Seems admin has a new smart filter ?
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 10 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most sensible thing you've posted
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 minutes ago
Seems admin has a new smart filter ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Their password filter is good BTW
If you accidentally type your password into the comment box it automatically hides its
Like mine which is ****************
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 10 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most sensible thing you've posted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly more sensithM Maeda as motm
Cracking that cantwell doesn't think we won btw.
Denial is their new go to.
Getting the fans on board with daft comments will only buy u so much time, ya wee titty
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 5 hours, 28 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can say that again.
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 7 hours, 27 minutes ago
Cracking that cantwell doesn't think we won btw.
Denial is their new go to.
Getting the fans on board with daft comments will only buy u so much time, ya wee titty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See the DR doing its wind up best again https://twitter.com/Record_Sport/status/1645178018648969217?t=ZeTaUXfGeHP1GBAQo-mZJQ&s=19 , still find it funny that Jota's wang has been mistaken for an arm, lucky bassa ☹️
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 7 hours, 54 minutes ago
Cracking that cantwell doesn't think we won btw.
Denial is their new go to.
Getting the fans on board with daft comments will only buy u so much time, ya wee titty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s an attention seeker. That’s all.
He was making the point that the Rangers players threw away the game by gifting Celtic two goals. A pretty accurate point and good to see a player (albeit would have been better had it been Souttar or Davies) acknowledging that it was individual errors in big moments that lost the game. You can read it as some sort of oblique dig at Celtic if you like but it's pretty clearly a criticism aimed at his own teammates.
Tavernier has won 9 out of about 30 games against us.
2 were a draw after 90 minutes.
Talk is cheap
James Tavernier warns Celtic, they will see the real Rangers at Hampden.
Pointy?
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 15 minutes ago
He was making the point that the Rangers players threw away the game by gifting Celtic two goals. A pretty accurate point and good to see a player (albeit would have been better had it been Souttar or Davies) acknowledging that it was individual errors in big moments that lost the game. You can read it as some sort of oblique dig at Celtic if you like but it's pretty clearly a criticism aimed at his own teammates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What on earth is accurate about “Celtic didn’t win the game” for goodness sake? That was his headline grabber.
A game in which is has to be said he had practically zero influence in? I don’t recall him making any decent runs, challenges, passes or tackles. He was effectively a waste of a jersey.
It’s very early days but from what I’ve seen (and I watch most Rangers games to a point), he’s yet to show anything better than being a slight improvement on the dross that preceded him.
He is well known for his self promotion ant previous clubs and this is him simply being a daft wee attention seeker trying to crave popularity with the support.
Let him pull you into that if you want. It’s self promotion and nothing else.
I’d be well annoyed if any of our players came out with that had we lost to anyone.
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 9 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 10 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most sensible thing you've posted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly more sensithM Maeda as motm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't be blamed if admin has stopped drinking and is coding instead - what's your excuse, sausage fingers?
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 15 minutes ago
He was making the point that the Rangers players threw away the game by gifting Celtic two goals. A pretty accurate point and good to see a player (albeit would have been better had it been Souttar or Davies) acknowledging that it was individual errors in big moments that lost the game. You can read it as some sort of oblique dig at Celtic if you like but it's pretty clearly a criticism aimed at his own teammates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What on earth is accurate about “Celtic didn’t win the game” for goodness sake? That was his headline grabber.
A game in which is has to be said he had practically zero influence in? I don’t recall him making any decent runs, challenges, passes or tackles. He was effectively a waste of a jersey.
It’s very early days but from what I’ve seen (and I watch most Rangers games to a point), he’s yet to show anything better than being a slight improvement on the dross that preceded him.
He is well known for his self promotion ant previous clubs and this is him simply being a daft wee attention seeker trying to crave popularity with the support.
Let him pull you into that if you want. It’s self promotion and nothing else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also - and not to be too dinosaurian - he has the haircut of a pooof.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 15 minutes ago
He was making the point that the Rangers players threw away the game by gifting Celtic two goals. A pretty accurate point and good to see a player (albeit would have been better had it been Souttar or Davies) acknowledging that it was individual errors in big moments that lost the game. You can read it as some sort of oblique dig at Celtic if you like but it's pretty clearly a criticism aimed at his own teammates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What on earth is accurate about “Celtic didn’t win the game” for goodness sake? That was his headline grabber.
A game in which is has to be said he had practically zero influence in? I don’t recall him making any decent runs, challenges, passes or tackles. He was effectively a waste of a jersey.
It’s very early days but from what I’ve seen (and I watch most Rangers games to a point), he’s yet to show anything better than being a slight improvement on the dross that preceded him.
He is well known for his self promotion ant previous clubs and this is him simply being a daft wee attention seeker trying to crave popularity with the support.
Let him pull you into that if you want. It’s self promotion and nothing else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't imagine his team mates being too happy with him throwing then under the bus either so to speak, especially as he rather anonymous himself.
Rangers need to bring the cart horse and Kamara back for the semi.
Cantplay and SnowWhite's wee pal will get badly exposed at Hampden if Hatate is back.
"They didn't win the game, we lost it" is a pretty basic football cliché dragged out when a team's shaat the bed like Rangers did on Saturday. You can perceive it as some attempted dig at Celtic if you want but his words are literally just acknowledging that his team were at fault. Which they were. This wasn't a case of an irresistible Celtic team rolling Rangers over, it was a competitive game which Rangers threw away any shot at with Sunday league defending, hence it being, in cliché terms, more of a case of Rangers losing it than Celtic winning it.
It's pretty basic use of the English language. So basic in fact that even a preening footballer can wrap his head around it. I'm sure you can all get there too.
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 seconds ago
"They didn't win the game, we lost it" is a pretty basic football cliché dragged out when a team's shaat the bed like Rangers did on Saturday. You can perceive it as some attempted dig at Celtic if you want but his words are literally just acknowledging that his team were at fault. Which they were. This wasn't a case of an irresistible Celtic team rolling Rangers over, it was a competitive game which Rangers threw away any shot at with Sunday league defending, hence it being, in cliché terms, more of a case of Rangers losing it than Celtic winning it.
It's pretty basic use of the English language. So basic in fact that even a preening footballer can wrap his head around it. I'm sure you can all get there too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we had heads that wanted to appeal to the gallery and be in absolute denial by uttering such a stupid deflective comment, then yes; we could get our heads around it.
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 5 minutes ago
Rangers need to bring the cart horse and Kamara back for the semi.
Cantplay and SnowWhite's wee pal will get badly exposed at Hampden if Hatate is back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 10 minutes ago
"They didn't win the game, we lost it" is a pretty basic football cliché dragged out when a team's shaat the bed like Rangers did on Saturday. You can perceive it as some attempted dig at Celtic if you want but his words are literally just acknowledging that his team were at fault. Which they were. This wasn't a case of an irresistible Celtic team rolling Rangers over, it was a competitive game which Rangers threw away any shot at with Sunday league defending, hence it being, in cliché terms, more of a case of Rangers losing it than Celtic winning it.
It's pretty basic use of the English language. So basic in fact that even a preening footballer can wrap his head around it. I'm sure you can all get there too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bad players make mistakes when put under pressure by good player.
Branding your team mates as losers when you've been chasing shadows yourself is unlikely to help with integration.
I could understand if rangers had dominated (say possession, shots, shots on goal, xG, however you want to class it) and Celtic had been really lucky (say with a couple set piece goals coming against the run of play) then you could reasonably use the narrative that “ They didn't win the game, we lost it”.
That’s not what happened though.
Sign in if you want to comment
🇮🇪 Celtic 3 - 2* Rangers
Page 34 of 39
35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39
posted on 9/4/23
posted on 9/4/23
Seems admin has a new smart filter ?
posted on 9/4/23
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 10 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most sensible thing you've posted
posted on 9/4/23
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 minutes ago
Seems admin has a new smart filter ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Their password filter is good BTW
If you accidentally type your password into the comment box it automatically hides its
Like mine which is ****************
posted on 9/4/23
That's class
posted on 10/4/23
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 10 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most sensible thing you've posted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly more sensithM Maeda as motm
posted on 10/4/23
More sensible than *
posted on 10/4/23
Cracking that cantwell doesn't think we won btw.
Denial is their new go to.
Getting the fans on board with daft comments will only buy u so much time, ya wee titty
posted on 10/4/23
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 5 hours, 28 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can say that again.
posted on 10/4/23
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 7 hours, 27 minutes ago
Cracking that cantwell doesn't think we won btw.
Denial is their new go to.
Getting the fans on board with daft comments will only buy u so much time, ya wee titty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See the DR doing its wind up best again https://twitter.com/Record_Sport/status/1645178018648969217?t=ZeTaUXfGeHP1GBAQo-mZJQ&s=19 , still find it funny that Jota's wang has been mistaken for an arm, lucky bassa ☹️
posted on 10/4/23
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 7 hours, 54 minutes ago
Cracking that cantwell doesn't think we won btw.
Denial is their new go to.
Getting the fans on board with daft comments will only buy u so much time, ya wee titty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s an attention seeker. That’s all.
posted on 10/4/23
He was making the point that the Rangers players threw away the game by gifting Celtic two goals. A pretty accurate point and good to see a player (albeit would have been better had it been Souttar or Davies) acknowledging that it was individual errors in big moments that lost the game. You can read it as some sort of oblique dig at Celtic if you like but it's pretty clearly a criticism aimed at his own teammates.
posted on 10/4/23
Tavernier has won 9 out of about 30 games against us.
2 were a draw after 90 minutes.
Talk is cheap
posted on 10/4/23
James Tavernier warns Celtic, they will see the real Rangers at Hampden.
Pointy?
posted on 10/4/23
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 15 minutes ago
He was making the point that the Rangers players threw away the game by gifting Celtic two goals. A pretty accurate point and good to see a player (albeit would have been better had it been Souttar or Davies) acknowledging that it was individual errors in big moments that lost the game. You can read it as some sort of oblique dig at Celtic if you like but it's pretty clearly a criticism aimed at his own teammates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What on earth is accurate about “Celtic didn’t win the game” for goodness sake? That was his headline grabber.
A game in which is has to be said he had practically zero influence in? I don’t recall him making any decent runs, challenges, passes or tackles. He was effectively a waste of a jersey.
It’s very early days but from what I’ve seen (and I watch most Rangers games to a point), he’s yet to show anything better than being a slight improvement on the dross that preceded him.
He is well known for his self promotion ant previous clubs and this is him simply being a daft wee attention seeker trying to crave popularity with the support.
Let him pull you into that if you want. It’s self promotion and nothing else.
posted on 10/4/23
I’d be well annoyed if any of our players came out with that had we lost to anyone.
posted on 10/4/23
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 9 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 10 minutes ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most sensible thing you've posted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Certainly more sensithM Maeda as motm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't be blamed if admin has stopped drinking and is coding instead - what's your excuse, sausage fingers?
posted on 10/4/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 15 minutes ago
He was making the point that the Rangers players threw away the game by gifting Celtic two goals. A pretty accurate point and good to see a player (albeit would have been better had it been Souttar or Davies) acknowledging that it was individual errors in big moments that lost the game. You can read it as some sort of oblique dig at Celtic if you like but it's pretty clearly a criticism aimed at his own teammates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What on earth is accurate about “Celtic didn’t win the game” for goodness sake? That was his headline grabber.
A game in which is has to be said he had practically zero influence in? I don’t recall him making any decent runs, challenges, passes or tackles. He was effectively a waste of a jersey.
It’s very early days but from what I’ve seen (and I watch most Rangers games to a point), he’s yet to show anything better than being a slight improvement on the dross that preceded him.
He is well known for his self promotion ant previous clubs and this is him simply being a daft wee attention seeker trying to crave popularity with the support.
Let him pull you into that if you want. It’s self promotion and nothing else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also - and not to be too dinosaurian - he has the haircut of a pooof.
posted on 10/4/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 15 minutes ago
He was making the point that the Rangers players threw away the game by gifting Celtic two goals. A pretty accurate point and good to see a player (albeit would have been better had it been Souttar or Davies) acknowledging that it was individual errors in big moments that lost the game. You can read it as some sort of oblique dig at Celtic if you like but it's pretty clearly a criticism aimed at his own teammates.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What on earth is accurate about “Celtic didn’t win the game” for goodness sake? That was his headline grabber.
A game in which is has to be said he had practically zero influence in? I don’t recall him making any decent runs, challenges, passes or tackles. He was effectively a waste of a jersey.
It’s very early days but from what I’ve seen (and I watch most Rangers games to a point), he’s yet to show anything better than being a slight improvement on the dross that preceded him.
He is well known for his self promotion ant previous clubs and this is him simply being a daft wee attention seeker trying to crave popularity with the support.
Let him pull you into that if you want. It’s self promotion and nothing else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can't imagine his team mates being too happy with him throwing then under the bus either so to speak, especially as he rather anonymous himself.
posted on 10/4/23
Rangers need to bring the cart horse and Kamara back for the semi.
Cantplay and SnowWhite's wee pal will get badly exposed at Hampden if Hatate is back.
posted on 10/4/23
"They didn't win the game, we lost it" is a pretty basic football cliché dragged out when a team's shaat the bed like Rangers did on Saturday. You can perceive it as some attempted dig at Celtic if you want but his words are literally just acknowledging that his team were at fault. Which they were. This wasn't a case of an irresistible Celtic team rolling Rangers over, it was a competitive game which Rangers threw away any shot at with Sunday league defending, hence it being, in cliché terms, more of a case of Rangers losing it than Celtic winning it.
It's pretty basic use of the English language. So basic in fact that even a preening footballer can wrap his head around it. I'm sure you can all get there too.
posted on 10/4/23
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 seconds ago
"They didn't win the game, we lost it" is a pretty basic football cliché dragged out when a team's shaat the bed like Rangers did on Saturday. You can perceive it as some attempted dig at Celtic if you want but his words are literally just acknowledging that his team were at fault. Which they were. This wasn't a case of an irresistible Celtic team rolling Rangers over, it was a competitive game which Rangers threw away any shot at with Sunday league defending, hence it being, in cliché terms, more of a case of Rangers losing it than Celtic winning it.
It's pretty basic use of the English language. So basic in fact that even a preening footballer can wrap his head around it. I'm sure you can all get there too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we had heads that wanted to appeal to the gallery and be in absolute denial by uttering such a stupid deflective comment, then yes; we could get our heads around it.
posted on 10/4/23
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 5 minutes ago
Rangers need to bring the cart horse and Kamara back for the semi.
Cantplay and SnowWhite's wee pal will get badly exposed at Hampden if Hatate is back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 10/4/23
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 10 minutes ago
"They didn't win the game, we lost it" is a pretty basic football cliché dragged out when a team's shaat the bed like Rangers did on Saturday. You can perceive it as some attempted dig at Celtic if you want but his words are literally just acknowledging that his team were at fault. Which they were. This wasn't a case of an irresistible Celtic team rolling Rangers over, it was a competitive game which Rangers threw away any shot at with Sunday league defending, hence it being, in cliché terms, more of a case of Rangers losing it than Celtic winning it.
It's pretty basic use of the English language. So basic in fact that even a preening footballer can wrap his head around it. I'm sure you can all get there too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bad players make mistakes when put under pressure by good player.
Branding your team mates as losers when you've been chasing shadows yourself is unlikely to help with integration.
posted on 10/4/23
I could understand if rangers had dominated (say possession, shots, shots on goal, xG, however you want to class it) and Celtic had been really lucky (say with a couple set piece goals coming against the run of play) then you could reasonably use the narrative that “ They didn't win the game, we lost it”.
That’s not what happened though.
Page 34 of 39
35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39