiz & Moreno who were bought to send straight out on loan
They would be at least £15m
posted on 26/12/17
Robb is a noob but £400m and £380m is hardly a huge difference.in scheme.of.things these.days.to.argue the toss over
posted on 26/12/17
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 15 seconds ago
Pep has spent £380m according to transferleague
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/manchester-city/english-football-teams/manchester-city-transfers
Same website has united at £295m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they value mkhi at like 38m when they paid 26.5m according to SP and Lukaku at 75m when sources say everton held out for 90m and koeman even said 90+ etc.
it says city spent Expenditures: £224.37m in 17/18 and Expenditures: £191.70m the year beofre so idk where they/you got 380m from.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The link has 17/18 as £212m and 16/17 as £168m so £380m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i just went to the premier league transfers and manually checked city expenditure this year and last.
posted on 26/12/17
If we want to keep up with City we need to keep spending. Simple as that.
People don’t seem to understand we’re up against a near invincible side. How else do you keep up without bringing in better players?
posted on 26/12/17
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 15 seconds ago
Pep has spent £380m according to transferleague
http://www.transferleague.co.uk/manchester-city/english-football-teams/manchester-city-transfers
Same website has united at £295m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
they value mkhi at like 38m when they paid 26.5m according to SP and Lukaku at 75m when sources say everton held out for 90m and koeman even said 90+ etc.
it says city spent Expenditures: £224.37m in 17/18 and Expenditures: £191.70m the year beofre so idk where they/you got 380m from.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The link has 17/18 as £212m and 16/17 as £168m so £380m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i just went to the premier league transfers and manually checked city expenditure this year and last.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/premier-league/transfers/wettbewerb/GB1/plus/?saison_id=2017&s_w=&leihe=0&leihe=1&intern=0&intern=1
posted on 26/12/17
comment by Robb 🎬⚽️⭐️ (U21234)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 27 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Poor you
Or could it be that we’re likely to bring in Ozil, a superior player than mata. For £0
Chequebook Jose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mata is superior to Fellaini. Whether or not Ozil is a success at Old Trafford is another matter- the lad is lazier than Martial
posted on 26/12/17
Robb is a noob but £400m and £380m is hardly a huge difference.in scheme.of.things these.days.to.argue the toss over
---------------
The point is obvious.
It's simply stupid to mention figures in making a point if you don't know what the figures actually are.
Robb's entire point is negated for that simple fact.
posted on 26/12/17
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 2 seconds ago
Robb is a noob but £400m and £380m is hardly a huge difference.in scheme.of.things these.days.to.argue the toss over
---------------
The point is obvious.
It's simply stupid to mention figures in making a point if you don't know what the figures actually are.
Robb's entire point is negated for that simple fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. The list I had said £400 million.
Someone provided an even more official list which said £380 million.
It’s noy exactly a smoking gun that shoots my opinion down. Unless you purposely want to have a fight of semantics to distract from the realities of your mega splurge
posted on 26/12/17
comment by Robb 🎬⚽️⭐️ (U21234)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Zlatanariyan (U19849)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 12 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the key and fundamental point that likes of robb will never understand
Utd had stability with SAF. City prepared behind the scenes for pep from way back
I would rather a long term manager and a few years in the wilderness than a quick fix like mourinho, who most acknowledge is a 2/3 year thing
We need to rebuild completely and changing managers and buying Herrera's, lukakus etc will.mean big spend every couple of years with each new manager
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ironically you display a lack of understanding
You say you’d be happy with a period of wilderness
That can never happen. The club is a victim of its own success and has to have people like Jose run it
I’m not saying that a philosophy I particularly want. But I’m a realist and accept the reality of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still don't get it.
Let me put it this way, and yes it is hypothetical
If we had dropped down to 15th in Moyes 2nd year but won in his 3rd is that better than what we got with Moyes sacked, lvg sacked and mourinho off the pace?
FYI I think Moyes was the wrong man unless he had SAF helping him for a year or so.
posted on 26/12/17
Semantics?
You fool. This isn't an argument about semantics. It's an argument about specifics.
Your figures are wrong. Which negates your entire point.
posted on 26/12/17
comment by Zlatanariyan (U19849)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Robb 🎬⚽️⭐️ (U21234)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Zlatanariyan (U19849)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 12 seconds ago
Someone said the other day we are now in a position wherein we have to continue with Mourinho, as any manager who wants to play expansive, sexy football is going to get rid of Lukaku. This club is rotten from top to bottom. I also heard today Juan Mata contract ends this summer and we have not approached him, we are wasting our efforts begging a player like Fellaini to stay at this great club. It brings a tear to my eye, ha.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the key and fundamental point that likes of robb will never understand
Utd had stability with SAF. City prepared behind the scenes for pep from way back
I would rather a long term manager and a few years in the wilderness than a quick fix like mourinho, who most acknowledge is a 2/3 year thing
We need to rebuild completely and changing managers and buying Herrera's, lukakus etc will.mean big spend every couple of years with each new manager
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ironically you display a lack of understanding
You say you’d be happy with a period of wilderness
That can never happen. The club is a victim of its own success and has to have people like Jose run it
I’m not saying that a philosophy I particularly want. But I’m a realist and accept the reality of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still don't get it.
Let me put it this way, and yes it is hypothetical
If we had dropped down to 15th in Moyes 2nd year but won in his 3rd is that better than what we got with Moyes sacked, lvg sacked and mourinho off the pace?
FYI I think Moyes was the wrong man unless he had SAF helping him for a year or so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can’t run a football club with hindsight or fantasy outcomes.
A club like ours is massive. So big that two seasons outside the CL, while not quite terminal, is quite damaging to the business so we need to bring in safe hands like Jose.
What Pep has done with City is unprecedented. Jose shouldn’t be blamed for that.
Page 4 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9