comment by £350k Förtnite Skin (U18355)
posted 12 minutes ago
What’s going on in Nevada. There hasn’t been an update in like 24 hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://twitter.com/i/status/1324218622751830019
Trump's lead in Gerogia dramatically shrunk overnight
GA Presidential Election Results
Trump (R): 49.62% (2,429,783 votes)
Biden (D): 49.15% (2,406,774 votes)
Going down to the wire
PA Presidential Election Results
Trump (R): 50.63% (3,220,597 votes)
Biden (D): 48.22% (3,067,410 votes)
Estimated: 91-99% votes in
Still a lot of ballots left to be counted in this too
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
PA looks like it’s going down to the wire, same with NV. Could be recounts there which could last weeks to complete.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A recount would take a few days, just as long as the first count
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
There's no proof that democrats vote more per post. There's no indication that a supreme court judge will not uphold the democratic process. If the votes are legal they are legal
There's no historic proof of fraud in US elections
------------------------------------------------
It's a known fact in the US that democrats traditionally send in more mail in ballots than republicans do. That's in any election. Both still vote in person on the day too. But any election sees a higher percentage of democrats, voting absentee/by mail, than republicans doing the same. Voting on the day numbers correspond. Every election, of all republican votes. The percentage of cast in person, is always higher than the percentage of total democrat votes that were cast in person. Nothing to do with number of votes in the whole election, just how the two party's way of doing things is and has been for years.
You're right about there being no historic proof of major fraud in election terms.
The court is a whole other issue. Trump now has it stacked with a 6-3 majority in his favour. He personally appointed 3 of them. In THEORY the Supreme Court should throw his cases out. But with an administration this crooked and 1/3 of the supreme court personally installed by Trump. On top of 70 federal appeals court judges, personally installed by Trump. Don't be so sure that the courts will do the right thing here. The federalists society didn't spend 250 million dollars, installing hand picked (vetted to their agenda) judges, for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its proven that there is no difference in numbers of voting per post. People keep saying that, its nonsense.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/08/do-republicans-or-democrats-benefit-mail-voting-it-turns-out-neither
comment by Hansaplast (U1250)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
There's no proof that democrats vote more per post. There's no indication that a supreme court judge will not uphold the democratic process. If the votes are legal they are legal
There's no historic proof of fraud in US elections
------------------------------------------------
It's a known fact in the US that democrats traditionally send in more mail in ballots than republicans do. That's in any election. Both still vote in person on the day too. But any election sees a higher percentage of democrats, voting absentee/by mail, than republicans doing the same. Voting on the day numbers correspond. Every election, of all republican votes. The percentage of cast in person, is always higher than the percentage of total democrat votes that were cast in person. Nothing to do with number of votes in the whole election, just how the two party's way of doing things is and has been for years.
You're right about there being no historic proof of major fraud in election terms.
The court is a whole other issue. Trump now has it stacked with a 6-3 majority in his favour. He personally appointed 3 of them. In THEORY the Supreme Court should throw his cases out. But with an administration this crooked and 1/3 of the supreme court personally installed by Trump. On top of 70 federal appeals court judges, personally installed by Trump. Don't be so sure that the courts will do the right thing here. The federalists society didn't spend 250 million dollars, installing hand picked (vetted to their agenda) judges, for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its proven that there is no difference in numbers of voting per post. People keep saying that, its nonsense.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/08/do-republicans-or-democrats-benefit-mail-voting-it-turns-out-neither
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That article doesn't show what you claim it shows. It talks about whether one party benefits more from mail votes in states that have switched to all mail votes. The original claim is that democrats are more likely to vote by mail when they have the option of both - which they do.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/01/why-itll-be-normal-if-results-shift-in-the-days-after-the-election
comment by Hansaplast (U1250)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
PA looks like it’s going down to the wire, same with NV. Could be recounts there which could last weeks to complete.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A recount would take a few days, just as long as the first count
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One for Martin, two for Martin.
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Hansaplast (U1250)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
PA looks like it’s going down to the wire, same with NV. Could be recounts there which could last weeks to complete.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A recount would take a few days, just as long as the first count
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One for Matin, two for Martin.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One for Ivan, one for Vladimir...
Make America Democrat Again
There’s a lot of noise from the Trump campaign at the moment but, in amongst it all, a few more moderate voices are making some coherent points:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AUmMUmLYT1Y
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 27 seconds ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it’s very odd
Its proven that there is no difference in numbers of voting per post. People keep saying that, its nonsense
-----------------------------
Someone else has already corrected you but I wll just add. You've been watching the casting differences, play out live in the current election.
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can certainly believe that Trump is trying everything. But how long this count takes won't be what decides it. Will come down to how many votes Trump, a federalist lawyer army and a tonne of cash from unknown sources, can get the Supreme Court to throw out. There's already a fraction which are the subject of a previous ruling, left open to appeal. A ruling given on a 4-4 split, before Trump added his 3rd and latest judge Amy Coney-Barrett. She will be there to hear the appeal.
comment by We got our Arsenal back (U10012)
posted 6 hours, 20 minutes ago
comment by £350k Förtnite Skin (U18355)
posted 12 minutes ago
What’s going on in Nevada. There hasn’t been an update in like 24 hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://twitter.com/i/status/1324218622751830019
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in Nevada, they haven't counted non stop. They went home for sleep and came back to continue in some of the counties.
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can certainly believe that Trump is trying everything. But how long this count takes won't be what decides it. Will come down to how many votes Trump, a federalist lawyer army and a tonne of cash from unknown sources, can get the Supreme Court to throw out. There's already a fraction which are the subject of a previous ruling, left open to appeal. A ruling given on a 4-4 split, before Trump added his 3rd and latest judge Amy Coney-Barrett. She will be there to hear the appeal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is worrying. Say what you like about Trump’s intelligence, but I don’t think he’d pursue something like this if he felt he had no chance of winning.
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can certainly believe that Trump is trying everything. But how long this count takes won't be what decides it. Will come down to how many votes Trump, a federalist lawyer army and a tonne of cash from unknown sources, can get the Supreme Court to throw out. There's already a fraction which are the subject of a previous ruling, left open to appeal. A ruling given on a 4-4 split, before Trump added his 3rd and latest judge Amy Coney-Barrett. She will be there to hear the appeal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is worrying. Say what you like about Trump’s intelligence, but I don’t think he’d pursue something like this if he felt he had no chance of winning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He would. Not to actually win but to sow discord and stir up his nutjob supporters in the hope the cause enough hassle....
comment by Ole-dirty-baztard - You want ole in, ole out, in, out, in, out, shake it all about. Do the ole Koke (U19119)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can certainly believe that Trump is trying everything. But how long this count takes won't be what decides it. Will come down to how many votes Trump, a federalist lawyer army and a tonne of cash from unknown sources, can get the Supreme Court to throw out. There's already a fraction which are the subject of a previous ruling, left open to appeal. A ruling given on a 4-4 split, before Trump added his 3rd and latest judge Amy Coney-Barrett. She will be there to hear the appeal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is worrying. Say what you like about Trump’s intelligence, but I don’t think he’d pursue something like this if he felt he had no chance of winning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He would. Not to actually win but to sow discord and stir up his nutjob supporters in the hope the cause enough hassle....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds familiar comrade
It really was quite surreal watching the BBC coverage yesterday. The amount of times the BBC had to say things like "baseless claims" or "without evidence" was amazing and, to a Trump sympathiser, it really would have sounded like open bias. But this is the world he's created for himself: if you say the things he said yesterday, you can't seriously expect news outlets to report it as a legitimate claim, so they're going to have to couch their reporting in language that seems to be biased against you.
I get that people like(d) him because he's "not like other politicians", but one thing politicians are generally good at is hedging their language, thinking about how they might be interpreted and how it might come back to haunt them - in short, being careful. He just rambles and comes out with stuff openly, thus leaving himself vulnerable to being proven wrong.
I think what should be getting more discussion is the polls. What a disgrace they are.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think what should be getting more discussion is the polls. What a disgrace they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UK elections 2015, Brexit, US 2016 and now US 2020. That's four I can remember where they've been way off recently.
I heard one guy basically saying yesterday that they underestimated how many people won't admit to voting Trump. Always seems to be the same mistakes they make.
comment by Igor have you ever felt the warm embrace of a leather seat between your legs. (U22200)
posted 14 hours, 8 minutes ago
Get Dublin ruling NI
If I ever have to vote for I'd vote NO!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Am hurt
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
I think what should be getting more discussion is the polls. What a disgrace they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair call....they get paid, right?
Biden was 10 to 12 pts ahead for months.
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think what should be getting more discussion is the polls. What a disgrace they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UK elections 2015, Brexit, US 2016 and now US 2020. That's four I can remember where they've been way off recently.
I heard one guy basically saying yesterday that they underestimated how many people won't admit to voting Trump. Always seems to be the same mistakes they make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Conservatives and leavers are afraid to be called racist or stupid, so lie to pollsters
Sign in if you want to comment
US Election - Live
Page 33 of 49
34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38
posted on 5/11/20
comment by £350k Förtnite Skin (U18355)
posted 12 minutes ago
What’s going on in Nevada. There hasn’t been an update in like 24 hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://twitter.com/i/status/1324218622751830019
posted on 5/11/20
Trump's lead in Gerogia dramatically shrunk overnight
posted on 5/11/20
GA Presidential Election Results
Trump (R): 49.62% (2,429,783 votes)
Biden (D): 49.15% (2,406,774 votes)
Going down to the wire
posted on 5/11/20
PA Presidential Election Results
Trump (R): 50.63% (3,220,597 votes)
Biden (D): 48.22% (3,067,410 votes)
Estimated: 91-99% votes in
Still a lot of ballots left to be counted in this too
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
PA looks like it’s going down to the wire, same with NV. Could be recounts there which could last weeks to complete.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A recount would take a few days, just as long as the first count
posted on 5/11/20
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
There's no proof that democrats vote more per post. There's no indication that a supreme court judge will not uphold the democratic process. If the votes are legal they are legal
There's no historic proof of fraud in US elections
------------------------------------------------
It's a known fact in the US that democrats traditionally send in more mail in ballots than republicans do. That's in any election. Both still vote in person on the day too. But any election sees a higher percentage of democrats, voting absentee/by mail, than republicans doing the same. Voting on the day numbers correspond. Every election, of all republican votes. The percentage of cast in person, is always higher than the percentage of total democrat votes that were cast in person. Nothing to do with number of votes in the whole election, just how the two party's way of doing things is and has been for years.
You're right about there being no historic proof of major fraud in election terms.
The court is a whole other issue. Trump now has it stacked with a 6-3 majority in his favour. He personally appointed 3 of them. In THEORY the Supreme Court should throw his cases out. But with an administration this crooked and 1/3 of the supreme court personally installed by Trump. On top of 70 federal appeals court judges, personally installed by Trump. Don't be so sure that the courts will do the right thing here. The federalists society didn't spend 250 million dollars, installing hand picked (vetted to their agenda) judges, for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its proven that there is no difference in numbers of voting per post. People keep saying that, its nonsense.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/08/do-republicans-or-democrats-benefit-mail-voting-it-turns-out-neither
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Hansaplast (U1250)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 5 hours, 43 minutes ago
There's no proof that democrats vote more per post. There's no indication that a supreme court judge will not uphold the democratic process. If the votes are legal they are legal
There's no historic proof of fraud in US elections
------------------------------------------------
It's a known fact in the US that democrats traditionally send in more mail in ballots than republicans do. That's in any election. Both still vote in person on the day too. But any election sees a higher percentage of democrats, voting absentee/by mail, than republicans doing the same. Voting on the day numbers correspond. Every election, of all republican votes. The percentage of cast in person, is always higher than the percentage of total democrat votes that were cast in person. Nothing to do with number of votes in the whole election, just how the two party's way of doing things is and has been for years.
You're right about there being no historic proof of major fraud in election terms.
The court is a whole other issue. Trump now has it stacked with a 6-3 majority in his favour. He personally appointed 3 of them. In THEORY the Supreme Court should throw his cases out. But with an administration this crooked and 1/3 of the supreme court personally installed by Trump. On top of 70 federal appeals court judges, personally installed by Trump. Don't be so sure that the courts will do the right thing here. The federalists society didn't spend 250 million dollars, installing hand picked (vetted to their agenda) judges, for nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its proven that there is no difference in numbers of voting per post. People keep saying that, its nonsense.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/08/do-republicans-or-democrats-benefit-mail-voting-it-turns-out-neither
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That article doesn't show what you claim it shows. It talks about whether one party benefits more from mail votes in states that have switched to all mail votes. The original claim is that democrats are more likely to vote by mail when they have the option of both - which they do.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/01/why-itll-be-normal-if-results-shift-in-the-days-after-the-election
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Hansaplast (U1250)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
PA looks like it’s going down to the wire, same with NV. Could be recounts there which could last weeks to complete.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A recount would take a few days, just as long as the first count
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One for Martin, two for Martin.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Hansaplast (U1250)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Constantinople (U11781)
posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
PA looks like it’s going down to the wire, same with NV. Could be recounts there which could last weeks to complete.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A recount would take a few days, just as long as the first count
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One for Matin, two for Martin.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One for Ivan, one for Vladimir...
posted on 5/11/20
Make America Democrat Again
posted on 5/11/20
There’s a lot of noise from the Trump campaign at the moment but, in amongst it all, a few more moderate voices are making some coherent points:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AUmMUmLYT1Y
posted on 5/11/20
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 27 seconds ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it’s very odd
posted on 5/11/20
Its proven that there is no difference in numbers of voting per post. People keep saying that, its nonsense
-----------------------------
Someone else has already corrected you but I wll just add. You've been watching the casting differences, play out live in the current election.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can certainly believe that Trump is trying everything. But how long this count takes won't be what decides it. Will come down to how many votes Trump, a federalist lawyer army and a tonne of cash from unknown sources, can get the Supreme Court to throw out. There's already a fraction which are the subject of a previous ruling, left open to appeal. A ruling given on a 4-4 split, before Trump added his 3rd and latest judge Amy Coney-Barrett. She will be there to hear the appeal.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by We got our Arsenal back (U10012)
posted 6 hours, 20 minutes ago
comment by £350k Förtnite Skin (U18355)
posted 12 minutes ago
What’s going on in Nevada. There hasn’t been an update in like 24 hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://twitter.com/i/status/1324218622751830019
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think in Nevada, they haven't counted non stop. They went home for sleep and came back to continue in some of the counties.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can certainly believe that Trump is trying everything. But how long this count takes won't be what decides it. Will come down to how many votes Trump, a federalist lawyer army and a tonne of cash from unknown sources, can get the Supreme Court to throw out. There's already a fraction which are the subject of a previous ruling, left open to appeal. A ruling given on a 4-4 split, before Trump added his 3rd and latest judge Amy Coney-Barrett. She will be there to hear the appeal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is worrying. Say what you like about Trump’s intelligence, but I don’t think he’d pursue something like this if he felt he had no chance of winning.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can certainly believe that Trump is trying everything. But how long this count takes won't be what decides it. Will come down to how many votes Trump, a federalist lawyer army and a tonne of cash from unknown sources, can get the Supreme Court to throw out. There's already a fraction which are the subject of a previous ruling, left open to appeal. A ruling given on a 4-4 split, before Trump added his 3rd and latest judge Amy Coney-Barrett. She will be there to hear the appeal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is worrying. Say what you like about Trump’s intelligence, but I don’t think he’d pursue something like this if he felt he had no chance of winning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He would. Not to actually win but to sow discord and stir up his nutjob supporters in the hope the cause enough hassle....
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Ole-dirty-baztard - You want ole in, ole out, in, out, in, out, shake it all about. Do the ole Koke (U19119)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by WB2 (Emery'll Get Me Killed) (U8276)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf---Mustn't grumble (U11551)
posted 8 minutes ago
All starting to feel a little suspicious this. The longer it goes on the more I think Trump will still win it. Seems a little bizarre a few important states have basically ground to a halt. And Nevada hasn't added a single vote for 30 odd hours.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can certainly believe that Trump is trying everything. But how long this count takes won't be what decides it. Will come down to how many votes Trump, a federalist lawyer army and a tonne of cash from unknown sources, can get the Supreme Court to throw out. There's already a fraction which are the subject of a previous ruling, left open to appeal. A ruling given on a 4-4 split, before Trump added his 3rd and latest judge Amy Coney-Barrett. She will be there to hear the appeal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is worrying. Say what you like about Trump’s intelligence, but I don’t think he’d pursue something like this if he felt he had no chance of winning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He would. Not to actually win but to sow discord and stir up his nutjob supporters in the hope the cause enough hassle....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds familiar comrade
posted on 5/11/20
It really was quite surreal watching the BBC coverage yesterday. The amount of times the BBC had to say things like "baseless claims" or "without evidence" was amazing and, to a Trump sympathiser, it really would have sounded like open bias. But this is the world he's created for himself: if you say the things he said yesterday, you can't seriously expect news outlets to report it as a legitimate claim, so they're going to have to couch their reporting in language that seems to be biased against you.
I get that people like(d) him because he's "not like other politicians", but one thing politicians are generally good at is hedging their language, thinking about how they might be interpreted and how it might come back to haunt them - in short, being careful. He just rambles and comes out with stuff openly, thus leaving himself vulnerable to being proven wrong.
posted on 5/11/20
I think what should be getting more discussion is the polls. What a disgrace they are.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think what should be getting more discussion is the polls. What a disgrace they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UK elections 2015, Brexit, US 2016 and now US 2020. That's four I can remember where they've been way off recently.
I heard one guy basically saying yesterday that they underestimated how many people won't admit to voting Trump. Always seems to be the same mistakes they make.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Igor have you ever felt the warm embrace of a leather seat between your legs. (U22200)
posted 14 hours, 8 minutes ago
Get Dublin ruling NI
If I ever have to vote for I'd vote NO!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Am hurt
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 5 minutes ago
I think what should be getting more discussion is the polls. What a disgrace they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair call....they get paid, right?
Biden was 10 to 12 pts ahead for months.
posted on 5/11/20
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 2 minutes ago
I think what should be getting more discussion is the polls. What a disgrace they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UK elections 2015, Brexit, US 2016 and now US 2020. That's four I can remember where they've been way off recently.
I heard one guy basically saying yesterday that they underestimated how many people won't admit to voting Trump. Always seems to be the same mistakes they make.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Conservatives and leavers are afraid to be called racist or stupid, so lie to pollsters
Page 33 of 49
34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38