If it wasn't for biiitch boy Hazard, Oscuuunt and Ivanobiiiitch, Mourinho would still be Chelsea manager today

comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 1 minute ago
How is Hazard a level above Sterling and Mane? Let's compare stats:

Hazard goals 17/18 = 17
Mane goals 17/18 = 20
Sterling goals 17/18 = 23

Hazard goals 18/19 = 16
Mane goals 18/19 = 20
Sterling goals 18/19 = 19

What a surprise, both outscoring Hazard in each of the last two seasons. AND Hazard takes penalties, the other two don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many managers make special exceptions for mane and sterling?

e.g Man marking, doubling up on etc?

comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 3 minutes ago
If it wasn't for biiitch boy Hazard, Oscuuunt and Ivanobiiiitch, Mourinho would still be Chelsea manager today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then why didn't he drop them before it was too late then?

They don't do that for Mane and Sterling because if you double up on Sterling you have no one for Aguero and Sane and if you double up on Mane you have no one for Salah and Firmino.

comment by DL11 (U21614)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 3 minutes ago
If it wasn't for biiitch boy Hazard, Oscuuunt and Ivanobiiiitch, Mourinho would still be Chelsea manager today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then why didn't he drop them before it was too late then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guess that's him scarpered

He didn't drop them because he didn't have any options because the board didn't sign John Stones, Pogba and another winger like he asked for in the summer.

comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 21 seconds ago
He didn't drop them because he didn't have any options because the board didn't sign John Stones, Pogba and another winger like he asked for in the summer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He could have gone 433, had Willian and Pedro flanking Costa and he could have put Azpi at RB and told the board to block Filipe Luis's move back to Spain.

Really difficult one to answer this. Hazard has that something special in him that makes you think he could be the best in the world. The trouble is it comes out in bursts. The other two probably has less natural talent but they are much more consistent. Hazard doesn't score anywhere near enough goals for a player in his position. He is the better footballer but much less productive.

Pedro was shiiit and he'd already sold Luis by the time the rats had started downing tools.

His options were Remy and Falcao pretty much. So no actual good options.

How do you explain in the first game after Mourinho is fired Oscar is man of the match and Chelsea win 3-1?

1- hazard
2- mane
3- sterling

Hazard doesn't score anywhere near enough goals for a player in his position.
------------------------------

He's our main goalscorer as well, so no excuses.

Falcao wasn't a good option?

Falcao was a flop for Chelsea. Answer my question: How do you explain in the first game after Mourinho is fired Oscar is man of the match and Chelsea win 3-1?

Jose himself seemed to disagree with you on that one.

"It hurts me that people in England think that the real Falcao is the one we saw at Manchester United."

I don't rate Hazard tbh. He doesn't score anywhere near enough goals for a forward. Highly skilful player though.

Mane hasn't done enough though so far in his career. He hasn't won anything.

For me...

1) Sterling - loads of skill, goals, assists and titles.

2) Hazard

3) Mane (but this could change if he guides Liverpool to the PL or CL)

comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 30 minutes ago
How is Hazard a level above Sterling and Mane? Let's compare stats:

Hazard goals 17/18 = 17
Mane goals 17/18 = 20
Sterling goals 17/18 = 23

Hazard goals 18/19 = 16
Mane goals 18/19 = 20
Sterling goals 18/19 = 19

What a surprise, both outscoring Hazard in each of the last two seasons. AND Hazard takes penalties, the other two don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And both play in free scoring teams whereas Hazard has been mismanaged for two years. Hazard is undoubtedly a better player than both.

I don't rate Hazard tbh. He doesn't score anywhere near enough goals for a forward. Highly skilful player though.
----------------------------------------
My thoughts on him exactly.

comment by DL11 (U21614)
posted 3 minutes ago
Jose himself seemed to disagree with you on that one.

"It hurts me that people in England think that the real Falcao is the one we saw at Manchester United."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer my question

comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 30 minutes ago
How is Hazard a level above Sterling and Mane? Let's compare stats:

Hazard goals 17/18 = 17
Mane goals 17/18 = 20
Sterling goals 17/18 = 23

Hazard goals 18/19 = 16
Mane goals 18/19 = 20
Sterling goals 18/19 = 19

What a surprise, both outscoring Hazard in each of the last two seasons. AND Hazard takes penalties, the other two don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And both play in free scoring teams whereas Hazard has been mismanaged for two years. Hazard is undoubtedly a better player than both.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazard has been mismanaged for two years? He played as a striker largely for conte last season in a 3-5-2 and I was told Sarri is a very attacking manager. Also, is 17 and 16 goals enough goals for a forward who takes penalties who claims to be world class? Definitely not.

comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 1 second ago
comment by The Lambeau Leap (U21050)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 30 minutes ago
How is Hazard a level above Sterling and Mane? Let's compare stats:

Hazard goals 17/18 = 17
Mane goals 17/18 = 20
Sterling goals 17/18 = 23

Hazard goals 18/19 = 16
Mane goals 18/19 = 20
Sterling goals 18/19 = 19

What a surprise, both outscoring Hazard in each of the last two seasons. AND Hazard takes penalties, the other two don't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And both play in free scoring teams whereas Hazard has been mismanaged for two years. Hazard is undoubtedly a better player than both.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazard has been mismanaged for two years? He played as a striker largely for conte last season in a 3-5-2 and I was told Sarri is a very attacking manager. Also, is 17 and 16 goals enough goals for a forward who takes penalties who claims to be world class? Definitely not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Exaclty. Played as a striker. He’s not a f*cking striker

So you think Hazard would have scored more goals if he played further back on the pitch?

Where was Conte supposed to have played him?

comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 34 seconds ago
So you think Hazard would have scored more goals if he played further back on the pitch?

Where was Conte supposed to have played him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m not judging him on goals alone, because I understand football and you don’t

Hazard is a forward, as is Sterling and Mane. On top of that, UNLIKE Sterling and Mane, Hazard is our main goalscorer in our team.

Goals should be the first stat you judge him on.

comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows ✌ (U22090)
posted 15 seconds ago
Hazard is a forward, as is Sterling and Mane. On top of that, UNLIKE Sterling and Mane, Hazard is our main goalscorer in our team.

Goals should be the first stat you judge him on.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Goals alone is not an indicator of who is the beaut player.

Now stop being a WUM.