comment by NijaFox (U21877)
posted 3 minutes ago
You can't keep an unhappy player, performance wise it would be disastrous. Cash in and have peace ✌
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sure they will as soon as city pay the asking price
comment by NijaFox (U21877)
posted 2 minutes ago
You can't keep an unhappy player, performance wise it would be disastrous. Cash in and have peace ✌
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can of you believe that they'll perform to a level above what you'll replace them with, especially with the world Cup coming up.
Fully agree with cashing in though, but has to be an acceptable cash amount.
No business sells their most valuable assets at a discount rate.
comment by NijaFox (U21877)
posted 6 minutes ago
You can't keep an unhappy player, performance wise it would be disastrous. Cash in and have peace ✌
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See Zaha
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
No one knows how true any of this is, but IF it’s the case that Levy promised Kane or led him to believe that Kane could leave if we didn’t get CL / trophies, and has since broken that, then how the hell can anyone be blaming Kane in this situation?
Just don’t make promises or agreements if you don’t intend to stick to them. Levy is unbearable sometimes. Just be a decent human.
comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 4 hours ago
“A derisory offer of £120m”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh...you thought you might get full whack first offer...I see
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 4 hours ago
“A derisory offer of £120m”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh...you thought you might get full whack first offer...I see
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he will go for 90- 125 mil,no one will pay 160 mil for Kane that's fanciful thinking
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
KLS - You are assuming Levy has broken his word but their are two sides to every story. We don't know if the 'promise' included a fee. So far we have only heard from Kane's side. Until Levy speaks or all the information around the promise is fully disclosed we are just speculating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think Kane is lying?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know. If the gentleman's agreement went along the lines of "No champions league and we get the fee we want you can leave" then Kane is not telling the whole story is he?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. KLS is making an assumption about what was said. Levy may very likely have said you can leave if we don’t get CL, I don’t doubt Kane is telling the truth here. But that will be on the condition that a club meets our valuation. It seems that City have not done that. Kane can’t expect Levy to accept a low ball offer to do him (and City) a favour. My assumption is Levy will honour his word providing the right offer is made - Kane should direct his frustration at City who, like others have said, have the means to purchase him but haven’t made an appropriate offer and have spent a fortune on Grealish who they didn’t need anywhere near as much as Kane.
That’s a world away from Sol Scuumball who looked the fans in the eye and told a a bare faced lie about his intentions, then compounded it by moving to Arsenal. He knifed the fans in the back and deserved absolute dogs abuse for it the miserable cuunnntt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This. I’m pretty certain some sort of gentleman’s agreement was set, but this was on our terms and when the price is offered for what we want, then he goes with our blessing. That being said, he’s single handily ruined his legacy with the club and supporters. What a fall from Grace.
comment by der kloppites Hi, wie geht es dir * (U13373)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 4 hours ago
“A derisory offer of £120m”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh...you thought you might get full whack first offer...I see
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he will go for 90- 125 mil,no one will pay 160 mil for Kane that's fanciful thinking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well he'll be staying then, already rejected 100m
The agreement that was that he can leave
Which he can but someone has to pay.
City could easily pay 150m for him, they decided to spend 100m on a player where they already have lots of 60m+ players in same position.
Kane should be frustrated with City and take it out on them by playing another great season at spurs and showing them what they're missing for not submitting a good offer
'But Haaland is available next summer for half that'
Only one club can sign Haaland, they'll be a big fight for him next summer and why not bid for him this summer then?
'Hes 28'
Right, still have many season of guaranteed 20+ goals in him.
'Hes injury prone'
No hes not, just misses handful of games most seasons with the same reoccurring ankle issue
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 5 minutes ago
The agreement that was that he can leave
Which he can but someone has to pay.
City could easily pay 150m for him, they decided to spend 100m on a player where they already have lots of 60m+ players in same position.
Kane should be frustrated with City and take it out on them by playing another great season at spurs and showing them what they're missing for not submitting a good offer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’ll tell ‘em
Surely he must know what kind of negotiator Levy is and he would demand the absolute maximum for him.
---------------------------------------------------------
That's the key point
If Kane genuinely thought Levy would've put his personal feelings above business then he's a fool. There's no other way to dress it up. Had decades of evidence to see what kind of owner he is.
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
KLS - You are assuming Levy has broken his word but their are two sides to every story. We don't know if the 'promise' included a fee. So far we have only heard from Kane's side. Until Levy speaks or all the information around the promise is fully disclosed we are just speculating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think Kane is lying?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know. If the gentleman's agreement went along the lines of "No champions league and we get the fee we want you can leave" then Kane is not telling the whole story is he?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. KLS is making an assumption about what was said. Levy may very likely have said you can leave if we don’t get CL, I don’t doubt Kane is telling the truth here. But that will be on the condition that a club meets our valuation. It seems that City have not done that. Kane can’t expect Levy to accept a low ball offer to do him (and City) a favour. My assumption is Levy will honour his word providing the right offer is made - Kane should direct his frustration at City who, like others have said, have the means to purchase him but haven’t made an appropriate offer and have spent a fortune on Grealish who they didn’t need anywhere near as much as Kane.
That’s a world away from Sol Scuumball who looked the fans in the eye and told a a bare faced lie about his intentions, then compounded it by moving to Arsenal. He knifed the fans in the back and deserved absolute dogs abuse for it the miserable cuunnntt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only me making the assumption is it? Ok!
Why the fack are Bin Dippers all over this thread, it is none of their business, they are like a dog`s dikk.... have to be in everywhere
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 2 hours, 36 minutes ago
'But Haaland is available next summer for half that'
Only one club can sign Haaland, they'll be a big fight for him next summer and why not bid for him this summer then?
'Hes 28'
Right, still have many season of guaranteed 20+ goals in him.
'Hes injury prone'
No hes not, just misses handful of games most seasons with the same reoccurring ankle issue
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So...he's not prone to a recurring injury then...?
comment by Genius of Nielsen (U9059)
posted 6 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 1 minute ago
Sol Campbell was one of the best defenders of his generation, won the league cup with Spurs, and transferred to Arsenal. He will always be considered a club legend at Arsenal. ... With Arsenal, Sol won the Premier League twice, the FA Cup twice and scored in the Champions League Final. Sol is the only man to have scored in the Champions League Final for Arsenal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ted, WTF do you have to keep bringing up Campbell, unless as I suspect you are really a closet Arsenal supporter. I doubt you will get a single Spurs supporter want to hear a single word about Judas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is the similarity with Kane totally beyond your limited intelligence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is zero similarity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sol Campbell:
-Lied to the club and fans saying he would stay and renew
- went on a free so the club didn’t recoup any money for arguably their biggest star and a player we’d developed
- went to Arsenal
Harry Kane:
- Pretty much openly admitted he wants to go
- if he does, we’ll likely get top dollar
- not going Arsenal
There are things about the Kane transfer saga not to like, but it’s not remotely like the Sol issue
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are saying things are different because the two players went about leaving in different ways.
I am saying the situations are the same because both players wanted to leave.
Simple enough!
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you did and were happy to terminate it at your convenience. Yet hold Kane against different standards.
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you did and were happy to terminate it at your convenience. Yet hold Kane against different standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are dumb. There is a legal and fecking obvious difference between the employment of a manager and other staff, and that of a player. If you cannot understand this concept then go educate yourself and cease spouting ignorant BS
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you did and were happy to terminate it at your convenience. Yet hold Kane against different standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are dumb. There is a legal and fecking obvious difference between the employment of a manager and other staff, and that of a player. If you cannot understand this concept then go educate yourself and cease spouting ignorant BS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You come out with that drivel and call me ignorant? Ok then.
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 16 hours, 59 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you did and were happy to terminate it at your convenience. Yet hold Kane against different standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are dumb. There is a legal and fecking obvious difference between the employment of a manager and other staff, and that of a player. If you cannot understand this concept then go educate yourself and cease spouting ignorant BS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You come out with that drivel and call me ignorant? Ok then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
we sacked Mourinho. Employers privilege.
We want certain players gone. they only leave if they want to. Employees privilege
Some players want to leave. They only go if we let them. Employers privilege.
All different scenarios both legally and morally and to try and conflate them and claim hypocrisy is petty, flawed point scoring displaying a lack of understanding.
Sign in if you want to comment
Broken promises
Page 5 of 6
6
posted on 18/8/21
comment by NijaFox (U21877)
posted 3 minutes ago
You can't keep an unhappy player, performance wise it would be disastrous. Cash in and have peace ✌
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sure they will as soon as city pay the asking price
posted on 18/8/21
comment by NijaFox (U21877)
posted 2 minutes ago
You can't keep an unhappy player, performance wise it would be disastrous. Cash in and have peace ✌
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can of you believe that they'll perform to a level above what you'll replace them with, especially with the world Cup coming up.
Fully agree with cashing in though, but has to be an acceptable cash amount.
No business sells their most valuable assets at a discount rate.
posted on 18/8/21
comment by NijaFox (U21877)
posted 6 minutes ago
You can't keep an unhappy player, performance wise it would be disastrous. Cash in and have peace ✌
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See Zaha
posted on 18/8/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/8/21
No one knows how true any of this is, but IF it’s the case that Levy promised Kane or led him to believe that Kane could leave if we didn’t get CL / trophies, and has since broken that, then how the hell can anyone be blaming Kane in this situation?
Just don’t make promises or agreements if you don’t intend to stick to them. Levy is unbearable sometimes. Just be a decent human.
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 4 hours ago
“A derisory offer of £120m”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh...you thought you might get full whack first offer...I see
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 4 hours ago
“A derisory offer of £120m”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh...you thought you might get full whack first offer...I see
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he will go for 90- 125 mil,no one will pay 160 mil for Kane that's fanciful thinking
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
KLS - You are assuming Levy has broken his word but their are two sides to every story. We don't know if the 'promise' included a fee. So far we have only heard from Kane's side. Until Levy speaks or all the information around the promise is fully disclosed we are just speculating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think Kane is lying?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know. If the gentleman's agreement went along the lines of "No champions league and we get the fee we want you can leave" then Kane is not telling the whole story is he?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. KLS is making an assumption about what was said. Levy may very likely have said you can leave if we don’t get CL, I don’t doubt Kane is telling the truth here. But that will be on the condition that a club meets our valuation. It seems that City have not done that. Kane can’t expect Levy to accept a low ball offer to do him (and City) a favour. My assumption is Levy will honour his word providing the right offer is made - Kane should direct his frustration at City who, like others have said, have the means to purchase him but haven’t made an appropriate offer and have spent a fortune on Grealish who they didn’t need anywhere near as much as Kane.
That’s a world away from Sol Scuumball who looked the fans in the eye and told a a bare faced lie about his intentions, then compounded it by moving to Arsenal. He knifed the fans in the back and deserved absolute dogs abuse for it the miserable cuunnntt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This. I’m pretty certain some sort of gentleman’s agreement was set, but this was on our terms and when the price is offered for what we want, then he goes with our blessing. That being said, he’s single handily ruined his legacy with the club and supporters. What a fall from Grace.
posted on 18/8/21
comment by der kloppites Hi, wie geht es dir * (U13373)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Jed Maxwell (U1449)
posted 4 hours ago
“A derisory offer of £120m”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh...you thought you might get full whack first offer...I see
----------------------------------------------------------------------
he will go for 90- 125 mil,no one will pay 160 mil for Kane that's fanciful thinking
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well he'll be staying then, already rejected 100m
posted on 18/8/21
The agreement that was that he can leave
Which he can but someone has to pay.
City could easily pay 150m for him, they decided to spend 100m on a player where they already have lots of 60m+ players in same position.
Kane should be frustrated with City and take it out on them by playing another great season at spurs and showing them what they're missing for not submitting a good offer
posted on 18/8/21
'But Haaland is available next summer for half that'
Only one club can sign Haaland, they'll be a big fight for him next summer and why not bid for him this summer then?
'Hes 28'
Right, still have many season of guaranteed 20+ goals in him.
'Hes injury prone'
No hes not, just misses handful of games most seasons with the same reoccurring ankle issue
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 5 minutes ago
The agreement that was that he can leave
Which he can but someone has to pay.
City could easily pay 150m for him, they decided to spend 100m on a player where they already have lots of 60m+ players in same position.
Kane should be frustrated with City and take it out on them by playing another great season at spurs and showing them what they're missing for not submitting a good offer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’ll tell ‘em
posted on 18/8/21
Surely he must know what kind of negotiator Levy is and he would demand the absolute maximum for him.
---------------------------------------------------------
That's the key point
If Kane genuinely thought Levy would've put his personal feelings above business then he's a fool. There's no other way to dress it up. Had decades of evidence to see what kind of owner he is.
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by KLS (U1695)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 3 minutes ago
KLS - You are assuming Levy has broken his word but their are two sides to every story. We don't know if the 'promise' included a fee. So far we have only heard from Kane's side. Until Levy speaks or all the information around the promise is fully disclosed we are just speculating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think Kane is lying?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know. If the gentleman's agreement went along the lines of "No champions league and we get the fee we want you can leave" then Kane is not telling the whole story is he?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. KLS is making an assumption about what was said. Levy may very likely have said you can leave if we don’t get CL, I don’t doubt Kane is telling the truth here. But that will be on the condition that a club meets our valuation. It seems that City have not done that. Kane can’t expect Levy to accept a low ball offer to do him (and City) a favour. My assumption is Levy will honour his word providing the right offer is made - Kane should direct his frustration at City who, like others have said, have the means to purchase him but haven’t made an appropriate offer and have spent a fortune on Grealish who they didn’t need anywhere near as much as Kane.
That’s a world away from Sol Scuumball who looked the fans in the eye and told a a bare faced lie about his intentions, then compounded it by moving to Arsenal. He knifed the fans in the back and deserved absolute dogs abuse for it the miserable cuunnntt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only me making the assumption is it? Ok!
posted on 18/8/21
Why the fack are Bin Dippers all over this thread, it is none of their business, they are like a dog`s dikk.... have to be in everywhere
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 2 hours, 36 minutes ago
'But Haaland is available next summer for half that'
Only one club can sign Haaland, they'll be a big fight for him next summer and why not bid for him this summer then?
'Hes 28'
Right, still have many season of guaranteed 20+ goals in him.
'Hes injury prone'
No hes not, just misses handful of games most seasons with the same reoccurring ankle issue
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So...he's not prone to a recurring injury then...?
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Genius of Nielsen (U9059)
posted 6 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 1 minute ago
Sol Campbell was one of the best defenders of his generation, won the league cup with Spurs, and transferred to Arsenal. He will always be considered a club legend at Arsenal. ... With Arsenal, Sol won the Premier League twice, the FA Cup twice and scored in the Champions League Final. Sol is the only man to have scored in the Champions League Final for Arsenal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ted, WTF do you have to keep bringing up Campbell, unless as I suspect you are really a closet Arsenal supporter. I doubt you will get a single Spurs supporter want to hear a single word about Judas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is the similarity with Kane totally beyond your limited intelligence?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is zero similarity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sol Campbell:
-Lied to the club and fans saying he would stay and renew
- went on a free so the club didn’t recoup any money for arguably their biggest star and a player we’d developed
- went to Arsenal
Harry Kane:
- Pretty much openly admitted he wants to go
- if he does, we’ll likely get top dollar
- not going Arsenal
There are things about the Kane transfer saga not to like, but it’s not remotely like the Sol issue
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You are saying things are different because the two players went about leaving in different ways.
I am saying the situations are the same because both players wanted to leave.
Simple enough!
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
posted on 18/8/21
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
posted on 18/8/21
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you did and were happy to terminate it at your convenience. Yet hold Kane against different standards.
posted on 18/8/21
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you did and were happy to terminate it at your convenience. Yet hold Kane against different standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are dumb. There is a legal and fecking obvious difference between the employment of a manager and other staff, and that of a player. If you cannot understand this concept then go educate yourself and cease spouting ignorant BS
posted on 18/8/21
Tetchy.
posted on 19/8/21
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you did and were happy to terminate it at your convenience. Yet hold Kane against different standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are dumb. There is a legal and fecking obvious difference between the employment of a manager and other staff, and that of a player. If you cannot understand this concept then go educate yourself and cease spouting ignorant BS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You come out with that drivel and call me ignorant? Ok then.
posted on 19/8/21
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 16 hours, 59 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 hour, 55 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Citizen Smeg. Hope anyone but City win it (U6574)
posted 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
The only thing that matters is the legally binding contract he was paid millions to sign and signed willingly.
Everything else is petulance
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But happy to cancel Mourinho's contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Er yeah but er that's er different.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose should never have been given a contract in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you did and were happy to terminate it at your convenience. Yet hold Kane against different standards.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christ you are dumb. There is a legal and fecking obvious difference between the employment of a manager and other staff, and that of a player. If you cannot understand this concept then go educate yourself and cease spouting ignorant BS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You come out with that drivel and call me ignorant? Ok then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
we sacked Mourinho. Employers privilege.
We want certain players gone. they only leave if they want to. Employees privilege
Some players want to leave. They only go if we let them. Employers privilege.
All different scenarios both legally and morally and to try and conflate them and claim hypocrisy is petty, flawed point scoring displaying a lack of understanding.
Page 5 of 6
6