comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 10 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Marksmanship (U21765)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
vvd saved Liverpool from a loss against Arsenal, he was superb.
As for other dijk news, apparently liverpool have the shared best defensive in europe since he joined:
https://twitter.com/FootyAccums/status/1057605707854462976
Brain has been proven utterly incorrect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or, based on this season, Liverpool haven't even got the best defensive record in the premier league, and today Liverpool failed to hold onto a lead in a game where it they really needed to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fluck me talking about scraping the barrel
Do we have to have the best defensive record in the league to say VVD has significantly improved us? Since when?
He was magnificent again today and this article is just a catastrophe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If my post is incorrect, by all means let me know where.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not the article though, is it?
The question is whether VVD has significantly improved our defence.
To anyone that has even half a brain cell, it's pretty flucking blatantly obvious he has.
You've got nothing left, face it, this article is just a humiliation for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were responding to my post, that's why you quoted it, presumably. Poor attempt at moving the goalposts.
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
If my post is incorrect, by all means let me know where.
=========
You diarrhoead verbally when you said VVD wouldn't improve Liverpool significantly.
We've spent ages letting you know this and laughing at you yet you still don't know where you were incorrect.
Some brains are insane you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've spent ages convincing yourselves, but I'm not blinded by your partisan groupthink
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 17 minutes ago
If there was a JA606 sharticle hall of fame this would be well in it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's an exceptional article. Also, you've misspelled the word 'article'.
Brain
How many goals had we conceded at this point last season?
How many goals have we conceded so far this season?
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
comment by Brain (U18701)
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
If my post is incorrect, by all means let me know where.
=========
You diarrhoead verbally when you said VVD wouldn't improve Liverpool significantly.
We've spent ages letting you know this and laughing at you yet you still don't know where you were incorrect.
Some brains are insane you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've spent ages convincing yourselves, but I'm not blinded by your partisan groupthink
=========
Keep going...
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you've now abandoned the thread you were quoting, presumably because your discussion points were inadequate. I was responding to that because it is topical, thats how discussions work. Regarding the original article, I have discussed my points on a multitude of fronts over the previous 800 or so posts, so Im not going to waste my time re-treading that with you yet again. Have a pick through the original discussion if you want to, but I'm not going to spoon feed it to you just because you're lazy.
Brain
Goals conceded since last January
Real Madrid - 44 goals
Barcelona - 32 goals
Man United - 30 goals
Bayern Munich - 27 goals
Man City - 17 goals
Juventus - 16 goals
Atletico Madrid - 14 goals
Liverpool - 14 goals
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
Brain
How many goals had we conceded at this point last season?
How many goals have we conceded so far this season?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For this statistic to be truly meaningful in judging VVD, you would have had to play exactly the same teams, and every other meaningful variable would need to have not changed, otherwise it isn't a like for like comparison. That isn't the case it is?
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you've now abandoned the thread you were quoting, presumably because your discussion points were inadequate. I was responding to that because it is topical, thats how discussions work. Regarding the original article, I have discussed my points on a multitude of fronts over the previous 800 or so posts, so Im not going to waste my time re-treading that with you yet again. Have a pick through the original discussion if you want to, but I'm not going to spoon feed it to you just because you're lazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not made a single valid point to the contrary in any of those posts addressing the fact VVD has significantly improved us.
The only correct thing you have posted in all that absolute drivel is that we don’t have the best defence in the league. Unfortunately for you, it is completely irrelevant to the initial article.
You call me the lazy one, yet you won’t even answer a simple question. It’s because you can’t, you have literally nothing.
Absolute humiliation for Brainless.
Go find that evidence Brainless
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
Brain
How many goals had we conceded at this point last season?
How many goals have we conceded so far this season?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For this statistic to be truly meaningful in judging VVD, you would have had to play exactly the same teams, and every other meaningful variable would need to have not changed, otherwise it isn't a like for like comparison. That isn't the case it is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Safe to say we’ve played harder teams this season so far, City, Chelsea, Spurs, Arsenal.
Also, if you want to go down the science route. When proposing a hypothesis it’s usually best to define the exact meaning in your hypothesis in order to avoid confusion. Particularly when hypothesising a comparison. So definition of the word ‘significant’ should’ve been used to avoid ambiguity. Is ‘significant improvement’ defined as conceding 2 goals less this season, 10 goals, 15 goals? Also how do you measure improvement? Again ambiguity in your hypothesis.
Therefore I think your hypothesis is null and void and your article largely pointless.
How much of a beat down can one man take?
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 13 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
Brain
How many goals had we conceded at this point last season?
How many goals have we conceded so far this season?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For this statistic to be truly meaningful in judging VVD, you would have had to play exactly the same teams, and every other meaningful variable would need to have not changed, otherwise it isn't a like for like comparison. That isn't the case it is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Safe to say we’ve played harder teams this season so far, City, Chelsea, Spurs, Arsenal.
Also, if you want to go down the science route. When proposing a hypothesis it’s usually best to define the exact meaning in your hypothesis in order to avoid confusion. Particularly when hypothesising a comparison. So definition of the word ‘significant’ should’ve been used to avoid ambiguity. Is ‘significant improvement’ defined as conceding 2 goals less this season, 10 goals, 15 goals? Also how do you measure improvement? Again ambiguity in your hypothesis.
Therefore I think your hypothesis is null and void and your article largely pointless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done, you'll probably get at least a 'C' in your GCSE, or whatever they call them now.
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 14 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you've now abandoned the thread you were quoting, presumably because your discussion points were inadequate. I was responding to that because it is topical, thats how discussions work. Regarding the original article, I have discussed my points on a multitude of fronts over the previous 800 or so posts, so Im not going to waste my time re-treading that with you yet again. Have a pick through the original discussion if you want to, but I'm not going to spoon feed it to you just because you're lazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not made a single valid point to the contrary in any of those posts addressing the fact VVD has significantly improved us.
The only correct thing you have posted in all that absolute drivel is that we don’t have the best defence in the league. Unfortunately for you, it is completely irrelevant to the initial article.
You call me the lazy one, yet you won’t even answer a simple question. It’s because you can’t, you have literally nothing.
Absolute humiliation for Brainless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
Brain
“Well done, you'll probably get at least a 'C' in your GCSE, or whatever they call them now.”
Did it bore you to tears?
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 7 minutes ago
Brain
“Well done, you'll probably get at least a 'C' in your GCSE, or whatever they call them now.”
Did it bore you to tears?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your attempts to appear educated are at least vaguely more engaging than the rest of this poor quality suite of contributions
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
======
We have the most improved defence which justifies the expenditure.
Next!!!
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 8 minutes ago
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
======
We have the most improved defence which justifies the expenditure.
Next!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and blows apart the OP!
The OP is already blown wide apart already. All we do now is laugh and marvel at the aftermath of a glorious trainwreck of a brainfart.
What a masterpiece.
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 1 minute ago
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
======
We have the most improved defence which justifies the expenditure.
Next!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If that measure was absolute rather than relative, it would have some value.
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 8 minutes ago
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
======
We have the most improved defence which justifies the expenditure.
Next!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and blows apart the OP!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alas, nobody has managed to even articulate a coherent counter discussion that doesn't involve fragmented, barely literate sentences, meaningless statistics, emoji and insults. To suggest otherwise is ludicrous.
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 30 minutes ago
The OP is already blown wide apart already. All we do now is laugh and marvel at the aftermath of a glorious trainwreck of a brainfart.
What a masterpiece.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you keep returning to this thread, there is clearly a discussion taking place, so your comments and actions are contradictory.
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 8 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 14 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you've now abandoned the thread you were quoting, presumably because your discussion points were inadequate. I was responding to that because it is topical, thats how discussions work. Regarding the original article, I have discussed my points on a multitude of fronts over the previous 800 or so posts, so Im not going to waste my time re-treading that with you yet again. Have a pick through the original discussion if you want to, but I'm not going to spoon feed it to you just because you're lazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not made a single valid point to the contrary in any of those posts addressing the fact VVD has significantly improved us.
The only correct thing you have posted in all that absolute drivel is that we don’t have the best defence in the league. Unfortunately for you, it is completely irrelevant to the initial article.
You call me the lazy one, yet you won’t even answer a simple question. It’s because you can’t, you have literally nothing.
Absolute humiliation for Brainless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet again, not answering the question.
Has VVD significantly improved Liverpool's defence?
It's a Yes or No answer, really not that hard.
(the answer is Yes by the way)
Sign in if you want to comment
Van Dijk won't improve Liverpool significan
Page 36 of 68
37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41
posted on 4/11/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 10 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by Marksmanship (U21765)
posted 1 hour, 39 minutes ago
vvd saved Liverpool from a loss against Arsenal, he was superb.
As for other dijk news, apparently liverpool have the shared best defensive in europe since he joined:
https://twitter.com/FootyAccums/status/1057605707854462976
Brain has been proven utterly incorrect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or, based on this season, Liverpool haven't even got the best defensive record in the premier league, and today Liverpool failed to hold onto a lead in a game where it they really needed to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fluck me talking about scraping the barrel
Do we have to have the best defensive record in the league to say VVD has significantly improved us? Since when?
He was magnificent again today and this article is just a catastrophe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If my post is incorrect, by all means let me know where.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not the article though, is it?
The question is whether VVD has significantly improved our defence.
To anyone that has even half a brain cell, it's pretty flucking blatantly obvious he has.
You've got nothing left, face it, this article is just a humiliation for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were responding to my post, that's why you quoted it, presumably. Poor attempt at moving the goalposts.
posted on 4/11/18
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
If my post is incorrect, by all means let me know where.
=========
You diarrhoead verbally when you said VVD wouldn't improve Liverpool significantly.
We've spent ages letting you know this and laughing at you yet you still don't know where you were incorrect.
Some brains are insane you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've spent ages convincing yourselves, but I'm not blinded by your partisan groupthink
posted on 4/11/18
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 17 minutes ago
If there was a JA606 sharticle hall of fame this would be well in it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's an exceptional article. Also, you've misspelled the word 'article'.
posted on 4/11/18
Brain
How many goals had we conceded at this point last season?
How many goals have we conceded so far this season?
posted on 4/11/18
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
posted on 4/11/18
comment by Brain (U18701)
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
If my post is incorrect, by all means let me know where.
=========
You diarrhoead verbally when you said VVD wouldn't improve Liverpool significantly.
We've spent ages letting you know this and laughing at you yet you still don't know where you were incorrect.
Some brains are insane you know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've spent ages convincing yourselves, but I'm not blinded by your partisan groupthink
=========
Keep going...
posted on 4/11/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you've now abandoned the thread you were quoting, presumably because your discussion points were inadequate. I was responding to that because it is topical, thats how discussions work. Regarding the original article, I have discussed my points on a multitude of fronts over the previous 800 or so posts, so Im not going to waste my time re-treading that with you yet again. Have a pick through the original discussion if you want to, but I'm not going to spoon feed it to you just because you're lazy.
posted on 4/11/18
Brain
Goals conceded since last January
Real Madrid - 44 goals
Barcelona - 32 goals
Man United - 30 goals
Bayern Munich - 27 goals
Man City - 17 goals
Juventus - 16 goals
Atletico Madrid - 14 goals
Liverpool - 14 goals
posted on 4/11/18
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
Brain
How many goals had we conceded at this point last season?
How many goals have we conceded so far this season?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For this statistic to be truly meaningful in judging VVD, you would have had to play exactly the same teams, and every other meaningful variable would need to have not changed, otherwise it isn't a like for like comparison. That isn't the case it is?
posted on 4/11/18
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you've now abandoned the thread you were quoting, presumably because your discussion points were inadequate. I was responding to that because it is topical, thats how discussions work. Regarding the original article, I have discussed my points on a multitude of fronts over the previous 800 or so posts, so Im not going to waste my time re-treading that with you yet again. Have a pick through the original discussion if you want to, but I'm not going to spoon feed it to you just because you're lazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not made a single valid point to the contrary in any of those posts addressing the fact VVD has significantly improved us.
The only correct thing you have posted in all that absolute drivel is that we don’t have the best defence in the league. Unfortunately for you, it is completely irrelevant to the initial article.
You call me the lazy one, yet you won’t even answer a simple question. It’s because you can’t, you have literally nothing.
Absolute humiliation for Brainless.
posted on 4/11/18
Go find that evidence Brainless
posted on 4/11/18
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
Brain
How many goals had we conceded at this point last season?
How many goals have we conceded so far this season?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For this statistic to be truly meaningful in judging VVD, you would have had to play exactly the same teams, and every other meaningful variable would need to have not changed, otherwise it isn't a like for like comparison. That isn't the case it is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Safe to say we’ve played harder teams this season so far, City, Chelsea, Spurs, Arsenal.
Also, if you want to go down the science route. When proposing a hypothesis it’s usually best to define the exact meaning in your hypothesis in order to avoid confusion. Particularly when hypothesising a comparison. So definition of the word ‘significant’ should’ve been used to avoid ambiguity. Is ‘significant improvement’ defined as conceding 2 goals less this season, 10 goals, 15 goals? Also how do you measure improvement? Again ambiguity in your hypothesis.
Therefore I think your hypothesis is null and void and your article largely pointless.
posted on 4/11/18
How much of a beat down can one man take?
posted on 5/11/18
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 13 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 15 minutes ago
Brain
How many goals had we conceded at this point last season?
How many goals have we conceded so far this season?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For this statistic to be truly meaningful in judging VVD, you would have had to play exactly the same teams, and every other meaningful variable would need to have not changed, otherwise it isn't a like for like comparison. That isn't the case it is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Safe to say we’ve played harder teams this season so far, City, Chelsea, Spurs, Arsenal.
Also, if you want to go down the science route. When proposing a hypothesis it’s usually best to define the exact meaning in your hypothesis in order to avoid confusion. Particularly when hypothesising a comparison. So definition of the word ‘significant’ should’ve been used to avoid ambiguity. Is ‘significant improvement’ defined as conceding 2 goals less this season, 10 goals, 15 goals? Also how do you measure improvement? Again ambiguity in your hypothesis.
Therefore I think your hypothesis is null and void and your article largely pointless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well done, you'll probably get at least a 'C' in your GCSE, or whatever they call them now.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 14 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you've now abandoned the thread you were quoting, presumably because your discussion points were inadequate. I was responding to that because it is topical, thats how discussions work. Regarding the original article, I have discussed my points on a multitude of fronts over the previous 800 or so posts, so Im not going to waste my time re-treading that with you yet again. Have a pick through the original discussion if you want to, but I'm not going to spoon feed it to you just because you're lazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not made a single valid point to the contrary in any of those posts addressing the fact VVD has significantly improved us.
The only correct thing you have posted in all that absolute drivel is that we don’t have the best defence in the league. Unfortunately for you, it is completely irrelevant to the initial article.
You call me the lazy one, yet you won’t even answer a simple question. It’s because you can’t, you have literally nothing.
Absolute humiliation for Brainless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
posted on 5/11/18
Brain
“Well done, you'll probably get at least a 'C' in your GCSE, or whatever they call them now.”
Did it bore you to tears?
posted on 5/11/18
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 7 minutes ago
Brain
“Well done, you'll probably get at least a 'C' in your GCSE, or whatever they call them now.”
Did it bore you to tears?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your attempts to appear educated are at least vaguely more engaging than the rest of this poor quality suite of contributions
posted on 5/11/18
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
======
We have the most improved defence which justifies the expenditure.
Next!!!
posted on 5/11/18
Complete embarrassment.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 8 minutes ago
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
======
We have the most improved defence which justifies the expenditure.
Next!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and blows apart the OP!
posted on 5/11/18
The OP is already blown wide apart already. All we do now is laugh and marvel at the aftermath of a glorious trainwreck of a brainfart.
What a masterpiece.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 1 minute ago
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
======
We have the most improved defence which justifies the expenditure.
Next!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If that measure was absolute rather than relative, it would have some value.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 8 minutes ago
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
======
We have the most improved defence which justifies the expenditure.
Next!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and blows apart the OP!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alas, nobody has managed to even articulate a coherent counter discussion that doesn't involve fragmented, barely literate sentences, meaningless statistics, emoji and insults. To suggest otherwise is ludicrous.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 30 minutes ago
The OP is already blown wide apart already. All we do now is laugh and marvel at the aftermath of a glorious trainwreck of a brainfart.
What a masterpiece.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you keep returning to this thread, there is clearly a discussion taking place, so your comments and actions are contradictory.
posted on 5/11/18
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 8 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 14 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 5 minutes ago
Why won't you just address the original argument, the whole point of this article.
Has VVD significantly improved us? The evidence is literally all there, it is a fact he has.
I challenge you, to find literally ANY piece of evidence to prove the contrary. Go.
When you finally grow a pair and admit you were wrong we will be ready
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you've now abandoned the thread you were quoting, presumably because your discussion points were inadequate. I was responding to that because it is topical, thats how discussions work. Regarding the original article, I have discussed my points on a multitude of fronts over the previous 800 or so posts, so Im not going to waste my time re-treading that with you yet again. Have a pick through the original discussion if you want to, but I'm not going to spoon feed it to you just because you're lazy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve not made a single valid point to the contrary in any of those posts addressing the fact VVD has significantly improved us.
The only correct thing you have posted in all that absolute drivel is that we don’t have the best defence in the league. Unfortunately for you, it is completely irrelevant to the initial article.
You call me the lazy one, yet you won’t even answer a simple question. It’s because you can’t, you have literally nothing.
Absolute humiliation for Brainless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Correct, Liverpool don't have the best defence in the league, despite spending £75m on a defender
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet again, not answering the question.
Has VVD significantly improved Liverpool's defence?
It's a Yes or No answer, really not that hard.
(the answer is Yes by the way)
Page 36 of 68
37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41