I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley (U3732)
posted 49 minutes ago
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were 4 points behind Chelsea heading into the last 4 fixtures in May. I don't see how that is not "competing".for the title. It also hardly seems fair to write off Spurs' challenge based on the fact their only superior rivals had the 2nd best points total of the entire 25-year Premier League era. Chelsea deserve credit for that rather than looking to denigrate Spurs based on it.
comment by Grand Cannon (U18697)
posted 18 hours, 26 minutes ago
Players have no business going on fan forums unless they want their egos bruised badly. We are fans and we are entitled to say what we want, and that includes calling players overpaid spoilt beetards. Bellerin has a lot of growing up to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this the most contradictory statement or what?!
"Players have no business going on fan forums unless they want their egos bruised badly."
He doesn't... he said as much.
"Bellerin has a lot of growing up to do."
Why? Because he doesn't go to that YouTube page... like you said he shouldn't?
I just want to know... which one of THE AFTV rabble is the OP?! Can't see why he'd be so, riled if he didn't think it was directed at him and therefore if he wasn't one of them...
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted 49 minutes ago
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were 4 points behind Chelsea heading into the last 4 fixtures in May. I don't see how that is not "competing".for the title. It also hardly seems fair to write off Spurs' challenge based on the fact their only superior rivals had the 2nd best points total of the entire 25-year Premier League era. Chelsea deserve credit for that rather than looking to denigrate Spurs based on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not denigrating anyone. I've admitted how good spurs were/are.
They may have been 4 points off with 4 fixtures, but Chelsea just had unreal form last season after we beat them. They were never gonna lose it, and nobody expected them to. It was a 7 point gap with 3 games to go.
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley (U3732)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted 49 minutes ago
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were 4 points behind Chelsea heading into the last 4 fixtures in May. I don't see how that is not "competing".for the title. It also hardly seems fair to write off Spurs' challenge based on the fact their only superior rivals had the 2nd best points total of the entire 25-year Premier League era. Chelsea deserve credit for that rather than looking to denigrate Spurs based on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not denigrating anyone. I've admitted how good spurs were/are.
They may have been 4 points off with 4 fixtures, but Chelsea just had unreal form last season after we beat them. They were never gonna lose it, and nobody expected them to. It was a 7 point gap with 3 games to go.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea's unreal form doesn't have anything to do with the fact Spurs DID compete for the title. I don't see how that is somehow mutually exclusive. Spurs were brilliant, but ultimately denied by Chelsea's super-consistency. A team that goes into the month of May 4 points off the leaders with 4 matches to go (and 12 points to fight for) were certainly title contenders.
Agree to disagree.
"Bellerin has a lot of growing up to do."
Why? Because he doesn't go to that YouTube page... like you said he shouldn't?
-----------------------------------------
In a thread of many strawman arguments, this is the worst. There is not one single person here that criticized Bellerin because he didn't go to a Youtube page.
The sheer absurdity of that strawman is hard to put into words.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 9 minutes ago
"Bellerin has a lot of growing up to do."
Why? Because he doesn't go to that YouTube page... like you said he shouldn't?
-----------------------------------------
In a thread of many strawman arguments, this is the worst. There is not one single person here that criticized Bellerin because he didn't go to a Youtube page.
The sheer absurdity of that strawman is hard to put into words.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Try:
1. Taking it in the context of the entire response rather than the bit that you decided fitted your argument
2. Taking it as the facetious response to Grand Cannon it was.
Or just be a bent out of shape over an Internet comment as you are...
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted 49 minutes ago
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were 4 points behind Chelsea heading into the last 4 fixtures in May. I don't see how that is not "competing".for the title. It also hardly seems fair to write off Spurs' challenge based on the fact their only superior rivals had the 2nd best points total of the entire 25-year Premier League era. Chelsea deserve credit for that rather than looking to denigrate Spurs based on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not denigrating anyone. I've admitted how good spurs were/are.
They may have been 4 points off with 4 fixtures, but Chelsea just had unreal form last season after we beat them. They were never gonna lose it, and nobody expected them to. It was a 7 point gap with 3 games to go.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea's unreal form doesn't have anything to do with the fact Spurs DID compete for the title. I don't see how that is somehow mutually exclusive. Spurs were brilliant, but ultimately denied by Chelsea's super-consistency. A team that goes into the month of May 4 points off the leaders with 4 matches to go (and 12 points to fight for) were certainly title contenders.
Agree to disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
Just to show you where I was coming from though, Chelsea's form showed they were never gonna lose it. Not everything has to be brought down to numbers.
Of course anything can happen, but Chelsea losing it from there would have been a total shock, even Spurs fans wouldn't have expected it.
Ultimately, they finished 7 points off, same as us in 2014 when we got rag-dolled by all the big boys away from home.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HectorBellerin/status/964891032616951808
😂
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 4 hours, 40 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/HectorBellerin/status/964891032616951808
😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So I ask again... which one of the AFTV lot is Sheriff...?
comment by Song's gone but Santi coming to town make... (U12977)
posted 14 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 4 hours, 40 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/HectorBellerin/status/964891032616951808
😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So I ask again... which one of the AFTV lot is Sheriff...?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not Moh, he called the likes of Sheriff "princesses"
@HectorBellerin
Anyway, in the @OxfordUnion talk I spoke about Mental Health, Healthy Life Balace, Racism which @RhianBrewster9 and many are subjects of in football, and other key society problems. Maybe we should focus on all opening up about these also..
_____
Whatever, Hector. You slagged off AFTV, so F_CK you!
Sign in if you want to comment
Bellerin criticizes ArsenalFanTV.
Page 5 of 5
posted on 17/2/18
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
posted on 17/2/18
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley (U3732)
posted 49 minutes ago
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were 4 points behind Chelsea heading into the last 4 fixtures in May. I don't see how that is not "competing".for the title. It also hardly seems fair to write off Spurs' challenge based on the fact their only superior rivals had the 2nd best points total of the entire 25-year Premier League era. Chelsea deserve credit for that rather than looking to denigrate Spurs based on it.
posted on 17/2/18
comment by Grand Cannon (U18697)
posted 18 hours, 26 minutes ago
Players have no business going on fan forums unless they want their egos bruised badly. We are fans and we are entitled to say what we want, and that includes calling players overpaid spoilt beetards. Bellerin has a lot of growing up to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this the most contradictory statement or what?!
"Players have no business going on fan forums unless they want their egos bruised badly."
He doesn't... he said as much.
"Bellerin has a lot of growing up to do."
Why? Because he doesn't go to that YouTube page... like you said he shouldn't?
posted on 17/2/18
I just want to know... which one of THE AFTV rabble is the OP?! Can't see why he'd be so, riled if he didn't think it was directed at him and therefore if he wasn't one of them...
posted on 17/2/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted 49 minutes ago
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were 4 points behind Chelsea heading into the last 4 fixtures in May. I don't see how that is not "competing".for the title. It also hardly seems fair to write off Spurs' challenge based on the fact their only superior rivals had the 2nd best points total of the entire 25-year Premier League era. Chelsea deserve credit for that rather than looking to denigrate Spurs based on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not denigrating anyone. I've admitted how good spurs were/are.
They may have been 4 points off with 4 fixtures, but Chelsea just had unreal form last season after we beat them. They were never gonna lose it, and nobody expected them to. It was a 7 point gap with 3 games to go.
posted on 17/2/18
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley (U3732)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted 49 minutes ago
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were 4 points behind Chelsea heading into the last 4 fixtures in May. I don't see how that is not "competing".for the title. It also hardly seems fair to write off Spurs' challenge based on the fact their only superior rivals had the 2nd best points total of the entire 25-year Premier League era. Chelsea deserve credit for that rather than looking to denigrate Spurs based on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not denigrating anyone. I've admitted how good spurs were/are.
They may have been 4 points off with 4 fixtures, but Chelsea just had unreal form last season after we beat them. They were never gonna lose it, and nobody expected them to. It was a 7 point gap with 3 games to go.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea's unreal form doesn't have anything to do with the fact Spurs DID compete for the title. I don't see how that is somehow mutually exclusive. Spurs were brilliant, but ultimately denied by Chelsea's super-consistency. A team that goes into the month of May 4 points off the leaders with 4 matches to go (and 12 points to fight for) were certainly title contenders.
Agree to disagree.
posted on 17/2/18
"Bellerin has a lot of growing up to do."
Why? Because he doesn't go to that YouTube page... like you said he shouldn't?
-----------------------------------------
In a thread of many strawman arguments, this is the worst. There is not one single person here that criticized Bellerin because he didn't go to a Youtube page.
The sheer absurdity of that strawman is hard to put into words.
posted on 17/2/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 9 minutes ago
"Bellerin has a lot of growing up to do."
Why? Because he doesn't go to that YouTube page... like you said he shouldn't?
-----------------------------------------
In a thread of many strawman arguments, this is the worst. There is not one single person here that criticized Bellerin because he didn't go to a Youtube page.
The sheer absurdity of that strawman is hard to put into words.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Try:
1. Taking it in the context of the entire response rather than the bit that you decided fitted your argument
2. Taking it as the facetious response to Grand Cannon it was.
Or just be a bent out of shape over an Internet comment as you are...
posted on 17/2/18
*as
posted on 17/2/18
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - bring back David Dein (U7482)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Tu Meke Ainsley(U3732)
posted 49 minutes ago
I'm not denying how good they were/are, but I don't believe they challenged for the title. Chelsea were always comfortable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They were 4 points behind Chelsea heading into the last 4 fixtures in May. I don't see how that is not "competing".for the title. It also hardly seems fair to write off Spurs' challenge based on the fact their only superior rivals had the 2nd best points total of the entire 25-year Premier League era. Chelsea deserve credit for that rather than looking to denigrate Spurs based on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not denigrating anyone. I've admitted how good spurs were/are.
They may have been 4 points off with 4 fixtures, but Chelsea just had unreal form last season after we beat them. They were never gonna lose it, and nobody expected them to. It was a 7 point gap with 3 games to go.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea's unreal form doesn't have anything to do with the fact Spurs DID compete for the title. I don't see how that is somehow mutually exclusive. Spurs were brilliant, but ultimately denied by Chelsea's super-consistency. A team that goes into the month of May 4 points off the leaders with 4 matches to go (and 12 points to fight for) were certainly title contenders.
Agree to disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
Just to show you where I was coming from though, Chelsea's form showed they were never gonna lose it. Not everything has to be brought down to numbers.
Of course anything can happen, but Chelsea losing it from there would have been a total shock, even Spurs fans wouldn't have expected it.
Ultimately, they finished 7 points off, same as us in 2014 when we got rag-dolled by all the big boys away from home.
posted on 17/2/18
https://mobile.twitter.com/HectorBellerin/status/964891032616951808
😂
posted on 18/2/18
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 4 hours, 40 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/HectorBellerin/status/964891032616951808
😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So I ask again... which one of the AFTV lot is Sheriff...?
posted on 18/2/18
Osar
posted on 18/2/18
comment by Song's gone but Santi coming to town make... (U12977)
posted 14 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U18355)
posted 4 hours, 40 minutes ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/HectorBellerin/status/964891032616951808
😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So I ask again... which one of the AFTV lot is Sheriff...?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not Moh, he called the likes of Sheriff "princesses"
posted on 19/2/18
@HectorBellerin
Anyway, in the @OxfordUnion talk I spoke about Mental Health, Healthy Life Balace, Racism which @RhianBrewster9 and many are subjects of in football, and other key society problems. Maybe we should focus on all opening up about these also..
_____
Whatever, Hector. You slagged off AFTV, so F_CK you!
Page 5 of 5