comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 8 minutes ago
should of bowled first ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didnt we win the toss?
Utter no brainer given the overcast conditions yesterday...Stokes has had a mare (& I haven't even included the handshake)
Maybe he thought they’d be an it more rain = less play.
Oh well, good chance we’ll be bowling on this today anyway. Next few days are bright sunshine
Broad and Anderson bowling first would have picked up at least 4 wickets in 17 overs yesterday. Shocker.
Fed up with this crap batting team, just fed up.
Yes Neo..... hope you doing well pal. England Wumming is all and just trying to make a game of this will win by an innings and 81 runs.
Avg/wkt of the top 5 in the batting order since 1st Jan, 2016 (top 8 Test teams):
1. Ind= 47.09
2. Aus= 42.45
3. NZ= 41.04
4. Pak= 36.92
5. SA= 34.75
6. Eng= 33.11
7. SL= 32.36
8. WI= 26.99
Eng & WI have 2 of the 3 worst top 5s. A lot will depend on lower order... england gave upper hand there
I completely forgot about the cricket till now. Just checked the score, 153-5
So facking standard
Probably be 170-6 or 7 before a lower order batsman like Buttler or Archer has a cameo to get us to 260 all out
———
This was my prediction this time yesterday. No idea why I don’t put money on england when they bat. Easiest thing in sport to predict
not bad from where we are, should get over 200 not a bad score
Buttler gone. Well bowled, well caught.
Been some great bowling to be fair, never should have batted first
A14 good thanks pal, you.
Had enough of this shiite, ffs. Why the fack did we elect to bat
find it hard to like Holder
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 6 minutes ago
Been some great bowling to be fair, never should have batted first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No...we could have bowled as well i'm sure
comment by Afridi14... ( ليدز_يونايتد )You go... (U2805)
posted 28 minutes ago
Avg/wkt of the top 5 in the batting order since 1st Jan, 2016 (top 8 Test teams):
1. Ind= 47.09
2. Aus= 42.45
3. NZ= 41.04
4. Pak= 36.92
5. SA= 34.75
6. Eng= 33.11
7. SL= 32.36
8. WI= 26.99
Eng & WI have 2 of the 3 worst top 5s. A lot will depend on lower order... england gave upper hand there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great stat
Sign in if you want to comment
England v West Indies: 3 closed-door Tests
Page 8 of 64
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
posted on 9/7/20
should of bowled first ?
posted on 9/7/20
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 8 minutes ago
should of bowled first ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didnt we win the toss?
posted on 9/7/20
Utter no brainer given the overcast conditions yesterday...Stokes has had a mare (& I haven't even included the handshake)
posted on 9/7/20
Maybe he thought they’d be an it more rain = less play.
Oh well, good chance we’ll be bowling on this today anyway. Next few days are bright sunshine
posted on 9/7/20
Broad and Anderson bowling first would have picked up at least 4 wickets in 17 overs yesterday. Shocker.
posted on 9/7/20
Fed up with this crap batting team, just fed up.
posted on 9/7/20
Yes Neo..... hope you doing well pal. England Wumming is all and just trying to make a game of this will win by an innings and 81 runs.
posted on 9/7/20
Us all**
posted on 9/7/20
Avg/wkt of the top 5 in the batting order since 1st Jan, 2016 (top 8 Test teams):
1. Ind= 47.09
2. Aus= 42.45
3. NZ= 41.04
4. Pak= 36.92
5. SA= 34.75
6. Eng= 33.11
7. SL= 32.36
8. WI= 26.99
Eng & WI have 2 of the 3 worst top 5s. A lot will depend on lower order... england gave upper hand there
posted on 9/7/20
Looking tighter now.
posted on 9/7/20
I completely forgot about the cricket till now. Just checked the score, 153-5
So facking standard
posted on 9/7/20
Wow it was 87-5 !
posted on 9/7/20
Fack stokes gone
posted on 9/7/20
Probably be 170-6 or 7 before a lower order batsman like Buttler or Archer has a cameo to get us to 260 all out
———
This was my prediction this time yesterday. No idea why I don’t put money on england when they bat. Easiest thing in sport to predict
posted on 9/7/20
posted on 9/7/20
not bad from where we are, should get over 200 not a bad score
posted on 9/7/20
Buttler gone. Well bowled, well caught.
posted on 9/7/20
Been some great bowling to be fair, never should have batted first
posted on 9/7/20
Just smack us to 200
posted on 9/7/20
Ffs
posted on 9/7/20
A14 good thanks pal, you.
Had enough of this shiite, ffs. Why the fack did we elect to bat
posted on 9/7/20
find it hard to like Holder
posted on 9/7/20
Dreadful
posted on 9/7/20
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 6 minutes ago
Been some great bowling to be fair, never should have batted first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No...we could have bowled as well i'm sure
posted on 9/7/20
comment by Afridi14... ( ليدز_يونايتد )You go... (U2805)
posted 28 minutes ago
Avg/wkt of the top 5 in the batting order since 1st Jan, 2016 (top 8 Test teams):
1. Ind= 47.09
2. Aus= 42.45
3. NZ= 41.04
4. Pak= 36.92
5. SA= 34.75
6. Eng= 33.11
7. SL= 32.36
8. WI= 26.99
Eng & WI have 2 of the 3 worst top 5s. A lot will depend on lower order... england gave upper hand there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great stat
Page 8 of 64
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13