or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1697 comments are related to an article called:

Van Dijk won't improve Liverpool significan

Page 37 of 68

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 5/11/18

On a side note, if we are judging defences on how good they should be based on transfer fees, Man City's defence that started yesterday cost them £240m. Way more than ours, so it should be expected they have the best defence in the league.

Another nonsense argument from Brainless cuuntt

posted on 5/11/18

Of course there is a discussion taking place about this shameful post and how amusing it is as VVD continues to be rampant in defence.

Did I say there was no discussion? I said the OP been blown to smithereens which you haven't even attempted to deny.

You're not very smart, are you?

Explains why you made this crapticle in the first place. VVD was always gonna improve us, clear for all to see but you were too blinkered, jealous and in denial so you made this post seeking reassurances but instead you've had to endure an embarrassing beat down.

posted on 5/11/18

Brain, if you want I can ask the guys to go easy on you but you'd have to own up to this fecal matter of an article first.

It all starts with you.

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 5/11/18

Answer the question Brainless, now don't go into hiding again

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 5/11/18

comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
On a side note, if we are judging defences on how good they should be based on transfer fees, Man City's defence that started yesterday cost them £240m. Way more than ours, so it should be expected they have the best defence in the league.

Another nonsense argument from Brainless cuuntt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you chose to read and understand the words rather than just see what you want to see, you would understand that isn't really the point being made. And to really cement your failure to engage like a civilised adult, you throw in yet another insult. Very poor.

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 5/11/18

comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
Brain, if you want I can ask the guys to go easy on you but you'd have to own up to this fecal matter of an article first.

It all starts with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What makes you think that you have any influence òver any of the people on here? You don't seem to have any obvious qualities that would likely garner the respect of your peers, and certainly not any of my peers.

Further to that, why would you think I would care about that in any case? This is a football discussion forum, it's just inconsequential trifle in the grand scheme of things.

If you really care what people think of you on here I would suggest you got out a little more.

posted on 5/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 10 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 7 minutes ago
Brain

“Well done, you'll probably get at least a 'C' in your GCSE, or whatever they call them now.”

Did it bore you to tears?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your attempts to appear educated are at least vaguely more engaging than the rest of this poor quality suite of contributions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It bored me to tears typing it.

Just like this article.

posted on 5/11/18

lets stick to the tried and trusted..

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 5/11/18

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 56 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 10 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 7 minutes ago
Brain

“Well done, you'll probably get at least a 'C' in your GCSE, or whatever they call them now.”

Did it bore you to tears?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your attempts to appear educated are at least vaguely more engaging than the rest of this poor quality suite of contributions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It bored me to tears typing it.

Just like this article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet here you still are.

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 5/11/18

comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 48 minutes ago
lets stick to the tried and trusted..


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard content free contribution from you.

posted on 5/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
comment by No Love (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
Brain, if you want I can ask the guys to go easy on you but you'd have to own up to this fecal matter of an article first.

It all starts with you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What makes you think that you have any influence òver any of the people on here? You don't seem to have any obvious qualities that would likely garner the respect of your peers, and certainly not any of my peers.

Further to that, why would you think I would care about that in any case? This is a football discussion forum, it's just inconsequential trifle in the grand scheme of things.

If you really care what people think of you on here I would suggest you got out a little more.
========
Just because you have no influence doesn't mean others are as useless as you mate. Furthermore you're thicker than two short planks if you think you can judge anyone's qualities by their posting on JA606.

I assume you are a decent bloke coming here for a bit of fun but if I judged you by your posts I'd assume you were on the spectrum.

Also, its weak to claim you don't care when you actually do, more than most. Otherwise it would have been easy to swallow your pride ages ago and admit you were wrong.

Instead you plough on, preferring to look stupid rather than to having to swallow your pride, eat humble pie and clean egg off your face in front of your peers on an anonymous internet forum

On the off chance that you were serious all along and genuinely thought VVD wouldn't improve us, then all we can do is

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 5/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 1 hour, 31 minutes ago
On a side note, if we are judging defences on how good they should be based on transfer fees, Man City's defence that started yesterday cost them £240m. Way more than ours, so it should be expected they have the best defence in the league.

Another nonsense argument from Brainless cuuntt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you chose to read and understand the words rather than just see what you want to see, you would understand that isn't really the point being made. And to really cement your failure to engage like a civilised adult, you throw in yet another insult. Very poor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another paragraph of diverting rubbish.

Answer the question you coward.

Has VVD significantly improved us?

posted on 5/11/18

Still going on???

posted on 6/11/18

My favourite thread.

Wish the institution would allow Brain more internet access so he can do more articles like this one.

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 6/11/18

So far, a couple of missed clearances, and also the chance for the goal was ultimately created by a very poor VVD header. Presumably the partisans will say the header was world class but the ball was misshapen, leading to an incorrect trajectory.

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 6/11/18

VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's a few straws for your collection...

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 21 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has he significantly improved us, yes or no?

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 21 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has he significantly improved us, yes or no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly didn't today.

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Planète des Singes - (U4158)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's a few straws for your collection...


----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll take that as a tacit agreement with me.

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 21 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has he significantly improved us, yes or no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly didn't today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still can't answer the question. Coward

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 21 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has he significantly improved us, yes or no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly didn't today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus wept

comment by Brain (U18701)

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 21 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has he significantly improved us, yes or no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly didn't today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still can't answer the question. Coward
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe currently that VVD has improved Liverpool to the extent that I would consider it to be significant. All you blinkered partisans will of course disagree with me, but that is your burden to carry, not mine.

And for the record, I have made my point clearly and several times - your peculiar assertion that not wanting to repeat myself yet again is somehow a cowardly act demonstrates that you assign far too much value to the content of this forum, and also that you probably misread some of the more subtle aspects of social interaction.

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 21 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has he significantly improved us, yes or no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly didn't today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still can't answer the question. Coward
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe currently that VVD has improved Liverpool to the extent that I would consider it to be significant. All you blinkered partisans will of course disagree with me, but that is your burden to carry, not mine.

And for the record, I have made my point clearly and several times - your peculiar assertion that not wanting to repeat myself yet again is somehow a cowardly act demonstrates that you assign far too much value to the content of this forum, and also that you probably misread some of the more subtle aspects of social interaction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Keep digging.

posted on 6/11/18

comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Firmino's Brightest Tooth (U1217)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Brain (U18701)
posted 3 hours, 21 minutes ago
VVD didn't seem to read the play so well for the second either - very slow to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Has he significantly improved us, yes or no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He certainly didn't today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still can't answer the question. Coward
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe currently that VVD has improved Liverpool to the extent that I would consider it to be significant. All you blinkered partisans will of course disagree with me, but that is your burden to carry, not mine.

And for the record, I have made my point clearly and several times - your peculiar assertion that not wanting to repeat myself yet again is somehow a cowardly act demonstrates that you assign far too much value to the content of this forum, and also that you probably misread some of the more subtle aspects of social interaction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh but you do believe that he improved Liverpool significantly. You're merely trolling to extend the amusementpark that is your article.

"All you blinkered partisans will of course disagree with me, but that is your burden to carry, not mine."

You'll probaby feel the burden of the world on your shoulders then since it's not reasonable to accept that the whole world acknowledges van dijks significant improvement. It's just you who is playing games with words without substance.

You have no arguments, that's why you don't repeat them. It's fine to keep your act as the clown though, Im just disappointed that you're not a more clever troll. Would have liked more shrewd and elaborate reasoning to your trail of fought - which of course is a mere fantasy since you've already been proven incorrect by the voice of reason and sensibility. But any real effort would be appreciated. I guess all we have to look forward to is to see van dijk fail for an extended period to provide you some ammo.

'Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things!'

Page 37 of 68

Sign in if you want to comment