comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I know the laws of the game very well and this is proven by my post history.
You have trouble reading and remembering what you have said, and this is proven by your post history.
Funny to watch but tragic at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its becoming a daily occurrence for him, its been funny to see
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all happened because I have the audacity to have a different opinion to him regarding a supposed foul on Salah earlier this season.
Facking loads of pages of sheite because he wanted to discredit my opinion. The guy is a mess.
What happens when you ask Winston to be specific about which law he based his opinion on;
Winston yesterday afternoon
“Why are you asking for which law out of the blue?”
Winston early afternoon
“I don’t have to post the laws just because you ask”
Winston last night
“I’ve already posted the laws”
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
What happens when you ask Winston to be specific about which law he based his opinion on;
Winston yesterday afternoon
“Why are you asking for which law out of the blue?”
Winston early afternoon
“I don’t have to post the laws just because you ask”
Winston last night
“I’ve already posted the laws”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If I only said last night that I'd already posted the laws, why were you calling me a liar yesterday afternoon?
You're a mess, soft lad.
I posted my opinion and I justified using criteria from the laws. I did it multiple times.
Hope this helps.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I know the laws of the game very well and this is proven by my post history.
You have trouble reading and remembering what you have said, and this is proven by your post history.
Funny to watch but tragic at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its becoming a daily occurrence for him, its been funny to see
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all happened because I have the audacity to have a different opinion to him regarding a supposed foul on Salah earlier this season.
Facking loads of pages of sheite because he wanted to discredit my opinion. The guy is a mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it wasn’t. And you make comments about me and reading
I disagreed with your opinion about Salah diving, yes. What I disagreed with more was you claiming to base your opinion on some supposed knowledge of the laws. I asked you to clarify which law. Not a big deal. Not an unreasonable question.
You then said I’d asked out of the blue, outright refused to clarify, then claimed you’d actually posted which law all along.
The more you changed your story the more it confirmed you’re lying and talking out of your rse about the laws of the game.
Loads of pages of shiite because you made a claim about the laws and then did your best not to clarify which one.
“If I only said last night that I'd already posted the laws, why were you calling me a liar yesterday afternoon?”
Magically Winston can remember when he posted about the laws.
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
“If I only said last night that I'd already posted the laws, why were you calling me a liar yesterday afternoon?”
Magically Winston can remember when he posted about the laws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting desperate
FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
No, at first you just tried to discredit my opinion because Dermot Gallagher disagrees with me.
You said the FA disagreed with me and after about 10 pages I still don't think you realise why that's not correct.
But you lost that debate and then moved onto wanting me to prove that I understand the laws, when I'd already outlined my understanding of why it's not a foul and why it doesn't qualify for retrospective action.
You keep trying to find something... anything to beat me on and you keep losing. You've argued for about 5 pages whether you asked me to look for something or not ffs
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
“If I only said last night that I'd already posted the laws, why were you calling me a liar yesterday afternoon?”
Magically Winston can remember when he posted about the laws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh make no mistake, I remember a lot about it. Although I don't know which page it's on you donut.
But I'm not following instruction from you.
Hey Winston, when did you post about the laws of the game?
“Can’t remember, can’t remember, can’t remember, it was last night”
That’s some complex you’ve got there Rain Man.
I’m tying to discredit your opinion
Asking you a question is giving you instructions
Mental
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 3 seconds ago
Hey Winston, when did you post about the laws of the game?
“Can’t remember, can’t remember, can’t remember, it was last night”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say that?
I said you were calling me a liar yesterday afternoon.
Keep up you facking muppet
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s some complex you’ve got there Rain Man.
I’m tying to discredit your opinion
Asking you a question is giving you instructions
Mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ THE ACTUAL WORDS
You tried to discredit my opinion about the foul by saying that refs, the FA and pundits all disagreed with me.
Facking hell, you need every single thing explained don't you?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s some complex you’ve got there Rain Man.
I’m tying to discredit your opinion
Asking you a question is giving you instructions
Mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ THE ACTUAL WORDS
You tried to discredit my opinion about the foul by saying that refs, the FA and pundits all disagreed with me.
Facking hell, you need every single thing explained don't you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think he should try to grasp the concept of counting first
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s some complex you’ve got there Rain Man.
I’m tying to discredit your opinion
Asking you a question is giving you instructions
Mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ THE ACTUAL WORDS
You tried to discredit my opinion about the foul by saying that refs, the FA and pundits all disagreed with me.
Facking hell, you need every single thing explained don't you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So wait a minute.
You cite your knowledge of the rules (fook knows which one) and this is you backing up your opinion.
I cite refs, the FA and pundits to back up my opinion and it’s ‘trying to discredit you’
Are you actually mental
FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
Fack me, you are simple.
I'm backing up my opinion with the laws.
You're not backing up your opinion, you're trying to discredit/rubbish mine.
You're trying to make out that I'm all alone with my view and anyone with any substance disagrees, which you were wrong to do.
We don't know what the referee in charge would have thought if Salah hadn't fallen to the floor.
We don't know the FA's or any individual at the FA's opinion.
There were pundits saying it was a dive and some saying not.
So the only voice against mine is Dermot Gallagher's.
I'm perfectly entitled to my opinion and I can back it up with a knowledge of the laws.
If you want to debate that then great, but all you actually did was to try and make out my opinion is worthless with nonsense about the FA and pundits etc. It's a pathetic argument and it's why it eventually became you scrapping around for something to 'win' with, eventually settling on whether you asked me to look for something or not.
You're a mess and you cannot beat me in a debate like this because I'm more intelligent and more knowledgeable than you.
I'm more intelligent and more knowledgeable than you.
--------------
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm more intelligent and more knowledgeable than you.
--------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think pretty much everyone on this site is
Why didn't Winston just post what was required?
Its because he prefers this long drawn back and forth. He could have just posted the info.
comment by Thörgen Klopp - "Mjolnir, to me!!!" (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
Why didn't Winston just post what was required?
Its because he prefers this long drawn back and forth. He could have just posted the info.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was already a long drawn back and forth, because of your mate.
He suddenly decided he'd start asking me to write out laws, as if that would prove anything.
I don't follow instructions from people like him.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 days, 18 hours ago
I’m entitled to my opinion and can back it up based on the law.
TOOR can’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for quoting something I said nearly three days ago.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 59 seconds ago
Your opinion is based on the law. You just choose not to provide a skerrick to support your opinion.
It's funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've consistently provided details about the law to back up my opinion.
The difference here was that it was requested out of the blue, not in response to anything I'd said that day, simply as a diversion tactic from someone getting upset because he was losing an argument.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Hypocritical media..
Page 22 of 25
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25
posted on 23/4/19
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I know the laws of the game very well and this is proven by my post history.
You have trouble reading and remembering what you have said, and this is proven by your post history.
Funny to watch but tragic at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its becoming a daily occurrence for him, its been funny to see
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all happened because I have the audacity to have a different opinion to him regarding a supposed foul on Salah earlier this season.
Facking loads of pages of sheite because he wanted to discredit my opinion. The guy is a mess.
posted on 23/4/19
What happens when you ask Winston to be specific about which law he based his opinion on;
Winston yesterday afternoon
“Why are you asking for which law out of the blue?”
Winston early afternoon
“I don’t have to post the laws just because you ask”
Winston last night
“I’ve already posted the laws”
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
What happens when you ask Winston to be specific about which law he based his opinion on;
Winston yesterday afternoon
“Why are you asking for which law out of the blue?”
Winston early afternoon
“I don’t have to post the laws just because you ask”
Winston last night
“I’ve already posted the laws”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If I only said last night that I'd already posted the laws, why were you calling me a liar yesterday afternoon?
You're a mess, soft lad.
I posted my opinion and I justified using criteria from the laws. I did it multiple times.
Hope this helps.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by robmandy16 (U22116)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
I know the laws of the game very well and this is proven by my post history.
You have trouble reading and remembering what you have said, and this is proven by your post history.
Funny to watch but tragic at the same time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its becoming a daily occurrence for him, its been funny to see
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all happened because I have the audacity to have a different opinion to him regarding a supposed foul on Salah earlier this season.
Facking loads of pages of sheite because he wanted to discredit my opinion. The guy is a mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it wasn’t. And you make comments about me and reading
I disagreed with your opinion about Salah diving, yes. What I disagreed with more was you claiming to base your opinion on some supposed knowledge of the laws. I asked you to clarify which law. Not a big deal. Not an unreasonable question.
You then said I’d asked out of the blue, outright refused to clarify, then claimed you’d actually posted which law all along.
The more you changed your story the more it confirmed you’re lying and talking out of your rse about the laws of the game.
Loads of pages of shiite because you made a claim about the laws and then did your best not to clarify which one.
posted on 23/4/19
“If I only said last night that I'd already posted the laws, why were you calling me a liar yesterday afternoon?”
Magically Winston can remember when he posted about the laws.
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
“If I only said last night that I'd already posted the laws, why were you calling me a liar yesterday afternoon?”
Magically Winston can remember when he posted about the laws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Getting desperate
posted on 23/4/19
FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
No, at first you just tried to discredit my opinion because Dermot Gallagher disagrees with me.
You said the FA disagreed with me and after about 10 pages I still don't think you realise why that's not correct.
But you lost that debate and then moved onto wanting me to prove that I understand the laws, when I'd already outlined my understanding of why it's not a foul and why it doesn't qualify for retrospective action.
You keep trying to find something... anything to beat me on and you keep losing. You've argued for about 5 pages whether you asked me to look for something or not ffs
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
“If I only said last night that I'd already posted the laws, why were you calling me a liar yesterday afternoon?”
Magically Winston can remember when he posted about the laws.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh make no mistake, I remember a lot about it. Although I don't know which page it's on you donut.
But I'm not following instruction from you.
posted on 23/4/19
Hey Winston, when did you post about the laws of the game?
“Can’t remember, can’t remember, can’t remember, it was last night”
posted on 23/4/19
That’s some complex you’ve got there Rain Man.
I’m tying to discredit your opinion
Asking you a question is giving you instructions
Mental
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 3 seconds ago
Hey Winston, when did you post about the laws of the game?
“Can’t remember, can’t remember, can’t remember, it was last night”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where did I say that?
I said you were calling me a liar yesterday afternoon.
Keep up you facking muppet
posted on 23/4/19
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s some complex you’ve got there Rain Man.
I’m tying to discredit your opinion
Asking you a question is giving you instructions
Mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ THE ACTUAL WORDS
You tried to discredit my opinion about the foul by saying that refs, the FA and pundits all disagreed with me.
Facking hell, you need every single thing explained don't you?
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s some complex you’ve got there Rain Man.
I’m tying to discredit your opinion
Asking you a question is giving you instructions
Mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ THE ACTUAL WORDS
You tried to discredit my opinion about the foul by saying that refs, the FA and pundits all disagreed with me.
Facking hell, you need every single thing explained don't you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think he should try to grasp the concept of counting first
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 hours, 31 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
That’s some complex you’ve got there Rain Man.
I’m tying to discredit your opinion
Asking you a question is giving you instructions
Mental
----------------------------------------------------------------------
READ THE ACTUAL WORDS
You tried to discredit my opinion about the foul by saying that refs, the FA and pundits all disagreed with me.
Facking hell, you need every single thing explained don't you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So wait a minute.
You cite your knowledge of the rules (fook knows which one) and this is you backing up your opinion.
I cite refs, the FA and pundits to back up my opinion and it’s ‘trying to discredit you’
Are you actually mental
posted on 23/4/19
FieldsofAnnieRd (U18971)
Fack me, you are simple.
I'm backing up my opinion with the laws.
You're not backing up your opinion, you're trying to discredit/rubbish mine.
You're trying to make out that I'm all alone with my view and anyone with any substance disagrees, which you were wrong to do.
We don't know what the referee in charge would have thought if Salah hadn't fallen to the floor.
We don't know the FA's or any individual at the FA's opinion.
There were pundits saying it was a dive and some saying not.
So the only voice against mine is Dermot Gallagher's.
I'm perfectly entitled to my opinion and I can back it up with a knowledge of the laws.
If you want to debate that then great, but all you actually did was to try and make out my opinion is worthless with nonsense about the FA and pundits etc. It's a pathetic argument and it's why it eventually became you scrapping around for something to 'win' with, eventually settling on whether you asked me to look for something or not.
You're a mess and you cannot beat me in a debate like this because I'm more intelligent and more knowledgeable than you.
posted on 23/4/19
I'm more intelligent and more knowledgeable than you.
--------------
posted on 23/4/19
comment by Hulk's little brother Yoda (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm more intelligent and more knowledgeable than you.
--------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think pretty much everyone on this site is
posted on 24/4/19
Why didn't Winston just post what was required?
Its because he prefers this long drawn back and forth. He could have just posted the info.
posted on 24/4/19
comment by Thörgen Klopp - "Mjolnir, to me!!!" (U1282)
posted 11 minutes ago
Why didn't Winston just post what was required?
Its because he prefers this long drawn back and forth. He could have just posted the info.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was already a long drawn back and forth, because of your mate.
He suddenly decided he'd start asking me to write out laws, as if that would prove anything.
I don't follow instructions from people like him.
posted on 24/4/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/19
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 days, 18 hours ago
I’m entitled to my opinion and can back it up based on the law.
TOOR can’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for quoting something I said nearly three days ago.
posted on 24/4/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 24/4/19
comment by Dave NotSo (U11711)
posted 59 seconds ago
Your opinion is based on the law. You just choose not to provide a skerrick to support your opinion.
It's funny.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've consistently provided details about the law to back up my opinion.
The difference here was that it was requested out of the blue, not in response to anything I'd said that day, simply as a diversion tactic from someone getting upset because he was losing an argument.
posted on 24/4/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 22 of 25
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25