https://youtu.be/GFHcCoUYalY
Go on ...have a wee listen
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 4 minutes ago
Not a good result for Rangers but I suspect they will go through which is all you're after
Why was Rodgers having a (de)presser yesterday?
Did he have any good news at all ??
OH out 4-6 weeks
Hart number 1
Aj and Tillio out till September
Then he spunked his gun over ' Browny'
Wtf ?? Nocoont gives a fck about Browny , you're muling about with 1 striker with a dodgy shoulder for Pittodrie and ibrox and yet he wants to talk about Scott Brown
Gtf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not even listening to his interviews tbh, the few i have listened to are pathetic attempts to come across as humble.
feeling quite disconnected at the moment tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im the same i think
It's like being with the Mrs
It's kinda fine , as long as I don't have to listen to him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what about Brendan?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1689426159753150465
Surely some malarkey going on here.
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 5 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/i/status/1689426159753150465
Surely some malarkey going on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael just opens his mouth and words come out.
Spurs accept £100M bid for Kane.
comment by Zico - Celtic Treble Winners 22/23 (U21900)
posted less than a minute ago
Spurs accept £100M bid for Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to him now
I don't think he will go...hell bottle it and stay where he is
Has a chance to break Shearers all time Premier League goals record, he'll probably value that more than a Bundesliga title, and I don't see Bayern winning the UCL like
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 24 minutes ago
Not a good result for Rangers but I suspect they will go through which is all you're after
Why was Rodgers having a (de)presser yesterday?
Did he have any good news at all ??
OH out 4-6 weeks
Hart number 1
Aj and Tillio out till September
Then he spunked his gun over ' Browny'
Wtf ?? Nocoont gives a fck about Browny , you're muling about with 1 striker with a dodgy shoulder for Pittodrie and ibrox and yet he wants to talk about Scott Brown
Gtf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it is the level of questions our managers get at press conferences. Ange got ridiculous questions too.
Why would anyone want to ask Rodgers if he is keeping an eye on Scott Brown's future. Rodgers at least answered but it brought absolutely nothing to the proceedings. Stupid fan media
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 14 seconds ago
After a couple of games, this is how the squad is shaping up best to me in this system
GK Butland / McCrorie
LB Barasic / Yilmaz
CB Souttar / Davies
CB Goldson / Balogun
RB Tavernier / Sterling
CM Raskin / Jack / Lundstram
CM Cifuentes / Dowell
LW Lawrence / Wright / Sima
AM Cantwell / Hagi
RW Danilo / Roofe
FW Dessers / Lammers
The RW options are basically secondary strikers and could play off either side as long as we have width on one side. The real issue being lack of quality for that wide position, Lawrence might solve that but not reliable so a loan there might be something we should look at, or a new signing if we can use the Sakala money and punt Matondo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think our best Cm's will be Raskin as the 6, Cantwell and Cifu with more of a licence to play off him.
Sima is downgrade on Sakala.
Beale pretty much confirmed that as far as attackers our transfer business is done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He can say that but opinions might change after watching us.
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Zico - Celtic Treble Winners 22/23 (U21900)
posted less than a minute ago
Spurs accept £100M bid for Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to him now
I don't think he will go...hell bottle it and stay where he is
Has a chance to break Shearers all time Premier League goals record, he'll probably value that more than a Bundesliga title, and I don't see Bayern winning the UCL like
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Kane had no interest Bayern would have kept bidding. the deal with Kane and Bayern prob already agreed in principal before bids made.
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 4 minutes ago
Not a good result for Rangers but I suspect they will go through which is all you're after
Why was Rodgers having a (de)presser yesterday?
Did he have any good news at all ??
OH out 4-6 weeks
Hart number 1
Aj and Tillio out till September
Then he spunked his gun over ' Browny'
Wtf ?? Nocoont gives a fck about Browny , you're muling about with 1 striker with a dodgy shoulder for Pittodrie and ibrox and yet he wants to talk about Scott Brown
Gtf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not even listening to his interviews tbh, the few i have listened to are pathetic attempts to come across as humble.
feeling quite disconnected at the moment tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A (de)presser indeed. Disconnected is pretty much where I'm at these days as well. Still going to 'Todders on Sun though ... might even join in with the home support in booing the smarmy cant.
BTW, out of all the different players we're getting linked with, LB and keeper really don't seem to be on the radar. Massive mistake if that's the case, as BR will find out soon enough.
Kane's chances of waiting a season and moving on a free in the Prem to win something pretty much rely on Real Madrid buying Haaland but with Mbappe on their list next season it's difficult to see them buying both.
Its Bayern now to guarantee a diddy league title or hold on and then probably not have the City offer on the table so basically have to gamble on a United or Liverpool move on a free and them to be in with title chances then.
Which is why it's now or never. Bayern now or Tottenham forever (unless Haaland moves to Madrid)
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said it was a reserve squad they had out, that suggest you know who the first team and back up players are/were.
Sorry I thought you would have known on the back of that, my bad didnt realise it was just guess work
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Zico - Celtic Treble Winners 22/23 (U21900)
posted less than a minute ago
Spurs accept £100M bid for Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to him now
I don't think he will go...hell bottle it and stay where he is
Has a chance to break Shearers all time Premier League goals record, he'll probably value that more than a Bundesliga title, and I don't see Bayern winning the UCL like
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Kane had no interest Bayern would have kept bidding. the deal with Kane and Bayern prob already agreed in principal before bids made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldnt*
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said it was a reserve squad they had out, that suggest you know who the first team and back up players are/were.
Sorry I thought you would have known on the back of that, my bad didnt realise it was just guess work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there is an element of tongue in cheek with the “reserve squad” comment.
I think I am guilty of overestimating the ability of reading between the lines here.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said it was a reserve squad they had out, that suggest you know who the first team and back up players are/were.
Sorry I thought you would have known on the back of that, my bad didnt realise it was just guess work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there is an element of tongue in cheek with the “reserve squad” comment.
I think I am guilty of overestimating the ability of reading between the lines here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to ja606
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said it was a reserve squad they had out, that suggest you know who the first team and back up players are/were.
Sorry I thought you would have known on the back of that, my bad didnt realise it was just guess work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there is an element of tongue in cheek with the “reserve squad” comment.
I think I am guilty of overestimating the ability of reading between the lines here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to ja606
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite
How much did we supposedly get for Starfelt ?
BTW, out of all the different players we're getting linked with, LB and keeper really don't seem to be on the radar. Massive mistake if that's the case, as BR will find out soon enough.
____
Yeah bit of a loss as to what's the plans for improvement within the team
We've lost Jota ....is yang and Tillio the replacement ?
I'm not sure Brendan has a realistic idea of how influential Jota was and consistent.
He was often the difference.
And now he's taking Hatate out the team and playing Turnbull?
I'm not sure Brendan has a realistic idea of how influential Jota was and consistent.
He was often the difference.
And now he's taking Hatate out the team and playing Turnbull?
======
a manager as amazing and him, as wonderful as him, can get the same out of mikey johnston as ange got out of jota.
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted about a minute ago
BTW, out of all the different players we're getting linked with, LB and keeper really don't seem to be on the radar. Massive mistake if that's the case, as BR will find out soon enough.
____
Yeah bit of a loss as to what's the plans for improvement within the team
We've lost Jota ....is yang and Tillio the replacement ?
I'm not sure Brendan has a realistic idea of how influential Jota was and consistent.
He was often the difference.
And now he's taking Hatate out the team and playing Turnbull?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He did it for part of a game in which to be fair Turnbull scored twice.
Not convinced he’ll stick with that unless shock, horror; Hatate is next for the off.
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted less than a minute ago
I'm not sure Brendan has a realistic idea of how influential Jota was and consistent.
He was often the difference.
And now he's taking Hatate out the team and playing Turnbull?
======
a manager as amazing and him, as wonderful as him, can get the same out of mikey johnston as ange got out of jota.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Filtered
he's a whank.
i honestly wouldn't be shocked to see hatate dropped, i feel like celtic social media is really bumming up turnbull.
f... going into champs league with turnbull and oriley playing, too similar.
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 8 minutes ago
How much did we supposedly get for Starfelt ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Five million pounds.
Sign in if you want to comment
Rangers v Servette
Page 20 of 24
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
posted on 10/8/23
https://youtu.be/GFHcCoUYalY
Go on ...have a wee listen
posted on 10/8/23
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 4 minutes ago
Not a good result for Rangers but I suspect they will go through which is all you're after
Why was Rodgers having a (de)presser yesterday?
Did he have any good news at all ??
OH out 4-6 weeks
Hart number 1
Aj and Tillio out till September
Then he spunked his gun over ' Browny'
Wtf ?? Nocoont gives a fck about Browny , you're muling about with 1 striker with a dodgy shoulder for Pittodrie and ibrox and yet he wants to talk about Scott Brown
Gtf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not even listening to his interviews tbh, the few i have listened to are pathetic attempts to come across as humble.
feeling quite disconnected at the moment tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im the same i think
It's like being with the Mrs
It's kinda fine , as long as I don't have to listen to him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
what about Brendan?
posted on 10/8/23
https://twitter.com/i/status/1689426159753150465
Surely some malarkey going on here.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 5 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/i/status/1689426159753150465
Surely some malarkey going on here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael just opens his mouth and words come out.
posted on 10/8/23
Spurs accept £100M bid for Kane.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Zico - Celtic Treble Winners 22/23 (U21900)
posted less than a minute ago
Spurs accept £100M bid for Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to him now
I don't think he will go...hell bottle it and stay where he is
Has a chance to break Shearers all time Premier League goals record, he'll probably value that more than a Bundesliga title, and I don't see Bayern winning the UCL like
posted on 10/8/23
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 24 minutes ago
Not a good result for Rangers but I suspect they will go through which is all you're after
Why was Rodgers having a (de)presser yesterday?
Did he have any good news at all ??
OH out 4-6 weeks
Hart number 1
Aj and Tillio out till September
Then he spunked his gun over ' Browny'
Wtf ?? Nocoont gives a fck about Browny , you're muling about with 1 striker with a dodgy shoulder for Pittodrie and ibrox and yet he wants to talk about Scott Brown
Gtf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair it is the level of questions our managers get at press conferences. Ange got ridiculous questions too.
Why would anyone want to ask Rodgers if he is keeping an eye on Scott Brown's future. Rodgers at least answered but it brought absolutely nothing to the proceedings. Stupid fan media
posted on 10/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 14 seconds ago
After a couple of games, this is how the squad is shaping up best to me in this system
GK Butland / McCrorie
LB Barasic / Yilmaz
CB Souttar / Davies
CB Goldson / Balogun
RB Tavernier / Sterling
CM Raskin / Jack / Lundstram
CM Cifuentes / Dowell
LW Lawrence / Wright / Sima
AM Cantwell / Hagi
RW Danilo / Roofe
FW Dessers / Lammers
The RW options are basically secondary strikers and could play off either side as long as we have width on one side. The real issue being lack of quality for that wide position, Lawrence might solve that but not reliable so a loan there might be something we should look at, or a new signing if we can use the Sakala money and punt Matondo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think our best Cm's will be Raskin as the 6, Cantwell and Cifu with more of a licence to play off him.
Sima is downgrade on Sakala.
Beale pretty much confirmed that as far as attackers our transfer business is done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He can say that but opinions might change after watching us.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Zico - Celtic Treble Winners 22/23 (U21900)
posted less than a minute ago
Spurs accept £100M bid for Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to him now
I don't think he will go...hell bottle it and stay where he is
Has a chance to break Shearers all time Premier League goals record, he'll probably value that more than a Bundesliga title, and I don't see Bayern winning the UCL like
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Kane had no interest Bayern would have kept bidding. the deal with Kane and Bayern prob already agreed in principal before bids made.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 4 minutes ago
Not a good result for Rangers but I suspect they will go through which is all you're after
Why was Rodgers having a (de)presser yesterday?
Did he have any good news at all ??
OH out 4-6 weeks
Hart number 1
Aj and Tillio out till September
Then he spunked his gun over ' Browny'
Wtf ?? Nocoont gives a fck about Browny , you're muling about with 1 striker with a dodgy shoulder for Pittodrie and ibrox and yet he wants to talk about Scott Brown
Gtf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not even listening to his interviews tbh, the few i have listened to are pathetic attempts to come across as humble.
feeling quite disconnected at the moment tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A (de)presser indeed. Disconnected is pretty much where I'm at these days as well. Still going to 'Todders on Sun though ... might even join in with the home support in booing the smarmy cant.
BTW, out of all the different players we're getting linked with, LB and keeper really don't seem to be on the radar. Massive mistake if that's the case, as BR will find out soon enough.
posted on 10/8/23
Kane's chances of waiting a season and moving on a free in the Prem to win something pretty much rely on Real Madrid buying Haaland but with Mbappe on their list next season it's difficult to see them buying both.
Its Bayern now to guarantee a diddy league title or hold on and then probably not have the City offer on the table so basically have to gamble on a United or Liverpool move on a free and them to be in with title chances then.
Which is why it's now or never. Bayern now or Tottenham forever (unless Haaland moves to Madrid)
posted on 10/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said it was a reserve squad they had out, that suggest you know who the first team and back up players are/were.
Sorry I thought you would have known on the back of that, my bad didnt realise it was just guess work
posted on 10/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by Zico - Celtic Treble Winners 22/23 (U21900)
posted less than a minute ago
Spurs accept £100M bid for Kane.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to him now
I don't think he will go...hell bottle it and stay where he is
Has a chance to break Shearers all time Premier League goals record, he'll probably value that more than a Bundesliga title, and I don't see Bayern winning the UCL like
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If Kane had no interest Bayern would have kept bidding. the deal with Kane and Bayern prob already agreed in principal before bids made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wouldnt*
posted on 10/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said it was a reserve squad they had out, that suggest you know who the first team and back up players are/were.
Sorry I thought you would have known on the back of that, my bad didnt realise it was just guess work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there is an element of tongue in cheek with the “reserve squad” comment.
I think I am guilty of overestimating the ability of reading between the lines here.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said it was a reserve squad they had out, that suggest you know who the first team and back up players are/were.
Sorry I thought you would have known on the back of that, my bad didnt realise it was just guess work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there is an element of tongue in cheek with the “reserve squad” comment.
I think I am guilty of overestimating the ability of reading between the lines here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to ja606
posted on 10/8/23
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
They had 8 players missing didn’t they?
Fair to say they had their reserve side out and even one of them got himself sent off to make things a bit more interesting.
Back at home on Tuesday, likely a few more first team players available, early goal eh?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
how many of they 8 player were first team players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idea. Enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sorry figured you knew going by your post
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which bit made you figure I’d know when all I did was repeat what was widely reported?
Regardless of how many were or were not first team picks, I’d say it’s safe to deduce they were at least squared ad players in some consideration.
Having that number, or even some of that number unavailable would severely limit any options their team would have had
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you said it was a reserve squad they had out, that suggest you know who the first team and back up players are/were.
Sorry I thought you would have known on the back of that, my bad didnt realise it was just guess work
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there is an element of tongue in cheek with the “reserve squad” comment.
I think I am guilty of overestimating the ability of reading between the lines here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
welcome to ja606
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quite
posted on 10/8/23
How much did we supposedly get for Starfelt ?
posted on 10/8/23
BTW, out of all the different players we're getting linked with, LB and keeper really don't seem to be on the radar. Massive mistake if that's the case, as BR will find out soon enough.
____
Yeah bit of a loss as to what's the plans for improvement within the team
We've lost Jota ....is yang and Tillio the replacement ?
I'm not sure Brendan has a realistic idea of how influential Jota was and consistent.
He was often the difference.
And now he's taking Hatate out the team and playing Turnbull?
posted on 10/8/23
I'm not sure Brendan has a realistic idea of how influential Jota was and consistent.
He was often the difference.
And now he's taking Hatate out the team and playing Turnbull?
======
a manager as amazing and him, as wonderful as him, can get the same out of mikey johnston as ange got out of jota.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted about a minute ago
BTW, out of all the different players we're getting linked with, LB and keeper really don't seem to be on the radar. Massive mistake if that's the case, as BR will find out soon enough.
____
Yeah bit of a loss as to what's the plans for improvement within the team
We've lost Jota ....is yang and Tillio the replacement ?
I'm not sure Brendan has a realistic idea of how influential Jota was and consistent.
He was often the difference.
And now he's taking Hatate out the team and playing Turnbull?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He did it for part of a game in which to be fair Turnbull scored twice.
Not convinced he’ll stick with that unless shock, horror; Hatate is next for the off.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by JFK (U8919)
posted less than a minute ago
I'm not sure Brendan has a realistic idea of how influential Jota was and consistent.
He was often the difference.
And now he's taking Hatate out the team and playing Turnbull?
======
a manager as amazing and him, as wonderful as him, can get the same out of mikey johnston as ange got out of jota.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Filtered
posted on 10/8/23
he's a whank.
i honestly wouldn't be shocked to see hatate dropped, i feel like celtic social media is really bumming up turnbull.
f... going into champs league with turnbull and oriley playing, too similar.
posted on 10/8/23
comment by CelticTornado (U4316)
posted 8 minutes ago
How much did we supposedly get for Starfelt ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Five million pounds.
posted on 10/8/23
500 kuntos
Page 20 of 24
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24