Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch

Except when tommy robinson got one thrown at him cause he's a horrible yoke

comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 5 seconds ago
Except when tommy robinson got one thrown at him cause he's a horrible yoke
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can't have one rule for some and a different one for others. It's why being truely liberal is so difficult

comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Hope you've never been patted down at airport security mate, God forbid you're subjected to that type of violence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think they ask you before doing it?
So naive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jo Cox’s murder was inspired by the racist rhetoric of Nigel Farage and the Leave Campaign, and he has the gall to complain about a fecking milkshake?

comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate

comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hope you called the police?

On wait, there aren’t any, The Tories got rid of them all.

For me Tommy deserved it. He's not a politician despite his delusions.

But you make a valid point. At least when push came to shove and the votes were cast tommy found out that being a thug will likely hamper a political career

comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 8 minutes ago
The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ffs

comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didnt go to debating society ffs

You made a claim - "The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent."

I've given examples of what a joke of statement that is - the fact you're having to give ground and add extra clauses rather than being able to defend the original statement shows that it was a faaacking stupid thing to say

comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Hope you've never been patted down at airport security mate, God forbid you're subjected to that type of violence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think they ask you before doing it?
So naive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jo Cox’s murder was inspired by the racist rhetoric of Nigel Farage and the Leave Campaign, and he has the gall to complain about a fecking milkshake?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So if someone reads the rhetoric on here you posted and committed a violent act its your fault? No it's their fault that did it, they have their own agency.

That republican politician was nearly killed by a mad lefty, its the attackers fault, not the people he listened to who weren't spouting calls to violence, they were saying resist republicans but not with violence

comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didnt go to debating society ffs

You made a claim - "The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent."

I've given examples of what a joke of statement that is - the fact you're having to give ground and add extra clauses rather than being able to defend the original statement shows that it was a faaacking stupid thing to say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean I could type out all the clauses that it obviously includes such as intent, desire to hurt or humiliate but I didn't realise some people had a toddlers comprehension ability, my mistake

As a species we basically need a threat that will wipe us out to actually bring us together. Like indepenence day 🤣

comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 minute ago
As a species we basically need a threat that will wipe us out to actually bring us together. Like indepenence day 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We can only hope the magnetic poles really are about to reverse!

comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 3 minutes ago
For me Tommy deserved it. He's not a politician despite his delusions.

But you make a valid point. At least when push came to shove and the votes were cast tommy found out that being a thug will likely hamper a political career
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wee Tommy Ten names absolutely deserved it. He deserves far worse.

I dunno, kneerash, you’d probably still get some left wing nut jobs like Sizzle that would scream that the aliens are coming in peace.

comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 49 seconds ago
I dunno, kneerash, you’d probably still get some left wing nut jobs like Sizzle that would scream that the aliens are coming in peace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not me who hates “aliens” legal or otherwise.

Just sayin.....

comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didnt go to debating society ffs

You made a claim - "The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent."

I've given examples of what a joke of statement that is - the fact you're having to give ground and add extra clauses rather than being able to defend the original statement shows that it was a faaacking stupid thing to say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean I could type out all the clauses that it obviously includes such as intent, desire to hurt or humiliate but I didn't realise some people had a toddlers comprehension ability, my mistake
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or you could use the actual definiton of violence I provided and admit that throwing a drink over someone isn't actually violent, rather than slowly crafting your own definition that fits with your argument

comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 3 minutes ago
Everyone saying she could have been armed and you have no idea what a terrorist looks like blah blah blah, you do realise she was wearing a massive sashe that said climate change, a fellow protester was reading a speech about climate change, and the girl grabbed was holding leaflets.

You honestly telling me anyone in that room thought she was armed

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only thing she was armed with was facts and knowledge.

Everything Right Wingers Hate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And yet you're the one calling anyone right of Stalin sc@m who deserve violence.

Every single thing you post reeks of hate.

I pity you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Deserve violence?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wee Tommy Ten names absolutely deserved it. He deserves far worse


Bi polar much?

comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didnt go to debating society ffs

You made a claim - "The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent."

I've given examples of what a joke of statement that is - the fact you're having to give ground and add extra clauses rather than being able to defend the original statement shows that it was a faaacking stupid thing to say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean I could type out all the clauses that it obviously includes such as intent, desire to hurt or humiliate but I didn't realise some people had a toddlers comprehension ability, my mistake
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or you could use the actual definiton of violence I provided and admit that throwing a drink over someone isn't actually violent, rather than slowly crafting your own definition that fits with your argument
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So common assault and criminal damage are non violent offenses?

comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didnt go to debating society ffs

You made a claim - "The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent."

I've given examples of what a joke of statement that is - the fact you're having to give ground and add extra clauses rather than being able to defend the original statement shows that it was a faaacking stupid thing to say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean I could type out all the clauses that it obviously includes such as intent, desire to hurt or humiliate but I didn't realise some people had a toddlers comprehension ability, my mistake
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or you could use the actual definiton of violence I provided and admit that throwing a drink over someone isn't actually violent, rather than slowly crafting your own definition that fits with your argument
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So common assault and criminal damage are non violent offenses?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not intrinsically, but there is usually a crossover there as you could imagine

comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didnt go to debating society ffs

You made a claim - "The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent."

I've given examples of what a joke of statement that is - the fact you're having to give ground and add extra clauses rather than being able to defend the original statement shows that it was a faaacking stupid thing to say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean I could type out all the clauses that it obviously includes such as intent, desire to hurt or humiliate but I didn't realise some people had a toddlers comprehension ability, my mistake
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or you could use the actual definiton of violence I provided and admit that throwing a drink over someone isn't actually violent, rather than slowly crafting your own definition that fits with your argument
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So common assault and criminal damage are non violent offenses?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not intrinsically, but there is usually a crossover there as you could imagine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Common assault is listed as a violent crime by the CPS. I believe spitting even counts but not sure. I'm pretty sure you don't have to cause physical harm.

Criminal damage probably isn't but against a person, such as this case, probably is

comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didnt go to debating society ffs

You made a claim - "The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent."

I've given examples of what a joke of statement that is - the fact you're having to give ground and add extra clauses rather than being able to defend the original statement shows that it was a faaacking stupid thing to say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean I could type out all the clauses that it obviously includes such as intent, desire to hurt or humiliate but I didn't realise some people had a toddlers comprehension ability, my mistake
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or you could use the actual definiton of violence I provided and admit that throwing a drink over someone isn't actually violent, rather than slowly crafting your own definition that fits with your argument
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So common assault and criminal damage are non violent offenses?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not intrinsically, but there is usually a crossover there as you could imagine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Common assault is listed as a violent crime by the CPS. I believe spitting even counts but not sure. I'm pretty sure you don't have to cause physical harm.

Criminal damage probably isn't but against a person, such as this case, probably is
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I dont think that throwing a drink over someone is violent

I dont think spitting at someone is violent

But theres a clear disconnect here as I'm guessing you think that the law is infallible (or atleast is in this case)

We're clearly not going to make any progress here as we fundamentally disagree on this

comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Moussa Chrissoko (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
Was walking down the street the other day and this woman bumped into me

Violent biiitch
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Accidently, without intent. Honestly this is embarrassing. You clearly never went to debate society did you mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didnt go to debating society ffs

You made a claim - "The second you lay a hand or object on someones person its violent."

I've given examples of what a joke of statement that is - the fact you're having to give ground and add extra clauses rather than being able to defend the original statement shows that it was a faaacking stupid thing to say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean I could type out all the clauses that it obviously includes such as intent, desire to hurt or humiliate but I didn't realise some people had a toddlers comprehension ability, my mistake
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or you could use the actual definiton of violence I provided and admit that throwing a drink over someone isn't actually violent, rather than slowly crafting your own definition that fits with your argument
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So common assault and criminal damage are non violent offenses?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not intrinsically, but there is usually a crossover there as you could imagine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Common assault is listed as a violent crime by the CPS. I believe spitting even counts but not sure. I'm pretty sure you don't have to cause physical harm.

Criminal damage probably isn't but against a person, such as this case, probably is
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I dont think that throwing a drink over someone is violent

I dont think spitting at someone is violent

But theres a clear disconnect here as I'm guessing you think that the law is infallible (or atleast is in this case)

We're clearly not going to make any progress here as we fundamentally disagree on this
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't tihink the law is infallible but in this regard it is correct and just.

Sadly we won't agree on this

Anyone seen that film A History of Violence? It’s about a bloke that hides his dark past, he used to go around throwing milkshakes at people.

comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 7 seconds ago
Anyone seen that film A History of Violence? It’s about a bloke that hides his dark past, he used to go around throwing milkshakes at people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go ahead and throw one at someone you think is a really bad person, see what you're charged with.

Or keep posting childish gibberish