comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 16 minutes ago
My extensive knowledge of Football Manager tells me this is bogus.
===========



the sole reason i was buzzing about us getting nakamura btw.

my entire knowledge of him was he was good for 25-30 assists a season.

football manager now is mad, scouts are absolute mutants.

3 million transfer budget? sound here i've scouted this guy leo messi we should try and sign him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, I've got the free download cm01/02

Absolute nostalgia. You can patch it to have this season's players too. So much better, get through a season in a day

comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 22 minutes ago
What’s happening with the Tillman signing? Reports in Germany that Bayern have decided not to sell him to rangers?!

I thought they couldn’t do that with the exclusive option to buy they had?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooo, I remember that thread - might be a good search for someone....?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No need really. Suffice to say that many of them simply got it completely wrong and were talking out of their hats. As usual.

A release clause can only be activated if all 3 parties agree. It just sets out the fee in advance. Simples.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My extensive knowledge of Football Manager tells me this is bogus. You can have a minimum release fee. Meaning the selling club can't reject. Player could still reject though.

I guess it could have been a different clause though? Maybe a gentleman's agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not at all. If some other club had come in and offered £10m; Bayern had the right to sell to them with Tillman’s agreement. Rangers £5m sell on clause then becomes meaningless.

No club can be “forced” to sell a player even if the player and the buying club agree.

Is my understanding.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And it's wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So according to this, it’s Tillman that doesn’t want to come, seeing as Bayern clearly have no choice in the matter

Ok

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 22 minutes ago
What’s happening with the Tillman signing? Reports in Germany that Bayern have decided not to sell him to rangers?!

I thought they couldn’t do that with the exclusive option to buy they had?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooo, I remember that thread - might be a good search for someone....?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No need really. Suffice to say that many of them simply got it completely wrong and were talking out of their hats. As usual.

A release clause can only be activated if all 3 parties agree. It just sets out the fee in advance. Simples.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My extensive knowledge of Football Manager tells me this is bogus. You can have a minimum release fee. Meaning the selling club can't reject. Player could still reject though.

I guess it could have been a different clause though? Maybe a gentleman's agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not at all. If some other club had come in and offered £10m; Bayern had the right to sell to them with Tillman’s agreement. Rangers £5m sell on clause then becomes meaningless.

No club can be “forced” to sell a player even if the player and the buying club agree.

Is my understanding.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And it's wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So according to this, it’s Tillman that doesn’t want to come, seeing as Bayern clearly have no choice in the matter

Ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it could be a different clause?

As I already said holiday heed

comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 22 minutes ago
What’s happening with the Tillman signing? Reports in Germany that Bayern have decided not to sell him to rangers?!

I thought they couldn’t do that with the exclusive option to buy they had?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooo, I remember that thread - might be a good search for someone....?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No need really. Suffice to say that many of them simply got it completely wrong and were talking out of their hats. As usual.

A release clause can only be activated if all 3 parties agree. It just sets out the fee in advance. Simples.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My extensive knowledge of Football Manager tells me this is bogus. You can have a minimum release fee. Meaning the selling club can't reject. Player could still reject though.

I guess it could have been a different clause though? Maybe a gentleman's agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not at all. If some other club had come in and offered £10m; Bayern had the right to sell to them with Tillman’s agreement. Rangers £5m sell on clause then becomes meaningless.

No club can be “forced” to sell a player even if the player and the buying club agree.

Is my understanding.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And it's wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------



So according to this, it’s Tillman that doesn’t want to come, seeing as Bayern clearly have no choice in the matter

Ok
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it could be a different clause?

As I already said holiday heed
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Fwck off

Now you’re inserting imaginary clauses. Time you had a holiday.

comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 16 minutes ago
My extensive knowledge of Football Manager tells me this is bogus.
===========



the sole reason i was buzzing about us getting nakamura btw.

my entire knowledge of him was he was good for 25-30 assists a season.

football manager now is mad, scouts are absolute mutants.

3 million transfer budget? sound here i've scouted this guy leo messi we should try and sign him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, I've got the free download cm01/02

Absolute nostalgia. You can patch it to have this season's players too. So much better, get through a season in a day
----------------------------------------------------------------------

for realsies?

if you could pass me the site to download the patch i would appreciate...

a number of years ago i had a patch that put celtic in the third division, nae dosh, just the reserves left, it was fun.

i expect it was not fun when it happened with rangers.

comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 16 minutes ago
My extensive knowledge of Football Manager tells me this is bogus.
===========



the sole reason i was buzzing about us getting nakamura btw.

my entire knowledge of him was he was good for 25-30 assists a season.

football manager now is mad, scouts are absolute mutants.

3 million transfer budget? sound here i've scouted this guy leo messi we should try and sign him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, I've got the free download cm01/02

Absolute nostalgia. You can patch it to have this season's players too. So much better, get through a season in a day
----------------------------------------------------------------------

for realsies?

if you could pass me the site to download the patch i would appreciate...

a number of years ago i had a patch that put celtic in the third division, nae dosh, just the reserves left, it was fun.

i expect it was not fun when it happened with rangers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But likewise they had nae munny

Au contraire - we kept hearing they had loadsa money and no co-op debt. Then they spunked it on wi-fi and Jon Daly.

What's the point in having a clause to buy a player for a set fee if the selling team can just say "actually naw" when an offer is made? That's just not honouring a contract. The only way it makes sense that he's not joining is if we didn't make an offer (unlikely), there was a buy-out fee for Bayern to cancel the clause (maybe), or Tillman himself has decided he doesn't want to join (entirely possible). If clubs can just ignore contract clauses when they don't like them anymore, no one would ever agree contracts because they're meaningless. That's the foundational argument of the categorical imperative.

comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 45 seconds ago
If clubs can just ignore contract clauses when they don't like them anymore, no one would ever agree contracts because they're meaningless. That's the foundational argument of the categorical imperative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


A bit like paying tax and face painters

Its cool, if Rangers believe a contract has been broken and are aggrieved then they can take BM to court.

Said it before, football is a dirty business and everyone lies to everyone else. It is largely accepted and move on.

comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 7 minutes ago
What's the point in having a clause to buy a player for a set fee if the selling team can just say "actually naw" when an offer is made? That's just not honouring a contract. The only way it makes sense that he's not joining is if we didn't make an offer (unlikely), there was a buy-out fee for Bayern to cancel the clause (maybe), or Tillman himself has decided he doesn't want to join (entirely possible). If clubs can just ignore contract clauses when they don't like them anymore, no one would ever agree contracts because they're meaningless. That's the foundational argument of the categorical imperative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s simply setting the fee payable should ALL parties agree to a transfer. That includes the selling club.

comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 16 minutes ago
My extensive knowledge of Football Manager tells me this is bogus.
===========



the sole reason i was buzzing about us getting nakamura btw.

my entire knowledge of him was he was good for 25-30 assists a season.

football manager now is mad, scouts are absolute mutants.

3 million transfer budget? sound here i've scouted this guy leo messi we should try and sign him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye, I've got the free download cm01/02

Absolute nostalgia. You can patch it to have this season's players too. So much better, get through a season in a day
----------------------------------------------------------------------

for realsies?

if you could pass me the site to download the patch i would appreciate...

a number of years ago i had a patch that put celtic in the third division, nae dosh, just the reserves left, it was fun.

i expect it was not fun when it happened with rangers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it's in Nick's patch or the starter patch

I'll have a look mate

did celtic not have a clause with edouard but there was a date it had to be taken up by.

would not shock me if the number was 5.1 million and rangers were like "take 5?"

People on Radio defending Boris Johnston, ffs man

'he's a loveable rouge'
'he got Brexit done'
'he can persuade people'

Seven weans fae seven maws. Aye, he can persuade people right enough.

good man, cheers :D

it's wild the things they tell themselves to portray the lump as a success.

he'd happily smear his schite in every one of their faces and they would be licking their lips like mmm cheers mate

I'm playing an older one with Brian Laudrup in it and going to town on myself

in an older one when rangers had laudrup and gazza etc i would go celtic, then add another manager, rangers.

free transfer all your players.

was glorious.

comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 55 seconds ago
it's wild the things they tell themselves to portray the lump as a success.

he'd happily smear his schite in every one of their faces and they would be licking their lips like mmm cheers mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beale or Boris?

well, if you believe boris you will believe beale tbf

JFK

Patches available (there’smore in the starter kit and nicks kit)

https://www.champman0102.net/viewforum.php?f=72&fbclid=IwAR1yK97CoBWW4HJC7KgMRH9h1H4WtOda41u81kMfaqF0EHSpcPW2730FVZU_aem_th_ASGk6jkVwiH39wemVUfLqWxrokA8m9DVeGwinvi59_IBdOq2TX45IJwCadnux1gtAg4


Game downloads (defo use a starter kit to turn off work per nets and give extra subs)

https://www.champman0102.net/viewtopic.php?t=2450&fbclid=IwAR3fjB12v9DjM-6Nx_5eyl6bDsikkZ2rQKOkXPnPrPS6DFvzoT4_TqysUDs_aem_th_ASG-3YwaaWClwJYAxIpJbZjf8X6btLlMWFy1zHN3Dp29mpf0tyWTnf850gccV1VeSvY

comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 4 minutes ago
it's wild the things they tell themselves to portray the lump as a success.

he'd happily smear his schite in every one of their faces and they would be licking their lips like mmm cheers mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Apparently Boris has offered to do just that, to the Parliamentary Standards Committee..

comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 8 minutes ago
JFK

Patches available (there’smore in the starter kit and nicks kit)

https://www.champman0102.net/viewforum.php?f=72&fbclid=IwAR1yK97CoBWW4HJC7KgMRH9h1H4WtOda41u81kMfaqF0EHSpcPW2730FVZU_aem_th_ASGk6jkVwiH39wemVUfLqWxrokA8m9DVeGwinvi59_IBdOq2TX45IJwCadnux1gtAg4


Game downloads (defo use a starter kit to turn off work per nets and give extra subs)

https://www.champman0102.net/viewtopic.php?t=2450&fbclid=IwAR3fjB12v9DjM-6Nx_5eyl6bDsikkZ2rQKOkXPnPrPS6DFvzoT4_TqysUDs_aem_th_ASG-3YwaaWClwJYAxIpJbZjf8X6btLlMWFy1zHN3Dp29mpf0tyWTnf850gccV1VeSvY
----------------------------------------------------------------------

cheers

i'd ask if she fancied me but i'm waiting for ivans sister in law
--
Well if she's not up for it, one of the other nine might be?

comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 14 minutes ago
i'd ask if she fancied me but i'm waiting for ivans sister in law
--
Well if she's not up for it, one of the other nine might be?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is that how old they are?