comment by Striketeam7 - #WhatwouldFelix/Sandydo? - other than filter me (U18109)
posted 14 minutes ago
The release clause could close the book on the whole thing. If it’s £150m then City won’t pay that next summer. I’m guessing it will be nearer to £100m which I think will tempt both Manchester clubs next season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane has to sign the contract. Does anyone really think he will? He wants trophies and just seen Grealish sign for £100m. He knows what the best option is.
When he sits down with City he can say to them Spurs offered me £300k-£400k a week.
This puts more pressure on City paying the fee we want.
It's up in the air though..
I guess if there's no chance of a move then Kane now has leverage to say 'if you want me so badly, why don't you pay me like Lukaku, or Grealish, or Messi'.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by פlǝuƃɥᴉs (U19365)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by פlǝuƃɥᴉs (U19365)
posted 2 seconds ago
From TFA "Spurs remain very interested in signing Martinez from Milan. Even though they say he’s not for sale, there is confidence that they will buckle under their intense financial pressure."
So let's get this straight, some Spurs fans are up in arms that City have unsettled Kane & turned his head, to the extent that some of you want City sanctioned for doing so BUT are quite happy for your own club to do the same to try and get one of their targets.
Hypocrisy much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is putting 2+2 and getting 5. Very embarrassing for you.
There are only a couple of idiot Spurs fans who think it is wrong that City have "tapped up" Kane.
In regards to Martinez, if Inter were not in financial trouble would we even contemplate signing him? In essence we are helping with the survival of their future.
Quite alot of Spurs fans have acknowledged tapping up happens but in the case of Kane, he wants to win trophies and sees City as his best chance to do so.
I and quite alot of other Spurs fans don't blame him. Only a few muggy Spurs fans will be bitter towards him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What part of 'some spurs fans are up in arms' & 'some of you want sanctions' is 'putting 2+2 together to make 5'?
After all you yourself DID actually agree that 'a few muggy spurs fans' will be bitter & 'only a couple of idiot spurs fans' think its wrong that City have tapped him up.
Is not 'a few' the same as some?
Is not 'a couple' some?
The numbers may be small but it's still 'some spurs fans'. OK I'll concede that it's mainly Shandy, his sock accounts and followers, but it's still some.
BTW, I hope you keep Kane so he doesn't strengthen City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL you seem absolutely obsessed with me, do you ever post without mentioning my name. I think you need some help mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He did not mention you in his previous half a dozen comments, but you talk sheite a 100%, so no surprise there
any player deemed not good enough for £ity should not be deemed good enough for Spurs
#----------------------------
2. If Messi was so desperate to stay at Barca then he could have accepted lower wages to make the deal work - I have no doubt that they could have layered in sweeteners for him in exchange for a lower salary.
---------------------------------------
Why don't you lot research the facts first before spouting all this nonsense. He took the maxiumum pay cut allowed by law. He would have played for free, but wasnt allowed to. And even if he played for free, Barca still cannot register any players, because their wage bill is still too high.
Sign in if you want to comment
Transfer update
Page 4 of 4
posted on 10/8/21
comment by Striketeam7 - #WhatwouldFelix/Sandydo? - other than filter me (U18109)
posted 14 minutes ago
The release clause could close the book on the whole thing. If it’s £150m then City won’t pay that next summer. I’m guessing it will be nearer to £100m which I think will tempt both Manchester clubs next season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane has to sign the contract. Does anyone really think he will? He wants trophies and just seen Grealish sign for £100m. He knows what the best option is.
When he sits down with City he can say to them Spurs offered me £300k-£400k a week.
This puts more pressure on City paying the fee we want.
It's up in the air though..
posted on 10/8/21
I guess if there's no chance of a move then Kane now has leverage to say 'if you want me so badly, why don't you pay me like Lukaku, or Grealish, or Messi'.
posted on 10/8/21
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by פlǝuƃɥᴉs (U19365)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by פlǝuƃɥᴉs (U19365)
posted 2 seconds ago
From TFA "Spurs remain very interested in signing Martinez from Milan. Even though they say he’s not for sale, there is confidence that they will buckle under their intense financial pressure."
So let's get this straight, some Spurs fans are up in arms that City have unsettled Kane & turned his head, to the extent that some of you want City sanctioned for doing so BUT are quite happy for your own club to do the same to try and get one of their targets.
Hypocrisy much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is putting 2+2 and getting 5. Very embarrassing for you.
There are only a couple of idiot Spurs fans who think it is wrong that City have "tapped up" Kane.
In regards to Martinez, if Inter were not in financial trouble would we even contemplate signing him? In essence we are helping with the survival of their future.
Quite alot of Spurs fans have acknowledged tapping up happens but in the case of Kane, he wants to win trophies and sees City as his best chance to do so.
I and quite alot of other Spurs fans don't blame him. Only a few muggy Spurs fans will be bitter towards him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What part of 'some spurs fans are up in arms' & 'some of you want sanctions' is 'putting 2+2 together to make 5'?
After all you yourself DID actually agree that 'a few muggy spurs fans' will be bitter & 'only a couple of idiot spurs fans' think its wrong that City have tapped him up.
Is not 'a few' the same as some?
Is not 'a couple' some?
The numbers may be small but it's still 'some spurs fans'. OK I'll concede that it's mainly Shandy, his sock accounts and followers, but it's still some.
BTW, I hope you keep Kane so he doesn't strengthen City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL you seem absolutely obsessed with me, do you ever post without mentioning my name. I think you need some help mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He did not mention you in his previous half a dozen comments, but you talk sheite a 100%, so no surprise there
posted on 10/8/21
any player deemed not good enough for £ity should not be deemed good enough for Spurs
#----------------------------
posted on 10/8/21
2. If Messi was so desperate to stay at Barca then he could have accepted lower wages to make the deal work - I have no doubt that they could have layered in sweeteners for him in exchange for a lower salary.
---------------------------------------
Why don't you lot research the facts first before spouting all this nonsense. He took the maxiumum pay cut allowed by law. He would have played for free, but wasnt allowed to. And even if he played for free, Barca still cannot register any players, because their wage bill is still too high.
Page 4 of 4