Wtf why are you reading a Tory paper
Oh well, nevermind, wanted the other bid personally
No real investment then. Let’s hope he hires good footballing directors.
Was coming round to the idea of the Qataris and all
We’ve been given some shiiit choices for owners. A human rights abusing regime or a Tory climate sceptic Brexiteer. Shambles
I don't think Ineos have bid higher but they've done a deal with the devil, to keep the leeches on board. As a result they've valued the club proportionately higher, would be my guess, but with a lower figure as they aren't bidding for the whole club
If the Glazers stay at the club with SJR because of his sh*thouse broke b*tch bid I will despite him for eternity.
That's Neymar gone.
Welcome to Manchester Danny Ings
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 15 seconds ago
That's Neymar gone.
Welcome to Manchester Danny Ings
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 seconds ago
That's Neymar gone.
Welcome to Manchester Danny Ings
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, Weghorst on a permanent deal.
comment by Gilbert Napthine (U15867)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 seconds ago
That's Neymar gone.
Welcome to Manchester Danny Ings
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, Weghorst on a permanent deal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's the statement signing we've all been crying out for
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👌
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's willing? Sounds to me that the Glazer inbreds want to stay.
I'm fairly sure Sir Jim would be happy with a majority takeover and them being gone too. Why should he care as long as he has at least 51%?
The best news is the Glazers will no longer have any say on club decisions.
I'm sure I won't like them, but I didn't want Qatar, and they are the only other choice. One thing gives me hope, he's a United fan, apparently.
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's willing? Sounds to me that the Glazer inbreds want to stay.
I'm fairly sure Sir Jim would be happy with a majority takeover and them being gone too. Why should he care as long as he has at least 51%?
The best news is the Glazers will no longer have any say on club decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he's only buying 51% of the club, that means by default they would stay. The point is that by doing that deal, he's shown a willingness to keep them on board and to hell with the fans.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 9 seconds ago
I'm sure I won't like them, but I didn't want Qatar, and they are the only other choice. One thing gives me hope, he's a United fan, apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn’t you want the Qatar bid?
They were willing to clear the debt those parasites burdened the club with
Also he’s a United fan who wanted to own Chelsea
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's willing? Sounds to me that the Glazer inbreds want to stay.
I'm fairly sure Sir Jim would be happy with a majority takeover and them being gone too. Why should he care as long as he has at least 51%?
The best news is the Glazers will no longer have any say on club decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he's only buying 51% of the club, that means by default they would stay. The point is that by doing that deal, he's shown a willingness to keep them on board and to hell with the fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's actually 69% as we now know and that's all he needs. Them staying as minor shareholders means nada. They don't get any voting power. Nothing.
Sheikh Mansoor has sold off a sizeable chunk of City to far East. He still owns a majority though. That's all that matters.
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's willing? Sounds to me that the Glazer inbreds want to stay.
I'm fairly sure Sir Jim would be happy with a majority takeover and them being gone too. Why should he care as long as he has at least 51%?
The best news is the Glazers will no longer have any say on club decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he's only buying 51% of the club, that means by default they would stay. The point is that by doing that deal, he's shown a willingness to keep them on board and to hell with the fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's actually 69% as we now know and that's all he needs. Them staying as minor shareholders means nada. They don't get any voting power. Nothing.
Sheikh Mansoor has sold off a sizeable chunk of City to far East. He still owns a majority though. That's all that matters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not. The Glazers own 69% of the club so if Ratcliffe was buying that proportion, we'd be rid of them.
Regardless, there is a lot of uncertainty around this and the sheer fact there is probably doesn't bode well
He’s not a United fan, I’m pretty sure he had a ST at Chelsea. And he’s a parasite just like the Qatari’s
Sign in if you want to comment
INEOS
Page 1 of 6
6
posted on 29/4/23
Wtf why are you reading a Tory paper
posted on 29/4/23
posted on 29/4/23
Oh well, nevermind, wanted the other bid personally
posted on 29/4/23
No real investment then. Let’s hope he hires good footballing directors.
posted on 29/4/23
Was coming round to the idea of the Qataris and all
posted on 29/4/23
We’ve been given some shiiit choices for owners. A human rights abusing regime or a Tory climate sceptic Brexiteer. Shambles
posted on 29/4/23
Please God no!
posted on 29/4/23
I don't think Ineos have bid higher but they've done a deal with the devil, to keep the leeches on board. As a result they've valued the club proportionately higher, would be my guess, but with a lower figure as they aren't bidding for the whole club
posted on 29/4/23
If the Glazers stay at the club with SJR because of his sh*thouse broke b*tch bid I will despite him for eternity.
posted on 29/4/23
That's Neymar gone.
Welcome to Manchester Danny Ings
posted on 29/4/23
Despise*
posted on 29/4/23
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 15 seconds ago
That's Neymar gone.
Welcome to Manchester Danny Ings
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
posted on 29/4/23
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 seconds ago
That's Neymar gone.
Welcome to Manchester Danny Ings
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, Weghorst on a permanent deal.
posted on 29/4/23
comment by Gilbert Napthine (U15867)
posted 26 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 seconds ago
That's Neymar gone.
Welcome to Manchester Danny Ings
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, Weghorst on a permanent deal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's the statement signing we've all been crying out for
posted on 29/4/23
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
posted on 29/4/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
posted on 29/4/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👌
posted on 29/4/23
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's willing? Sounds to me that the Glazer inbreds want to stay.
I'm fairly sure Sir Jim would be happy with a majority takeover and them being gone too. Why should he care as long as he has at least 51%?
The best news is the Glazers will no longer have any say on club decisions.
posted on 29/4/23
I'm sure I won't like them, but I didn't want Qatar, and they are the only other choice. One thing gives me hope, he's a United fan, apparently.
posted on 29/4/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's willing? Sounds to me that the Glazer inbreds want to stay.
I'm fairly sure Sir Jim would be happy with a majority takeover and them being gone too. Why should he care as long as he has at least 51%?
The best news is the Glazers will no longer have any say on club decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he's only buying 51% of the club, that means by default they would stay. The point is that by doing that deal, he's shown a willingness to keep them on board and to hell with the fans.
posted on 29/4/23
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 9 seconds ago
I'm sure I won't like them, but I didn't want Qatar, and they are the only other choice. One thing gives me hope, he's a United fan, apparently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn’t you want the Qatar bid?
They were willing to clear the debt those parasites burdened the club with
posted on 29/4/23
Also he’s a United fan who wanted to own Chelsea
posted on 29/4/23
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's willing? Sounds to me that the Glazer inbreds want to stay.
I'm fairly sure Sir Jim would be happy with a majority takeover and them being gone too. Why should he care as long as he has at least 51%?
The best news is the Glazers will no longer have any say on club decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he's only buying 51% of the club, that means by default they would stay. The point is that by doing that deal, he's shown a willingness to keep them on board and to hell with the fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's actually 69% as we now know and that's all he needs. Them staying as minor shareholders means nada. They don't get any voting power. Nothing.
Sheikh Mansoor has sold off a sizeable chunk of City to far East. He still owns a majority though. That's all that matters.
posted on 29/4/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 53 seconds ago
It's not done and dusted yet but I will be happy if we don't have the Glazers in any controlling capacity. I'd rather them not have any shares but as long as it's a minority with no say whatsoever on how the club is ran I can live with that.
We also don't have to sell our soul to the Qataris and be a sports washing vehicle for them so it's even better news.....well for me at least.
Sir Jim is the richest Briton on the planet and has a company with revenues of 60bn behind him. That's a far better deal than being owned by parasites who have about 6bn between the lot of them (before any sale of the club)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. But if he's willing to keep the Glazers on board, it means that fan opinion is not something he cares one iota about.
He's also not made it at all clear if we will still have the debt. The only statement said there would be NEW debt. Add that to it being reported that he's been in discussions with the Elliot venture capitalists and there are a lot of questions to be answered.
It may well turn out okay but there is very little transparency from which to base an opinion on that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's willing? Sounds to me that the Glazer inbreds want to stay.
I'm fairly sure Sir Jim would be happy with a majority takeover and them being gone too. Why should he care as long as he has at least 51%?
The best news is the Glazers will no longer have any say on club decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he's only buying 51% of the club, that means by default they would stay. The point is that by doing that deal, he's shown a willingness to keep them on board and to hell with the fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's actually 69% as we now know and that's all he needs. Them staying as minor shareholders means nada. They don't get any voting power. Nothing.
Sheikh Mansoor has sold off a sizeable chunk of City to far East. He still owns a majority though. That's all that matters.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not. The Glazers own 69% of the club so if Ratcliffe was buying that proportion, we'd be rid of them.
Regardless, there is a lot of uncertainty around this and the sheer fact there is probably doesn't bode well
posted on 29/4/23
He’s not a United fan, I’m pretty sure he had a ST at Chelsea. And he’s a parasite just like the Qatari’s
Page 1 of 6
6