comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 11 minutes ago
Genk won 19 of their first 22 league games last season. They then sold Paul Onuachu to Southampton and only won 6 of their last 18 league games
Just seen this on Twitter. Encouraging
----------------------------------------------------------------------
aye that guy is a monster ,,, about 6'5, quick and powerful .... moved to Southampton and has looked rotten mind you !!
young striker in belgian football called Gift Orban @ Gent is tearing it up and has a huge future ahead of him. shocked that no big team came in for him yet.
Genk also not long signed Eboue Kouassi.
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it will do the bank balance harm
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
Yes, id be happy for both to go that route. would mean two, possible 3 teams in the groups at the latter stages which would be great. We really are under pressure to perform this season to keep our places!
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 16 seconds ago
Yes, id be happy for both to go that route. would mean two, possible 3 teams in the groups at the latter stages which would be great. We really are under pressure to perform this season to keep our places!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
swings and round abouts , if we move up in spaces we will only end up dropping down.
The other teams in our league cant do anything to help our co-efficient, they never help it only hinder it. If we do better we get more teams , get more teams and Rangers and celtics accumulated points contribution will drop and we fall again.
the only way we progress is by banking as much money as possible.
It's interesting that people are struggling to work out how Tierney winds up back at Celtic because it's actually quite straightforward.
If he really wants to come back he just tells Arsenal that he goes to Celtic or he'll stay there and see out the remainder of his contract. He also tells them that he wants a chunk of the transfer fee.
So Celtic pay about £10m, KT gets £3m of that and signs on for £50k a week.
Everyone is better off than in scenario B.
Only issue is Celtic might be reluctant to go to that level given his injury record.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
i'd be happy to have him back but i doubt we're given anyone 50k a week.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 16 seconds ago
Yes, id be happy for both to go that route. would mean two, possible 3 teams in the groups at the latter stages which would be great. We really are under pressure to perform this season to keep our places!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
swings and round abouts , if we move up in spaces we will only end up dropping down.
The other teams in our league cant do anything to help our co-efficient, they never help it only hinder it. If we do better we get more teams , get more teams and Rangers and celtics accumulated points contribution will drop and we fall again.
the only way we progress is by banking as much money as possible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the other teams might be able to help more with the introduction of the conference league. Hearts earnt decent money from it last season, but they all need to be regularly getting in and earning results. Should help them attract better players and give us both a better challenge!
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 7 minutes ago
It's interesting that people are struggling to work out how Tierney winds up back at Celtic because it's actually quite straightforward.
If he really wants to come back he just tells Arsenal that he goes to Celtic or he'll stay there and see out the remainder of his contract. He also tells them that he wants a chunk of the transfer fee.
So Celtic pay about £10m, KT gets £3m of that and signs on for £50k a week.
Everyone is better off than in scenario B.
Only issue is Celtic might be reluctant to go to that level given his injury record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would be great, but Arsenal are never going to let him go for anything close to what we can afford when there are suitors out there that can!
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 7 minutes ago
It's interesting that people are struggling to work out how Tierney winds up back at Celtic because it's actually quite straightforward.
If he really wants to come back he just tells Arsenal that he goes to Celtic or he'll stay there and see out the remainder of his contract. He also tells them that he wants a chunk of the transfer fee.
So Celtic pay about £10m, KT gets £3m of that and signs on for £50k a week.
Everyone is better off than in scenario B.
Only issue is Celtic might be reluctant to go to that level given his injury record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would be great, but Arsenal are never going to let him go for anything close to what we can afford when there are suitors out there that can!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
teams in the EPL can offer him over 100k a week quite comfortably as well as pay 15/20m for him.
Hyunjun is Celtic’s new signing.
I wonder how you pronounce his name?
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and including tickets we got got about 35m.....so thats less than the estimated 40m and thats for us getting to the final. You need to win the europa to make more money than you get for Champ League.
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 7 minutes ago
It's interesting that people are struggling to work out how Tierney winds up back at Celtic because it's actually quite straightforward.
If he really wants to come back he just tells Arsenal that he goes to Celtic or he'll stay there and see out the remainder of his contract. He also tells them that he wants a chunk of the transfer fee.
So Celtic pay about £10m, KT gets £3m of that and signs on for £50k a week.
Everyone is better off than in scenario B.
Only issue is Celtic might be reluctant to go to that level given his injury record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would be great, but Arsenal are never going to let him go for anything close to what we can afford when there are suitors out there that can!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is why I said 'if he really wants to come back'.
Arsenal can either be £7m up or £15m down.
Are people really that scared of it happening that their brains won't allow them to even imagine how it could get done?
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and including tickets we got got about 35m.....so thats less than the estimated 40m and thats for us getting to the final. You need to win the europa to make more money than you get for Champ League.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tickets would’ve been 9m or so.
Was reported the 40m figure was no where near right
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and including tickets we got got about 35m.....so thats less than the estimated 40m and thats for us getting to the final. You need to win the europa to make more money than you get for Champ League.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tickets would’ve been 9m or so.
Was reported the 40m figure was no where near right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah you know what your right you get about the same amount of money for the champ league as you do for europa. that makes loads of sense.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and including tickets we got got about 35m.....so thats less than the estimated 40m and thats for us getting to the final. You need to win the europa to make more money than you get for Champ League.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tickets would’ve been 9m or so.
Was reported the 40m figure was no where near right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah you know what your right you get about the same amount of money for the champ league as you do for europa. that makes loads of sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye that’s not what I said though is it, I said the same as getting to the final.
But guessing the 40m was you getting your info from the daily record
Sign in if you want to comment
Underwhelming
Page 10 of 19
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15
posted on 24/7/23
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 11 minutes ago
Genk won 19 of their first 22 league games last season. They then sold Paul Onuachu to Southampton and only won 6 of their last 18 league games
Just seen this on Twitter. Encouraging
----------------------------------------------------------------------
aye that guy is a monster ,,, about 6'5, quick and powerful .... moved to Southampton and has looked rotten mind you !!
posted on 24/7/23
young striker in belgian football called Gift Orban @ Gent is tearing it up and has a huge future ahead of him. shocked that no big team came in for him yet.
posted on 24/7/23
Genk also not long signed Eboue Kouassi.
posted on 24/7/23
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
posted on 24/7/23
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
it will do the bank balance harm
posted on 24/7/23
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
posted on 24/7/23
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
posted on 24/7/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
posted on 24/7/23
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
posted on 24/7/23
Yes, id be happy for both to go that route. would mean two, possible 3 teams in the groups at the latter stages which would be great. We really are under pressure to perform this season to keep our places!
posted on 24/7/23
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 16 seconds ago
Yes, id be happy for both to go that route. would mean two, possible 3 teams in the groups at the latter stages which would be great. We really are under pressure to perform this season to keep our places!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
swings and round abouts , if we move up in spaces we will only end up dropping down.
The other teams in our league cant do anything to help our co-efficient, they never help it only hinder it. If we do better we get more teams , get more teams and Rangers and celtics accumulated points contribution will drop and we fall again.
the only way we progress is by banking as much money as possible.
posted on 24/7/23
It's interesting that people are struggling to work out how Tierney winds up back at Celtic because it's actually quite straightforward.
If he really wants to come back he just tells Arsenal that he goes to Celtic or he'll stay there and see out the remainder of his contract. He also tells them that he wants a chunk of the transfer fee.
So Celtic pay about £10m, KT gets £3m of that and signs on for £50k a week.
Everyone is better off than in scenario B.
Only issue is Celtic might be reluctant to go to that level given his injury record.
posted on 24/7/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
posted on 24/7/23
i'd be happy to have him back but i doubt we're given anyone 50k a week.
posted on 24/7/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 16 seconds ago
Yes, id be happy for both to go that route. would mean two, possible 3 teams in the groups at the latter stages which would be great. We really are under pressure to perform this season to keep our places!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
swings and round abouts , if we move up in spaces we will only end up dropping down.
The other teams in our league cant do anything to help our co-efficient, they never help it only hinder it. If we do better we get more teams , get more teams and Rangers and celtics accumulated points contribution will drop and we fall again.
the only way we progress is by banking as much money as possible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the other teams might be able to help more with the introduction of the conference league. Hearts earnt decent money from it last season, but they all need to be regularly getting in and earning results. Should help them attract better players and give us both a better challenge!
posted on 24/7/23
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 7 minutes ago
It's interesting that people are struggling to work out how Tierney winds up back at Celtic because it's actually quite straightforward.
If he really wants to come back he just tells Arsenal that he goes to Celtic or he'll stay there and see out the remainder of his contract. He also tells them that he wants a chunk of the transfer fee.
So Celtic pay about £10m, KT gets £3m of that and signs on for £50k a week.
Everyone is better off than in scenario B.
Only issue is Celtic might be reluctant to go to that level given his injury record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would be great, but Arsenal are never going to let him go for anything close to what we can afford when there are suitors out there that can!
posted on 24/7/23
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
posted on 24/7/23
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 7 minutes ago
It's interesting that people are struggling to work out how Tierney winds up back at Celtic because it's actually quite straightforward.
If he really wants to come back he just tells Arsenal that he goes to Celtic or he'll stay there and see out the remainder of his contract. He also tells them that he wants a chunk of the transfer fee.
So Celtic pay about £10m, KT gets £3m of that and signs on for £50k a week.
Everyone is better off than in scenario B.
Only issue is Celtic might be reluctant to go to that level given his injury record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would be great, but Arsenal are never going to let him go for anything close to what we can afford when there are suitors out there that can!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
teams in the EPL can offer him over 100k a week quite comfortably as well as pay 15/20m for him.
posted on 24/7/23
Hyunjun is Celtic’s new signing.
I wonder how you pronounce his name?
posted on 24/7/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
posted on 24/7/23
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and including tickets we got got about 35m.....so thats less than the estimated 40m and thats for us getting to the final. You need to win the europa to make more money than you get for Champ League.
posted on 24/7/23
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 7 minutes ago
It's interesting that people are struggling to work out how Tierney winds up back at Celtic because it's actually quite straightforward.
If he really wants to come back he just tells Arsenal that he goes to Celtic or he'll stay there and see out the remainder of his contract. He also tells them that he wants a chunk of the transfer fee.
So Celtic pay about £10m, KT gets £3m of that and signs on for £50k a week.
Everyone is better off than in scenario B.
Only issue is Celtic might be reluctant to go to that level given his injury record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would be great, but Arsenal are never going to let him go for anything close to what we can afford when there are suitors out there that can!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which is why I said 'if he really wants to come back'.
Arsenal can either be £7m up or £15m down.
Are people really that scared of it happening that their brains won't allow them to even imagine how it could get done?
posted on 24/7/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and including tickets we got got about 35m.....so thats less than the estimated 40m and thats for us getting to the final. You need to win the europa to make more money than you get for Champ League.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tickets would’ve been 9m or so.
Was reported the 40m figure was no where near right
posted on 24/7/23
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and including tickets we got got about 35m.....so thats less than the estimated 40m and thats for us getting to the final. You need to win the europa to make more money than you get for Champ League.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tickets would’ve been 9m or so.
Was reported the 40m figure was no where near right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah you know what your right you get about the same amount of money for the champ league as you do for europa. that makes loads of sense.
posted on 24/7/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by LogieB... (U8397)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't think it would do any harm for Rangers not to get through and go straight into the EL as a pot 1 team. I think one team in the Cl is embarrassment enough. Hopefully BR can find a balance this time and try and grab 3rd which would be beyond my expectations!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My ideal scenario would be winning the first tie, then losing in playoff to drop into the EL. Get a 5m parachute payment plus means we can build some coefficient hopefully. If there is a club World Cup and that’s what counts would be huge for us.
And Thursday night is just better for getting on the beers and making a day of it or a weekend of it if a trip.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the best option is to get into the CL groups and finish 3rd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye but that’s easiwr said than done.
Financially there wouldn’t have been much difference between what we got last years ha what we would have got if we’d got through EL groups. Celtic swept up majority of CL money because of how it works last year
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but you did say "ideal scenario" We got to the final and it worked out as being slightly less than just qualifying for the groups. If we dont get into champ league then we need to get to semi's at least to kinda offset the financial difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t think that’s correct. Amounts were very similar.
And that’s before ticket revenue. After ticket revenue EL run would’ve been far better financially.
Think we’d get a higher coefficient share this year than last though since it’s based on 10 years. And if we did actually win/draw some CL games to finish 3rd it’d be a lot more profitable doing that route. So would be ideal scenario you’re right.
I’d still prefer EL groups right now after how last years Group games went though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
including ticket revenue, sponsorship and merchandising, we made slightly less than the 40m estimated that you get for CL.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where is that from? Before tickets we were estimated to have got 17/18m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and including tickets we got got about 35m.....so thats less than the estimated 40m and thats for us getting to the final. You need to win the europa to make more money than you get for Champ League.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tickets would’ve been 9m or so.
Was reported the 40m figure was no where near right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah you know what your right you get about the same amount of money for the champ league as you do for europa. that makes loads of sense.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye that’s not what I said though is it, I said the same as getting to the final.
But guessing the 40m was you getting your info from the daily record
Page 10 of 19
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15