1. Everyone - They are effectively holding the entire Scottish football scene to ransom. We can't finalise the proposal and equally we can't start to move an any alternatives. Lockdown
2. May 8th I'd think, after the bank holiday
3. One with enough fuel to make a single journey
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
i really dislike piers morgan becaucse I find he is more likely to attack people than defend them.
however, while it pains me to say it, throughout this he has been very vocal about the failings of the government and i'm struggling to argue with his views on it.
It’s Scottish football authorities. They make the impossible, possible and real. It’s what their reputation is based on.
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
twitter has been amazing lately btw
rangers fans arguing that celtic will be given a league they never won, but not recognising they will get money and a European place based on a position they, by their logic, don't deserve.
some bunch.
I would put 3 people in the one way spaceship. Piers Morgan, the Trumpet and Bojo. A trio of bumchums 😂
So what are these supposed 6 options the Rangers fans are suggesting?
Let me guess
1. Null and Void - nobody crowned champions
2. Null and void but give us money - nobody crowned champions but get money based on your position
3. Null and Void - No surrender
4. Null and Void - No closed doors games sorry we ripped our pitch up and can't play games. WATP
5. Aye bit Lennon
6. Null and Void
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The different option (6 in total iirc) were debated by the SPFL board. It was determined that only one was practical and the board issued voting papers to the clubs along with an explanation of the other options.
That was from Ann Budge.
This idea of a multiple choice voting paper is totally bats and I can't believe people still think that's an option.
The right and proper process was followed IMO. The board assesses the options, makes a recommendation and asks the members for approval to proceed.
Is that really unusual, corrupt or incompetent?
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 4 minutes ago
twitter has been amazing lately btw
rangers fans arguing that celtic will be given a league they never won, but not recognising they will get money and a European place based on a position they, by their logic, don't deserve.
some bunch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty. Just scrap the season. I think however that UEFA will take it out of our hands later this month anyway as they will want the league positions finalised. Not sure how you can do that without recognising winners and losers.
That money won't last a month for any club in the top division but will mean so much more to those further down the leagues.
comment by Call Sign: Invictus (U3627)
posted 8 seconds ago
So what are these supposed 6 options the Rangers fans are suggesting?
Let me guess
1. Null and Void - nobody crowned champions
2. Null and void but give us money - nobody crowned champions but get money based on your position
3. Null and Void - No surrender
4. Null and Void - No closed doors games sorry we ripped our pitch up and can't play games. WATP
5. Aye bit Lennon
6. Null and Void
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not rangers fans, it was the spfl members. I have no idea what they are.
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Call Sign: Invictus (U3627)
posted 8 seconds ago
So what are these supposed 6 options the Rangers fans are suggesting?
Let me guess
1. Null and Void - nobody crowned champions
2. Null and void but give us money - nobody crowned champions but get money based on your position
3. Null and Void - No surrender
4. Null and Void - No closed doors games sorry we ripped our pitch up and can't play games. WATP
5. Aye bit Lennon
6. Null and Void
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not rangers fans, it was the spfl members. I have no idea what they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good choices
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty.
=========
of course you would
nothing for celtic
everything for rangers
hun-ger-nuts.
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 11 minutes ago
i really dislike piers morgan becaucse I find he is more likely to attack people than defend them.
however, while it pains me to say it, throughout this he has been very vocal about the failings of the government and i'm struggling to argue with his views on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came to on say that very thing. Obviously he’s a cvnt and agreeing with him is kind of like when you accidentally see a little too much up a bag-lady’s skirt on the street and find yourself wondering if the smell would be worth the ride, but still.
The bigger question is:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/15/jacinda-ardern-and-ministers-take-20-pay-cut-in-solidarity-with-those-hit-by-covid-19
Jacinda. Would/would not bang?
I like the idea of reconstruction as in no club suffers relegation, except hearts, fvck them.
but I imagine sky will have something to say about it if they have to drop a couple of old firm games.
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you see any teams changing their vote if they could?
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty.
=========
of course you would
nothing for celtic
everything for rangers
hun-ger-nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would mate
What do you think teams like Rangers and Hearts will be like once they've spent that money?
What would be left for them to get so wound up about?
A pyrrhic victory if ever there was one.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you see any teams changing their vote if they could?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont know but at least it would resove this and we could move on or look at a different option.
I cant see Dundee changing their vote to yes after being offered xyz resolving anything as clubs will rightly say that's not the proposal they voted on
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
I like the idea of reconstruction as in no club suffers relegation, except hearts, fvck them.
but I imagine sky will have something to say about it if they have to drop a couple of old firm games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
agree, but that should be resolved and discussed and part of any vote. Not vague promises of discussions on it.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty.
=========
of course you would
nothing for celtic
everything for rangers
hun-ger-nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would mate
What do you think teams like Rangers and Hearts will be like once they've spent that money?
What would be left for them to get so wound up about?
A pyrrhic victory if ever there was one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sack that I want 9.
I don't care if they don't like it, in fact, even better.
happy to count their EBT titles and yet we are turning down this belter?
no chance, get it up them
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you see any teams changing their vote if they could?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont know but at least it would resove this and we could move on or look at a different option.
I cant see Dundee changing their vote to yes after being offered xyz resolving anything as clubs will rightly say that's not the proposal they voted on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see anyone changing their vote mate.
Yes they may be angry at feeling they've been railroaded but bottom line is that they will have voted on what's best for them. So unless something other than their circumstances have changed you'd think they'd vote the same way a second time around.
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty.
=========
of course you would
nothing for celtic
everything for rangers
hun-ger-nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would mate
What do you think teams like Rangers and Hearts will be like once they've spent that money?
What would be left for them to get so wound up about?
A pyrrhic victory if ever there was one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sack that I want 9.
I don't care if they don't like it, in fact, even better.
happy to count their EBT titles and yet we are turning down this belter?
no chance, get it up them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the 9 is a given even if the SPFL tried and agreed not to award it.
Or the clubs could face being kicked out of Europe.
say they don't call the league, even though they will.
they chimps would be unbearable (no pun intended), smug about it and everything.
i'd rather we were the ones who get to chuckle about it, and if they say "disnae count" then 10 will, and so will 11.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you see any teams changing their vote if they could?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont know but at least it would resove this and we could move on or look at a different option.
I cant see Dundee changing their vote to yes after being offered xyz resolving anything as clubs will rightly say that's not the proposal they voted on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see anyone changing their vote mate.
Yes they may be angry at feeling they've been railroaded but bottom line is that they will have voted on what's best for them. So unless something other than their circumstances have changed you'd think they'd vote the same way a second time around.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Circumstances have changed. clubs now now they can request an advance on prize money regardless of vote
Sign in if you want to comment
Wednesday
Page 1 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 15/4/20
1. Everyone - They are effectively holding the entire Scottish football scene to ransom. We can't finalise the proposal and equally we can't start to move an any alternatives. Lockdown
2. May 8th I'd think, after the bank holiday
3. One with enough fuel to make a single journey
posted on 15/4/20
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
posted on 15/4/20
i really dislike piers morgan becaucse I find he is more likely to attack people than defend them.
however, while it pains me to say it, throughout this he has been very vocal about the failings of the government and i'm struggling to argue with his views on it.
posted on 15/4/20
It’s Scottish football authorities. They make the impossible, possible and real. It’s what their reputation is based on.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
posted on 15/4/20
twitter has been amazing lately btw
rangers fans arguing that celtic will be given a league they never won, but not recognising they will get money and a European place based on a position they, by their logic, don't deserve.
some bunch.
posted on 15/4/20
I would put 3 people in the one way spaceship. Piers Morgan, the Trumpet and Bojo. A trio of bumchums 😂
posted on 15/4/20
So what are these supposed 6 options the Rangers fans are suggesting?
Let me guess
1. Null and Void - nobody crowned champions
2. Null and void but give us money - nobody crowned champions but get money based on your position
3. Null and Void - No surrender
4. Null and Void - No closed doors games sorry we ripped our pitch up and can't play games. WATP
5. Aye bit Lennon
6. Null and Void
posted on 15/4/20
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
posted on 15/4/20
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The different option (6 in total iirc) were debated by the SPFL board. It was determined that only one was practical and the board issued voting papers to the clubs along with an explanation of the other options.
That was from Ann Budge.
This idea of a multiple choice voting paper is totally bats and I can't believe people still think that's an option.
The right and proper process was followed IMO. The board assesses the options, makes a recommendation and asks the members for approval to proceed.
Is that really unusual, corrupt or incompetent?
posted on 15/4/20
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 4 minutes ago
twitter has been amazing lately btw
rangers fans arguing that celtic will be given a league they never won, but not recognising they will get money and a European place based on a position they, by their logic, don't deserve.
some bunch.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty. Just scrap the season. I think however that UEFA will take it out of our hands later this month anyway as they will want the league positions finalised. Not sure how you can do that without recognising winners and losers.
That money won't last a month for any club in the top division but will mean so much more to those further down the leagues.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by Call Sign: Invictus (U3627)
posted 8 seconds ago
So what are these supposed 6 options the Rangers fans are suggesting?
Let me guess
1. Null and Void - nobody crowned champions
2. Null and void but give us money - nobody crowned champions but get money based on your position
3. Null and Void - No surrender
4. Null and Void - No closed doors games sorry we ripped our pitch up and can't play games. WATP
5. Aye bit Lennon
6. Null and Void
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not rangers fans, it was the spfl members. I have no idea what they are.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Call Sign: Invictus (U3627)
posted 8 seconds ago
So what are these supposed 6 options the Rangers fans are suggesting?
Let me guess
1. Null and Void - nobody crowned champions
2. Null and void but give us money - nobody crowned champions but get money based on your position
3. Null and Void - No surrender
4. Null and Void - No closed doors games sorry we ripped our pitch up and can't play games. WATP
5. Aye bit Lennon
6. Null and Void
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not rangers fans, it was the spfl members. I have no idea what they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good choices
posted on 15/4/20
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty.
=========
of course you would
nothing for celtic
everything for rangers
hun-ger-nuts.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 11 minutes ago
i really dislike piers morgan becaucse I find he is more likely to attack people than defend them.
however, while it pains me to say it, throughout this he has been very vocal about the failings of the government and i'm struggling to argue with his views on it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Came to on say that very thing. Obviously he’s a cvnt and agreeing with him is kind of like when you accidentally see a little too much up a bag-lady’s skirt on the street and find yourself wondering if the smell would be worth the ride, but still.
The bigger question is:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/15/jacinda-ardern-and-ministers-take-20-pay-cut-in-solidarity-with-those-hit-by-covid-19
Jacinda. Would/would not bang?
posted on 15/4/20
I like the idea of reconstruction as in no club suffers relegation, except hearts, fvck them.
but I imagine sky will have something to say about it if they have to drop a couple of old firm games.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you see any teams changing their vote if they could?
posted on 15/4/20
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty.
=========
of course you would
nothing for celtic
everything for rangers
hun-ger-nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would mate
What do you think teams like Rangers and Hearts will be like once they've spent that money?
What would be left for them to get so wound up about?
A pyrrhic victory if ever there was one.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you see any teams changing their vote if they could?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont know but at least it would resove this and we could move on or look at a different option.
I cant see Dundee changing their vote to yes after being offered xyz resolving anything as clubs will rightly say that's not the proposal they voted on
posted on 15/4/20
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
I like the idea of reconstruction as in no club suffers relegation, except hearts, fvck them.
but I imagine sky will have something to say about it if they have to drop a couple of old firm games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
agree, but that should be resolved and discussed and part of any vote. Not vague promises of discussions on it.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty.
=========
of course you would
nothing for celtic
everything for rangers
hun-ger-nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would mate
What do you think teams like Rangers and Hearts will be like once they've spent that money?
What would be left for them to get so wound up about?
A pyrrhic victory if ever there was one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sack that I want 9.
I don't care if they don't like it, in fact, even better.
happy to count their EBT titles and yet we are turning down this belter?
no chance, get it up them
posted on 15/4/20
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you see any teams changing their vote if they could?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont know but at least it would resove this and we could move on or look at a different option.
I cant see Dundee changing their vote to yes after being offered xyz resolving anything as clubs will rightly say that's not the proposal they voted on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see anyone changing their vote mate.
Yes they may be angry at feeling they've been railroaded but bottom line is that they will have voted on what's best for them. So unless something other than their circumstances have changed you'd think they'd vote the same way a second time around.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
I'd happily give them the money and forego the league in all honesty.
=========
of course you would
nothing for celtic
everything for rangers
hun-ger-nuts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would mate
What do you think teams like Rangers and Hearts will be like once they've spent that money?
What would be left for them to get so wound up about?
A pyrrhic victory if ever there was one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sack that I want 9.
I don't care if they don't like it, in fact, even better.
happy to count their EBT titles and yet we are turning down this belter?
no chance, get it up them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the 9 is a given even if the SPFL tried and agreed not to award it.
Or the clubs could face being kicked out of Europe.
posted on 15/4/20
say they don't call the league, even though they will.
they chimps would be unbearable (no pun intended), smug about it and everything.
i'd rather we were the ones who get to chuckle about it, and if they say "disnae count" then 10 will, and so will 11.
posted on 15/4/20
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - I drank a lava lamp (U14864)
posted 1 minute ago
They took carole baskins husband instead.
They really need to scrap this vote and start again. Perhaps even doing what they should have in the first place. Properly discuss all 6 options and then decide as a group whaich ones to vote on.
Even doing the same vote again but properly would be better than what they are doing now.
Lets say Dundee secure agreements in addition to the vote on the table, whats to then stop anyone saying thats not what i voted for.
YOu wouldn't have thought it possible bu they are somehow managing to make it worse everyday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think they can just scrap it as 85% teams voted for it. Some might understandably not be happy at the way it was done but that doesn't mean they'd change their vote.
This needs to be finalised I'd think.
Are there 5 other alternatives?
The only one I can see is that of clubs applying for loans on a case by case basis.
Null and void isn't an option as I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
even holding the same vote again is better than what they are doing now
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you see any teams changing their vote if they could?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dont know but at least it would resove this and we could move on or look at a different option.
I cant see Dundee changing their vote to yes after being offered xyz resolving anything as clubs will rightly say that's not the proposal they voted on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't see anyone changing their vote mate.
Yes they may be angry at feeling they've been railroaded but bottom line is that they will have voted on what's best for them. So unless something other than their circumstances have changed you'd think they'd vote the same way a second time around.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Circumstances have changed. clubs now now they can request an advance on prize money regardless of vote
Page 1 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10