comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
This guy is more Winston than Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The discovery of McWinston is unbelievable. If there’s a RaithDD I’ll die.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah man that'd be so good.
A Strathclyde Stretty too.
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 9 minutes ago
This guy is more Winston than Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re here trying to laugh about me, when you’ve been arguing on this thread for two days and I had already worked out this guy is a waste of time and left him to it?
Your lack of self awareness is as amusing as it is staggering.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 9 minutes ago
This guy is more Winston than Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re here trying to laugh about me, when you’ve been arguing on this thread for two days and I had already worked out this guy is a waste of time and left him to it?
Your lack of self awareness is as amusing as it is staggering.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tell us more about how technique and composure are the same thing ?
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
Boring. Next chapter of this thread please?
comment by Lorent Tolaj (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
Boring. Next chapter of this thread please?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This seems a valid viewpoint...
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/10264808/arena-attack-survivor-shamima-begum/
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol ok kid
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by Lorent Tolaj (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
Boring. Next chapter of this thread please?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This seems a valid viewpoint...
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/10264808/arena-attack-survivor-shamima-begum/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A strong emotional argument. Being dead, you can hardly come back to the country though. Unless you're delusional, or religious. I could have just said religious.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol ok kid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at you trying to stir the pot đ
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol ok kid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at you trying to stir the pot đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right? Christ I just don’t think this will set a precedent setting us back to withdrawing citizenship based on sxual preference, race or any other protect characteristic!
But apparently I support that and have fairly horrifying views lol
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. On a completely unrelated note. How come we let Prince Andrew back in?
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 9 minutes ago
Look at you trying to stir the pot đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
filth
comment by Lorent Tolaj (U1734)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. On a completely unrelated note. How come we let Prince Andrew back in?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Send him to Greece!
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lee Anderson is a massive c*nt who has actively called for the death penalty to be brought back and is almost certainly going to get voted out at the next election because most of his constituents are sick of him.
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol ok kid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at you trying to stir the pot đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right? Christ I just don’t think this will set a precedent setting us back to withdrawing citizenship based on sxual preference, race or any other protect characteristic!
But apparently I support that and have fairly horrifying views lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's big of you to admit it.
Anyway, need to go play some outdoor table tennis.
Happy to call it there and just say that we agree to disagree.
Those on the anti-terrorist side, we respect your arguments and you have every right to express them. All that us on the pro-terrorist side ask though is that you respect our views too?
Thanks.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind of guy who'll have to say 'what difference does a year make' about a 15 year old in court.
Christ I just don’t think this will set a precedent setting us back to withdrawing citizenship based on sxual preference, race or any other protect characteristic!
———
It may not, but I think it would foolish to assume that a society couldn’t descend to something similar if we treat the government with apathy for rowing back on protected freedoms.
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind of guy who'll have to say 'what difference does a year make' about a 15 year old in court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ironically, he’s the kind of guy that would say a 16 year old shouldn’t be able to vote because they are a child but would want to charge them as an adult when it comes to crime. There’s probably evidence of him saying just this if you looked.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind of guy who'll have to say 'what difference does a year make' about a 15 year old in court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ironically, he’s the kind of guy that would say a 16 year old shouldn’t be able to vote because they are a child but would want to charge them as an adult when it comes to crime. There’s probably evidence of him saying just this if you looked.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't even think of that!
It’s a classic Tory self-own.
Sign in if you want to comment
Shamima Begum
Page 24 of 32
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
This guy is more Winston than Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The discovery of McWinston is unbelievable. If there’s a RaithDD I’ll die.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah man that'd be so good.
A Strathclyde Stretty too.
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 9 minutes ago
This guy is more Winston than Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re here trying to laugh about me, when you’ve been arguing on this thread for two days and I had already worked out this guy is a waste of time and left him to it?
Your lack of self awareness is as amusing as it is staggering.
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 9 minutes ago
This guy is more Winston than Winston.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re here trying to laugh about me, when you’ve been arguing on this thread for two days and I had already worked out this guy is a waste of time and left him to it?
Your lack of self awareness is as amusing as it is staggering.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tell us more about how technique and composure are the same thing ?
posted on 23/2/23
Strathclyde Stretty
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
posted on 23/2/23
Boring. Next chapter of this thread please?
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Lorent Tolaj (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
Boring. Next chapter of this thread please?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This seems a valid viewpoint...
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/10264808/arena-attack-survivor-shamima-begum/
posted on 23/2/23
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol ok kid
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by Lorent Tolaj (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
Boring. Next chapter of this thread please?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This seems a valid viewpoint...
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/10264808/arena-attack-survivor-shamima-begum/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A strong emotional argument. Being dead, you can hardly come back to the country though. Unless you're delusional, or religious. I could have just said religious.
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol ok kid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at you trying to stir the pot đ
posted on 23/2/23
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
posted on 23/2/23
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol ok kid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at you trying to stir the pot đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right? Christ I just don’t think this will set a precedent setting us back to withdrawing citizenship based on sxual preference, race or any other protect characteristic!
But apparently I support that and have fairly horrifying views lol
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. On a completely unrelated note. How come we let Prince Andrew back in?
posted on 23/2/23
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 9 minutes ago
Look at you trying to stir the pot đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
filth
posted on 23/2/23
*protected
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Lorent Tolaj (U1734)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 1 minute ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. On a completely unrelated note. How come we let Prince Andrew back in?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Send him to Greece!
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lee Anderson is a massive c*nt who has actively called for the death penalty to be brought back and is almost certainly going to get voted out at the next election because most of his constituents are sick of him.
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Rdd II (U22942)
posted 16 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown đ¤ (U14177)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 1 minute ago
Bring her back, lock her up until trial and then keep her locked up and throw away the key.
There are some mitigating factors but ultimately you know that the ISIS rhetoric & actions are pure evil, even at 15/16/17.
As others have mentioned she doesn’t seem to have much remorse.
I won’t lose sleep either way though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Until she is deemed no longer a significant threat to the wider public. If through whatever we can do through the prison system we are able to rehabilitate her, she should be assessed through the normal parole procedures.
We have a prison system that has dealt with and continues to deal with terrorists. Use it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure sure but with terrorists, I won’t lose sleep over it either way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I lose sleep over many things, and won’t on the case of an individual like this. What I am concerned about is the treatment of people who have dual nationality, like my daughter for example. The implication of this is that one can have their British nationality revoked if they could also conceivably have another nationality, that’s a two-tier approach to nationality in this country which I do object to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think this is the dangerous precedent that many are predicting & worrying it will be. It’s not going to affect normal, well-behaved citizens. It won’t descend into ‘any type of criminal will have their citizenship revoked’. We’re talking about terrorists.
I still think we should deal with her but I wouldn’t worry about this affecting your family.
One thing you may need to think about is when your daughter is 18 and if she decides to study over here but if you guys moved abroad until then - boom International student fees. £24,000 a year please - cheers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Terrorists for now, but what about when its applies to homosexuals, people of colour, certain religions?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is exactly the kind of alarmist nonsense that I’m talking about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you don't think those groups have ever been criminalised?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think this country is going to take away peoples’ citizenship based on their sxual orientation, race or religion? You really think that?
If you do then good luck to you bro
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was within living memory that it was a crime to be gay in this country. Less than 40 years ago it was legal to rape your wife.
If that was the case that recently then why are you so sure that some lunatics might not do similar in the future? The tory party are already treating asylum seekers inhumanely
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently? Lmao
Like I said, good luck to you bro đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who said recently?
Clearly you would have no problem with these things happening again which says more about you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You said recently you dummy
As for your second statement well that’s just as silly.
You fail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I said "that recently" which clearly refers to the context of my comment about in living memory of people currently alive today. Since the discussion is about human behaviour I don't think that's a particularly long time when compared to human history is it?
Yes, I agree it's silly to jave no problem with the persecution of minorities. It wouldn't be the first time you have fairly horrifying views though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol ok kid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at you trying to stir the pot đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know right? Christ I just don’t think this will set a precedent setting us back to withdrawing citizenship based on sxual preference, race or any other protect characteristic!
But apparently I support that and have fairly horrifying views lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's big of you to admit it.
posted on 23/2/23
Anyway, need to go play some outdoor table tennis.
Happy to call it there and just say that we agree to disagree.
Those on the anti-terrorist side, we respect your arguments and you have every right to express them. All that us on the pro-terrorist side ask though is that you respect our views too?
Thanks.
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind of guy who'll have to say 'what difference does a year make' about a 15 year old in court.
posted on 23/2/23
Christ I just don’t think this will set a precedent setting us back to withdrawing citizenship based on sxual preference, race or any other protect characteristic!
———
It may not, but I think it would foolish to assume that a society couldn’t descend to something similar if we treat the government with apathy for rowing back on protected freedoms.
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind of guy who'll have to say 'what difference does a year make' about a 15 year old in court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ironically, he’s the kind of guy that would say a 16 year old shouldn’t be able to vote because they are a child but would want to charge them as an adult when it comes to crime. There’s probably evidence of him saying just this if you looked.
posted on 23/2/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 2 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/LeeAndersonMP_/status/1628476596792303616?s=20
Only just seen this now. Seems a bit dodgy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, ladies and gentlemen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind of guy who'll have to say 'what difference does a year make' about a 15 year old in court.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ironically, he’s the kind of guy that would say a 16 year old shouldn’t be able to vote because they are a child but would want to charge them as an adult when it comes to crime. There’s probably evidence of him saying just this if you looked.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't even think of that!
posted on 23/2/23
It’s a classic Tory self-own.
Page 24 of 32
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29