comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 minutes ago
Imagine making such a mess of debating a decision that you end up shouting ‘you’re a liar’ over and over again, about something completely unrelated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are window licking thick aren’t you.

We debated the Salah incident. Sadly one of us resorting to making up fairy stories about the laws of the game and ended up making up lies about the person they were debating with.

You expected the debate to go how exactly?

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 minutes ago
Imagine making such a mess of debating a decision that you end up shouting ‘you’re a liar’ over and over again, about something completely unrelated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are window licking thick aren’t you.

We debated the Salah incident. Sadly one of us resorting to making up fairy stories about the laws of the game and ended up making up lies about the person they were debating with.

You expected the debate to go how exactly?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fairy stories?

No, I justified my opinion, you threw a tantrum and here we are.

Honestly, there are 5 year olds who could hold their own in a debate better than you.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 minutes ago
Imagine making such a mess of debating a decision that you end up shouting ‘you’re a liar’ over and over again, about something completely unrelated.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You really are window licking thick aren’t you.

We debated the Salah incident. Sadly one of us resorting to making up fairy stories about the laws of the game and ended up making up lies about the person they were debating with.

You expected the debate to go how exactly?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fairy stories?

No, I justified my opinion, you threw a tantrum and here we are.

Honestly, there are 5 year olds who could hold their own in a debate better than you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See fairy stories.

Justified your opinion

All you’ve done is insist you knew the laws better than others, throw your toys out when asked to clarify which laws and made shiite up.

Still want to know when I said this;

“If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.”

Justify this claim you made.

Nope, I’ve backed up my opinion with the laws.

You?

You started trying to debate it, then tried to play question master and then got upset.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago


I love how you take those things literally.

Calm down you muppet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean when I asked who said that and you replied I did you didn’t mean literally.

Fook sake lad

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
Nope, I’ve backed up my opinion with the laws.

You?

You started trying to debate it, then tried to play question master and then got upset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which laws?

The comment above is number 214 on this thread.

There’s my proof.

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
Nope, I’ve backed up my opinion with the laws.

You?

You started trying to debate it, then tried to play question master and then got upset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which laws?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Check back, it’s all there.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
Nope, I’ve backed up my opinion with the laws.

You?

You started trying to debate it, then tried to play question master and then got upset.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which laws?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Check back, it’s all there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And round we go again. Autistic as fook Winston is off again.

Which laws?

Oh look, the mental health jibes because he’s getting upset.

What a mess.

Read back, I justified my view and told you exactly what criteria I was basing it on. It’s all there.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 seconds ago
Oh look, the mental health jibes because he’s getting upset.

What a mess.

Read back, I justified my view and told you exactly what criteria I was basing it on. It’s all there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Crying again because I brought up the fact your mental

Again you think I’m going to go looking for somethings i don’t think is there. Thick Winston strikes again.

Which laws?

It’s not that hard. Just type which laws your on about and the revel in your victory by proving me wrong. You can do a jig around your bedsit.

I couldn’t give a fack whether you go looking, it’s all there whether you choose to or not.

And I’m not upset. I pity someone who gets so angry on a forum that he has to use mental health as an insult.

If you’d read my comments properly the first time you’d know what my justification was. Silly little you.

Maybe ask mummy to help with the big words?

Winnie fuming there

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
I couldn’t give a fack whether you go looking, it’s all there whether you choose to or not.

And I’m not upset. I pity someone who gets so angry on a forum that he has to use mental health as an insult.

If you’d read my comments properly the first time you’d know what my justification was. Silly little you.

Maybe ask mummy to help with the big words?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More avoidance

Of course you’re not upset. How long before you run to Admin again Rain Man? Maybe Mummy shouldn’t have drank whilst pregnant with the mess that is you.

For someone who revels in ‘destroying’ people on the internet you’re strangely reluctant to post which law you were on about. If you did it would prove me wrong, another thing you revel in. Just think you can ‘destroy me’ in seconds by typing out a few words on the keyboard.

Instead you keep insisting I look for something I don’t think is there.

I know why, you know why. But you’ll keep delaying, denying and outright lying.

Proof to me you don’t knowledge the laws of the game, and haven’t got a clue what you’re on about.

I’m enjoying watching you fume.

I know the laws well and I specifically referenced the appropriate criteria when asked.

It’s all there.

You hate that I’m so much more knowledgeable than you and I will enjoy watching you get upset about it.

Oh look, another excuse.

You haven’t posted a thing about this supposed showing you know the laws, fact.

If you disagree with this prove me wrong.

“You hate that I’m so much more knowledgeable than you and I will enjoy watching you get upset about it.”

The arrogance of this

You’re the lad who insists someone prove a negative.

You’ve proven yourself to be a thick caant. That much is clear.

Now haven’t you got a US government agency to hack and some energy drinks to guzzle?

There’s no excuse - you’re not very good with the English language, are you?

I’m choosing to let you squirm.

You can keep calling me a liar for days if you like. I’ll be here to ensure you carry on raging, safe in the knowledge that proof of my knowledge is all here.

I know the laws well and that’s the reason you lost the debate.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
There’s no excuse - you’re not very good with the English language, are you?

I’m choosing to let you squirm.

You can keep calling me a liar for days if you like. I’ll be here to ensure you carry on raging, safe in the knowledge that proof of my knowledge is all here.

I know the laws well and that’s the reason you lost the debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is an excuse. We’ve gone from you saying ‘I don’t have to tell you the law’ to you delaying to you telling me to look it up.

Well you are, this has been proven. You even went so far as to claim I said something I didn’t. But it’s me that’s angry. I haven’t resorted to making up things you’ve said.

Well Winston, the evidence on this thread proves you wrong. You have shown nothing that says you know the laws well.

All you’ve done is bluster and make unsubstantiated claims.

You are full of shiite lad. It’s been fun proving it.

Nope, it’s no excuse.

I’m choosing to mock you and will continue to do so.

I know the laws very well and like most things I suspect, I know them far better than you.

I irritate you and it’s meant you’ve lost all control. You’ve been made to look a fool and I’m loving it.

Keep trying, I’ll keep destroying you.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
Nope, it’s no excuse.

I’m choosing to mock you and will continue to do so.

I know the laws very well and like most things I suspect, I know them far better than you.

I irritate you and it’s meant you’ve lost all control. You’ve been made to look a fool and I’m loving it.

Keep trying, I’ll keep destroying you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it’s not an excuse, it’s one of many you’ve given for not posting proof.

Yeah yeah yeah you keep saying this without actually backing it up. Just saying it over and k we again doesn’t make it true.

You amuse me. You are actually mental, a liar and the least self aware person on the site.

‘Destroying me’

Ah yes the words of a sane person there. You don’t even know how mental that makes you sound

I don’t need to trawl through the article just because you’ve forgotten what I’ve said.

You’re hanging onto this irrelevant point because it’s all you’ve got left.

I’ve destroyed you again and you’re upset, again.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 34 seconds ago
I don’t need to trawl through the article just because you’ve forgotten what I’ve said.

You’re hanging onto this irrelevant point because it’s all you’ve got left.

I’ve destroyed you again and you’re upset, again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said you did need to trawl through the article. You can use your fingers and type the proof.

No I’m keeping on this point because it’s pertinent to your whole argument. You claim you made your opinion on Salah diving because of your knowledge of the laws of the game.

But you won’t say which laws you’re on about

Makes a mockery of your entire argument.

‘Destroyed’, ‘upset’

If you say so Dustin Hoffman. Time for the meds.

FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)

Yes you did. You claimed I haven't told you what my opinion is based on i.e. the law. But I did.

As usual, you didn't bother understanding what I'd written because you were too upset.

Maybe there's a lesson for you - I seem to recall last time we argued you made three mistakes simply because you couldn't read properly.

It's happened again.

Winston

Show me where I said you have to trawl through the the article?

“As usual, you didn't bother understanding what I'd written because you were too upset”.

You said this;

“I don’t need to trawl through the article just because you’ve forgotten what I’ve said.”

I replied I never said you have to trawl through posts, just use your fingers to type out the proof.

Mr make up quotes from people has got it wrong yet again, and is on his soapbox about people reading properly

Well done Rain Man. You’ve outdone yourself again