comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 40 minutes ago
Not a single Fulham player appealed, VAR didn't even check it.
Winston knows best though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would anyone appeal? Everyone was waiting for something like that. Convenient that VAR didn't check it. This is Manchester City after all.
Another match day another debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here’s mamba with another spoonful of sanctimony 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you know what sanctimony is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool good city bad etc etc.
Mane was probably the worst for it actually, truly amazing how he could go from vertical to horizontal in the blink of an eye. Don’t remember anyone kicking off about that in the scouse camp tho
Watched it multiple times from multiple angles, looks just as bad on each one.
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted on 20/1/19
Opposition fans and pundits can cry all they want about him going down easily theres always been contact and in most cases multiple points of contact.
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 3 minutes ago
Watched it multiple times from multiple angles, looks just as bad on each one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a life, go for a walk.
It's a contact sport. There being contact doesn't necessarily mean it's a foul. A foul must be a foul. A foul is not just contact.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 3 minutes ago
Watched it multiple times from multiple angles, looks just as bad on each one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a life, go for a walk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Weird comment as usual.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
Not a single Fulham player appealed, VAR didn't even check it.
Winston knows best though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought the lack of protest from Fulham said a lot too, surely they would of pushed for a review given what was at stake?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A review wouldn’t overturn that though.
Doesn’t mean it’s not a clear dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First time I saw it back, I thought it was poor defending, a dive and a pen all at the same time (the last one due to how refs and VAR overly interpret contact to mean a foul nowadays).
Thought the more interesting one yesterday for both referee decisions and VAR was the Forest game. That seemed to be a really inconsistent application of it just in one game.
The de Bruyne one still doesn’t look like a penalty to me. Having said that, the defender doesn’t complain, so perhaps the contact was fuller than it looked on TV. Still, it’s only a trailing leg from the defender and de Bruyne certainly seems to milk the fall. I wouldn’t have given it.
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's settled then.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's settled then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, but it does challenge this view:
Just seen the pen on MOTD.
It seems the only people who were disputing it are on this thread
Finally we're all in agreement.
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's settled then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, but it does challenge this view:
Just seen the pen on MOTD.
It seems the only people who were disputing it are on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not like Boris to lie.
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's settled then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, but it does challenge this view:
Just seen the pen on MOTD.
It seems the only people who were disputing it are on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not like Boris to lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong Boris
Are you denying there was contact?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are you denying there was contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who, me? I said above there was contact.
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are you denying there was contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who, me? I said above there was contact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, Lizzy.
Melton, it’s really difficult to judge whether the contact was sufficient to give a foul when the player cheats.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Are you denying there was contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. We went over this yesterday.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 45 seconds ago
Melton, it’s really difficult to judge whether the contact was sufficient to give a foul when the player cheats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sticking with MOTD, it's weird that they dismissed three or four penalty claims in the Forest-Brentford game as "dives" or "not enough contact", when they were all about as convincing as the penalty de Bruyne won.
KdB had just played for 95 minutes against a team who were constantly cheating with blatent timewasting and cynical fouls.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Melton, it’s really difficult to judge whether the contact was sufficient to give a foul when the player cheats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed, it is even without “when the player cheats”, which is probably why so many seem to interpret contact equals foul nowadays. That’s why I said I thought it was poor defending too, players have got to not give the referee the option in the first place. There was a covering defender there, it wasn’t needed.
In the ground, I didn’t even think it was contentious tbh given the reaction. It’s only on seeing it back afterwards.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 35 seconds ago
KdB had just played for 95 minutes against a team who were constantly cheating with blatent timewasting and cynical fouls.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you can't beat them, Bruyne them.
Sign in if you want to comment
KDB dive
Page 8 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Serious Thorgen Kloppinson - No laughing matter (U1282)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 40 minutes ago
Not a single Fulham player appealed, VAR didn't even check it.
Winston knows best though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would anyone appeal? Everyone was waiting for something like that. Convenient that VAR didn't check it. This is Manchester City after all.
Another match day another debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here’s mamba with another spoonful of sanctimony 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you know what sanctimony is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool good city bad etc etc.
posted on 6/11/22
Mane was probably the worst for it actually, truly amazing how he could go from vertical to horizontal in the blink of an eye. Don’t remember anyone kicking off about that in the scouse camp tho
posted on 6/11/22
Watched it multiple times from multiple angles, looks just as bad on each one.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted on 20/1/19
Opposition fans and pundits can cry all they want about him going down easily theres always been contact and in most cases multiple points of contact.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 3 minutes ago
Watched it multiple times from multiple angles, looks just as bad on each one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a life, go for a walk.
posted on 6/11/22
Winston
posted on 6/11/22
It's a contact sport. There being contact doesn't necessarily mean it's a foul. A foul must be a foul. A foul is not just contact.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 3 minutes ago
Watched it multiple times from multiple angles, looks just as bad on each one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a life, go for a walk.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Weird comment as usual.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
Not a single Fulham player appealed, VAR didn't even check it.
Winston knows best though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought the lack of protest from Fulham said a lot too, surely they would of pushed for a review given what was at stake?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A review wouldn’t overturn that though.
Doesn’t mean it’s not a clear dive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First time I saw it back, I thought it was poor defending, a dive and a pen all at the same time (the last one due to how refs and VAR overly interpret contact to mean a foul nowadays).
Thought the more interesting one yesterday for both referee decisions and VAR was the Forest game. That seemed to be a really inconsistent application of it just in one game.
posted on 6/11/22
The de Bruyne one still doesn’t look like a penalty to me. Having said that, the defender doesn’t complain, so perhaps the contact was fuller than it looked on TV. Still, it’s only a trailing leg from the defender and de Bruyne certainly seems to milk the fall. I wouldn’t have given it.
posted on 6/11/22
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's settled then.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's settled then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, but it does challenge this view:
Just seen the pen on MOTD.
It seems the only people who were disputing it are on this thread
posted on 6/11/22
Finally we're all in agreement.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's settled then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, but it does challenge this view:
Just seen the pen on MOTD.
It seems the only people who were disputing it are on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not like Boris to lie.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
Chris Sutton says dive:
https://twitter.com/chris_sutton73/status/1589035228932079616?s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it's settled then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, but it does challenge this view:
Just seen the pen on MOTD.
It seems the only people who were disputing it are on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not like Boris to lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wrong Boris
posted on 6/11/22
Are you denying there was contact?
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are you denying there was contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who, me? I said above there was contact.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are you denying there was contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who, me? I said above there was contact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, Lizzy.
posted on 6/11/22
Melton, it’s really difficult to judge whether the contact was sufficient to give a foul when the player cheats.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 6 minutes ago
Are you denying there was contact?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No. We went over this yesterday.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 45 seconds ago
Melton, it’s really difficult to judge whether the contact was sufficient to give a foul when the player cheats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sticking with MOTD, it's weird that they dismissed three or four penalty claims in the Forest-Brentford game as "dives" or "not enough contact", when they were all about as convincing as the penalty de Bruyne won.
posted on 6/11/22
KdB had just played for 95 minutes against a team who were constantly cheating with blatent timewasting and cynical fouls.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
Melton, it’s really difficult to judge whether the contact was sufficient to give a foul when the player cheats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed, it is even without “when the player cheats”, which is probably why so many seem to interpret contact equals foul nowadays. That’s why I said I thought it was poor defending too, players have got to not give the referee the option in the first place. There was a covering defender there, it wasn’t needed.
In the ground, I didn’t even think it was contentious tbh given the reaction. It’s only on seeing it back afterwards.
posted on 6/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 35 seconds ago
KdB had just played for 95 minutes against a team who were constantly cheating with blatent timewasting and cynical fouls.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you can't beat them, Bruyne them.
Page 8 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9