"Again, why would so go looking for something I don’t believe is there?"
Because you seem obsessed by it. You've be going on about it for many pages now.
Read the thread again if you care so much.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Winston
“Obviously I need to look for it to be able to answer that.”
That’s your prerogative. If you can’t remember that’s on you. I didn’t ask you to go looking. I asked if you could recall from memory.
How would I possibly know you couldn’t remember when you said something when I asked what page the thing you’re adamant you said is on?
If you were that adamant it’s fair to say you’d remember when you said it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not 'on me' it's just normal behaviour.
I've no idea which pages those comments are on, so I'd need to look for them to answer your question.
Any normal person would.
So yes, you did ask me to look for specific comments and this attempt at denying it is probably the most pathetic thing you've done yet. And that is saying something.
"I didn't ask you to look for anything"
"I asked you what page the supposed comment about the laws of the game was on"
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
"Again, why would so go looking for something I don’t believe is there?"
Because you seem obsessed by it. You've be going on about it for many pages now.
Read the thread again if you care so much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And look for something I don’t think I’ll find. What would be the point in that?
I’m 100% sure I didn’t lose a tenner down the back of my couch. Would I go looking for it by tearing the couch apart?
No
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
"Again, why would so go looking for something I don’t believe is there?"
Because you seem obsessed by it. You've be going on about it for many pages now.
Read the thread again if you care so much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And look for something I don’t think I’ll find. What would be the point in that?
I’m 100% sure I didn’t lose a tenner down the back of my couch. Would I go looking for it by tearing the couch apart?
No
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point would be you'd find it, you numpty.
Although on current form you'd somehow deny I actually explained the basis for my opinion because you really don't like admitting when you're wrong.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Winston
“Obviously I need to look for it to be able to answer that.”
That’s your prerogative. If you can’t remember that’s on you. I didn’t ask you to go looking. I asked if you could recall from memory.
How would I possibly know you couldn’t remember when you said something when I asked what page the thing you’re adamant you said is on?
If you were that adamant it’s fair to say you’d remember when you said it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not 'on me' it's just normal behaviour.
I've no idea which pages those comments are on, so I'd need to look for them to answer your question.
Any normal person would.
So yes, you did ask me to look for specific comments and this attempt at denying it is probably the most pathetic thing you've done yet. And that is saying something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t. You interpreted my comment as me asking for you to look for it. You’ve said so many times you’ve said it its fair to say you must be going off memory. To be that sure you said something you must know when you said it.
If you took that as me asking you to look the that’s on you, not me.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
"Again, why would so go looking for something I don’t believe is there?"
Because you seem obsessed by it. You've be going on about it for many pages now.
Read the thread again if you care so much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And look for something I don’t think I’ll find. What would be the point in that?
I’m 100% sure I didn’t lose a tenner down the back of my couch. Would I go looking for it by tearing the couch apart?
No
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point would be you'd find it, you numpty.
Although on current form you'd somehow deny I actually explained the basis for my opinion because you really don't like admitting when you're wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, I’d rely on my memory before tearing the couch apart and looking.
Thick caant.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Winston
“Obviously I need to look for it to be able to answer that.”
That’s your prerogative. If you can’t remember that’s on you. I didn’t ask you to go looking. I asked if you could recall from memory.
How would I possibly know you couldn’t remember when you said something when I asked what page the thing you’re adamant you said is on?
If you were that adamant it’s fair to say you’d remember when you said it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not 'on me' it's just normal behaviour.
I've no idea which pages those comments are on, so I'd need to look for them to answer your question.
Any normal person would.
So yes, you did ask me to look for specific comments and this attempt at denying it is probably the most pathetic thing you've done yet. And that is saying something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t. You interpreted my comment as me asking for you to look for it. You’ve said so many times you’ve said it its fair to say you must be going off memory. To be that sure you said something you must know when you said it.
If you took that as me asking you to look the that’s on you, not me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interpreted?
No, you asked me where I'd said something. in 20 pages of facking sheite, unsurprisingly I'd need to find the comment because I don't know exactly where it is.
So obviously I'd have to look for it.
You can't ask someone where they said something in over 400 comments and then claim that is not asking them to look for something.
Well, you can, and you sound like an idiot.
'tearing the couch apart' = 're-reading the thread to find the comment you're asking for'
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Winston
Look you thick caant. You told me to go and find the page you said about the laws of the game, yes or no?
I asked you what page you said it on, so I could do what you asked and locate it, yes or no?
Funny, you can’t remember what page you said about the laws of the game. But you’ve gone back pages on this thread previously to quote something I’ve said.
How bizarre
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 48 seconds ago
Winston
Look you thick caant. You told me to go and find the page you said about the laws of the game, yes or no?
I asked you what page you said it on, so I could do what you asked and locate it, yes or no?
Funny, you can’t remember what page you said about the laws of the game. But you’ve gone back pages on this thread previously to quote something I’ve said.
How bizarre
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have I?
I am just remembering the exchange, that's all.
You asked me 'where?' before you asked what page it was on. You wanted me to show you.
To show you, I'd need to look for it.
This is facking basic lad.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is who are arguing with...I'd say leave it
“Oh and if you fancy some light reading, have a look at some of the lengthy debates TOOR & I have had on the subject over the past few weeks/months.
I've referenced the law over and over again.”
You can remember discussing the laws with TOOR over the past weeks/months but can’t remember where you said about the laws yesterday
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 11 seconds ago
“Oh and if you fancy some light reading, have a look at some of the lengthy debates TOOR & I have had on the subject over the past few weeks/months.
I've referenced the law over and over again.”
You can remember discussing the laws with TOOR over the past weeks/months but can’t remember where you said about the laws yesterday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember discussing it, not the specific page it's on you dopey caant
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is who are arguing with...I'd say leave it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not been banned again Dangermong?
I’m not thick enough to keep getting banned and coming back.
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is who are arguing with...I'd say leave it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much fun tbh
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is who are arguing with...I'd say leave it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much fun tbh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is a bit of an idiot
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 11 seconds ago
“Oh and if you fancy some light reading, have a look at some of the lengthy debates TOOR & I have had on the subject over the past few weeks/months.
I've referenced the law over and over again.”
You can remember discussing the laws with TOOR over the past weeks/months but can’t remember where you said about the laws yesterday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember discussing it, not the specific page it's on you dopey caant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Never asked which page with TOOR.
You can’t remember what you said yesterday or when you said it.
Anyway I’m done.
You can’t cite which laws you and your ‘knowledge of the laws’ formed your opinion, this is a fact.
You’ve confirmed you are full of shiite. Anything to win an argument eh. Thing is when someone calls you out on your shiite you get all defensive, you’ll distract, lie and delay.
Either post the laws or you’re full of shiite. Simple.
FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
I remember what I said but I don't know which page it's on.
There were over 400 comments - I reckon it's fairly normal that someone wouldn't know exactly where one specific comment is.
You're just trying to get out of the fact that you denied asking me to look for something when you blatantly did.
And you're willing to make yourself look like an either bigger muppet to try and do that.
Cringeworthy stuff.
'Either write out the laws or you don't know them and I win'
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
I remember what I said but I don't know which page it's on.
There were over 400 comments - I reckon it's fairly normal that someone wouldn't know exactly where one specific comment is.
You're just trying to get out of the fact that you denied asking me to look for something when you blatantly did.
And you're willing to make yourself look like an either bigger muppet to try and do that.
Cringeworthy stuff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you do.
You know fook all about the laws of the game -fact.
Bit silly making big claims like that then nog backing them up.
I know the laws of the game very well and this is proven by my post history.
You have trouble reading and remembering what you have said, and this is proven by your post history.
Funny to watch but tragic at the same time.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I know the laws of the game very well and this is proven by my post history.
You have trouble reading and remembering what you have said, and this is proven by your post history.
Funny to watch but tragic at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its becoming a daily occurrence for him, its been funny to see
Sign in if you want to comment
Hypocritical media..
Page 21 of 25
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25
posted on 23/4/19
"Again, why would so go looking for something I don’t believe is there?"
Because you seem obsessed by it. You've be going on about it for many pages now.
Read the thread again if you care so much.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Winston
“Obviously I need to look for it to be able to answer that.”
That’s your prerogative. If you can’t remember that’s on you. I didn’t ask you to go looking. I asked if you could recall from memory.
How would I possibly know you couldn’t remember when you said something when I asked what page the thing you’re adamant you said is on?
If you were that adamant it’s fair to say you’d remember when you said it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not 'on me' it's just normal behaviour.
I've no idea which pages those comments are on, so I'd need to look for them to answer your question.
Any normal person would.
So yes, you did ask me to look for specific comments and this attempt at denying it is probably the most pathetic thing you've done yet. And that is saying something.
posted on 23/4/19
"I didn't ask you to look for anything"
"I asked you what page the supposed comment about the laws of the game was on"
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
"Again, why would so go looking for something I don’t believe is there?"
Because you seem obsessed by it. You've be going on about it for many pages now.
Read the thread again if you care so much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And look for something I don’t think I’ll find. What would be the point in that?
I’m 100% sure I didn’t lose a tenner down the back of my couch. Would I go looking for it by tearing the couch apart?
No
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
"Again, why would so go looking for something I don’t believe is there?"
Because you seem obsessed by it. You've be going on about it for many pages now.
Read the thread again if you care so much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And look for something I don’t think I’ll find. What would be the point in that?
I’m 100% sure I didn’t lose a tenner down the back of my couch. Would I go looking for it by tearing the couch apart?
No
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point would be you'd find it, you numpty.
Although on current form you'd somehow deny I actually explained the basis for my opinion because you really don't like admitting when you're wrong.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Winston
“Obviously I need to look for it to be able to answer that.”
That’s your prerogative. If you can’t remember that’s on you. I didn’t ask you to go looking. I asked if you could recall from memory.
How would I possibly know you couldn’t remember when you said something when I asked what page the thing you’re adamant you said is on?
If you were that adamant it’s fair to say you’d remember when you said it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not 'on me' it's just normal behaviour.
I've no idea which pages those comments are on, so I'd need to look for them to answer your question.
Any normal person would.
So yes, you did ask me to look for specific comments and this attempt at denying it is probably the most pathetic thing you've done yet. And that is saying something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t. You interpreted my comment as me asking for you to look for it. You’ve said so many times you’ve said it its fair to say you must be going off memory. To be that sure you said something you must know when you said it.
If you took that as me asking you to look the that’s on you, not me.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
"Again, why would so go looking for something I don’t believe is there?"
Because you seem obsessed by it. You've be going on about it for many pages now.
Read the thread again if you care so much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And look for something I don’t think I’ll find. What would be the point in that?
I’m 100% sure I didn’t lose a tenner down the back of my couch. Would I go looking for it by tearing the couch apart?
No
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The point would be you'd find it, you numpty.
Although on current form you'd somehow deny I actually explained the basis for my opinion because you really don't like admitting when you're wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, I’d rely on my memory before tearing the couch apart and looking.
Thick caant.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
Winston
“Obviously I need to look for it to be able to answer that.”
That’s your prerogative. If you can’t remember that’s on you. I didn’t ask you to go looking. I asked if you could recall from memory.
How would I possibly know you couldn’t remember when you said something when I asked what page the thing you’re adamant you said is on?
If you were that adamant it’s fair to say you’d remember when you said it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not 'on me' it's just normal behaviour.
I've no idea which pages those comments are on, so I'd need to look for them to answer your question.
Any normal person would.
So yes, you did ask me to look for specific comments and this attempt at denying it is probably the most pathetic thing you've done yet. And that is saying something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t. You interpreted my comment as me asking for you to look for it. You’ve said so many times you’ve said it its fair to say you must be going off memory. To be that sure you said something you must know when you said it.
If you took that as me asking you to look the that’s on you, not me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interpreted?
No, you asked me where I'd said something. in 20 pages of facking sheite, unsurprisingly I'd need to find the comment because I don't know exactly where it is.
So obviously I'd have to look for it.
You can't ask someone where they said something in over 400 comments and then claim that is not asking them to look for something.
Well, you can, and you sound like an idiot.
posted on 23/4/19
'tearing the couch apart' = 're-reading the thread to find the comment you're asking for'
posted on 23/4/19
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 23/4/19
Winston
Look you thick caant. You told me to go and find the page you said about the laws of the game, yes or no?
I asked you what page you said it on, so I could do what you asked and locate it, yes or no?
Funny, you can’t remember what page you said about the laws of the game. But you’ve gone back pages on this thread previously to quote something I’ve said.
How bizarre
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 48 seconds ago
Winston
Look you thick caant. You told me to go and find the page you said about the laws of the game, yes or no?
I asked you what page you said it on, so I could do what you asked and locate it, yes or no?
Funny, you can’t remember what page you said about the laws of the game. But you’ve gone back pages on this thread previously to quote something I’ve said.
How bizarre
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have I?
I am just remembering the exchange, that's all.
You asked me 'where?' before you asked what page it was on. You wanted me to show you.
To show you, I'd need to look for it.
This is facking basic lad.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is who are arguing with...I'd say leave it
posted on 23/4/19
“Oh and if you fancy some light reading, have a look at some of the lengthy debates TOOR & I have had on the subject over the past few weeks/months.
I've referenced the law over and over again.”
You can remember discussing the laws with TOOR over the past weeks/months but can’t remember where you said about the laws yesterday
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 11 seconds ago
“Oh and if you fancy some light reading, have a look at some of the lengthy debates TOOR & I have had on the subject over the past few weeks/months.
I've referenced the law over and over again.”
You can remember discussing the laws with TOOR over the past weeks/months but can’t remember where you said about the laws yesterday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember discussing it, not the specific page it's on you dopey caant
posted on 23/4/19
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is who are arguing with...I'd say leave it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not been banned again Dangermong?
I’m not thick enough to keep getting banned and coming back.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is who are arguing with...I'd say leave it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much fun tbh
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
A child born on 9th April 2012 was born 8 years ago.
Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is who are arguing with...I'd say leave it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Too much fun tbh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is a bit of an idiot
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 11 seconds ago
“Oh and if you fancy some light reading, have a look at some of the lengthy debates TOOR & I have had on the subject over the past few weeks/months.
I've referenced the law over and over again.”
You can remember discussing the laws with TOOR over the past weeks/months but can’t remember where you said about the laws yesterday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I remember discussing it, not the specific page it's on you dopey caant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Never asked which page with TOOR.
You can’t remember what you said yesterday or when you said it.
Anyway I’m done.
You can’t cite which laws you and your ‘knowledge of the laws’ formed your opinion, this is a fact.
You’ve confirmed you are full of shiite. Anything to win an argument eh. Thing is when someone calls you out on your shiite you get all defensive, you’ll distract, lie and delay.
Either post the laws or you’re full of shiite. Simple.
posted on 23/4/19
FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
I remember what I said but I don't know which page it's on.
There were over 400 comments - I reckon it's fairly normal that someone wouldn't know exactly where one specific comment is.
You're just trying to get out of the fact that you denied asking me to look for something when you blatantly did.
And you're willing to make yourself look like an either bigger muppet to try and do that.
Cringeworthy stuff.
posted on 23/4/19
'Either write out the laws or you don't know them and I win'
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
I remember what I said but I don't know which page it's on.
There were over 400 comments - I reckon it's fairly normal that someone wouldn't know exactly where one specific comment is.
You're just trying to get out of the fact that you denied asking me to look for something when you blatantly did.
And you're willing to make yourself look like an either bigger muppet to try and do that.
Cringeworthy stuff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you do.
You know fook all about the laws of the game -fact.
Bit silly making big claims like that then nog backing them up.
posted on 23/4/19
I know the laws of the game very well and this is proven by my post history.
You have trouble reading and remembering what you have said, and this is proven by your post history.
Funny to watch but tragic at the same time.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I know the laws of the game very well and this is proven by my post history.
You have trouble reading and remembering what you have said, and this is proven by your post history.
Funny to watch but tragic at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its becoming a daily occurrence for him, its been funny to see
Page 21 of 25
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25