comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You.
Hope this helps.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t
More lies
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only people that have read the laws in a match are the refs and linesman.
I did name what offence I thought had taken place, impeding. You said that was wrong, it would come under holding. Fair enough if that's true. I've read both and both seem like they could be used. Regardless, as I said before, it doesnt matter what law is used and whether you or anybody else knows it, you still know it's a foul as you've played and watched the game for decades.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t
More lies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t
More lies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No i didnt. Stop lying
Or are you going to show me where I said this?
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look for the comment where you asked me which law and read my answer.
I’ll wait.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read both and there was nothing I could see that I didnt realise.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look for the comment where you asked me which law and read my answer.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which page?
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look for the comment where you asked me which law and read my answer.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which page?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll leave that to you to find out.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look for the comment where you asked me which law and read my answer.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which page?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll leave that to you to find out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah like fook am I scrolling through 16 pages.
Either prove it or you’re a liar, simple.
You accused me of lying, I provided proof to the contrary.
Off you pop.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read both and there was nothing I could see that I didnt realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
Personally I don’t think the defender prevented him moving past at all.
Salah could easily have carried on imo.
Fack of fieldsofannie, you want to call me a liar you prove it.
Fact is, I do know the law well, which is why your debate has gone from debating the actual decision to this pile of sheite.
What a mess you are.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read both and there was nothing I could see that I didnt realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
Personally I don’t think the defender prevented him moving past at all.
Salah could easily have carried on imo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes he could have carried on but he shouldn't as he was took off his stride by the foul and may have lost control of the ball, meaning the defender would have gained advantage by fouling him.
Generous, TOOR. It was barely a touch!
But I do appreciate you now accept its opinion - we’re both entitled to it and neither of us are wrong.
I did ask for your understanding on that point some time ago.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read both and there was nothing I could see that I didnt realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
Personally I don’t think the defender prevented him moving past at all.
Salah could easily have carried on imo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes he could have carried on but he shouldn't as he was took off his stride by the foul and may have lost control of the ball, meaning the defender would have gained advantage by fouling him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which I may add would have been fine if the referee would have given a penalty anyhow but he wouldn't have which we have seen on numerous occasions when players try to carry on, twice this season on Salah, with one being yesterday when he tried to carry on and still didnt get the penalty so went down.
Problem is TOOR is the referee may not have thought it was a foul (without the dive).
We’ll never know.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
Fack of fieldsofannie, you want to call me a liar you prove it.
Fact is, I do know the law well, which is why your debate has gone from debating the actual decision to this pile of sheite.
What a mess you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This against. You want me to prove you didn’t say something.Thick caant
“Fact is I do know the laws well”
Despite providing any evidence of this. Standard Winston talking shiite.
I know the laws of thermal dynamics. I’m not going to give examples of which, but I’ll still insist I do to win an argument with a stranger in the internet. It’s really important I ’destroy’ people.
What a fookin knobhead
No, I want you to find the bit where you asked me which law and I told you what I’m basing my opinion on.
I explained that to you last time.
Look at the state of what you’re left with.
Are you any good at throwing shoes over buildings using the laces? We can try that if you like.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
No, I want you to find the bit where you asked me which law and I told you what I’m basing my opinion on.
I explained that to you last time.
Look at the state of what you’re left with.
Are you any good at throwing shoes over buildings using the laces? We can try that if you like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you are lying. If you disagree with that then you pop off and prove me wrong. No skin off my nose of you don’t. It just further proves you talk shiite and can’t back it up.
It’s not on me to prove you’re not a liar. That’s on you little man.
Sign in if you want to comment
Hypocritical media..
Page 16 of 25
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You.
Hope this helps.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t
More lies
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only people that have read the laws in a match are the refs and linesman.
posted on 22/4/19
I did name what offence I thought had taken place, impeding. You said that was wrong, it would come under holding. Fair enough if that's true. I've read both and both seem like they could be used. Regardless, as I said before, it doesnt matter what law is used and whether you or anybody else knows it, you still know it's a foul as you've played and watched the game for decades.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t
More lies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
‘If you don’t write out the law in full right now then you don’t know it and I win.’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said who?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t
More lies
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No i didnt. Stop lying
Or are you going to show me where I said this?
posted on 22/4/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look for the comment where you asked me which law and read my answer.
I’ll wait.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read both and there was nothing I could see that I didnt realise.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look for the comment where you asked me which law and read my answer.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which page?
posted on 22/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look for the comment where you asked me which law and read my answer.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which page?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll leave that to you to find out.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I named the law.
Go back, see I’m right and then apologise.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where?
Prove it you liar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re the one calling me a liar. You go and check.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you are.
Why would I go looking for something I don’t believe is there. I’d never find it.
You thick caant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look for the comment where you asked me which law and read my answer.
I’ll wait.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which page?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll leave that to you to find out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah like fook am I scrolling through 16 pages.
Either prove it or you’re a liar, simple.
You accused me of lying, I provided proof to the contrary.
Off you pop.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read both and there was nothing I could see that I didnt realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
Personally I don’t think the defender prevented him moving past at all.
Salah could easily have carried on imo.
posted on 22/4/19
Fack of fieldsofannie, you want to call me a liar you prove it.
Fact is, I do know the law well, which is why your debate has gone from debating the actual decision to this pile of sheite.
What a mess you are.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read both and there was nothing I could see that I didnt realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
Personally I don’t think the defender prevented him moving past at all.
Salah could easily have carried on imo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes he could have carried on but he shouldn't as he was took off his stride by the foul and may have lost control of the ball, meaning the defender would have gained advantage by fouling him.
posted on 22/4/19
Generous, TOOR. It was barely a touch!
But I do appreciate you now accept its opinion - we’re both entitled to it and neither of us are wrong.
I did ask for your understanding on that point some time ago.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 minutes ago
TOOR, you said you don’t need to know the law to know if it’s a foul and you also couldn’t name which offence you thought had taken place.
So yes, I believe you hadn’t looked it up. Fair?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I did and that is still the case. You need to know the law to state specifically what the criteria was for it to be a foul. You don't need it to know whether it was a foul or not as you have played and watched the game for decades and know what a foul is. As I said before, the majority of players wont have read the laws but they know when they've been fouled and if the can pull players back in the box etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry but that’s wrong.
You need to know the criteria referees apply to know if it’s a foul. Holding is a really good example because there are some key points you may not realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've read both and there was nothing I could see that I didnt realise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough.
Personally I don’t think the defender prevented him moving past at all.
Salah could easily have carried on imo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes he could have carried on but he shouldn't as he was took off his stride by the foul and may have lost control of the ball, meaning the defender would have gained advantage by fouling him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which I may add would have been fine if the referee would have given a penalty anyhow but he wouldn't have which we have seen on numerous occasions when players try to carry on, twice this season on Salah, with one being yesterday when he tried to carry on and still didnt get the penalty so went down.
posted on 22/4/19
Problem is TOOR is the referee may not have thought it was a foul (without the dive).
We’ll never know.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
Fack of fieldsofannie, you want to call me a liar you prove it.
Fact is, I do know the law well, which is why your debate has gone from debating the actual decision to this pile of sheite.
What a mess you are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This against. You want me to prove you didn’t say something.Thick caant
“Fact is I do know the laws well”
Despite providing any evidence of this. Standard Winston talking shiite.
I know the laws of thermal dynamics. I’m not going to give examples of which, but I’ll still insist I do to win an argument with a stranger in the internet. It’s really important I ’destroy’ people.
What a fookin knobhead
posted on 22/4/19
No, I want you to find the bit where you asked me which law and I told you what I’m basing my opinion on.
I explained that to you last time.
Look at the state of what you’re left with.
Are you any good at throwing shoes over buildings using the laces? We can try that if you like.
posted on 22/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
No, I want you to find the bit where you asked me which law and I told you what I’m basing my opinion on.
I explained that to you last time.
Look at the state of what you’re left with.
Are you any good at throwing shoes over buildings using the laces? We can try that if you like.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you are lying. If you disagree with that then you pop off and prove me wrong. No skin off my nose of you don’t. It just further proves you talk shiite and can’t back it up.
It’s not on me to prove you’re not a liar. That’s on you little man.
Page 16 of 25
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21