Even more scary is how Oxenford didn't give that out. Was plum.
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 40 minutes ago
Best case scenario here:
- We hit 500+ with Cook, Root and Stokes scoring tons
- We go on to win the match and the series
- Jennings gets a king pair
That way we can call up Burns for the last test, which will be a lower-pressure dead rubber.
If anyone is calling for Vince to be selected, then I'm afraid your opinion is invalid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All going according to plan so far
Good ball from Bumrah to be fair, but a comically amateurish way to get out to it.
Bumrah’s no ball doesn’t cost much. Need to get cook and bairstow our quickly
Even more scary is how Oxenford didn't give that out. Was plum.
_____
and missed a No ball in a first place...2 errors !
Viru did we lose a review because of the no ball?
Find it difficult to understand how some of these players that England have tried have scored tons of runs in county but can’t buy a run in international cricket. Wonder whether that says much about the quality of bowling or the mindset of the players generally.
Kav don’t think we have lost the review
Jennings is done as a test player.
Imagine a proper bowler like Jimmy with the ball doing this. India would be 3/4 down by now
comment by Pidier Pogba (U11414)
posted 33 seconds ago
Imagine a proper bowler like Jimmy with the ball doing this. India would be 3/4 down by now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, like we were last test. Pipe down.
Review is still intact for India, don't worry.
Find it difficult to understand how some of these players that England have tried have scored tons of runs in county but can’t buy a run in international cricket. Wonder whether that says much about the quality of bowling or the mindset of the players generally.
+++++++
May be county level bowling is avg at its best and batsmen are not tested enough? Unlike Ranji ?
Ranji is hardly the highest of levels either tbf. Ishant is bowling some wonderful stuff here.
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
Best case scenario here:
- We hit 500+ with Cook, Root and Stokes scoring tons
- We go on to win the match and the series
- Jennings gets a king pair
That way we can call up Burns for the last test, which will be a lower-pressure dead rubber.
If anyone is calling for Vince to be selected, then I'm afraid your opinion is invalid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes sense to have picked Vince for this match at least.
Jennings deserves to be shot.
No, it made sense to pick Burns. Vince is no more a Test bat than Jennings.
Unless you mean having already called Vince up, in which case I suppose I agree. Vince is pretty pants at Test level, but he's certainly no worse than Jennings.
The big difference is that Vince has an excellent technique - and clearly the talent - Jennings clearly doesnt.
Vince is just too loose - if he could tighten up he’d be as good as anyone in the side
I think Vince would have put up a good score today based on form and being used to playing here. I also think people are a little harsh on him based on the Aussie series.
Not that I think he should necessarily open going forwards; he is just comfortably better than Jennings.
If England can get 250/300.. India will lose
A lamppost would score more than Jennings.
If England can get 250/300.. India will lose
__
I like your confidence
Sign in if you want to comment
England summer 2018 vs India
Page 58 of 104
59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63
posted on 30/8/18
Bumrah - more like bumma
posted on 30/8/18
Pathetic from Jennings
posted on 30/8/18
Even more scary is how Oxenford didn't give that out. Was plum.
posted on 30/8/18
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 40 minutes ago
Best case scenario here:
- We hit 500+ with Cook, Root and Stokes scoring tons
- We go on to win the match and the series
- Jennings gets a king pair
That way we can call up Burns for the last test, which will be a lower-pressure dead rubber.
If anyone is calling for Vince to be selected, then I'm afraid your opinion is invalid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All going according to plan so far
Good ball from Bumrah to be fair, but a comically amateurish way to get out to it.
posted on 30/8/18
root gone for 4.
posted on 30/8/18
Beauty from Ishant
posted on 30/8/18
Pathetic from Root
posted on 30/8/18
Bumrah’s no ball doesn’t cost much. Need to get cook and bairstow our quickly
posted on 30/8/18
Even more scary is how Oxenford didn't give that out. Was plum.
_____
and missed a No ball in a first place...2 errors !
posted on 30/8/18
Viru did we lose a review because of the no ball?
posted on 30/8/18
Find it difficult to understand how some of these players that England have tried have scored tons of runs in county but can’t buy a run in international cricket. Wonder whether that says much about the quality of bowling or the mindset of the players generally.
posted on 30/8/18
Kav don’t think we have lost the review
posted on 30/8/18
Jennings is done as a test player.
posted on 30/8/18
Imagine a proper bowler like Jimmy with the ball doing this. India would be 3/4 down by now
posted on 30/8/18
comment by Pidier Pogba (U11414)
posted 33 seconds ago
Imagine a proper bowler like Jimmy with the ball doing this. India would be 3/4 down by now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, like we were last test. Pipe down.
posted on 30/8/18
Review is still intact for India, don't worry.
Find it difficult to understand how some of these players that England have tried have scored tons of runs in county but can’t buy a run in international cricket. Wonder whether that says much about the quality of bowling or the mindset of the players generally.
+++++++
May be county level bowling is avg at its best and batsmen are not tested enough? Unlike Ranji ?
posted on 30/8/18
Ranji is hardly the highest of levels either tbf. Ishant is bowling some wonderful stuff here.
posted on 30/8/18
comment by HaaK (U11574)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
Best case scenario here:
- We hit 500+ with Cook, Root and Stokes scoring tons
- We go on to win the match and the series
- Jennings gets a king pair
That way we can call up Burns for the last test, which will be a lower-pressure dead rubber.
If anyone is calling for Vince to be selected, then I'm afraid your opinion is invalid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It makes sense to have picked Vince for this match at least.
Jennings deserves to be shot.
posted on 30/8/18
No, it made sense to pick Burns. Vince is no more a Test bat than Jennings.
posted on 30/8/18
Unless you mean having already called Vince up, in which case I suppose I agree. Vince is pretty pants at Test level, but he's certainly no worse than Jennings.
posted on 30/8/18
The big difference is that Vince has an excellent technique - and clearly the talent - Jennings clearly doesnt.
Vince is just too loose - if he could tighten up he’d be as good as anyone in the side
posted on 30/8/18
I think Vince would have put up a good score today based on form and being used to playing here. I also think people are a little harsh on him based on the Aussie series.
Not that I think he should necessarily open going forwards; he is just comfortably better than Jennings.
posted on 30/8/18
If England can get 250/300.. India will lose
posted on 30/8/18
A lamppost would score more than Jennings.
posted on 30/8/18
If England can get 250/300.. India will lose
__
I like your confidence
Page 58 of 104
59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63