comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 2 minutes ago
If you want to try and prove me wrong, go ahead
-----
He's done that over and over ya thick caaaaant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know
It’s ok though, he’s ‘destroyed me’ and saved face
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Any excuse for what?
There’s no reason for me to write down the laws for you.
Facking hell, this is weird
Debate, debate, debate and then randomly ‘write down the laws if you know them. If you don’t then I win’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any excuse to not give us some laws of the game.
It’s not hard. You’ve claimed something. You’ve then been asked to corroborate it. You’ve first distracted, than outright refused.
We know why. You are full of shiite, simple.
If you disagree you are full of shiite, prove it.
"The biggest problem though is that we just don’t know what referees would decide without the diving."
We do, well I certainly do as I've seen it many times. The Salah incident was a perfect example. The defender was holding him for about ten seconds and the referee didn't give the penalty until Salah went down.
I understand your point around players deceiving the referee and agree with it but like I say, it's the lesser of two evils for me and it's up to the referee and next season, VAR will help, to make the decision.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Any excuse for what?
There’s no reason for me to write down the laws for you.
Facking hell, this is weird
Debate, debate, debate and then randomly ‘write down the laws if you know them. If you don’t then I win’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any excuse to not give us some laws of the game.
It’s not hard. You’ve claimed something. You’ve then been asked to corroborate it. You’ve first distracted, than outright refused.
We know why. You are full of shiite, simple.
If you disagree you are full of shiite, prove it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not any excuse.
You just asked out of nowhere.
If there was something I’d said that required backing up then fair enough but you’ve just asked something for no reason because it’s all you’ve got left.
You are in such a state it’s odd.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 18 minutes ago
"The biggest problem though is that we just don’t know what referees would decide without the diving."
We do, well I certainly do as I've seen it many times. The Salah incident was a perfect example. The defender was holding him for about ten seconds and the referee didn't give the penalty until Salah went down.
I understand your point around players deceiving the referee and agree with it but like I say, it's the lesser of two evils for me and it's up to the referee and next season, VAR will help, to make the decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
I think you’re being overly generous myself.
I’d agree yesterday Salah went down because he was fed up of being held.
But the one against Newcastle I believe he just felt a touch and went over.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Any excuse for what?
There’s no reason for me to write down the laws for you.
Facking hell, this is weird
Debate, debate, debate and then randomly ‘write down the laws if you know them. If you don’t then I win’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any excuse to not give us some laws of the game.
It’s not hard. You’ve claimed something. You’ve then been asked to corroborate it. You’ve first distracted, than outright refused.
We know why. You are full of shiite, simple.
If you disagree you are full of shiite, prove it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not any excuse.
You just asked out of nowhere.
If there was something I’d said that required backing up then fair enough but you’ve just asked something for no reason because it’s all you’ve got left.
You are in such a state it’s odd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t just ask out of nowhere.
How many times have you said ‘I know the rules of the game’ on here?
You even said you’ve got better knowledge of the laws than me and TOOR about a hour ago. You poor decrepit old man
Now back it up or it just confirms you’re full of shiite.
You did say it out of nowhere. It’s not relevant to a particular point of discussion between me and you.
You lost the debate about the FA disagreeing with me so you came up with the idea of asking me to write out the laws of the game and if I refuse you’ll claim I don’t know them.
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 18 minutes ago
"The biggest problem though is that we just don’t know what referees would decide without the diving."
We do, well I certainly do as I've seen it many times. The Salah incident was a perfect example. The defender was holding him for about ten seconds and the referee didn't give the penalty until Salah went down.
I understand your point around players deceiving the referee and agree with it but like I say, it's the lesser of two evils for me and it's up to the referee and next season, VAR will help, to make the decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
I think you’re being overly generous myself.
I’d agree yesterday Salah went down because he was fed up of being held.
But the one against Newcastle I believe he just felt a touch and went over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As you know, I disagree. He was pulled back from behind, slowing him down and putting him at a disadvantage. He was therefore entitled to go down. The defender had a look of resignation also when he did it.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 20 minutes ago
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But at that moment I hadn’t said anything about my knowledge.
You just moved the goalposts because you’d lost the debate about what a lack of retrospective action means.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 18 minutes ago
"The biggest problem though is that we just don’t know what referees would decide without the diving."
We do, well I certainly do as I've seen it many times. The Salah incident was a perfect example. The defender was holding him for about ten seconds and the referee didn't give the penalty until Salah went down.
I understand your point around players deceiving the referee and agree with it but like I say, it's the lesser of two evils for me and it's up to the referee and next season, VAR will help, to make the decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
I think you’re being overly generous myself.
I’d agree yesterday Salah went down because he was fed up of being held.
But the one against Newcastle I believe he just felt a touch and went over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As you know, I disagree. He was pulled back from behind, slowing him down and putting him at a disadvantage. He was therefore entitled to go down. The defender had a look of resignation also when he did it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But I’m afraid the actual law of holding doesn’t back you up imo.
Don’t wish for it to become a silly row but you really do need to look up the law. It is possible to have a little pull at someone and not foul them - if you look at the criteria for holding I don’t think it was satisfied at all.
“If you don’t write down the laws of the game from memory right now it proves you don’t know the laws at all”
Welcome to JA606.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 20 minutes ago
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But at that moment I hadn’t said anything about my knowledge.
You just moved the goalposts because you’d lost the debate about what a lack of retrospective action means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Course you hadn’t
“comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 day, 4 hours ago
I’m entitled to my opinion and can back it up based on the law.
TOOR can’t.”
Back up your opinion by letting us know which law you’re referring to specifically
Chop chop little man. Wouldn’t want to be seen as being full of shiite now would you.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
“If you don’t write down the laws of the game from memory right now it proves you don’t know the laws at all”
Welcome to JA606.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are you quoting there?
“I’m basing my opinion on my knowledge of the laws of the game”
Oh right, what law is that then?
“I’m not telling you”
Bit weird but you must know which law specifically
“Stop asking out of the blue”
I’m not you mentioned it about two hours ago
“I’m not telling you”
Welcome to JA606
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 20 minutes ago
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But at that moment I hadn’t said anything about my knowledge.
You just moved the goalposts because you’d lost the debate about what a lack of retrospective action means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Course you hadn’t
“comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 day, 4 hours ago
I’m entitled to my opinion and can back it up based on the law.
TOOR can’t.”
Back up your opinion by letting us know which law you’re referring to specifically
Chop chop little man. Wouldn’t want to be seen as being full of shiite now would you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 day 4 hours ago.
Thanks for proving my point.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
“If you don’t write down the laws of the game from memory right now it proves you don’t know the laws at all”
Welcome to JA606.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are you quoting there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m mocking you.
Hope this helps.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 20 minutes ago
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But at that moment I hadn’t said anything about my knowledge.
You just moved the goalposts because you’d lost the debate about what a lack of retrospective action means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Course you hadn’t
“comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 day, 4 hours ago
I’m entitled to my opinion and can back it up based on the law.
TOOR can’t.”
Back up your opinion by letting us know which law you’re referring to specifically
Chop chop little man. Wouldn’t want to be seen as being full of shiite now would you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 day 4 hours ago.
Thanks for proving my point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts evidence and Winston ignores it.... again.
I’ve proven you’ve gone on about your knowledge of the laws of the game for the past 2 days. Yet it’s ‘out of the blue’ you being asked what laws specifically.
The things you’ll do to not answer a question.
Full of shiite
Evidence that I’m right.
You brought it up out of nowhere because you’d lost the debate.
Thanks for doing my job for me
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 50 seconds ago
Evidence that I’m right.
You brought it up out of nowhere because you’d lost the debate.
Thanks for doing my job for me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear.
You brought it up two hours ago. I then asked you to specify which law. Yet again it’s there in black and white you thick caant.
Out of the blue, fook off you utter knobhead
“comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
What law specifically?
No Googling now.
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share”
What a cretin
Crap attempt at moving the goalposts
I told you which law.
If I said it two hours ago why did you bring up a quote from over a day ago?
You’re all over the place. This is so funny to watch.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 seconds ago
“comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
What law specifically?
No Googling now.
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share”
What a cretin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I answered.
Oh dear. This is getting really bad for you now.
You were asking me to write out the laws of the game to prove I know them.
Quick question, do you know what’s on TV this evening?
You do?
Okay, please write out the entire TV guide without googling it to prove it.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 54 seconds ago
Crap attempt at moving the goalposts
I told you which law.
If I said it two hours ago why did you bring up a quote from over a day ago?
You’re all over the place. This is so funny to watch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow
I gave the example of two hours ago. You the said ‘I hadn’t mentioned it before then’. I provided proof of a post from over a day ago showing you mentioning the laws of the game. Then there’s your infamous quote about ‘knowing the laws of the game’.
“I answered”
No you didn’t you liar
Sign in if you want to comment
Hypocritical media..
Page 14 of 25
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 2 minutes ago
If you want to try and prove me wrong, go ahead
-----
He's done that over and over ya thick caaaaant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know
It’s ok though, he’s ‘destroyed me’ and saved face
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Any excuse for what?
There’s no reason for me to write down the laws for you.
Facking hell, this is weird
Debate, debate, debate and then randomly ‘write down the laws if you know them. If you don’t then I win’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any excuse to not give us some laws of the game.
It’s not hard. You’ve claimed something. You’ve then been asked to corroborate it. You’ve first distracted, than outright refused.
We know why. You are full of shiite, simple.
If you disagree you are full of shiite, prove it.
posted on 22/4/19
"The biggest problem though is that we just don’t know what referees would decide without the diving."
We do, well I certainly do as I've seen it many times. The Salah incident was a perfect example. The defender was holding him for about ten seconds and the referee didn't give the penalty until Salah went down.
I understand your point around players deceiving the referee and agree with it but like I say, it's the lesser of two evils for me and it's up to the referee and next season, VAR will help, to make the decision.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Any excuse for what?
There’s no reason for me to write down the laws for you.
Facking hell, this is weird
Debate, debate, debate and then randomly ‘write down the laws if you know them. If you don’t then I win’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any excuse to not give us some laws of the game.
It’s not hard. You’ve claimed something. You’ve then been asked to corroborate it. You’ve first distracted, than outright refused.
We know why. You are full of shiite, simple.
If you disagree you are full of shiite, prove it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not any excuse.
You just asked out of nowhere.
If there was something I’d said that required backing up then fair enough but you’ve just asked something for no reason because it’s all you’ve got left.
You are in such a state it’s odd.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 18 minutes ago
"The biggest problem though is that we just don’t know what referees would decide without the diving."
We do, well I certainly do as I've seen it many times. The Salah incident was a perfect example. The defender was holding him for about ten seconds and the referee didn't give the penalty until Salah went down.
I understand your point around players deceiving the referee and agree with it but like I say, it's the lesser of two evils for me and it's up to the referee and next season, VAR will help, to make the decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
I think you’re being overly generous myself.
I’d agree yesterday Salah went down because he was fed up of being held.
But the one against Newcastle I believe he just felt a touch and went over.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
Any excuse for what?
There’s no reason for me to write down the laws for you.
Facking hell, this is weird
Debate, debate, debate and then randomly ‘write down the laws if you know them. If you don’t then I win’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any excuse to not give us some laws of the game.
It’s not hard. You’ve claimed something. You’ve then been asked to corroborate it. You’ve first distracted, than outright refused.
We know why. You are full of shiite, simple.
If you disagree you are full of shiite, prove it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not any excuse.
You just asked out of nowhere.
If there was something I’d said that required backing up then fair enough but you’ve just asked something for no reason because it’s all you’ve got left.
You are in such a state it’s odd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t just ask out of nowhere.
How many times have you said ‘I know the rules of the game’ on here?
You even said you’ve got better knowledge of the laws than me and TOOR about a hour ago. You poor decrepit old man
Now back it up or it just confirms you’re full of shiite.
posted on 22/4/19
You did say it out of nowhere. It’s not relevant to a particular point of discussion between me and you.
You lost the debate about the FA disagreeing with me so you came up with the idea of asking me to write out the laws of the game and if I refuse you’ll claim I don’t know them.
posted on 22/4/19
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 18 minutes ago
"The biggest problem though is that we just don’t know what referees would decide without the diving."
We do, well I certainly do as I've seen it many times. The Salah incident was a perfect example. The defender was holding him for about ten seconds and the referee didn't give the penalty until Salah went down.
I understand your point around players deceiving the referee and agree with it but like I say, it's the lesser of two evils for me and it's up to the referee and next season, VAR will help, to make the decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
I think you’re being overly generous myself.
I’d agree yesterday Salah went down because he was fed up of being held.
But the one against Newcastle I believe he just felt a touch and went over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As you know, I disagree. He was pulled back from behind, slowing him down and putting him at a disadvantage. He was therefore entitled to go down. The defender had a look of resignation also when he did it.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 20 minutes ago
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But at that moment I hadn’t said anything about my knowledge.
You just moved the goalposts because you’d lost the debate about what a lack of retrospective action means.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 18 minutes ago
"The biggest problem though is that we just don’t know what referees would decide without the diving."
We do, well I certainly do as I've seen it many times. The Salah incident was a perfect example. The defender was holding him for about ten seconds and the referee didn't give the penalty until Salah went down.
I understand your point around players deceiving the referee and agree with it but like I say, it's the lesser of two evils for me and it's up to the referee and next season, VAR will help, to make the decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
I think you’re being overly generous myself.
I’d agree yesterday Salah went down because he was fed up of being held.
But the one against Newcastle I believe he just felt a touch and went over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As you know, I disagree. He was pulled back from behind, slowing him down and putting him at a disadvantage. He was therefore entitled to go down. The defender had a look of resignation also when he did it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But I’m afraid the actual law of holding doesn’t back you up imo.
Don’t wish for it to become a silly row but you really do need to look up the law. It is possible to have a little pull at someone and not foul them - if you look at the criteria for holding I don’t think it was satisfied at all.
posted on 22/4/19
“If you don’t write down the laws of the game from memory right now it proves you don’t know the laws at all”
Welcome to JA606.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 20 minutes ago
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But at that moment I hadn’t said anything about my knowledge.
You just moved the goalposts because you’d lost the debate about what a lack of retrospective action means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Course you hadn’t
“comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 day, 4 hours ago
I’m entitled to my opinion and can back it up based on the law.
TOOR can’t.”
Back up your opinion by letting us know which law you’re referring to specifically
Chop chop little man. Wouldn’t want to be seen as being full of shiite now would you.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
“If you don’t write down the laws of the game from memory right now it proves you don’t know the laws at all”
Welcome to JA606.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are you quoting there?
posted on 22/4/19
“I’m basing my opinion on my knowledge of the laws of the game”
Oh right, what law is that then?
“I’m not telling you”
Bit weird but you must know which law specifically
“Stop asking out of the blue”
I’m not you mentioned it about two hours ago
“I’m not telling you”
Welcome to JA606
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 20 minutes ago
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But at that moment I hadn’t said anything about my knowledge.
You just moved the goalposts because you’d lost the debate about what a lack of retrospective action means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Course you hadn’t
“comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 day, 4 hours ago
I’m entitled to my opinion and can back it up based on the law.
TOOR can’t.”
Back up your opinion by letting us know which law you’re referring to specifically
Chop chop little man. Wouldn’t want to be seen as being full of shiite now would you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 day 4 hours ago.
Thanks for proving my point.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
“If you don’t write down the laws of the game from memory right now it proves you don’t know the laws at all”
Welcome to JA606.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are you quoting there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m mocking you.
Hope this helps.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 20 minutes ago
Winston
Yeah you’re right. It was out of the blue. Why would someone randomly ask you to corroborate your knowledge of the laws of the game?
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
You absolute knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But at that moment I hadn’t said anything about my knowledge.
You just moved the goalposts because you’d lost the debate about what a lack of retrospective action means.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Course you hadn’t
“comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 day, 4 hours ago
I’m entitled to my opinion and can back it up based on the law.
TOOR can’t.”
Back up your opinion by letting us know which law you’re referring to specifically
Chop chop little man. Wouldn’t want to be seen as being full of shiite now would you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1 day 4 hours ago.
Thanks for proving my point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts evidence and Winston ignores it.... again.
I’ve proven you’ve gone on about your knowledge of the laws of the game for the past 2 days. Yet it’s ‘out of the blue’ you being asked what laws specifically.
The things you’ll do to not answer a question.
Full of shiite
posted on 22/4/19
Evidence that I’m right.
You brought it up out of nowhere because you’d lost the debate.
Thanks for doing my job for me
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 50 seconds ago
Evidence that I’m right.
You brought it up out of nowhere because you’d lost the debate.
Thanks for doing my job for me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear.
You brought it up two hours ago. I then asked you to specify which law. Yet again it’s there in black and white you thick caant.
Out of the blue, fook off you utter knobhead
posted on 22/4/19
“comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
What law specifically?
No Googling now.
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share”
What a cretin
posted on 22/4/19
Crap attempt at moving the goalposts
I told you which law.
If I said it two hours ago why did you bring up a quote from over a day ago?
You’re all over the place. This is so funny to watch.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 seconds ago
“comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 3 hours, 7 minutes ago
“My opinion based on my understanding of the laws.”
What law specifically?
No Googling now.
Reply | Add Comment | Complain | Share”
What a cretin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I answered.
Oh dear. This is getting really bad for you now.
You were asking me to write out the laws of the game to prove I know them.
posted on 22/4/19
Quick question, do you know what’s on TV this evening?
You do?
Okay, please write out the entire TV guide without googling it to prove it.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 54 seconds ago
Crap attempt at moving the goalposts
I told you which law.
If I said it two hours ago why did you bring up a quote from over a day ago?
You’re all over the place. This is so funny to watch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow
I gave the example of two hours ago. You the said ‘I hadn’t mentioned it before then’. I provided proof of a post from over a day ago showing you mentioning the laws of the game. Then there’s your infamous quote about ‘knowing the laws of the game’.
“I answered”
No you didn’t you liar
Page 14 of 25
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19