comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 4 minutes ago
The God Fowler....your not allowed an opinion, unless it agrees with the trans narrative...the hilarious aspect of modern trans is they want acceptance and no bigotry...yet they themselves are bigots against anyone who has a separate idea from them, they cancel...hound...and oppress anyone who has just a different idea to theirs...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've just made all this up.
Who is this "they" that you always speak of? I do wish you would stop referring to they/them. We don't need these made up words to refer to what we used to call people.
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 4 minutes ago
The God Fowler....your not allowed an opinion, unless it agrees with the trans narrative...the hilarious aspect of modern trans is they want acceptance and no bigotry...yet they themselves are bigots against anyone who has a separate idea from them, they cancel...hound...and oppress anyone who has just a different idea to theirs...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've just made all this up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really...so no body has been cancelled for having different opinions on trans matters?
Have u seen ANY trans discussions with people who.have a different view? They are labelled bigots..
Go do some research...then come back
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernançalvemiro triumvirate (U17054)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
As to the “shoving it down out throats” position, trans people have existed forever, and have been marginalised and often exploited in most (although not all) cultures throughout human history.
Now, as part of the LGBTQ+ community, they have a voice, they have allies and support, and they have something of a platform from which they’re able to try to cement in law for the first time those rights and privileges they deserve protected. They aren’t asking for any more than any of the rest of us have, as far as I can see; we’re talking about equal rights and recognition under the law here. I don’t see how anyone can really begrudge them that.
Now, if your position is, “I don’t care what people do with their own lives, I just don’t want to hear about it,” then fine. The next time anyone from either side of the debate pipes up (and I would suggest that in the last couple of years, from what I’ve seen of the mainstream UK media, we’ve heard more from anti-trans rights campaigners than the other side, but regardless), just turn the TV off. If there’s a pride march, don’t join in or watch it. If there’s a drag act performing at a local bar, don’t go.
I’m not a fan of celebrity culture. I’d go as far as saying I facking detest it. And sometimes it feels like wherever you turn, it’s stuck right in your face - TV, radio, print press, billboards, social media, shop facking windows. But I can get on with my life quite happily by choosing not to engage with it. It isn’t difficult to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The LGB and traditional Trans want out of the groomer organisation. It has been hijacked by groomers and we all know it. Its a peds playground these days. Have you seen all the rainbow vomit that is being shoved down kids throats at school. It is nothing short of indoctrination.
The LGB fought for decades to get on an equal footing to straight people, ony for these mentally ill loonies to jump on board and stir up hatred again due to their fascist ideologies and practices.
I someone looks like a dude, I'll call them a dude. If they have clearly made an effort (like the traditional trans) I'll be respectful. I may still think it is an illness, which technically it is, but I'll have respect. The dudes doing it to get access to womens facilities to stick one in the bank or worse/gain access to kids at parades or online (Jeffrey Marsh), can burn in hell!
The world is going down the toilet on this "don't offend anyone" bull I fear for my kids.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fantastic post
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 4 minutes ago
The God Fowler....your not allowed an opinion, unless it agrees with the trans narrative...the hilarious aspect of modern trans is they want acceptance and no bigotry...yet they themselves are bigots against anyone who has a separate idea from them, they cancel...hound...and oppress anyone who has just a different idea to theirs...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've just made all this up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really...so no body has been cancelled for having different opinions on trans matters?
Have u seen ANY trans discussions with people who.have a different view? They are labelled bigots..
Go do some research...then come back
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many people are getting cancelled? Give us numbers and tell us why it is a significant number
No mate...YOU do the research....
I googled "how many people are being cancelled for anti trans"
Came up with the headline:
"Nearly 240 anti-LGBTQ bills filed in 2022 so far, most of them targeting trans people"
It appears it is trans people that are being cancelled?
What other research am I supposed to do? Look up someone screaming on the Internet that they've been cancelled and have no voice?
Or shall I read back the comments of the extremely basic and insecure guys on here openly expressing their opinions on trans people, whilst complaining that they can't, whilst doing so, whilst being angry that they can't.
Any other research?
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/jan/14/sacked-silenced-academics-say-they-are-blocked-from-exploring-trans-issues
Just a quick search...there are loads, if u look.
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 53 seconds ago
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/jan/14/sacked-silenced-academics-say-they-are-blocked-from-exploring-trans-issues
Just a quick search...there are loads, if u look.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah yeah such a significant number. No wonder you are so concerned.
Also that article is basically saying both sides feel unsafe. Trans feel unsafe because of the perceived hate towards them, and then your side feel unsafe because you are little sissy girls. Am I right? Or are you scared of trans because you're a big man?
comment by Pierre Reedy (U1734)
posted 2 minutes ago
Also that article is basically saying both sides feel unsafe. Trans feel unsafe because of the perceived hate towards them, and then your side feel unsafe because you are little sissy girls. Am I right? Or are you scared of trans because you're a big man?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WOW...my side!! W.O.W.....
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 43 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, did u read it?
It specifically says a accudental mispronoun thingy is not part of the law only persustant, purposeful behavior with intent to cause harm.
So ur statement was 100% incorrect n overstated.
GT's side getting humiliated. Serves them right for trying to force their anti trans agenda on us. I'm all for you having an opinion GT, just don't shove it down our throat
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 43 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, did u read it?
It specifically says a accudental mispronoun thingy is not part of the law only persustant, purposeful behavior with intent to cause harm.
So ur statement was 100% incorrect n overstated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did read it...it appears u didnt
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 43 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, did u read it?
It specifically says a accudental mispronoun thingy is not part of the law only persustant, purposeful behavior with intent to cause harm.
So ur statement was 100% incorrect n overstated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did read it...it appears u didnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
U cannot comprehend ritten words
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 43 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, did u read it?
It specifically says a accudental mispronoun thingy is not part of the law only persustant, purposeful behavior with intent to cause harm.
So ur statement was 100% incorrect n overstated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did read it...it appears u didnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
U cannot comprehend ritten words
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh the irony...."ritten"..
Excerpt for you:
Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible,
--------
Because apparently you can't read...
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 26 seconds ago
Excerpt for you:
Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible,
--------
Because apparently you can't read...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
N u cannot comprehend
“Repeatedly” “purposefully” “refuse” “might” “was determined to constute” “discrimination”
Doent really cover a “hi mate” mustake
ru a Jets fan by any chance?
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Excerpt for you:
Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible,
--------
Because apparently you can't read...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When asked whether GT could chop his own coock off and then shaag his own arrse with it whilst screaming "told you I'd shaag a girl one day, dad", he also responded " it's possible".
comment by Pierre Reedy (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Excerpt for you:
Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible,
--------
Because apparently you can't read...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When asked whether GT could chop his own coock off and then shaag his own arrse with it whilst screaming "told you I'd shaag a girl one day, dad", he also responded " it's possible".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*GB
Wow this article is pure proof that there isnt any footy on atm lool
comment by 1manontherun 7-0 (U4291)
posted 47 seconds ago
Wow this article is pure proof that there isnt any footy on atm lool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ripper Street?
comment by 1manontherun 7-0 (U4291)
posted 6 minutes ago
Wow this article is pure proof that there isnt any footy on atm lool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 hour, 52 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From that very link
"Does the bill legislate the use of certain language? And could someone go to jail for using the wrong pronoun?
In the Criminal Code, which does not reference pronouns, Cossman says misusing pronouns alone would not constitute a criminal act.
“The misuse of gender pronouns, without more, cannot rise to the level of a crime,” she says. “It cannot rise to the level of advocating genocide, inciting hatred, hate speech or hate crimes … (it) simply cannot meet the threshold.”
The Canadian Human Rights Act does not mention pronouns either. The act protects certain groups from discrimination."
So not only have you been literally making up lies to justify your transphobia, you even provided the evidence to show you were lying.
What an absolutely embarrassment you are.
Sign in if you want to comment
Trans language..
Page 7 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 4 minutes ago
The God Fowler....your not allowed an opinion, unless it agrees with the trans narrative...the hilarious aspect of modern trans is they want acceptance and no bigotry...yet they themselves are bigots against anyone who has a separate idea from them, they cancel...hound...and oppress anyone who has just a different idea to theirs...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've just made all this up.
posted on 18/6/23
Who is this "they" that you always speak of? I do wish you would stop referring to they/them. We don't need these made up words to refer to what we used to call people.
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 4 minutes ago
The God Fowler....your not allowed an opinion, unless it agrees with the trans narrative...the hilarious aspect of modern trans is they want acceptance and no bigotry...yet they themselves are bigots against anyone who has a separate idea from them, they cancel...hound...and oppress anyone who has just a different idea to theirs...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've just made all this up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really...so no body has been cancelled for having different opinions on trans matters?
Have u seen ANY trans discussions with people who.have a different view? They are labelled bigots..
Go do some research...then come back
posted on 18/6/23
comment by The God Fowler (U2538)
posted 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernançalvemiro triumvirate (U17054)
posted 4 hours, 33 minutes ago
As to the “shoving it down out throats” position, trans people have existed forever, and have been marginalised and often exploited in most (although not all) cultures throughout human history.
Now, as part of the LGBTQ+ community, they have a voice, they have allies and support, and they have something of a platform from which they’re able to try to cement in law for the first time those rights and privileges they deserve protected. They aren’t asking for any more than any of the rest of us have, as far as I can see; we’re talking about equal rights and recognition under the law here. I don’t see how anyone can really begrudge them that.
Now, if your position is, “I don’t care what people do with their own lives, I just don’t want to hear about it,” then fine. The next time anyone from either side of the debate pipes up (and I would suggest that in the last couple of years, from what I’ve seen of the mainstream UK media, we’ve heard more from anti-trans rights campaigners than the other side, but regardless), just turn the TV off. If there’s a pride march, don’t join in or watch it. If there’s a drag act performing at a local bar, don’t go.
I’m not a fan of celebrity culture. I’d go as far as saying I facking detest it. And sometimes it feels like wherever you turn, it’s stuck right in your face - TV, radio, print press, billboards, social media, shop facking windows. But I can get on with my life quite happily by choosing not to engage with it. It isn’t difficult to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The LGB and traditional Trans want out of the groomer organisation. It has been hijacked by groomers and we all know it. Its a peds playground these days. Have you seen all the rainbow vomit that is being shoved down kids throats at school. It is nothing short of indoctrination.
The LGB fought for decades to get on an equal footing to straight people, ony for these mentally ill loonies to jump on board and stir up hatred again due to their fascist ideologies and practices.
I someone looks like a dude, I'll call them a dude. If they have clearly made an effort (like the traditional trans) I'll be respectful. I may still think it is an illness, which technically it is, but I'll have respect. The dudes doing it to get access to womens facilities to stick one in the bank or worse/gain access to kids at parades or online (Jeffrey Marsh), can burn in hell!
The world is going down the toilet on this "don't offend anyone" bull I fear for my kids.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
fantastic post
posted on 18/6/23
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 4 minutes ago
The God Fowler....your not allowed an opinion, unless it agrees with the trans narrative...the hilarious aspect of modern trans is they want acceptance and no bigotry...yet they themselves are bigots against anyone who has a separate idea from them, they cancel...hound...and oppress anyone who has just a different idea to theirs...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've just made all this up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really...so no body has been cancelled for having different opinions on trans matters?
Have u seen ANY trans discussions with people who.have a different view? They are labelled bigots..
Go do some research...then come back
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How many people are getting cancelled? Give us numbers and tell us why it is a significant number
posted on 18/6/23
No mate...YOU do the research....
posted on 18/6/23
I googled "how many people are being cancelled for anti trans"
Came up with the headline:
"Nearly 240 anti-LGBTQ bills filed in 2022 so far, most of them targeting trans people"
It appears it is trans people that are being cancelled?
What other research am I supposed to do? Look up someone screaming on the Internet that they've been cancelled and have no voice?
Or shall I read back the comments of the extremely basic and insecure guys on here openly expressing their opinions on trans people, whilst complaining that they can't, whilst doing so, whilst being angry that they can't.
Any other research?
posted on 18/6/23
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/jan/14/sacked-silenced-academics-say-they-are-blocked-from-exploring-trans-issues
Just a quick search...there are loads, if u look.
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 53 seconds ago
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/jan/14/sacked-silenced-academics-say-they-are-blocked-from-exploring-trans-issues
Just a quick search...there are loads, if u look.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah yeah such a significant number. No wonder you are so concerned.
posted on 18/6/23
Also that article is basically saying both sides feel unsafe. Trans feel unsafe because of the perceived hate towards them, and then your side feel unsafe because you are little sissy girls. Am I right? Or are you scared of trans because you're a big man?
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Pierre Reedy (U1734)
posted 2 minutes ago
Also that article is basically saying both sides feel unsafe. Trans feel unsafe because of the perceived hate towards them, and then your side feel unsafe because you are little sissy girls. Am I right? Or are you scared of trans because you're a big man?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WOW...my side!! W.O.W.....
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 43 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, did u read it?
It specifically says a accudental mispronoun thingy is not part of the law only persustant, purposeful behavior with intent to cause harm.
So ur statement was 100% incorrect n overstated.
posted on 18/6/23
GT's side getting humiliated. Serves them right for trying to force their anti trans agenda on us. I'm all for you having an opinion GT, just don't shove it down our throat
posted on 18/6/23
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 43 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, did u read it?
It specifically says a accudental mispronoun thingy is not part of the law only persustant, purposeful behavior with intent to cause harm.
So ur statement was 100% incorrect n overstated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did read it...it appears u didnt
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 43 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, did u read it?
It specifically says a accudental mispronoun thingy is not part of the law only persustant, purposeful behavior with intent to cause harm.
So ur statement was 100% incorrect n overstated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did read it...it appears u didnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
U cannot comprehend ritten words
posted on 18/6/23
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by #4zA Napul3 (U22472)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 43 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good, did u read it?
It specifically says a accudental mispronoun thingy is not part of the law only persustant, purposeful behavior with intent to cause harm.
So ur statement was 100% incorrect n overstated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did read it...it appears u didnt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
U cannot comprehend ritten words
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh the irony...."ritten"..
posted on 18/6/23
Excerpt for you:
Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible,
--------
Because apparently you can't read...
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 26 seconds ago
Excerpt for you:
Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible,
--------
Because apparently you can't read...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
N u cannot comprehend
“Repeatedly” “purposefully” “refuse” “might” “was determined to constute” “discrimination”
Doent really cover a “hi mate” mustake
ru a Jets fan by any chance?
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Excerpt for you:
Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible,
--------
Because apparently you can't read...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When asked whether GT could chop his own coock off and then shaag his own arrse with it whilst screaming "told you I'd shaag a girl one day, dad", he also responded " it's possible".
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Pierre Reedy (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Excerpt for you:
Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible,
--------
Because apparently you can't read...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When asked whether GT could chop his own coock off and then shaag his own arrse with it whilst screaming "told you I'd shaag a girl one day, dad", he also responded " it's possible".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*GB
posted on 18/6/23
Wow this article is pure proof that there isnt any footy on atm lool
posted on 18/6/23
comment by 1manontherun 7-0 (U4291)
posted 47 seconds ago
Wow this article is pure proof that there isnt any footy on atm lool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ripper Street?
posted on 18/6/23
comment by 1manontherun 7-0 (U4291)
posted 6 minutes ago
Wow this article is pure proof that there isnt any footy on atm lool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 18/6/23
comment by Got_Better (U6241)
posted 1 hour, 52 minutes ago
https://www.cbc.ca/cbcdocspov/features/canadas-gender-identity-rights-bill-c-16-explained
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From that very link
"Does the bill legislate the use of certain language? And could someone go to jail for using the wrong pronoun?
In the Criminal Code, which does not reference pronouns, Cossman says misusing pronouns alone would not constitute a criminal act.
“The misuse of gender pronouns, without more, cannot rise to the level of a crime,” she says. “It cannot rise to the level of advocating genocide, inciting hatred, hate speech or hate crimes … (it) simply cannot meet the threshold.”
The Canadian Human Rights Act does not mention pronouns either. The act protects certain groups from discrimination."
So not only have you been literally making up lies to justify your transphobia, you even provided the evidence to show you were lying.
What an absolutely embarrassment you are.
Page 7 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10