comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
Have you noticed how you’re arguing a completely different point to what you were arguing at the start?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you noticed debates tend to move along onto different topics and areas over a period of time. They don’t stick rigidly to the initial point being made. For example, the OP, and the subsequent pages after being completely different.

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
Have you noticed how you’re arguing a completely different point to what you were arguing at the start?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you noticed debates tend to move along onto different topics and areas over a period of time. They don’t stick rigidly to the initial point being made. For example, the OP, and the subsequent pages after being completely different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, of course.

But in this case you’re intentionally ignoring the original point everyone I raise it.

Because you were wrong.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
Winston

Funny seeing you make such a big thing about you ‘knowing the laws of the game’. Yet whenever you’ve been asked to cite a specific law you haven’t been able to.

Surely Mr ‘I know the laws of the game’ wouldn’t rely so much on opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There’s nothing to cite given that I didn’t reference any particular law.

You’re really not very good at this, are you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve been asked on numerous occasions to cite laws of the game, I asked at least 5 times for the laws on diving. Unsurprisingly you didn’t respond.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Have you, in what context?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn’t matter what context.

You ‘know the laws of the game’

Laws on diving, go.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Of course it matters. Where did I ask you to cite a law?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You didn’t.

I’m challenging your claim on ‘knowing the laws of the game’.

Laws on diving, go.

Must be the 8th time of asking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I explained the law.

If you think I’m wrong, prove it.

Good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you didn’t you liar.

Laws on diving, go.

Take 9.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you think I’m wrong, prove it.

Good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You want me to prove you haven’t typed something.

You really are thick
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Wrong about the law, you utter numpty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was asking you for the laws on diving.

Still no sign. Proof you don’t know them. What a I suspected all along. You are full of shiite lad

I don’t need to post the laws on diving. If you want them, you go find them.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
Have you noticed how you’re arguing a completely different point to what you were arguing at the start?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you noticed debates tend to move along onto different topics and areas over a period of time. They don’t stick rigidly to the initial point being made. For example, the OP, and the subsequent pages after being completely different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, of course.

But in this case you’re intentionally ignoring the original point everyone I raise it.

Because you were wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm no.

The debate moved on ages ago and I’m bored of repeating myself.

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
Have you noticed how you’re arguing a completely different point to what you were arguing at the start?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you noticed debates tend to move along onto different topics and areas over a period of time. They don’t stick rigidly to the initial point being made. For example, the OP, and the subsequent pages after being completely different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, of course.

But in this case you’re intentionally ignoring the original point everyone I raise it.

Because you were wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm no.

The debate moved on ages ago and I’m bored of repeating myself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it didn’t.

This is still about whether the FA disagree with me.

You still don’t understand why you were wrong.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t need to post the laws on diving. If you want them, you go find them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don’t know them.

I’m not the one that made the claim about ‘knowing the laws of the game’. Back it up or confirm you don’t actually know them.

Simple

“No it didn’t.

This is still about whether the FA disagree with me“

That was yesterday, we’ve moved on. Aside from you repeating yourself.

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t need to post the laws on diving. If you want them, you go find them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don’t know them.

I’m not the one that made the claim about ‘knowing the laws of the game’. Back it up or confirm you don’t actually know them.

Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I do know them.

Copying and pasting them from a rulebook is pointless.

If you think I’ve said something wrong, prove it. If not, shut up.

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 11 seconds ago
“No it didn’t.

This is still about whether the FA disagree with me“

That was yesterday, we’ve moved on. Aside from you repeating yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, same point. You think a lack of retrospective action shows they disagree with me.

It doesn’t.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t need to post the laws on diving. If you want them, you go find them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don’t know them.

I’m not the one that made the claim about ‘knowing the laws of the game’. Back it up or confirm you don’t actually know them.

Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I do know them.

Copying and pasting them from a rulebook is pointless.

If you think I’ve said something wrong, prove it. If not, shut up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said anything about copying and pasting?

Surely you’d be able to recite them off hand. After all you ‘know the laws of the game’ and the likes of TOOR and myself don’t.

Laws on diving, go. Or you’re full of shiite.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 11 seconds ago
“No it didn’t.

This is still about whether the FA disagree with me“

That was yesterday, we’ve moved on. Aside from you repeating yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, same point. You think a lack of retrospective action shows they disagree with me.

It doesn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They disagree with you that Salah dived you absolute cretin.

If they thought he’d dived they would’ve punished him. In accordance to the laws of the game that you’ve proven to know nothing about

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t need to post the laws on diving. If you want them, you go find them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don’t know them.

I’m not the one that made the claim about ‘knowing the laws of the game’. Back it up or confirm you don’t actually know them.

Simple
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I do know them.

Copying and pasting them from a rulebook is pointless.

If you think I’ve said something wrong, prove it. If not, shut up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said anything about copying and pasting?

Surely you’d be able to recite them off hand. After all you ‘know the laws of the game’ and the likes of TOOR and myself don’t.

Laws on diving, go. Or you’re full of shiite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So because I understand the laws I can recite them on here?

You really are funny.

I don’t need to prove my knowledge to you. If I’ve said something wrong, prove it.

I’ll wait.

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 11 seconds ago
“No it didn’t.

This is still about whether the FA disagree with me“

That was yesterday, we’ve moved on. Aside from you repeating yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, same point. You think a lack of retrospective action shows they disagree with me.

It doesn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They disagree with you that Salah dived you absolute cretin.

If they thought he’d dived they would’ve punished him. In accordance to the laws of the game that you’ve proven to know nothing about
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You still don’t understand.



No retrospective action simply means there’s case of clear deception. I never claimed there was.

I think he dived but I think it’s debatable, and I agree it doesn’t warrant retrospective action.

Maybe see if your mummy can explain it to you?

“So because I understand the laws I can recite them on here?”

You should be able to yes. It’s obvious you don’t though. Thanks for proving it.

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
“So because I understand the laws I can recite them on here?”

You should be able to yes. It’s obvious you don’t though. Thanks for proving it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Is this what you’re left with?

Absolutely brilliant stuff. Comedy gold.

“No retrospective action simply means there’s case of clear deception. I never claimed there was.”

No, you’ve been adamant he dived all along. A panel looked at the evidence, used their knowledge of the laws of the game, and found there was not enough evidence to show Salah deceived the ref, dived to you and me.

Therefore they didn’t think he dived. You do. Can you see the two contrasting opinions there?

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
“So because I understand the laws I can recite them on here?”

You should be able to yes. It’s obvious you don’t though. Thanks for proving it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Is this what you’re left with?

Absolutely brilliant stuff. Comedy gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What that you made a bold claim about knowing the laws of the game.

I asked you to back that claim up. You haven’t been able to.

You are full of shiite lad

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 33 seconds ago
“No retrospective action simply means there’s case of clear deception. I never claimed there was.”

No, you’ve been adamant he dived all along. A panel looked at the evidence, used their knowledge of the laws of the game, and found there was not enough evidence to show Salah deceived the ref, dived to you and me.

Therefore they didn’t think he dived. You do. Can you see the two contrasting opinions there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No, they don’t think there’s clear evidence of deception.

Nor do I.

There’s a difference between that and believing he dived.

comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
“So because I understand the laws I can recite them on here?”

You should be able to yes. It’s obvious you don’t though. Thanks for proving it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Is this what you’re left with?

Absolutely brilliant stuff. Comedy gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What that you made a bold claim about knowing the laws of the game.

I asked you to back that claim up. You haven’t been able to.

You are full of shiite lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So unless I sit here and try to write the laws out word for word, you can say I don’t know them?

You’re hilarious. Genuinely funny.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 24 seconds ago
“So because I understand the laws I can recite them on here?”

You should be able to yes. It’s obvious you don’t though. Thanks for proving it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Is this what you’re left with?

Absolutely brilliant stuff. Comedy gold.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What that you made a bold claim about knowing the laws of the game.

I asked you to back that claim up. You haven’t been able to.

You are full of shiite lad
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So unless I sit here and try to write the laws out word for word, you can say I don’t know them?

You’re hilarious. Genuinely funny.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’d think you’d know some you could cite. Obviously not

Facts are you know as much as me and TOOR on the laws of the game. But you get yourself into a debate and you being you ends up making bold claims on your knowledge of the laws of the game to try and ‘destroy’ people.

Turns out those bold claims are a load of shiite and you’re full of it, who knew?

No, I know the laws well.

I’m just going to be dictated to by some muppet on a forum who is desperately trying to find something to get over me having continually lost debates for a while now.

I don’t need to cite anything. I’ve given my opinion and explained the basis for it.

If you want to try and prove me wrong, go ahead. I’ll be sure to have a good laugh.

If you want to try and prove me wrong, go ahead
-----
He's done that over and over ya thick caaaaant

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
No, I know the laws well.

I’m just going to be dictated to by some muppet on a forum who is desperately trying to find something to get over me having continually lost debates for a while now.

I don’t need to cite anything. I’ve given my opinion and explained the basis for it.

If you want to try and prove me wrong, go ahead. I’ll be sure to have a good laugh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you’re not. Any excuse eh.

When you claim something that isn’t true, then embarrass yourself when you’re asked to back it up

Any excuse for what?

There’s no reason for me to write down the laws for you.

Facking hell, this is weird

Debate, debate, debate and then randomly ‘write down the laws if you know them. If you don’t then I win’.